1
   

Why Don't Christians ever present any evidence?

 
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 May, 2007 09:13 pm
neologist wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
neologist wrote:
You can't provide empirical proof for or against any entity that exists outside of our perception of space and time such as the word supernatural implies. all you can do is provide anecdotal or circumstantial evidence which has to be evaluated according to personal standards.

So, if you could accurately post your personal standards, I might be able to provide you with evidence.

There certainly could be evidence. There could be cases in which numerous people saw the same visitation in modern times, things that can't be explained any other way, etc. Even on that level, you guys avoid logical presentation of evidence.
If you wish to have God make a special revelation for your sake, I don't think I can help you. If you wish to see God's spirit in operation, Jesus claimed that "By this all will know that YOU are my disciples, if YOU have love among yourselves." (John 13:35) So, if you could find that group, you may get a revelation. Possibly.

I didn't ask for a personal revelation. I said that if a supernatural being created the world and interacts with it, there ought to be some sign of it.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 02:43 am
HMM, i have a question, has the planet always spun at the rate it does today?

if it the earth was rotating slow enough, a day back then could have been millions of years today.Using current time keeping techniques other than just the spin of the earth around the sun.

right?
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 02:47 am
Not only would the world have to be spinning slowly, it's spin would have to sync up with it's roatationaround the sun (which is elliptic) to achieve a literal long day.

Granted, if you were to do this, let's not forget that half of the earth would be void of life for billions of years making any progress in giving life pretty much in vain.

All in all, Abrahamic Creationists have to be clear about what they believe. It's one or the other.
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 06:55 am
OGIONIK wrote:
HMM, i have a question, has the planet always spun at the rate it does today?

if it the earth was rotating slow enough, a day back then could have been millions of years today.Using current time keeping techniques other than just the spin of the earth around the sun.

right?


The gravity from the sun is actually slowing down the earth's rotation. The moon is also serving to slow down the rotation, which from a scientific stand point would not have anything to do with the earth's rotation at the creation of the earth, as the current model says the moon came millions of years later, but from a creationist standpoint it would have to be taken into account.

Most scientists belive that the length of a day near the earth's creation was 8 hours.
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 07:42 am
even worse LOL!
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 10:00 am
Brandon9000 wrote:
neologist wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
neologist wrote:
You can't provide empirical proof for or against any entity that exists outside of our perception of space and time such as the word supernatural implies. all you can do is provide anecdotal or circumstantial evidence which has to be evaluated according to personal standards.

So, if you could accurately post your personal standards, I might be able to provide you with evidence.

There certainly could be evidence. There could be cases in which numerous people saw the same visitation in modern times, things that can't be explained any other way, etc. Even on that level, you guys avoid logical presentation of evidence.
If you wish to have God make a special revelation for your sake, I don't think I can help you. If you wish to see God's spirit in operation, Jesus claimed that "By this all will know that YOU are my disciples, if YOU have love among yourselves." (John 13:35) So, if you could find that group, you may get a revelation. Possibly.

I didn't ask for a personal revelation. I said that if a supernatural being created the world and interacts with it, there ought to be some sign of it.
According to the reported words of Jesus, there is.

At least I think I said that.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 10:04 am
OGIONIK wrote:
HMM, i have a question, has the planet always spun at the rate it does today?

if it the earth was rotating slow enough, a day back then could have been millions of years today.Using current time keeping techniques other than just the spin of the earth around the sun.

right?
Yeah, maybe. But the days recorded in the book of Genesis are of indefinite length. The proof is in the account itself when the entire six days are lumped into one at Genesis 2:4.

BTW, nowhere does it say the seventh day has ended.
0 Replies
 
I Stereo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 12:23 pm
Neo - No it doesn't say that the seventh day has ended. But we certainly have had many literal days.

So what is it? Figurative speech? How is "7 days" figurative but "Rose from the dead" literal?

I need evidence, but first I need a clear stance from you.
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 06:49 pm
Montana wrote:
I'm with you, Sterio. I tend to like proof of things before I wrap my life around it...


So prove that your Mom loves you - and vice versa!
0 Replies
 
I Stereo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 07:53 pm
How to prove [person] loves me.

1) Select person.
2) Examine personal history with that person.
3) Evaluate positive experiances. What degree of interaction did you have? Was there mutual benifit?
4) Evaluate negative experiances. What was the intent of the other person?
5) Evaluate emotional reactions to the person. Do you feel safe or threatened by them? Do you desire to be closer to the person? If they were upset with you, how would that make you feel?
6) Hypothosize that person's absence. How would there death affect you? How easy would it be to leave them?
7) If still unclear, find other criteria as love supplementally defined by you as an individual.
8) pass or fail; love or not.

