0
   

Top US Senate Democrat to Bush: Iraq war is lost

 
 
Zippo
 
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 02:01 pm
Quote:
Top US Senate Democrat to Bush: Iraq war is lost

By Susan Cornwell

WASHINGTON, April 19 (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on Thursday he told President George W. Bush the Iraq war was lost and the recent U.S. troop increase had accomplished nothing.

Reid, the Senate's top Democrat, described part of a meeting with Bush at the White House on Wednesday -- the same day bombs killed almost 200 people in Baghdad in the worst day of violence since a U.S.-backed security crackdown was launched there earlier this year.

"This is the message I took to the president," Reid said at a news conference.

"Now I believe myself ... that this war is lost, and that the surge is not accomplishing anything, as indicated by the extreme violence in Iraq yesterday," said Reid, of Nevada.

"I know I was like the odd guy out yesterday at the White House, but at least I told him what he needed to hear, not what he wanted to hear," he added.

Suspected Sunni al Qaeda militants detonated a string of bombs in mostly Shi'ite areas of Baghdad on Wednesday. The worst was a truck bombing that killed 140 people in the deadliest single insurgent attack since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.

In their meeting, Bush and congressional Democrats failed to settle their fight over funding for the Iraq war, as lawmakers pressed Bush to accept a troop withdrawal timetable.

The White House and its Republican allies call such timetables "surrender dates" and say Bush will reject them. The president accuses Democrats of trying to micromanage the war, and has vowed to veto any bill that includes a pullout date.

Reid said his message for Bush was to recall a turning point in the Vietnam War, in the mid 1960s, when Reid said President Lyndon Johnson decided to send thousands more troops to Vietnam despite knowing the conflict was not winnable.

"The (Iraq) war can only be won diplomatically, politically and economically, and the president needs to come to that realization," Reid said.

Bush is adding 30,000 troops to the war effort, mostly in Baghdad, although not all have arrived. Washington has 146,000 troops in Iraq and more than 3,200 U.S. soldiers have lost their lives there.

Reid said he did not think more U.S. troops could help. "I think it's failed, I say that without any question," he said of the troop increase.

source


You don't say!

The only place the 'surge' could have possibly worked is in the wishful-thinking imaginations of those who concocted it.

The US military seems still pathologically incapable of fighting asymetric warfare, which is exactly what they are dealing with in Iraq.

So now with this tactic going down in flames, what is the administration going to do, send every military personnel left to the region to continue what is obviously not working?

Don't put it past them.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,689 • Replies: 43
No top replies

 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Apr, 2007 08:15 am
Bush and his generals don't understand simple logistics. You can't win the war in Iraq with less than 200,000 military. The borders of Iraq is wide open; insurgents and al Qaida has free movement in and out of Iraq. They're all too stupid to be sacrificing our men and women for no reason and an impossible goal; bring freedom to the Middle East. There's no cure for stupid.
0 Replies
 
reverend hellh0und
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Apr, 2007 08:19 am
Too stupid or too handcuffed by democrats and liberals fighting against every step of this war to the detriment of the troops and the mission?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Apr, 2007 10:38 pm
Bush isn't "handcuffed" by the dems. Where did you learn your civics?
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 04:29 am
Bringing the troops home to their families so they don't become one of the increasing number of casualties...

This is to their detriment?

Bushes willingness to hold the troops hostage--using their welfare as a way to hold out against the will of the majority of the American people (and the majority of Congress) is to the their detriment.

Bush is making it clear that he would rather the troops die without funding, then to accept the will of the majority of the American people who have made it very clear that they no longer support this war.

Ending the occupation of Iraq, which has killed over 3,200 US soldiers with no "victory" in sight, is not to the "detriment" of the troops.

More and more, the troops themselves are saying this.
0 Replies
 
reverend hellh0und
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 07:30 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
Bush isn't "handcuffed" by the dems. Where did you learn your civics?




I see so there is no Budget holdup and the Dems are supporting the war effort and NOT trying to sabatoge it at every turn.


Interesting.
0 Replies
 
reverend hellh0und
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 07:35 am
ebrown_p wrote:
Bringing the troops home to their families so they don't become one of the increasing number of casualties...

