Oped: Democrats have 'let down' the American people

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Democrats have always let down the American people.

I guess that explains why they got voted back into power.

Dookiestix wrote:

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Democrats have always let down the American people.

I guess that explains why they got voted back into power.

By a massive landslide right? Not just barely?



And they show such typical leftist yellow cowardice. Still waiting for them to "Get us out" Dook?

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Dookiestix wrote:

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Democrats have always let down the American people.

I guess that explains why they got voted back into power.

By a massive landslide right? Not just barely?



And they show such typical leftist yellow cowardice. Still waiting for them to "Get us out" Dook?

I'm amazed how much you don't understand Washington. Truly amazing.

Where did I say they won by a landslide? You yourself in another thread just called them "cut and runners" over the Iraq bill despite their lack of veto-proof power.

Which is it? They either have the veto-proof power and were spinless, or they didn't win by a landslide, therefore cannot force Bush's hand?

Or will you just do your usual crap:

Dookiestix wrote:

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Dookiestix wrote:

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Democrats have always let down the American people.

I guess that explains why they got voted back into power.

By a massive landslide right? Not just barely?



And they show such typical leftist yellow cowardice. Still waiting for them to "Get us out" Dook?

I'm amazed how much you don't understand Washington. Truly amazing.

Where did I say they won by a landslide? You yourself in another thread just called them "cut and runners" over the Iraq bill despite their lack of veto-proof power.

Which is it? They either have the veto-proof power and were spinless, or they didn't win by a landslide, therefore cannot force Bush's hand?

Or will you just do your usual crap:

What an intelligent and insightful response.


Beating your horse sounds like a private personal matter dookster.... We don't need to hear what you do behind closed doors.

As I said, it's an act of hostage-taking.

Actually, it's even worse than that. According to reports, the final version of the funding bill ... won't even set a hard deadline for withdrawal..., only an "advisory," nonbinding date. has become a clear and present danger to national security. Thanks to the demands of the Iraq war, we're already a superpower without a strategic reserve, unable to respond to crises that might erupt elsewhere in the world.

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Dookiestix wrote:

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Dookiestix wrote:

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Democrats have always let down the American people.

I guess that explains why they got voted back into power.

By a massive landslide right? Not just barely?



And they show such typical leftist yellow cowardice. Still waiting for them to "Get us out" Dook?

I'm amazed how much you don't understand Washington. Truly amazing.

Where did I say they won by a landslide? You yourself in another thread just called them "cut and runners" over the Iraq bill despite their lack of veto-proof power.

Which is it? They either have the veto-proof power and were spinless, or they didn't win by a landslide, therefore cannot force Bush's hand?

Or will you just do your usual crap:

Beating your horse sounds like a private personal matter dookster.... We don't need to hear what you do behind closed doors.

It's never been me doing it. You should know that far too well by now.

Unless you've gotten a sudden case of Alzheimer's.

Dookiestix wrote:

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Dookiestix wrote:

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Dookiestix wrote:

reverend hellh0und wrote:

Democrats have always let down the American people.

I guess that explains why they got voted back into power.

By a massive landslide right? Not just barely?



And they show such typical leftist yellow cowardice. Still waiting for them to "Get us out" Dook?

I'm amazed how much you don't understand Washington. Truly amazing.

Where did I say they won by a landslide? You yourself in another thread just called them "cut and runners" over the Iraq bill despite their lack of veto-proof power.

Which is it? They either have the veto-proof power and were spinless, or they didn't win by a landslide, therefore cannot force Bush's hand?

Or will you just do your usual crap:

Beating your horse sounds like a private personal matter dookster.... We don't need to hear what you do behind closed doors.

It's never been me doing it. You should know that far too well by now.

Unless you've gotten a sudden case of Alzheimer's.

Thats a cute tophat you are wearing and what are you doing with that shaft and horse? Wait... DOn't want to know.

Actually I don't know about you beating your own horse. The Good Reverend is uninterested in your auto-erotic or zooaphilic activities. If you have an exhibitionist need perhaps you can get a webcam and a paypal account. I for one won't be visiting your new site.

Man... Maybe once you will address my points and not get all turgid for the Good Reverend's cod piece. As I have told you many times before. I prefer the company of women. I don't swing the SF way.


You got some scary patholgy thier boy.