The truth is, that I can fortunately simply go to my mother and ask her if I love her. I can ask myself. no proof greater than a simple query is needed.

You seem to think that proving something like this would be difficult. Make your point. You think that the bible or Christianity is so easily proven?

If so, then do it.
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 08:56 pm
I Stereo wrote:
How to prove [person] loves me.

1) Select person.
2) Examine personal history with that person.
3) Evaluate positive experiances. What degree of interaction did you have? Was there mutual benifit?
4) Evaluate negative experiances. What was the intent of the other person?
5) Evaluate emotional reactions to the person. Do you feel safe or threatened by them? Do you desire to be closer to the person? If they were upset with you, how would that make you feel?
6) Hypothosize that person's absence. How would there death affect you? How easy would it be to leave them?
7) If still unclear, find other criteria as love supplementally defined by you as an individual.
8) pass or fail; love or not.

The truth is, that I can fortunately simply go to my mother and ask her if I love her. I can ask myself. no proof greater than a simple query is needed.

You seem to think that proving something like this would be difficult. Make your point. You think that the bible or Christianity is so easily proven?

If so, then do it.


So are you saying that the examples you provide above consititute your criteria for proof?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 May, 2007 10:01 pm
I Stereo wrote:
Neo - No it doesn't say that the seventh day has ended. But we certainly have had many literal days.

So what is it? Figurative speech? How is "7 days" figurative but "Rose from the dead" literal?

I need evidence, but first I need a clear stance from you.
OK, first read Genesis 2:4. I'll save you the trouble of looking it up:
"This is a history of the heavens and the earth in the time of their being created, in the day that Jehovah God made earth and heaven."

This statement lumps together all the days of creation. Therefore, the term day cannot be literal. In fact, the seventh day not having ended would allow for at least 6000 years for each day, give or take.

You can read about Jesus' resurrection of Lazarus in the 11th chapter of John. Those folks reportedly saw him come to life after being dead for some time. Sounds literal to me.
0 Replies
 
I Stereo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:21 am
baddog1 wrote:
I Stereo wrote:
How to prove [person] loves me.

1) Select person.
2) Examine personal history with that person.
3) Evaluate positive experiances. What degree of interaction did you have? Was there mutual benifit?
4) Evaluate negative experiances. What was the intent of the other person?
5) Evaluate emotional reactions to the person. Do you feel safe or threatened by them? Do you desire to be closer to the person? If they were upset with you, how would that make you feel?
6) Hypothosize that person's absence. How would there death affect you? How easy would it be to leave them?
7) If still unclear, find other criteria as love supplementally defined by you as an individual.
8) pass or fail; love or not.

The truth is, that I can fortunately simply go to my mother and ask her if I love her. I can ask myself. no proof greater than a simple query is needed.

You seem to think that proving something like this would be difficult. Make your point. You think that the bible or Christianity is so easily proven?

If so, then do it.


So are you saying that the examples you provide above consititute your criteria for proof?


I have presented a method that would prove to me yes. In blue above is what I find to be of most importance. I don't need to apply my method or test. a simple query will do.

I can ask her in front of another person or in front of a camera. I can repeat it again and again until one of us dies.

Yes, I have proof, and further I can repeate the proof over and over again in a observable manner.
0 Replies
 
I Stereo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 01:24 am
I'll save you the trouble of looking this up in the old pages.

Quote:
1) Reproducable / Repeatbale
2) Tangable or observable
3) Uniform / No issues of continuity
4) Any assumption is stated as such and qualified
5) Any error in findings is explanable
6) Present tense


I'm sure you are interested in whether or not my test passes my own standard of proof.
0 Replies
 
baddog1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 07:46 am
Quote:
The truth is, that I can fortunately simply go to my mother and ask her if I love her. I can ask myself. no proof greater than a simple query is needed.


Your 'most important' example of proving an emotional issue is no more or less a choice (or series of choices). You ask your Mom - she tells you. She could be lying to you, she could 'love you' in a manner different than you expect or desire, etc. yet you know that she loves you just as I assume you choose to love her.

Then simply accept that Christians choose to love God in the same manner that you describe with your Mom. If it's enough proof for you - why not them (us)?
0 Replies
 
USAFHokie80
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 07:56 am
neologist wrote:
I Stereo wrote:
Neo - No it doesn't say that the seventh day has ended. But we certainly have had many literal days.

So what is it? Figurative speech? How is "7 days" figurative but "Rose from the dead" literal?

I need evidence, but first I need a clear stance from you.
OK, first read Genesis 2:4. I'll save you the trouble of looking it up:
"This is a history of the heavens and the earth in the time of their being created, in the day that Jehovah God made earth and heaven."