This is to their detriment?

Bushes willingness to hold the troops hostage--using their welfare as a way to hold out against the will of the majority of the American people (and the majority of Congress) is to the their detriment.

Bush is making it clear that he would rather the troops die without funding, then to accept the will of the majority of the American people who have made it very clear that they no longer support this war.

Ending the occupation of Iraq, which has killed over 3,200 US soldiers with no "victory" in sight, is not to the "detriment" of the troops.

More and more, the troops themselves are saying this.




So what of Iraq if we tuck tail, cower and run? Do those on the left still have that so called compassion or is "free tibet" no longer in vogue?


You say Bush would rather troops "die without funding" yet its congress who funds the war and this present congress threatening to NOT fund the troops. But you blame Bush..... how odd.


Your majority also does not want us to retreat in failure as some on the left are hoping for.....


BTW who are these "more and more" troops? How many have you spoken to and how do you back up this claim?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 07:57 am
Bush and his evil minions refuse to face reality. Even though it is staring them in the face. There is no win for us in Iraq. The only ones who can resolve the civil war in Iraq are the iraqi's themselves.
Bush's solution is the surge the sending of more American canon fodder to Iraq. Where the Shia's shoot at the Sunni's and the Sunni's shoot at the Shia and both shoot at American's.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 07:59 am
Harry Reid is a dick.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 08:15 am
cjhsa wrote:
Harry Reid is a dick.


And Bush doesn't have one. So what dickless Bush's policies are at best idiotic and worst crimes against humanity.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 08:17 am
cjhsa wrote:
Harry Reid is a dick.

george bush is a moron but the interesting thing is both are duly electected americans serving our great nation. ron paul is a patriot and so is dennis kucinich gun owners are good americans (mostly) and so are gun haters. there are anglo americans, brown, black, yellow and brown americans. there are christain, hindu, jewish, muslim, atheist and buddhist americans. there are neo-nazi, kkk, republican, conservative, communist, socialist, democrat and anarchist americans, all of the above make america the wonderful nation it is to live in.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 08:48 am
Harry Reid is still a dick and Kucinich is a pr-ck.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 08:52 am
Quote:

So what of Iraq if we tuck tail, cower and run? Do those on the left still have that so called compassion or is "free tibet" no longer in vogue?


The Democrats in Congress are saying with the bill that they will pass this week that have no intention to "tuck tail, cower or run". Bush is going to have to accept that.

I don't get why you think "Free Tibet" is a good example of what is happening in Iraq.

The people of Tibet are occupied by a foreign military force from a superior military power that says they need to be their for Tibet's best interest. The majority of the people of Tibet want the Chinese to leave.

What does this have to do with the crisis in Iraq?

Quote:

You say Bush would rather troops "die without funding" yet its congress who funds the war and this present congress threatening to NOT fund the troops. But you blame Bush..... how odd.


Congress will fully fund a withdrawral. When the troops are withdrawn, they will stop dying.

The fact that the troops are being kept in Iraq indefinately against the will of the majority of Americans is without question Bush's fault.

Quote:

Your majority also does not want us to retreat in failure as some on the left are hoping for.....


Without question the majority of Americans want the US to withdraw within a set time. This is proved by the polls... and if you don't believe the polls it was also proven by the last election where the Democrats (unexpectedly) took control of both houses of Congress.

Quote:

BTW who are these "more and more" troops? How many have you spoken to and how do you back up this claim?


I will let you do the Googling. Search for Veterans against the war.
0 Replies
 
reverend hellh0und
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 09:01 am
ebrown_p wrote:
Quote:

So what of Iraq if we tuck tail, cower and run? Do those on the left still have that so called compassion or is "free tibet" no longer in vogue?


The Democrats in Congress are saying with the bill that they will pass this week that have no intention to "tuck tail, cower or run". Bush is going to have to accept that.

I don't get why you think "Free Tibet" is a good example of what is happening in Iraq.

The people of Tibet are occupied by a foreign military force from a superior military power that says they need to be their for Tibet's best interest. The majority of the people of Tibet want the Chinese to leave.

