2
   

Why does the god of the Bible consider slavery to be moral??

 
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 05:47 pm
Joe Nation wrote:
It is kind of pathetic to watch. Although, I do admire Mesquite's ability to whack Neo's dreamy sense of the myth.
"They lost their physical perfection...."
"Where does God say he made them perfect?"
(He doesn't, but it must seem nicer somehow to Neo.

And you're right, Steve, this whole thread the Biblists have danced like angels on the head of a pin around the question asked by Frank so long ago. They offered variants of "Tweren't real slavery" to "Okay, there were slaves, but you couldn't beat them to death." As if that makes everything hunkydory morally. No one can explain how a just god would entertain for an instant the enslavement of one human by another.

So, they ask different questions: How many Gods are there in the Bible? What is the power of Satan? Is the Tree of Life still guarded by angels?
As if the answers to any of these questions brings any clarity to reality.

Some friends and I once spent a semester of college debating the various aspects of Superman and his life. One of the hot topics was "Where did Clark Kent put his clothes when he changed into Superman?"

Joe(Fun, and no one was killed because they didn't believe in the power of Green Kryptonite.)Nation


Maybe you do not see as clearly as Neo and some others that the conditions in heaven can directly influence the enslavement of the human soul here on earth...
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 05:51 pm
mesquite wrote:
neologist wrote:
It is obvious from the language of Genesis that God does not always measure days in terms of 24 hours.
First of All, Genesis 2:4 lumps all of the creative days into one: "This is a history of the heavens and the earth in the time of their being created, in the day that Jehovah God made earth and heaven."
The seventh day has never been recorded as having ended.
"For a thousand years are in your eyes but as yesterday when it is past,
And as a watch during the night." (Psalm 90:4)


The creation days were clearly 24 hour days as the Hebrew word yom was used with a number and the phrasing evening and morning. Whenever yom is used with a number modifier it refers to a literal 24 hour day. This is true in the 359 uses of that word outside chapter one of Genesis. The seventh day fits this pattern the same as all the others associated with a number. The psalm quote merely refers to the perception of time.
Really?! Even in Genesis 2:4? Genesis 5:1? And BTW, for that matter, there was no number associated with Genesis 2:17.
mesquite wrote:


neologist wrote:
A&E, lost their physical perfection and began to die as soon as they disobeyed. You have heard the term 'dead man walking', have you not?
.
Perfection? Where does god say he made them perfect? In Genesis 1:31 God said he made them very good not perfect.

[31]And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
Also written by the same author but different book "He is the Rock, his work is perfect. . ." (Deuteronomy 32:4) If you wish to impeach me using the bible, you will need to read the bible.
mesquite wrote:


They didn't even know good from bad. Had they been made perfect God would not have had to boot them out of Eden.
Had they been made according to your definition of perfect, they would have been robots, incapable of error. "
mesquite wrote:
neologist wrote:
As far as the tree of life is concerned, the fact that I am not willing to speculate does not mean there is no explanation. If it's so important, I will spend some time on it.

It is important because it is given as the reason for booting A&E out of Eden. lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
Not the reason - a reason, perhaps, but the (apparently metaphorical) flaming sword would have sufficed in case they tried to sneak back in. (Genesis 3:24)
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 05:54 pm
If creation was not 24-hour days, then why did god not rest on the seventh as he said he would. He evidently "worked" when he instructed A&E not to eat the fruit of knowledge(good and evil). Which one is it?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 05:55 pm
Joe Nation wrote:
It is kind of pathetic to watch. Although, I do admire Mesquite's ability to whack Neo's dreamy sense of the myth.
"They lost their physical perfection...."
"Where does God say he made them perfect?"
(He doesn't, but it must seem nicer somehow to Neo.

And you're right, Steve, this whole thread the Biblists have danced like angels on the head of a pin around the question asked by Frank so long ago. They offered variants of "Tweren't real slavery" to "Okay, there were slaves, but you couldn't beat them to death." As if that makes everything hunkydory morally. No one can explain how a just god would entertain for an instant the enslavement of one human by another.

So, they ask different questions: How many Gods are there in the Bible? What is the power of Satan? Is the Tree of Life still guarded by angels?
As if the answers to any of these questions brings any clarity to reality.

Some friends and I once spent a semester of college debating the various aspects of Superman and his life. One of the hot topics was "Where did Clark Kent put his clothes when he changed into Superman?"

Joe(Fun, and no one was killed because they didn't believe in the power of Green Kryptonite.)Nation
What is fascinating to me is the way in which folks who don't believe the bible are willing to use scriptures they do not understand to impeach scriptures they find inconvenient.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 05:56 pm
Steve 41oo wrote:
Dear oh dear, I have already told you I have no ****ing idea why the god of the Old Testament considers slavery to be moral...

and to be blunt neither do you guys

but the religionists could at least direct the question upwards for us, then perhaps we might get a definitive answer and call a halt to this very silly thread.

ok rant over
Moral is Frank's word.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 06:02 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
If creation was not 24-hour days, then why did god not rest on the seventh as he said he would. He evidently "worked" when he instructed A&E not to eat the fruit of knowledge(good and evil). Which one is it?
He rested (is resting) from his creative works.

