0
   

Impeachment against Cheney?

 
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 09:47 am
TTH wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
I will make it clear. I am anti bush. Simple as that.


Are you are a guy? I am laughing so hard. You are anti bush
It is funny if you are a guy. At least to me.

I think that belongs in the humor forum.


Well, ok. Now we have a good reading on our poster.
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 09:47 am
au1929 wrote:
TTH wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
because if you impeached bush first them cheney would be president? (shudder)


Laughing Laughing Sorry I find that funny.

What is with President Bush? What do you not like?


I do not like that he is not where he belongs, in an institution for the mentally impaired


That is better. Maybe I can meet him there. I must have a weird sense of humor.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 06:09 pm
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
well dubya would be pretty lost without cheney and then perhaps the new vice (pelosi) could slow him down....in any case it would be a wonderful thing...


I thought you were smarter then this.

Even if you manage to impeach AND convict Cheney,that does NOT mean that Nancy would become VP.

You should remember when Agnew was impeached.
The President simply appoints a new VP,of his choice.
The only way that Nancy could become President is if BOTH Bush AND Cheney were impeached AND convicted.
Simply being impeached does not remove someone from office (remember Clinton).
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 06:24 pm
a little wishful thinking Col. Sanders....that's all. :wink:
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 07:08 pm
mysteryman wrote:
......You should remember when Agnew was impeached.The only way that Nancy could become President is if BOTH Bush AND Cheney were impeached AND convicted.
Simply being impeached does not remove someone from office (remember Clinton).


I find it amusing that most people seem to think that impeachment = guilt.
That is not what it means.
Obviously you know that. Most people don't know or don't care or....whatever.

I care. I actually have a book on this.
Presidents impeached:
1) Andrew Johnson
2) Richard Nixon resigned to avoid impeachment (too bad, one of the best in IMO, at least he made history - 1st one to ever resign)
3) Bill Clinton

If I left someone off the list it is unintentional. Feel free to correct. I don't always remember either.
I thougt Agnew resigned? I could look it up but I am being lazy. I don't keep up with the vice's.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 07:31 pm
TTH wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
......You should remember when Agnew was impeached.The only way that Nancy could become President is if BOTH Bush AND Cheney were impeached AND convicted.
Simply being impeached does not remove someone from office (remember Clinton).


I find it amusing that most people seem to think that impeachment = guilt.
That is not what it means.
Obviously you know that. Most people don't know or don't care or....whatever.

I care. I actually have a book on this.
Presidents impeached:
1) Andrew Johnson
2) Richard Nixon resigned to avoid impeachment (too bad, one of the best in IMO, at least he made history - 1st one to ever resign)
3) Bill Clinton

If I left someone off the list it is unintentional. Feel free to correct. I don't always remember either.
I thougt Agnew resigned? I could look it up but I am being lazy. I don't keep up with the vice's.


Agnew did resign,but he was facing impeachment.

And your list of Presidents that were impeached is correct.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 07:40 pm
TTH, explaining the impeachment process to the unenlightened, wrote:

I care. I actually have a book on this


I knew you had books in your house, TTH, but I assumed they were phone books.

When did you get this other one?
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 07:43 pm
Impeachment has been right around the corner every moment since 2000. Dream on.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 07:44 pm
What fresh hell is this?

Oh, Hi, Brandon.
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 08:19 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
TTH wrote:

I care. I actually have a book on this


I knew you had books in your house, TTH, but I assumed they were phone books.

When did you get this other one?


Gus I have 839 books (not including the phone book). I like to learn. I am weird. I have a degree (a couple). I still take classes for fun. I took a boating class. I don't own a boat. I took a flagging class (construction). I don't work. I took a sign language class for the fun of it. I went to the University's store and bought a bunch of books. I had a bookshelf made for a complete wall in my house. I am running out of room. This book on the Presidents? I bought it at the University's book store. I don't remember when. Clinton is in there. So, it would have to be 1993 or later.
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 08:22 pm
Gus Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing You didn't think I would catch that did you?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 08:28 pm
Gus is very intuitive.
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Apr, 2007 09:09 pm
dyslexia wrote:
Gus is very intuitive.


Exactly, that is what I said.
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Thu 19 Apr, 2007 12:05 pm
This does accomplish changes. I had to alter it by taking out names, phone #'s and email addresses. We voted multiple times on the same issue. They (our govt.) didn't listen. So, it goes back on the ballot.
Some are sick and tired of it. She is not my Governor. She did not win.
If you are interested research it. It is complicated. Never the less we don't stop. WE ALREADY VOTED MORE THAN ONCE ON THIS ISSUE.
IT IS RIDICULOUS. They don't listen. Now they are doing it again.

