1
   

Ancient Cave Clues Point to Future Drought

 
 
Reply Sun 11 Feb, 2007 06:58 pm
URL: http://www.abqjournal.com/news/metro/537245metro02-11-07.htm

Sunday, February 11, 2007
Ancient Cave Clues Point to Future Drought
By John Fleck
Albuquerque Journal Staff Writer

Pink Panther Cave seems an odd place to study the vagaries of New Mexico drought. Deep beneath the Guadalupe Mountains in southern New Mexico, the temperature sits reliably in the low 50s, day in, day out, winter, summer. It never rains, save the steady drip, drip, drip from the cave's ceiling.

In those drips, though, scientists see an unsettling story of drought in our future. As the slow dripping created the stalagmites in Pink Panther Cave, it left traces of the climate above. In those traces, University of New Mexico professor Yemane Asmerom see signs of a climate that has in the past turned dry under conditions similar to the global warming predicted over the next century.

"Things don't bode well for the Southwest," Asmerom said in an interview.

The prediction is not a perfect fit. In the past, it was slight variations in the sun that heated things up. This time, it is greenhouse gases, emitted by humans burning fossil fuels.

But if the effect on climate is the same, Asmerom and a team of colleagues wrote in the latest issue of the scientific journal Geology, the warming could lead to "persistent hyperarid conditions."

Located on U.S. Forest Service land in the Guadalupe Mountains of southeastern New Mexico, Pink Panther Cave's name is a bit of misnomer.

The "pink" comes from a stain on the ground around the cave's mouth, left by firefighters who used red fire retardant in an aerial attack on a forest fire, according to Victor Polyak, one of Asmerom's UNM colleagues on the project.

The "panther" comes from a pile of bones found inside the cave's entrance. The name is a case of mistaken identity. The sad creature that made its fatal fall into the cave's mouth was not a cat at all. "It's a bear," Polyak said.

Where the bear fell, modern cavers must lower themselves some 50 feet by rope into the cave's beautifully decorated main room.

That is what the team of scientists did in September 2003 when they went, Forest Service permit in hand, in search of a stalagmite to use for their climate study.

Stalagmites and other cave formations?- "speleothems" is the scientific word?- are increasingly attractive to scientists trying to understand ancient climate.

In most parts of the world, New Mexico included, there have only been rain gauges and thermometers to record the weather for a little more than a century.

To figure out what happened before, scientists are exploiting a growing arsenal of tricks, from layers of ice in Antarctica to corals that grow differently depending on whether the water around them is warm or cold.

In New Mexico, tree rings have long been scientists' tool of choice. But tree ring records here only go back 2,000 years. Asmerom has turned to cave formations to push the climate record back in time.

The idea is that changing rainfall patterns on the mountains above Pink Panther Cave are reflected in the growth patterns of the cave's stalagmites. Asmeron and his colleagues painstakingly analyze the stalagmite's layers in a University of New Mexico lab to tease out the story.

Their Pink Panther Cave stalagmite goes back 12,000 years, to the end of the last ice age. As such, it gives them a climate record spanning the whole of the warm, climatically stable period in which human civilizations grew.

The great droughts that marked the end of the last ice age, as ancient lakes that once spread across New Mexico evaporated, show up in the scientists' cave record, as do brief wet spells that temporarily refilled lakes like Estancia east of Albuquerque.

The question is why.

Asmerom and his colleagues found that the wet and dry spells match up reasonably well with other records of the sun's activity. A more active sun means more drought here, they suggest.

They think the answer has something to do with the sun's effect on the Pacific Ocean, a key ingredient in storm patterns and, therefore, drought here.

Columbia University climate researcher Mark Cane, who has worked on the climate-sun-ocean problem, agrees. "It's a very interesting and important paper," Cane said of Asmerom's new work.

But Penn State's Michael Mann, who has worked with Cane on the link between past droughts and future global warming scenarios, cautions that the scientific question is still not settled.

The problem, Mann explained, is that it is not yet clear whether the ocean will behave the same in a greenhouse warming world as it did in the past when changes in the sun were doing the work.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 312 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 Feb, 2007 07:04 pm
Managing Population Growth Key to Water Supply
URL: http://www.abqjournal.com/news/metro/537241metro02-11-07.htm

Sunday, February 11, 2007
Managing Population Growth Key to Water Supply
By John Fleck
Albuquerque Journal Staff Writer

Booming population, as much as global warming-induced drought, defines the West's 21st-century water problems, according to University of Colorado researcher Roger Pielke Jr.

That means dealing with climate-related problems will require far more than slashing emissions of pollutants that are warming the atmosphere, Pielke said.

In coastal regions, he said, it means recognizing that whatever effect global warming might have on hurricanes, most of the increasing risk will come from coastal population growth.

In places like the West, with limited water, a similar argument holds: Whatever decrease in water supplies might be caused by global warming, growth-induced increases in water demand will be key.

New Mexico's population is projected to increase 33 percent by 2030?- an extra 650,000 people, all needing water to work and live.

In addition, scientists say that even if we slash greenhouse gas emissions now, Earth's climate will keep changing for decades as it catches up to what we have already put into the air.

"No matter what greenhouse gas reduction policies the world agrees to, those policies will not have an effect on the climate for decades," Pielke said.

That means residents of the West must focus as much on how we use our water as on what we put out our tailpipes, Pielke said in an interview.

Climate change is just one of many variables in the complex relationship between water and humanity in the arid west, said Dan Sarewitz, a political scientist at Arizona State University in Phoenix.

Pielke, Sarewitz and a group of colleagues raise the issue in Friday's issue of the scientific journal Nature. They argue that an emphasis on greenhouse gas reductions has shortchanged discussions of the need to adapt to climate problems, whatever their cause.

In the Philippines, for example, the government is concerned about coastal flooding from a global warming-induced sea level rise while ignoring the far greater sinking of coastal lands caused by groundwater pumping.

Their analysis comes less than a week after the release of a major international report offering the strongest statement yet by scientists about human-caused climate change and its potentially serious effects.

In the West, the report forecasts greater drought.

The problem, Pielke said, is that advocates fear efforts to adapt to climate change will blunt calls to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

That fear has affected New Mexico's ambitious governmental climate change effort.

A report last year from the New Mexico Office of the State Engineer concluded that "adaptation" is critical to coping with climate change and population growth.

But most of the state's climate change effort has focused on cutting greenhouse gas emissions rather than on coping with the collision between a growing population and a changing climate.

Jim Norton, one of the state officials heading up the effort, agrees with Pielke that adaptation is critical. But there was a fear, Norton said, that too much emphasis "could sort of divert attention away from solving the problem of growing greenhouse gas emissions."

Pielke said there is no reason to think we cannot do both. "We can walk and chew gum at the same time," he said.

Norton agreed. "I don't think it's an either-or proposition," he said. "As a society we're going to have to do both."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Ancient Cave Clues Point to Future Drought
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/02/2026 at 03:45:44