0
   

Long knives out for Federal Prosecutors

 
 
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 11:54 am
As you may or may not have read, the Bush admin. is pushing out judges who don't conform to their Conservative principles. They are using a part of the PATRIOT act - which was slipped in in the dead of night - to authorize doing so without Congressional approval.

So far, there are 8 known instances of this happening this year; none of those who have been forced out were given poor evaluations or any objective reason at all. In fact...

http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16802797.htm

Quote:
The U.S. attorney from New Mexico who was recently fired by the Bush administration said Wednesday that he believes he was forced out because he refused to rush an indictment in an ongoing probe of local Democrats a month before November's Congressional elections.

David Iglesias said two members of Congress separately called in mid October to inquire about the timing of an ongoing probe of a kickback scheme and appeared eager for an indictment to be issued on the eve of the elections in order to benefit the Republicans. He refused to name the members of Congress because he said he feared retaliation.

Two months later, on Dec. 7, Iglesias became one of six U.S. attorneys ordered to step down for what administration officials have termed "performance-related issues." Two other U.S. attorneys also have been asked to resign.

Iglesias, who received a positive performance review before he was fired, said he suspected he was forced out because of his refusal to be pressured to hand down an indictment in the ongoing probe.

"I believe that because I didn't play ball, so to speak, I was asked to resign," said Iglesias, who officially stepped down Wednesday.


Also out? Lam, who headed up the Duke Cunningham probe.

Is it right for the Bush admin to be pushing out judges who don't agree with their politics?

Cycloptichorn
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 2,946 • Replies: 74
No top replies

 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 12:43 pm
Judges or prosecutors?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 12:45 pm
Fantastic. Yaknow that I had written prosecutors in the entire piece, and then gone back and changed it to judges for some reason?

Sheesh Embarrassed

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 12:55 pm
I see. It is an interesting article, but I'm still not making the patriot act connection. Is there another story here?
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 01:09 pm
Copyright C 2006 Albuquerque Journal

By Mike Gallagher
Journal Investigative Reporter

U.S. Attorney David Iglesias will resign in the next few months- more than two years before his appointment expires, an office spokesman confirmed Monday night.

Iglesias, appointed by President Bush in 2001 would normally have served as the state's chief federal lawman until the end of Bush's term in 2008.

U.S. Attorney's Office spokesman Norm Cairns said Iglesias "has had discussions with officials in Washington, D.C. Based on those discussions, he has decided to move on."

Rumors that Iglesias was in trouble with his superiors at the Department of Justice have been circulating for months.

The chief criticism of Iglesias has been that he had not provided enough resources for public corruption investigations. Some of that criticism has come from the political arena and some from the FBI, which has made political corruption its No. 2 priority behind terrorism.

Iglesias' defenders, in private conversations, argued that the federal prosecutors are overwhelmed with immigration and narcotics cases because of the state's southern border with Mexico.

Confirmation of Iglesias' resignation plans comes while the sentencing of former state treasurer Robert Vigil is pending.

Vigil was convicted of one count of attempted extortion and acquitted of 23 counts of racketeering and extortion after a four-week trial in the fall. Vigil's attorney, Sam Bregman, claimed victory after the second trial.

Vigil's first trial on essentially the same charges in the spring ended in a hung jury, with 11 of the jurors voting to convict Vigil on at least some of the charges.

Vigil's predecessor, Michael Montoya, pleaded guilty to one count of extortion in a scheme that netted him millions. Montoya testified against Vigil.

Iglesias' resignation also comes while a second corruption case is in the law enforcement pipeline. That case could be as explosive as the treasurer's Office investigation.

The FBI has been investigating a kickback scheme centered on the construction of the multimillion-dollar state and metro courthouses Downtown.

Last month, Iglesias assigned additional prosecutors to that investigation, which had been in the works since September 2005. The investigation became public last spring when FBI agents began reviewing construction records at the Metropolitan Courthouse.

The pace of that investigation has apparently been point of contention between investigators and Iglesias office.

The FBI confirmed in July that it had sent a case involving the courthouses to the U.S Attorney's Office. Since then indictments have been expected or rumored on a monthly basis.

That investigation arose 'from a civil lawsuit between two partners in an Albuquerque engineering firm that implicated former State Sen. Manny Aragon, D-Albuquerque. Aragon confirmed he was a consultant to the firm for a number of years.

A company affiliated with the engineering firm was involved in the construction of the state District Courthouse. The investigation has apparently spread to include architects, lobbyists, contractors and politicians.

Cairns said he could not comment on any pending cases nor the impact of Iglesias' resignation plans.

"Mr. Iglesias is looking at several job opportunities at this point in time," Cairns said.