Considering the power attributed to him by the bible writers, the rest was for the benefit of creation, not God.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 06:16 pm
You mean all those "miracles" were man-made? 1) World flood, 2) Moses separating the sea, 3) turning a woman into a pile of salt, 4) the burning bush that talked. LOL
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 06:18 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
You mean all those "miracles" were man-made? 1) World flood, 2) Moses separating the sea, 3) turning a woman into a pile of salt, 4) the burning bush that talked. LOL
No. Just not part of creation.
Management, perhaps.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 06:29 pm
The creation of Eden was actual days but days from a human perspective not God's.

Throughout the Bible the length of a day is clearly defined.

Thought days are sometimes confused with ages Genesis is clearly not talking about ages because in Genesis the sun and moon repesent the passing of a day.

The only way Genesis makes sense is to overlay it with the today's current version of science and it's own story of creation.

The Bible says on such and such day God did this or that. People assume that God did these things on that day alone. They do not consider that these may have been being formed and made over millions of years and that in that certian day they became ready for God's purpose. It does not say God created the sun on such and such a day it says he made it to shine with a different kind of intensity so life could evolve toward intelligence. God breathed into man's nostrils meaning that God slightly altered the atmosphere so the body part of humans could evolve and form and eventually come to know the spirit of God. On that day in Eden the body became ready to have the spirit created within. It does not say WHEN God formed the body of man or how long it took only that on that certain day the "formed" body was ready for the creation of the spirit within. As a musician and I understand time, when things commence and when they diminish. Events are all framed in time and tempo beats, samples and gravity is the conductor of the heart of the players.

Just because God begins counting "days" in Eden does not mean there was not time before those days... It does not mean there was not an earth.

The first verse says "God created the heavens and the earth" this is before any of Eden's counting of days even commence from a human perspective.

The sun was not created in the sky on such and such day... it was more like ready to perform it's purpose in this new world God was starting on that day.

But the sun had been being prepared long before that day and before man began to reckon time on that day.

Thus, we see things by nature in such a selfish way that God is nearly obscured by our very own breath of life.

That power becomes corrupt even though God has made the world perfect it is this very perfection that creates an illusion of self grandeur. Only the humble to God are born of "power" that cannot be ever be exhausted.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 06:31 pm
er
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 06:39 pm
neologist wrote:
er


Neo my supposition is that there is a large section of time AFTER "the beginning" and BEFORE the first day of Eden.

This section of time may have taken up billions of years. Other passages in the Bible bear this interpretation up and verify it's theoretical standing.

For this would have been the time of the fall of lucifer. Did the fall of lucifer happen in the span of before the first day even happened?

You cannot just walk past the event of the fall of lucifer without allowing it to occupy some part of the Biblical time line.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 07:16 pm
Your supposition that Satan became Satan before humans were created implies that God knew that Adam and Eve would be subject to his attack.

The timing of Satan's rebellion was determined only by Satan. By inciting A&E to join him in his revolt, he raised many issues he may have thought would give him an upper hand.

If God forgave Adam and Eve, he could be accused of lying about the death penalty. This would also call into question his standard of justice.

If he destroyed all rebels immediately, as he could have, it would mean that he was unable to carry out his purpose to have humans inhabiting the earth - at least humans who were descended from Adam and Eve, who he had already declared 'good'.

Then there was the question of whether any intelligent being would serve God out of love.

And still a greater issue: that of whether God is worthy of being sovereign of the universe.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 09:00 pm
Why does god need to be served? Ego?
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Jul, 2007 11:20 pm
neologist wrote:
mesquite wrote:
neologist wrote:
It is obvious from the language of Genesis that God does not always measure days in terms of 24 hours.
First of All, Genesis 2:4 lumps all of the creative days into one: "This is a history of the heavens and the earth in the time of their being created, in the day that Jehovah God made earth and heaven."
The seventh day has never been recorded as having ended.
"For a thousand years are in your eyes but as yesterday when it is past,
And as a watch during the night." (Psalm 90:4)


The creation days were clearly 24 hour days as the Hebrew word yom was used with a number and the phrasing evening and morning. Whenever yom is used with a number modifier it refers to a literal 24 hour day. This is true in the 359 uses of that word outside chapter one of Genesis. The seventh day fits this pattern the same as all the others associated with a number. The psalm quote merely refers to the perception of time.
Really?! Even in Genesis 2:4? Genesis 5:1? And BTW, for that matter, there was no number associated with Genesis 2:17.

Yes, really. Day (yom) can have multiple meanings in English as well as in Hebrew. It can mean a solar day or a longer period of time. If I were to say "back in my day things were done differently", day would be referring to a longer period of time. Context is what determines the meaning. In Genesis 2:4 the context is obviously rolling together a longer period of time and not a specific event that occurred on a singular day. Note the lack of a number assignment also. Genesis 2:17 however does tie it to a specific event (eating the fruit) so the context sets it to a single day.


neologist wrote:
mesquite wrote:


neologist wrote:
A&E, lost their physical perfection and began to die as soon as they disobeyed. You have heard the term 'dead man walking', have you not?
.
Perfection? Where does god say he made them perfect? In Genesis 1:31 God said he made them very good not perfect.