This statement lumps together all the days of creation. Therefore, the term day cannot be literal. In fact, the seventh day not having ended would allow for at least 6000 years for each day, give or take.

You can read about Jesus' resurrection of Lazarus in the 11th chapter of John. Those folks reportedly saw him come to life after being dead for some time. Sounds literal to me.


So let's suppose both of those are completely true and accurate. How do you decide if other things in the Bible that are ambiguous should be taken literally or figuratively?
0 Replies
 
echi
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 08:03 am
baddog1 wrote:
Then simply accept that Christians choose to love God in the same manner that you describe with your Mom. If it's enough proof for you - why not them (us)?


He also can prove that his mom exists.
0 Replies
 
I Stereo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 08:42 am
baddog1 wrote:
Quote:
The truth is, that I can fortunately simply go to my mother and ask her if I love her. I can ask myself. no proof greater than a simple query is needed.


Your 'most important' example of proving an emotional issue is no more or less a choice (or series of choices). You ask your Mom - she tells you. She could be lying to you, she could 'love you' in a manner different than you expect or desire, etc. yet you know that she loves you just as I assume you choose to love her.

Then simply accept that Christians choose to love God in the same manner that you describe with your Mom. If it's enough proof for you - why not them (us)?


Christians no not have the same relationship I have with my mother. See list of creteria previously posted.

BTW, I do accept that Christian love what they feel is God. Furth I think they're sincere. But they do not have the same relationsship. I can prove that my mother loves me.

I'd be very interested in how you could prove that God loves you. Based on my criteria.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 08:52 am
neologist wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
neologist wrote:
Brandon9000 wrote:
neologist wrote:
You can't provide empirical proof for or against any entity that exists outside of our perception of space and time such as the word supernatural implies. all you can do is provide anecdotal or circumstantial evidence which has to be evaluated according to personal standards.

So, if you could accurately post your personal standards, I might be able to provide you with evidence.

There certainly could be evidence. There could be cases in which numerous people saw the same visitation in modern times, things that can't be explained any other way, etc. Even on that level, you guys avoid logical presentation of evidence.
If you wish to have God make a special revelation for your sake, I don't think I can help you. If you wish to see God's spirit in operation, Jesus claimed that "By this all will know that YOU are my disciples, if YOU have love among yourselves." (John 13:35) So, if you could find that group, you may get a revelation. Possibly.

I didn't ask for a personal revelation. I said that if a supernatural being created the world and interacts with it, there ought to be some sign of it.
According to the reported words of Jesus, there is.

At least I think I said that.

Can you give an example of such a sign that a God exists?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 May, 2007 09:29 am
USAFHokie80 wrote:
neologist wrote:
I Stereo wrote:
Neo - No it doesn't say that the seventh day has ended. But we certainly have had many literal days.

So what is it? Figurative speech? How is "7 days" figurative but "Rose from the dead" literal?

I need evidence, but first I need a clear stance from you.
OK, first read Genesis 2:4. I'll save you the trouble of looking it up:
"This is a history of the heavens and the earth in the time of their being created, in the day that Jehovah God made earth and heaven."

This statement lumps together all the days of creation. Therefore, the term day cannot be literal. In fact, the seventh day not having ended would allow for at least 6000 years for each day, give or take.

You can read about Jesus' resurrection of Lazarus in the 11th chapter of John. Those folks reportedly saw him come to life after being dead for some time. Sounds literal to me.


So let's suppose both of those are completely true and accurate. How do you decide if other things in the Bible that are ambiguous should be taken literally or figuratively?
I see where you asked the same question in another thread. Each issue has to be taken individually. I'm trying to think of something simple, but more profound than 'do unto others".
Assuming, of course that the bible is inerrant:

OK, how about Satan's role in this drama: In the book of Genesis he:

Lied to Eve about the consequence of disobedience. (She did die.)

Implied that humans would be better off making their own moral choices. (We can see how that turned out.)

Implied that God was not worthy of setting standards for his creation. (But, if not the creator, whom?)

In the book of Job, he:

Declared that humans (and, by extension, all sentient beings) would serve God only out of selfishness. (Job proved hm wrong.)

During his temptation of Jesus, he:

Verified the fact that all the kingdoms of the world belong to him. (How else could he have offered them to Jesus?) This was restated by Jesus at John 12:31 and other places.

So what does this all mean? (Continuing to assume the bible is inerrant)

Human governments cannot solve mankind's problems. (Seems like a given to me)

Brings into focus the prophetic words of Daniel 2:44: "And in the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be brought to ruin. And the kingdom itself will not be passed on to any other people. It will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms, and it itself will stand to times indefinite."

Remember that Jesus urged his followers to pray for God's "kingdom to come".
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2025 at 02:33:04