Iglesias, 48, ran as the Republican candidate for attorney general in 1998, losing to Democrat Patricia Madrid in the general election. He has served as an assistant attorney general and an assistant city attorney in Albuquerque.

He was the first Hispanic nominated as U.S. attorney in New Mexico since Richard Nixon's administration.


http://www.prosefights.org/nmlegal/iglesias/iglesias.htm
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Feb, 2007 01:11 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
I see. It is an interesting article, but I'm still not making the patriot act connection. Is there another story here?


Try this -
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-prosecutor25jan25,1,70435.story?coll=la-headlines-politics&ctrack=1&cset=true

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 07:33 am
I was just going to begin a thread on this story, cyclo. I've been following it for a while now. Here's a couple of paragraphs from the WP story today...
Quote:
Iglesias, 49 and the son of a Baptist minister, is a Navy Reserve commander whose role as a defense lawyer in a famous military hazing case was the basis for the Tom Cruise character in the movie "A Few Good Men." He held a news conference in Albuquerque yesterday, in which he said that he was fired for political reasons.

Iglesias was among seven U.S. attorneys notified by phone on Dec. 7 that they were being fired without explanation. An eighth prosecutor, in Little Rock, also was removed in December, to make room for a former aide to presidential adviser Karl Rove.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801502.html

Here's a PBS Newshour piece from a couple of days ago. The link will take you to a page where you can download the segment which includes a debate with an ex AG and a Loyola law prof...
Quote:
RAY SUAREZ: Margaret Chiara, the U.S. attorney for Western Michigan, suddenly announced her resignation on Friday after five years in the post. Although Chiara herself wouldn't comment, several news accounts report she was forced out by Justice Department officials over differences of views on capital punishment, among other things.

Chiara is the eighth U.S. attorney to resign since December at the government's request. The others: Bud Cummins, from Arkansas; Paul Charlton, of Arizona; Daniel Bogden, Nevada; David Iglesias, New Mexico; John McKay, Seattle; Kevin Ryan, San Francisco; and Carol Lam in San Diego.

Lam recently had won praise for indicting the number-three official at the CIA on corruption charges and for successfully prosecuting former Congressman Randy "Duke" Cunningham, who took $2 million in bribes from defense contractors.

In fact, in recent years, all had received positive job evaluations. However, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has insisted that the prosecutors were replaced because they performed inadequately.

At a Senate hearing last month, California Democrat Dianne Feinstein took issue with that assertion. She's pushing to repeal the law allowing the attorney general to replace sitting U.S. attorneys with temporary replacements indefinitely and without Senate approval.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/law/jan-june07/doj_02-26.html
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 07:38 am
ps... removing folks who or ideological or procedural impediments and putting loyalists into positions of power (judiciary and elsewhere) has been a common behavior of this administration. Rove, Abramoff, Reed and Norquist have utilized this strategy mercilessly since their college republican days.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 07:44 am
bm
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 07:56 am
blatham wrote:
ps... removing folks who or ideological or procedural impediments and putting loyalists into positions of power (judiciary and elsewhere) has been a common behavior of this administration. Rove, Abramoff, Reed and Norquist have utilized this strategy mercilessly since their college republican days.


You make it sound unique to this administration...
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 08:14 am
McGentrix wrote:
blatham wrote:
ps... removing folks who or ideological or procedural impediments and putting loyalists into positions of power (judiciary and elsewhere) has been a common behavior of this administration. Rove, Abramoff, Reed and Norquist have utilized this strategy mercilessly since their college republican days.


You make it sound unique to this administration...


There are religious extremists in every country. Therefore, Pakistan and the United States are the same.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 08:31 am
blatham wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
blatham wrote:
ps... removing folks who or ideological or procedural impediments and putting loyalists into positions of power (judiciary and elsewhere) has been a common behavior of this administration. Rove, Abramoff, Reed and Norquist have utilized this strategy mercilessly since their college republican days.


You make it sound unique to this administration...


There are religious extremists in every country. Therefore, Pakistan and the United States are the same.


Cute, but you know what I mean in regards to past American administrations.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 09:20 am
McGentrix wrote:
blatham wrote:
McGentrix wrote:
blatham wrote:
ps... removing folks who or ideological or procedural impediments and putting loyalists into positions of power (judiciary and elsewhere) has been a common behavior of this administration. Rove, Abramoff, Reed and Norquist have utilized this strategy mercilessly since their college republican days.


You make it sound unique to this administration...


There are religious extremists in every country. Therefore, Pakistan and the United States are the same.


Cute, but you know what I mean in regards to past American administrations.


