1
   

Does watching TV influence autism?

 
 
Miller
 
Reply Tue 27 Feb, 2007 11:53 am
Is an Economist Qualified To Solve Puzzle of Autism?

By Mark Whitehouse
Word Count: 2,210

In the spring of 2005, Cornell University economist Michael Waldman noticed a strange correlation in Washington, Oregon and California. The more it rained or snowed, the more likely children were to be diagnosed with autism.

To most people, the observation would have been little more than a riddle. But it soon led Prof. Waldman to conclude that something children do more during rain or snow -- perhaps watching television -- must influence autism. Last October, Cornell announced the resulting paper in a news release headlined, "Early childhood TV viewing may trigger autism, data analysis suggests."

WSJ online ( subscription required to read whole publication).
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,002 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Feb, 2007 01:24 pm
My mom was reading something about this...

Even if it's not true, perhaps it will scare people enough into actually spending time with their kids instead of setting them in front of the electric babysitter.
0 Replies
 
Stormwatch
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Mar, 2007 08:36 pm
Bella Dea wrote:

Even if it's not true, perhaps it will scare people enough into actually spending time with their kids instead of setting them in front of the electric babysitter.


Good idea!
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Mar, 2007 09:15 pm
NPR reported yesterday? that they've found that non-inherited autism is associated with multiple genetic mutations.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Mar, 2007 09:18 pm
Cause of Autism Narrowed Down to 100 Genes

Quote:
All Things Considered, March 15, 2007 ยท A new study links autism to subtle changes in a wide range of genes. The finding, published in the journal Science, suggests that autism has many causes, and that whatever triggers autism usually occurs long before birth.

The study, led by Jonathan Sebat, a geneticist at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York, examined the genes of 264 families. Some families had members with autism, others did not.

Sebat says the goal was to compare the genes of autistic children with the genes of their parents.

"By comparing the two," he says, "we could find a mutation in the child that was not inherited from either parent."

It turned out that children with autism were much more likely than other kids to have these "spontaneous" mutations. The mutations affected bits of genetic code that tend to appear more than once, like duplicate copies of certain pages of a book.

In many children with autism, some of the duplicates were deleted.

For example, Sebat says one child in the study was missing a copy of the gene for oxytocin - a hormone that seems to influence social behavior.

"That child has one copy of oxytocin instead of the normal two copies," Sebat says, "and that may have resulted in the corresponding decrease in the levels of oxytocin."

It's a change that could have affected normal social development.

But Sebat says that in other children with autism, the deletions affected other genes.

"There may in fact be many genes ?- I would speculate 100 or more ?- that play some role in cognitive development, and when they are altered, could cause autism," Sebat says.

That's many more than researchers have found involved in inherited autism.

Sebat's research is causing a lot of excitement among autism researchers, including Ezra Susser, an epidemiologist at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University and the New York State Psychiatric Institute.

"It changes our thinking about what kind of genetic causes are important," he says, "and knowing that changes our thinking about what kinds of environmental causes are important. Because I think everybody believes that there is an interplay of genes and environment in most diseases, and that would be true for autism, too."

The sort of mutations found in the study tend to occur in eggs or sperm before conception or in the earliest stages of an embryo's development, Susser says.

The finding suggests that things such as exposure to vaccines after birth probably aren't the main causes of autism.

Susser also says the study suggests a new direction for researchers seeking the causes of autism.

"It doesn't mean that we should stop looking for [early-life] exposures," he says. "It does not mean that we should stop looking for early life exposures. But it does mean we should start looking for exposures that might be preconceptional also."

Susser has already shown that older fathers are more likely to have genetic mutations in their sperm, and more likely to have a child who is autistic. He says scientists need to ask whether a parent's exposure to certain chemicals has a similar effect.

In the meantime, Sebat says, the new research offers at least one practical application. Parents who already have a child with autism could undergo genetic tests to see what sort of mutations are present. If the mutations are spontaneous, rather than inherited, future children would have no special risk for autism.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Mar, 2007 09:39 pm
DrewDad wrote:
NPR reported yesterday? that they've found that non-inherited autism is associated with multiple genetic mutations.


Heard that too. Given that inherited autism would also be a genetic disorder, one could surmise that ALL autism is genetic. I don't think TV can effect genes.
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Mar, 2007 10:19 pm
lots of kids are diagnosed autistic before being old enough to watch TV.

Current thinking relates some vaccinations (or possibly he mercury preservatives in vaccines) to autism.

It is likely that mild autistic disorders are more noticeable at a time when small children are in close and constant confined contact with parents ie housebound by snow and ice. Autism often manifests itself as sensory overload which may account for the "TV" diagnosis.

Quote:
Aetiology

The causes of autism spectrum disorders are not clearly understood. It is likely to be a heterogenous condition with different causal factors operating in different groups of cases. In very few children the clinical syndrome of autism is associated with chromosomal or single gene disorders: fragile X, phenylketonurea, tuberose sclerosis, or neurofibromatosis; in others with infections, for example, congenital rubella; and in others with evidence of diffuse brain dysfunction (believed to be due to a physical or chemical fault affecting the developing brain). It is now well established that it is not related to parental personality or child-rearing practices. http://www.nevdgp.org.au/info/std_misc/Autism_hcs.htm


My town runs a fully operational care center for autistic children along with early intervention traveling teacher, 24 hour care facility and school for autistic children.

