aidan wrote:Is Buddha considered to be a with an otherworldly or immortal source of power and knowledge like the god(s) of Christianity?
No. The buddha was human. There have been other buddhas after him, and they were all human.
I do not think buddhists pray, since there are no gods involved. But they meditate, and some of them chant. But all of that is for personal benefit, to align one's energies and maintain a beneficial balance.
But you should ask JLNobody, NickFun or Asherman. They're all buddhists of various schools, and I'm sure they could give a better answer than I can. I'm more of a "freelance" buddhist, if there is such a thing.
Real life.
I do not think that something is untrue just because it is incomprehensible. But I am of the mind that if it cannot be verified and put to the test, then it is of little personal value to me. So I guess I think that if something cannot be understood by anyone, then we cannot say if it is true or not. From there I guess it's a matter of preference when I chose to disregard it.
Neo
I define faith totally independent of religion. To have faith is to be optimistically wired, so to speak. It is the ability to fend off despair based on the knowledge that we do not know what will come, so it is illogical to emphasis the bad possibilities any more than the good. To have faith is to be able to endure the suspense.