What does this have to do with the crisis in Iraq?




Just that it seems your compassion for you fellow man has conditions. What will happen in Iraq if we tuck tail and run?


Quote:


Quote:

You say Bush would rather troops "die without funding" yet its congress who funds the war and this present congress threatening to NOT fund the troops. But you blame Bush..... how odd.


Congress will fully fund a withdrawral. When the troops are withdrawn, they will stop dying.

The fact that the troops are being kept in Iraq indefinately against the will of the majority of Americans is without question Bush's fault.



Again without a passed budget there is no funding. Congress pays the bills not set conditions and make war policy. They declare war thats about it. To threaten funding while troops are in country is not only irresponsible its despicable.


Laughing kept in Iraq....? Was that what we were talking about or was it the funding?


Quote:


Quote:

Your majority also does not want us to retreat in failure as some on the left are hoping for.....


Without question the majority of Americans want the US to withdraw within a set time. This is proved by the polls... and if you don't believe the polls it was also proven by the last election where the Democrats (unexpectedly) took control of both houses of Congress.



Unexpectedly? Man what revisionist history! the dems were supposed to SWEEP both congress and the house but instead despite all the media's attempts.... Barely eeked by!


What a "mandate"!


Quote:

Quote:

BTW who are these "more and more" troops? How many have you spoken to and how do you back up this claim?


I will let you do the Googling. Search for Veterans against the war.




Laughing you mean that group that has about 25% actual vets funded by that criminal Soros?


Do you mean that one?
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 09:11 am
Well Rev, it looks like we are from different planets.

All I can say is let's watch what happens.

On my planet, the American public is about to rally behind the Democrats as the Republican popularity ratings continue to sink. Last year on my planet, the Demcratic victories were heralded by the press, bemoaned by the right and considered quite impressive by all.

On my planet, the president will use his veto power... and the Democrats will pass a short term emergency bill which will make the Republicans go on record in favor of the war every three months or so.

On my planet, conservatives will continue in a political death spiral where they will increasingly break ranks against the president and more and more will viciously attack each other.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 09:14 am
reverend hellh0und

When were you last in Iraq?? If you haven't been, since you are hellbent for US forces to stay their. Why not put your ass on the line and volunteer.
0 Replies
 
reverend hellh0und
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 09:15 am
ebrown_p wrote:
Well Rev, it looks like we are from different planets.

All I can say is let's watch what happens.

On my planet, the American public is about to rally behind the Democrats as the Republican popularity ratings continue to sink. Last year on my planet, the Demcratic victories were heralded by the press, bemoaned by the right and considered quite impressive by all.

On my planet, the president will use his veto power... and the Democrats will pass a short term emergency bill which will make the Republicans go on record in favor of the war every three months or so.

On my planet, conservatives will continue in a political death spiral where they will increasingly break ranks against the president and more and more will viciously attack each other.




Yes the Good Reverend is from Earth while you seem to be from the planet of hope and dreams. I kid I kid Laughing


Don't you think you are speculating a bit?


Personally I wish the Dems would grow a pair and call for outright withdrawal. I'd have a little more respect for them instead of this 2 sides of the fence crap we are treated to currently.

Its funny though the dems have such an opportunity and they are blowing it.... Take a stand....


BTW what is hillary's stance this week?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 09:18 am
I think she's standing over Pelosi getting her "annual exam".
0 Replies
 
reverend hellh0und
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 09:21 am
au1929 wrote:
reverend hellh0und

When were you last in Iraq?? If you haven't been, since you are hellbent for US forces to stay their. Why not put your ass on the line and volunteer.




The Good Reverend was there in 91 painting targets, Putting the smart in da bombs. :wink:

Spent time in the Balkans too....


And you? :wink:
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Apr, 2007 09:23 am
I probably like Hillary less than you do.

The Democrats are taking a courageous stand.

They want a orderly phased withdrawal over a reasonable amount of time with while working diplomatically with the other interests in the region.

This is what the American people are calling for, as expressed by the Democrats in Congress.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Top US Senate Democrat to Bush: Iraq war is lost
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.24 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 11:27:04