For those needing to know more.
Links: http://www.autism.org/
https://www.autismwebsite.com/ari/index.htm
https://www.autismwebsite.com/
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 12:28 am
If this:
Quote:
In the spring of 2005, Cornell University economist Michael Waldman noticed a strange correlation in Washington, Oregon and California. The more it rained or snowed, the more likely children were to be diagnosed with autism.


means that more children were diagnosed with autism during the years that there was a higher yearly average of rain or snow, I'd be more likely to interpret a link with greater rates of autism being diagnosed in those years to be due to an increased amount of certain environmental toxins present in rain or snow (such as those found in acid rain) being reintroduced into the water cycle.

Quote:
The more it rained or snowed, the more likely children were to be diagnosed with autism.

The way this is stated, makes it sound like the problem is with the diagnosticians and not the children-in other words, the rain or snow affected the numbers of diagnoses made, whether they were correct or not- which would point to an issue with those making the diagnosis.

Maybe though, the passive sensory input a child receives from watching large amounts of tv acts as a trigger -kind of like strobe lights can trigger seizures in an epileptic. But as is the case in epilepsey, I would think that the genetic predisposition for autism would also have to be present- the organic basis for the disorder to have an appropriate host in which to take root would also have to be present. I'd be surprised if any of these cases involved an entirely normally developing child, whose development suddenly regressed due to watching an increased amount of television.

In most cases of autism, caregivers notice at least slight differences (in preferences, behaviours, or reactions to sensory stimulus) from the very beginning of the child's life, so it would be interesting to read the specific histories of these children to see if that is also the case with these children in these states diagnosed during the years with greater average rain or snow fall.

Quote:
Current thinking relates some vaccinations (or possibly he mercury preservatives in vaccines) to autism.

Dadpad, I don't know what the case is in Australia, but in the US and UK that theory has been debunked. The doctor (in the UK) who introduced that theory has been outed as having falsified research and statistics to support his pet theory. If I can find a link, I'll post it.

*But it has been established without a doubt that television watching certainly stunts creativity, energy, etc. in normally developing or developed people of any age, so it's not a good idea to sit your kid in front of the television, regardless-but that's a whole different disorder.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Mar, 2007 12:38 am
Quote:
18: Childhood Vaccines' Link To Autism Is Debunked
by Apoorva Mandavalli

The controversial theory that childhood vaccines cause autism was discredited by one report after another this year. The biggest blow came with the public retraction of a 1998 paper in the British medical journal The Lancet that had suggested a link between the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and autism in a study of 12 children. Despite questions at the time concerning its scientific credibility, the report garnered a blizzard of press coverage and led some parents to put off vaccinating their young children.

In February Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, said that the work was "flawed" and should never have been published. More reports followed. In May an expert panel at the Washington-based Institute of Medicine announced that neither the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine nor the mercury-based vaccine preservative thimerosal is associated with autism. The panel based its finding on expert testimony, published papers, and ongoing and completed research?-including epidemiological studies in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Sweden. Then in September a long-term study of more than 5,000 children in the United Kingdom?-published in The Lancet?-also found no association between measles-mumps-rubella shots and autism.

The new evidence has yet to quell the fears of some parents. In particular, uncertainty over the effects of exposure to mercury have made thimerosal a continued focus of controversy.

Arguing that the slightest risk warrants completely eliminating the preservative, the Food and Drug Administration recommended removing it from childhood vaccines. Today, except for the flu vaccine manufactured by Aventis, most vaccines contain only trace amounts of thimerosal or none.

Experts say it's crucial to win back parents who mistrust the government and refuse to have their kids vaccinated. "But there is no way we can assure them that every vaccine is safe for every child," says Christopher Wilson, chair of immunology at the University of Washington in Seattle. "That's not the case and never will be."
0 Replies
 
happytaffy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 08:59 am
interesting thread. I read another article on the correlation between tv and autism -- I dont think that it is the main cause but could maybe trigger it.
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Mon 26 Mar, 2007 09:13 am
I wish I had caught that NPR report....I'll link to it later.

I'm wondering...

since these mutations take place many times in the sperm or the egg before conception, might a big factor be the age of the parent(s).

It mentions the fathers are older.

What about the mothers? Do they tend to be older too?

Old eggs, old sperm
0 Replies
 
timberbranch
 
  1  
Reply Wed 28 Mar, 2007 01:44 pm
I always assumed Autism was completely genetic ... turns out there isn't one gene common to all cases.

One thing I'm CERTAIN of, if TV gives you autism, (which I am assuming we're all in agreement it does not, can not & will not), than I would have it. I watched more TV growing up than anyone I've ever met. I'm the MTV generation, I played video games until my fingers were inoperable, then watched the same movies every day until I had the lines all memorized...

"That's because he wasn't sick, he was skipping school. It's a fool's paradise, Mrs Bueller he's just leeeading you down the primrose path."


Confused
0 Replies
 
timberbranch
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 03:44 pm
I heard something on the radio, some doctor claims that while you watch TV or play video games, you're putting yourself in a "near brain-dead state." He suggested listening to the radio instead, because you paint a mental picture with a radio, as opposed to the TV which paints it for you. Listening to the radio is supposed to stimulate the brain to create more or new neural pathways.

I'm still going to watch the Daily Show, if it kills me, I'll die laughing. Laughing

T
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Does watching TV influence autism?
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/01/2026 at 06:37:45