Spain judge says Bush and Iraq war allies should face war...

*yawn*

"one of the most sordid and unjustifiable episodes in recent human history."

McGentrix wrote:

*yawn*

Wake up McG, It NOT AlQadea or Saddam Terrorists...A white christian spanish judge is saying this :

Quote:

"one of the most sordid and unjustifiable episodes in recent human history."

McGentrix wrote:

*yawn*

Wake up McG, It NOT AlQadea or Saddam Terrorists...A white christian spanish judge is saying this :

If it was not a "White Christian" echoing those sentiments would it be less creditable?

If it was not a "White Christian" echoing those sentiments would it be less creditable?

au1929 wrote:

If it was not a "White Christian" echoing those sentiments would it be less creditable?

This was spicifically intended for McG. I know he has a problem with Islamic people. I was going to add 'I'd doubt you'd trust the opinion of Jesus' if he'd said it.

Only if he puts it in writing

au1929 wrote:

If it was not a "White Christian" echoing those sentiments would it be less creditable?

This was spicifically intended for McG. I know he has a problem with Islamic people. I was going to add 'I'd doubt you'd trust the opinion of Jesus' if he'd said it. Meaning nothing anyone would say counts for McG except Bush the 'decider'.

Zippo wrote:

au1929 wrote:

If it was not a "White Christian" echoing those sentiments would it be less creditable?

This was spicifically intended for McG. I know he has a problem with Islamic people. I was going to add 'I'd doubt you'd trust the opinion of Jesus' if he'd said it. Meaning nothing anyone would say counts for McG except Bush the 'decider'.

I have a problem with Islamic people as well, but it only applies to the ones who kill innocent people with bombs.

You have a problem with Jews whats your point? Does that mean if an Islamic person came forward and said that Israel has the right to exist and should control all of what is current day Israel does that mean you would accept what they are saying?

Hitlers disciple would only accept it if someone[anyone] came forward and said that Israel deserved to be destroyed and all Israeli's massacred.

au1929 wrote:

Hitlers disciple would only accept it if someone[anyone] came forward and said that Israel deserved to be destroyed and all Israeli's massacred.

Interesting...
Anyone who calls for equal Justice or International Law to apply to the Zionist cabal in Israel are usually subjected with the nauseating smear tactics such as noted above.

The question that should be asked is "WHY"?

There is a difference between condemning Israel's conduct: The flagrant disregard of Human rights & International Law, Immoral apartheid conditions they impose on innocent civilians, the treasonous attack on the USS Liberty in 1967, the theft of classified military secrets by Israel's hero Jonathan Pollard, which inevitably led to the deaths of undercover secret agents stationed in Russia;
Compared to someone who merely hates any Jew that lives in the world.

One with an ounce of cognizance will also recognize the difference between a "Zionist" and a "Jew". If one cannot differentiate between the two entities, they do a huge disservice to the Jewish race.

Americanadian wrote:

au1929 wrote:

Hitlers disciple would only accept it if someone[anyone] came forward and said that Israel deserved to be destroyed and all Israeli's massacred.

Interesting...
Anyone who calls for equal Justice or International Law to apply to the Zionist cabal in Israel are usually subjected with the nauseating smear tactics such as noted above.

The question that should be asked is "WHY"?

There is a difference between condemning Israel's conduct: The flagrant disregard of Human rights & International Law, Immoral apartheid conditions they impose on innocent civilians, the treasonous attack on the USS Liberty in 1967, the theft of classified military secrets by Israel's hero Jonathan Pollard, which inevitably led to the deaths of undercover secret agents stationed in Russia;
Compared to someone who merely hates any Jew that lives in the world.

One with an ounce of cognizance will also recognize the difference between a "Zionist" and a "Jew". If one cannot differentiate between the two entities, they do a huge disservice to the Jewish race.

My question is why you would comment on something you know nothing about.

My question is why you would comment on something you know nothing about.

au1929 wrote:

Americanadian wrote:

au1929 wrote:

Hitlers disciple would only accept it if someone[anyone] came forward and said that Israel deserved to be destroyed and all Israeli's massacred.

Interesting...
Anyone who calls for equal Justice or International Law to apply to the Zionist cabal in Israel are usually subjected with the nauseating smear tactics such as noted above.

The question that should be asked is "WHY"?

There is a difference between condemning Israel's conduct: The flagrant disregard of Human rights & International Law, Immoral apartheid conditions they impose on innocent civilians, the treasonous attack on the USS Liberty in 1967, the theft of classified military secrets by Israel's hero Jonathan Pollard, which inevitably led to the deaths of undercover secret agents stationed in Russia;
Compared to someone who merely hates any Jew that lives in the world.

One with an ounce of cognizance will also recognize the difference between a "Zionist" and a "Jew". If one cannot differentiate between the two entities, they do a huge disservice to the Jewish race.

My question is why you would comment on something you know nothing about.

Nothing like a little arrogance to prove your point.

The presumption that others cannot recognize the difference between a Jew and a Zionist is laughable.

Cycloptichorn

Americanadian read this comment Hitlers disciple would only accept it if someone[anyone] came forward and said that Israel deserved to be destroyed and all Israeli's massacred. and immediately went into a rant about Israel, zionism and Jews. And you of course could not resist the temptation to comment.
The comment was directed at Zippo who has on to many occasions voiced both his, I will put it mildly, dislike for Israel and Jews in general.
Yes he went off half cocked or perhaps he was agreeing with what I accused Zippo of.

to Americanadian In case you were not aware of it. Judaisim is a religion not a race. I am a white caucasion. In addition I suggest you look before you leap.

I am well aware that Judaism is a Religion, not a race. The Scriptural Hebrews however, were a race. The majority of people today are rather confused as to the real definition of a Jew. I would define it much the same as a "Muslim" is a follower of Islam. Not all Muslims are Arab, and not all Jews are Hebrew.