Wolfowitz : "If they f**k with me..."

re India:



It's still a government with a left-leaning majority (12 [!] parties form the governing UPA) ...

georgeob, Your myopia is evident; there has been several reports about small loans being made to Indians who can start a business to earn money. That's the start of self-sufficiency, and it's been successful as far as I know.

I don't argue with that fact. However there has indeed been a decisive change in the economic policy (if not rhetoric) of the government, and a change in their political alignment as well. India has joined the world and relaxed the bureaucratic controls that so impeded its development -- and that has made all the difference.

Under the previous regime, World Bank loans couldn't have much beneficial effect. Under the current regime they are largely unnecessary.

Microcredit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is specific to small loans. For financial services to the poor see Microfinance. For small payments see Micropayment.
Microcredit is the extension of very small loans (microloans) to the unemployed, to poor entrepreneurs and to others living in poverty who are not considered bankable. These individuals lack collateral, steady employment and a verifiable credit history and therefore cannot meet even the most minimal qualifications to gain access to traditional credit. Microcredit is a part of microfinance, which is the provision of financial services to the very poor; apart from loans, it includes savings, microinsurance and other financial innovations.

Microcredit is a financial innovation which originated in developing countries where it has successfully enabled extremely impoverished people (mostly women) to engage in self-employment projects that allow them to generate an income and, in many cases, begin to build wealth and exit poverty. Due to the success of microcredit, many in the traditional banking industry have begun to realize that these microcredit borrowers should more correctly be categorized as pre-bankable; thus, microcredit is increasingly gaining credibility in the mainstream finance industry and many traditional large finance organizations are contemplating microcredit projects as a source of future growth. Although almost everyone in larger development organizations discounted the likelihood of success of microcredit when it was begun in its modern incarnation as pilot projects with ACCION and Muhammad Yunus in the mid-1970s, the United Nations declared 2005 the International Year of Microcredit.

Women have become the focus of many microcredit institutions and agencies worldwide. The reasoning behind this is the observation that loans to women tend to more often benefit the whole family than loans to men do. It has also been observed that giving women the control and the responsibility of small loans raises their socio-economic status, which is seen as a positive change to many of the current relationships of gender and class. However, there is an ongoing debate about whether microcredit loans have the power to truly change established political and economic relationships.[1]

According to the Microcredit Summit Campaign:

"1.2 billion people are living on less than a dollar a day. Women are often responsible for the upbringing of the world's children and the poverty of the women generally results in the physical and social underdevelopment of their children. Experience shows that women are a good credit risk, and that women invest their income toward the well being of their families. At the same time, women themselves benefit from the higher social status they achieve within the home when they are able to provide income."

Many microcredit organizations focus completely on women borrowers. Pro Mujer and NamasteDirect are two organizations that directly work with women. The Grameen Foundation, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan, and Hillary Rodham Clinton all emphasize women when they speak about microcredit.

Laugh test? It doesn't pass the smell test.

He was set up.