Yes, I do, but had no intention of doing cute. It is not enough to identify a similarity between two subjects. Magnitude becomes the real issue. We all commit crimes, for example, whether speeding or tax fudging or whatever.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 10:12 am
Quote:
Dems Seek Testimony From Fired Attorneys

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: March 1, 2007
Filed at 9:26 a.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Democrats are moving to compel some of the eight U.S. attorneys who have been ousted to tell their stories publicly, under oath, after a federal prosecutor claimed he was fired for political reasons.

A House subcommittee is slated to vote Thursday on subpoenas for four of the eight dismissed U.S. attorneys. The Senate Judiciary Committee, meanwhile, will send letters to those fired before voting next week on compelling their testimony, according to officials with both panels.

The prosecutors have privately told both committees that they would not testify voluntarily but would honor a congressional subpoena, according to Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., and an official close to the House subcommittee on commercial and administrative law.

House subcommittee Chairwoman Linda Sanchez said her panel will vote on subpoenas for fired prosecutors Carol Lam of California, David Iglesias of New Mexico, H.E. ''Bud'' Cummins of Arkansas and John McKay of Washington.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Congress-Prosecutors.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 10:20 am
Yikes! I imagine the prosecutors, being who they are, will prosecute.....? Hopefully this will become a bigger story - I hadn't heard of it until now.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 10:33 am
little k

It's no small story. The new conservative movement has been quite intelligent in how they've gone about crafting governance (and information and legal) structures to forward their ideology. One manifestation of this is the Federalist Society... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_Society (start with a look at funding sources...all the usual suspects). Alito and Roberts come out of this organizational structure and, very likely, so does this latest news story we are seeing here.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 04:25 pm
Quote:


BREAKING: House Committee to Subpoena Ousted Prosecutors
By Paul Kiel - March 1, 2007, 4:42 PM

The House Judiciary Committee will be issuing subpoenas to four of the fired prosecutors this afternoon, according to a committee spokesperson.

The U.S. attorneys who will receive a subpoena are California's Southern District's Carol Lam, Nevada's David Iglesias, Arkansas' Eastern District's H.E. "Bud" Cummins, and Washington's Western District's John McKay. They will testify next Thursday before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.


Blatham, this story has actually taken a gigantic turn: Gonzales, you may remember, testified in front of Congress on Jan. 17th that there was 'no political motivation whatsoever' in ousting these prosecutors.

I'm pretty sure Iglesias has already disproven this with his allegations about Heather Wilson of NM, and I have little doubt that Carol Lam - who was heading up the Cunningham investigation and moving on to Doolite and Brown - will say much the same thing.

Could Gonzales be in big-big trouble for lying under oath? We shall see?

What's even more delicious - maybe Gonzales would be willing to cut a deal in order to avoid a stint in pound-me-in-the-ass prison. Think about the beans he could spill...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 1 Mar, 2007 05:13 pm
McGentrix wrote:

Cute, but you know what I mean in regards to past American administrations.


BMed so that I won't miss McG's reply laying out the issues and providing his normal expert commentary.

The potential number of impeachables just keeps mounting and mounting. If nothing's done, this will be a travesty like no other.

Just how badly does this reflect on the image of the shining city on a hill when the sole purpose of such an important constitutional provision is that it is used only for political purposes but is ignored when it's needed to fulfill its vital role in maintaining the rule of law?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Mar, 2007 09:46 am
Thanks to the mods for changing the title.

There will be a lot more today on this topic, once I get around to posting it. Suffice it to say in the meantime that there will be some fireworks in the senate and house next week once some peeps get around to testifying...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Mar, 2007 10:04 am
Quote:
Report: Domenici, Wilson Pushed Prosecutor
By Staff
Mar 2, 2007

Sen. Pete Domenici and Rep. Heather Wilson of New Mexico pressured a U.S. attorney to expedite indictments of a Democratic politician, it was reported.

Citing two sources familiar with the case, McClatchy Newspapers reported that Domenici and Wilson -- both Republicans -- intervened in October to accelerate indictments in a federal corruption case that involved at least one former Democratic state senator.

Wilson was involved at the time in a hotly contested re-election campaign, which she won by 875 votes out of more than 210,000 cast.

The alleged involvement of the two lawmakers may expose them to questions about possible violations of Senate and House of Representatives ethics rules, McClatchy said.

David C. Iglesias, who resigned Wednesday as U.S. Attorney for New Mexico, had said two members of Congress tried to pressure him to speed up the investigation of Democrats before the November 2006 elections. He told the Washington Post he suspected complaints from the lawmakers, whom he would not name, may have led the Justice Department to fire him.

"I didn't give (the lawmakers) what they wanted," he said. "That was probably a political problem that caused them to go to the White House or whomever and complain that I wasn't a team player."

[URL=postchronicle.com/news/breakingnews/article_21266868.shtml]source[/URL]
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Long knives out for Federal Prosecutors
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/16/2024 at 07:10:38