Thomas asked for a new thread to debate this issue, sparked by Thomas comment about "grownup" Republicans again taking charge and returning to "civil government" as practiced in the previous 224 years prior to the George Bush presidency, as explained in the following posts.
Thomas wrote:okie wrote:Thomas wrote: Good. I hope this will help the grownup Republicans take charge and make their party attractive again.
Whats that supposed to mean, Thomas? Does it include abortion sanctioned and paid for by government is hunky dory?
No, but it definitely includes quitting to appoint ideologically connected incompetents; it includes not firing staffers for telling politically incorrect truths; it includes a restoration of
habeas corpus, stopping torture instead of inventing nicer names for it, and stopping illegal wiretaps. When this is done, I'd be willing to negotiate about all the other points. But in my comment about the grown-up Republicans, I was mostly thinking about a return to conventions of civil government as practiced -- by Democrats and Republicans -- during the 224 years before Bush. If this takes a devastating Republican loss in 2008, I can live with that.
I took this to mean that government was always more civil than now, so I think it is appropriate to ask Thomas a few questions. Rather than making it too long, I summarized it with less questions.
Quote:Quote:Whats that supposed to mean, Thomas? Does it include abortion sanctioned and paid for by government is hunky dory?
No, but it definitely includes quitting to appoint ideologically connected incompetents; it includes not firing staffers for telling politically incorrect truths;
Can you name names?
Quote:it includes a restoration of habeas corpus, stopping torture instead of inventing nicer names for it,
Can you provide any evidence that Bush authorized torture. Do terrorist suspects captured in Afghanistan or Iraq deserve the same rights as a civilian criminal?
Quote:and stopping illegal wiretaps. When this is done, I'd be willing to negotiate about all the other points.
Can you provide any evidence that wiretaps and monitoring of mail and other communications have not been done in other wars? Do you believe the president has no authority whatsoever in this regard to protect the country?
Quote:But in my comment about the grown-up Republicans, I was mostly thinking about a return to conventions of civil government as practiced -- by Democrats and Republicans -- during the 224 years before Bush. If this takes a devastating Republican loss in 2008, I can live with that.
Please explain what you mean by civil government.
If you apply some simple historical context here, perhaps you can explain what you mean.
For example, please explain why you must believe FDR's rounding up of tens of thousands of Japanese Americans and placing them in concentration camps 50 years ago was more civil than now.
Please explain why you believe JFK wiretapping Martin Luther King was more civil than wiretapping terrorist suspects to protect the country against another attack, which Bush has apparently done now.
And explain why the FBI routinely doing such was more civil than now, such as FDR, JFK, and LBJ wiretapping their political enemies was more civil than now.
Please explain why you apparently believe slavery as a policy over 150 years ago was more civil than now.
Please explain why Abraham Lincoln placing people under arrest for sedition who criticized the government was more civil than now, wherein leftists now routinely deface property and call Bush a Nazi and worse, including wishing him dead, and openly sympathize with terrorists.
Please explain how earlier methods of capital punishment for things like killing chickens or horses and the like was more civil than now, which is now predominantly reserved for heinous acts of brutal murder, etc.
Please explain why denying women or blacks the right to vote was more civil than now.
Oh, by the way, please explain how Janet Reno ordering tanks into Waco and ultimately causing the horrific burning to death of innocent women and children was more civil than now. All because the guy in charge had some illegal firearms. He could have been arrested in town.
Please realize I could provide many, many more examples beyond the above, but for brevity sake, I have restricted it to the above. So please explain why you believe the previous 224 years were more civil than now. Please provide convincing historical evidence that government was civil prior to George W. Bush, but now it is uncivil and needs to be returned to "civil government." I am not convinced yet.