"April 12, 2007

To: Our thousands of supporters throughout the state (cc'd to the media,
house & senate members, and Governor)
From:............ of the Taxpayer
Protection Initiative of 2007, ph: ***-***-****, email:
***_*****@*******.net, http://www............ **************.com .......................
to our website..............

Politicians' lust for more tax dollars is insatiable. You'd think a
whopping $2 billion tax surplus would deter them from jacking up taxes

even higher and looking greedy. But they are simply shameless when it
comes to their unquenchable thirst for higher taxes.

We've just learned that the House and Senate approved a bill to allow
counties and cities to substantially increase car tab fees -- WITHOUT A
VOTE OF THE PEOPLE.


Now it's up to Governor ******* to decide if she respects the voters
or not (she hasn't said whether or not she'll sign the bill into law).

Flying under the radar screen for months (today's ****** News *******
article was the first story on this bill), House Bill 1858 is a triple
insult to the taxpayers:

1) This bill violates the voters' double decision on $30 car tabs
(1999's I-695 and 2002's I-776)
2) This bill violates the Legislature's decision in 2000 to set and
keep car tabs at $30
3) This bill tells counties and cities they can unilaterally impose
higher car tabs WITHOUT A VOTE OF THE PEOPLE

In 2002, the voters approved Initiative 776 which, among other
things, stopped COUNTIES from unilaterally imposing a $15 per vehicle fee.
The message was clear: no more car tab fees imposed by local governments

and, no matter what, no higher car tab fees without a vote of the people.
This bill replaces a smaller $15 fee with a larger $20 fee and, just to
add insult to injury, expands the governments that can impose it,
including BOTH counties AND cities. All without a vote of the people.

If Governor ******** signs this bill into law, she will be showing
the highest level of contempt for the voters.

In addition, ******* is diluting voter-approved Initiative 747's 1%
limit. Despite this limit being in effect for five years, we have yet to
find any taxpayer who feels their property tax bill wasn't high enough.
All we hear from taxpayers are complaints of massive increases in property
taxes. Again, this crushing property tax burden is occurring with I-747
in effect. Nonetheless, the Legislature is moving full steam ahead to
pass Enhanced Senate Bill 5498 that makes it much, much easier for local
governments to increase property taxes even more.

If ESB 5498 is approved in both the House and Senate, Governor
******** will again decide whether she respects the voters or not.

It's important to remember that candidate ******** promised, if
elected, not to raise taxes. She broke that promise in the 2005 and 2006
legislative sessions. We'll see how she does in 2007 when she decides the
fate of anti-$30-Tabs HB 1858 and anti-1%-limit ESB 5498.

-- END -- "
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Apr, 2007 05:03 am
That is why he is a pain in the A** to them and even though I don't like him I help. They don't listen. So, we don't stop. We don't give up.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Apr, 2007 05:47 am
dyslexia wrote:
Gus is very intuitive.


Wonderful!

From "A Fish Called Wanda"...
Quote:
Otto: Apes don't read philosophy.
Wanda: Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it.
0 Replies
 
TTH
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Apr, 2007 05:56 am
blatham wrote:
dyslexia wrote:
Gus is very intuitive.


Wonderful!

From "A Fish Called Wanda"...
Quote:
Otto: Apes don't read philosophy.
Wanda: Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it.



Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing I find that funny.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Apr, 2007 07:32 am
TTH wrote:
blatham wrote:
dyslexia wrote:
Gus is very intuitive.


Wonderful!

From "A Fish Called Wanda"...
Quote:
Otto: Apes don't read philosophy.
Wanda: Yes they do, Otto, they just don't understand it.



Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing I find that funny.


To paraphrase WC Fields, "Anyone who likes a screenplay by John Cleese cannot be all bad."
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jun, 2007 07:57 am
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Jun, 2007 08:40 pm
Re: A Vice President Above the Law
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
A Vice President Above the Law
BY Scott Horton
Harpers Magazine
PUBLISHED June 4, 2007

The hallmark of the Bush Administration is impunity.......Of course, this list is only a beginning. What about war crimes? What about his conspiracy to out a covert CIA agent? Still, one solution for the public is to take a cue from Maureen Dowd and shorten Cheney's job title. From now on, let's just make it "vice." It's such a fitting name for him.

What about his penchant for murdering widows and orphans for kicks? What about some evidence of any of this, starting with any evidence at all that he accepted bribes from Halliburton while in office?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 12:46:39