1
   

here comes the bride again and again

 
 
Reply Thu 10 Jul, 2003 01:55 pm
What an eye opener. A lot of people are afraid of too much scrutiny myself included but this smacks of too little.

Top Stories - The New York Times

Here Comes the Bride. Again, and Again . . .
Thu Jul 10, 8:55 AM ET Add Top Stories - The New York Times to My Yahoo!


By SUSAN SAULNY The New York Times

In a era when divorce and remarriage are commonplace, it might not be surprising for a city clerk to see some of the same names pop up on applications for marriage licenses from time to time.


• Here Comes the Bride. Again, and Again . . .
• Food Makers Trim Fat as Lawsuits and Regulations Loom
• For the latest breaking news, visit NYTimes.com
• Get DealBook, a daily email digest of corporate finance newsDealBook.
Search NYTimes.com:
Today'sNewsPast WeekPast30 DaysPast 90 DaysPastYearSince 1996




But it did strike the city clerk's office as highly unusual when it learned this year that one Manhattan woman had applied for 27 marriage licenses from 1984 to 2002 and that at least a dozen others had seemingly married in numbers that were highly suspicious.


These "career brides," as one city official called them, were not marrying for love, according to the Manhattan district attorney's office, which announced yesterday that four women had been arrested and two more were being sought on felony charges punishable by up to four years in prison. The authorities said they believed that the women had offered to marry illegal immigrants for a fee, usually about $1,000. Officials said the women who had applied for the licenses sometimes actually went through with marriage ceremonies, but sometimes they did not.


A marriage would entitle the men to green cards and other benefits, including Social Security (news - web sites) and unemployment insurance, prosecutors said. The men involved in the scheme came from various countries, including Pakistan, India, Peru, Ecuador, Nigeria and the Dominican Republic, according to court papers.


Robert M. Morgenthau, the Manhattan district attorney, began his investigation after the city clerk's office raised suspicions. He said he planned to give the information to the F.B.I.-N.Y.P.D. Joint Terrorist Task Force, the Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services and various United States attorneys.


Officials said the possibilities for abuse are obvious and seemingly endless, given that municipal and county databases on marriage in New York State are not linked, nor are computerized records connected state to state.


"This opens the door to a lot of other fraud and expense for the U.S. taxpayer," Mr. Morgenthau said at a news conference.


Victor L. Robles, the city clerk who reported the multiple marriages to Mr. Morgenthau in January, still seemed stunned by his findings. "I wanted to know how that's possible in the city of New York," he said yesterday in a telephone interview.


In order to marry in New York City, prospective brides and grooms must complete an affidavit that requires information about previous marriages. The application is then filed with the city clerk's office. Only once did any of the women arrested yesterday acknowledge a previous marriage on the application.


Mr. Robles, a former city councilman who took over the city clerk's office in 2001, said he was surprised when he heard about a woman who had filed for numerous marriage licenses within a short period of time.


He then learned that his office was doing only one-year computer searches on applicants.


"Somebody who got married this year could go to the Bronx next year and get married again," and not be detected, he said.


Mr. Robles also learned that records were not immediately shared among boroughs or counties.


"I said, `From now on, every time we catch somebody, we'll forward it to the district attorney's office in the respective counties,' " he said.


Since taking office, Mr. Robles, who has 54 deputies in the five boroughs, has instituted a records search that goes back 10 years, and he is lobbying for all the state's marital records to be connected.


"I hope that this whole scandal will force the city and the state to link systems so that I can punch in a name and know if someone already applied for a license," he said.


This question remains: At what point does one who often says "I do" become suspicious? After three weddings? Five? Ten?





"We have to look very closely," Mr. Robles said, adding that he had hired a lawyer whose role it is to cross-check information on people with multiple marriages. The office also demands to see divorce decrees before issuing new marriage licenses, he said.

The women who were charged yesterday Dezerrie Cortes, 40, who had applied for 27 licenses; Maria Davis, 26; Monique Figueroa, 26; and Chera Larkins, 32 worked independently of each other, officials said, and had applied for licenses to marry a total of 43 men. The charges included perjury and offering false documents to officials. There was no pattern to the schemes or identifiable ringleader, prosecutors said.

None of the four women could be reached for comment yesterday.

Ms. Cortes is being held at Rikers Island in $25,000 bail. Ms. Davis was released on her own recognizance, and Ms. Figueroa was expected in Manhattan Criminal Court for arraignment last night. Officials said Ms. Larkins had been arrested, but they did not know her whereabouts.

Ms. Davis and Ms. Cortes live in the same Lexington Avenue apartment building, a high-rise near East 121st Street.

"She goes to work and takes her son to school every day mother kinds of things," a neighbor, Karen Williams, 29, said of Ms. Cortes.

In explaining how the prospective grooms found their brides, Dan Castleman, the chief of investigations in the Manhattan district attorney's office, said: "Oftentimes it was word of mouth in the neighborhood. Some of the women made it known they were available for a price."

Others used go-betweens to arrange unions, he said, adding that most who actually married after receiving the licenses never bothered to file for divorce before applying for new licenses.

In another case, an employee in the city clerk's office is being sought on accusations that he accepted a bribe to change a bride's name in the computer system. In that case, prosecutors said, the woman scheduled to appear at the clerk's office for a marriage ceremony did not show up, and the would-be groom wanted her name removed from the record so another woman could be substituted and the wedding could go on that day.

Mr. Morgenthau said an investigation into about a dozen other repeat brides and their grooms was continuing. If the government finds that a green card application is based on a fraudulent marriage, the applicant could be immediately deported.

"We wanted to put a stop to this now," Mr. Morgenthau said. Later, he added, "But the investigation still has a ways to go."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,430 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Jul, 2003 02:25 pm
We shall now pause for the strains of the wedding march from Lohengrin.

<Thank you; thank you>

I love stories like this, Bob. It reaffirms my lifelong trust in the avarice and total lack of ethics of the general public as well as the uselessness of trying to keep track of anything like accurate records in a megalopolis the size of NYC.

BTW, the story doesn't mention anything about divorce statistics. Do these gals become polyandrous poligamists or what?
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Jul, 2003 02:29 pm
Soooo, anyone wanna come to Canada? :wink:
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Jul, 2003 02:31 pm
Damn, i already bought ya a tee-vee, now yer lettin' bids ? ! ? ! ?
0 Replies
 
bobsmyth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Jul, 2003 02:34 pm
Hi Merry Andrew. Apparently some never married and those that did very often didn't divorce as it was just a money making scheme.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Jul, 2003 02:39 pm
someone has to pay for new stockings. the crane has sooooooo wrecked these ones. :wink:
0 Replies
 
bobsmyth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Jul, 2003 02:45 pm
ehBeth are you trying to take the spotlight away from Lola. Despite the fact that your avatar shows more than Lola's I will remain true to Lola's legs.
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Jul, 2003 03:04 pm
All of these weddings are sanctified unions because the ceremony (or at least the license) deals with a male and a female.

Eve and Adam, Adam, Adam, Adam.....

The mind boggles.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Jul, 2003 05:36 pm
bobS - stick with Lola. I'm sure it's a fine decision. Our demographics are rather different.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » here comes the bride again and again
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 09:12:09