malek wrote:I'm glad that quiet diplomacy won the day in the end. It should always be be given a proper opportunity to succeed before mud slinging and force is used.
The objective was to get those sailors back safe, as quickly as possible.
Loss of face means a hell of a lot to people from the middle east (and to some Americans, it would seem) but human lives must override that small thing every time, if at all possible.
Some Brit newspapers are calling it humiliation for the British government. Personally, I see it as mission accomplished for Blair and the diplomats concerned. Anyway, todays newspapers are tomorrow's fish and chip wrappers, so who cares about loss of face in the long run.
This situation could have easily escalated into a full blown war, so everyone on both sides should be celebrating today.
Well done to the grey men in suits who work behind the scenes and know their way round a minefield or two.
I am also glad that diplomacy worked,but I have to wonder what the "big stick" was that Britian used.
REmember,Teddy Roosevelt once said "speak softly and carry a big stick".
So,the Brits did speak softly,so it must be assumed that they were carrying a big stick to use if needed.
Personally,I think that the hostages were let go because Iran realized they had overplayed their hand.
They were getting no support,even from other Arab nations for their actions.
They didnt get the apology that they wanted (at least not one that was announced publicly),they didnt get the support from the UN,or the lifting of YN sanctions.
I think they gambled and lost,and they knew it.