Re: BBB
Bumble Bee Boogie wrote:Definitions of Social Darwinism on the Web:
There's a reason there are so many definitions. Douglas Hofstadter coined the phrase "Social Darwinism" in
his Ph.D thesis (published 1944). Throughout the book, he never bothered to define the term he had invented for the title of his thesis. This is no coincident. If he
had nailed it down to any reasonably rigorous definition, Hofstadter would have noticed that no one definition fits all the "social darwinist" authors he discusses. For example, Herbert Spencer's politics overlaps barely all with Francis Galton's. As far as I can see, there are only two elements Hofstaedter's "social darwinists" have in common with each other, but not with other authors who wrote at the same time as they did ---
1) They argued for ideas that New Dealers like the 1944 Douglas Hofstadter detested, and
2) Hofstaedter arbitrarily lumped them into one common category, and for this category he needed a catchier label than "authors whose politics are disagreeable to New Dealers."
Going by the descriptions in this thread, I would accuse Obama of intellectual fluffiness, because "Social Darwinism" doesn't mean anything in particular. But I wouldn't consider this a major deal.