[31]And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
Also written by the same author but different book "He is the Rock, his work is perfect. . ." (Deuteronomy 32:4) If you wish to impeach me using the bible, you will need to read the bible.

Don't blame me because your authors can't keep their stories straight. Within the context of the story we are discussing "very good" is the operative term. Deuteronomy is a different book, different style and almost certainly a different author. WHO WROTE THE PENTATEUCH?
neologist wrote:
mesquite wrote:


They didn't even know good from bad. Had they been made perfect God would not have had to boot them out of Eden.
Had they been made according to your definition of perfect, they would have been robots, incapable of error. "
mesquite wrote:
neologist wrote:
As far as the tree of life is concerned, the fact that I am not willing to speculate does not mean there is no explanation. If it's so important, I will spend some time on it.

It is important because it is given as the reason for booting A&E out of Eden. lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
Not the reason - a reason, perhaps, but the (apparently metaphorical) flaming sword would have sufficed in case they tried to sneak back in. (Genesis 3:24)

According to the Bible it is the reason. There may have been others, but that requires speculation. Keeping them away from the tree of life is the only reason given for their banishment.

Gen 3:22-24 (ESV)
[22]Then the Lord God said, "Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. "

[23]therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken.

[24]He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jul, 2007 12:06 am
neologist wrote:
The timing of Satan's rebellion was determined only by Satan. By inciting A&E to join him in his revolt, he raised many issues he may have thought would give him an upper hand.

A whole bunch of ad libbing going on there.

neologist wrote:
If God forgave Adam and Eve, he could be accused of lying about the death penalty. This would also call into question his standard of justice.

As it is now written he did lie. They did not die in the day that they ate of the tree.

neologist wrote:
If he destroyed all rebels immediately, as he could have, it would mean that he was unable to carry out his purpose to have humans inhabiting the earth - at least humans who were descended from Adam and Eve, who he had already declared 'good'.

He declared them good then cursed them (and their descendants?) when they turned out to have faults. So says the Bible .
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jul, 2007 12:27 am
Yeah, how many generations was that? God knew everything, and yet took revenge in a way that makes no sense to any christian (if they can be honest with themselves) or atheist. What ever happened to free will if he takes it away before they are able to practice it?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jul, 2007 01:19 am
mesquite wrote:
neologist wrote:
mesquite wrote:
neologist wrote:
It is obvious from the language of Genesis that God does not always measure days in terms of 24 hours.
First of All, Genesis 2:4 lumps all of the creative days into one: "This is a history of the heavens and the earth in the time of their being created, in the day that Jehovah God made earth and heaven."
The seventh day has never been recorded as having ended.
"For a thousand years are in your eyes but as yesterday when it is past,
And as a watch during the night." (Psalm 90:4)


The creation days were clearly 24 hour days as the Hebrew word yom was used with a number and the phrasing evening and morning. Whenever yom is used with a number modifier it refers to a literal 24 hour day. This is true in the 359 uses of that word outside chapter one of Genesis. The seventh day fits this pattern the same as all the others associated with a number. The psalm quote merely refers to the perception of time.
Really?! Even in Genesis 2:4? Genesis 5:1? And BTW, for that matter, there was no number associated with Genesis 2:17.

Yes, really. Day (yom) can have multiple meanings in English as well as in Hebrew. It can mean a solar day or a longer period of time. If I were to say "back in my day things were done differently", day would be referring to a longer period of time. Context is what determines the meaning. In Genesis 2:4 the context is obviously rolling together a longer period of time and not a specific event that occurred on a singular day. Note the lack of a number assignment also. Genesis 2:17 however does tie it to a specific event (eating the fruit) so the context sets it to a single day.
Are you aware of the importance of the lack of the definite article in Genesis 1:5, Genesis 1:8, Genesis 1:13, Genesis 1:19, Genesis 1:23, and Genesis 1:31?
neologist wrote:
mesquite wrote:


neologist wrote:
A&E, lost their physical perfection and began to die as soon as they disobeyed. You have heard the term 'dead man walking', have you not?
.
Perfection? Where does god say he made them perfect? In Genesis 1:31 God said he made them very good not perfect.

[31]And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
Also written by the same author but different book "He is the Rock, his work is perfect. . ." (Deuteronomy 32:4) If you wish to impeach me using the bible, you will need to read the bible.

Don't blame me because your authors can't keep their stories straight. Within the context of the story we are discussing "very good" is the operative term. Deuteronomy is a different book, different style and almost certainly a different author. WHO WROTE THE PENTATEUCH? Moses is generally considered the author of all five books and the book of Job. God is referred to as perfect throughout the bible.
neologist wrote:
mesquite wrote:


They didn't even know good from bad. Had they been made perfect God would not have had to boot them out of Eden.
Had they been made according to your definition of perfect, they would have been robots, incapable of error. "
mesquite wrote:
neologist wrote:
As far as the tree of life is concerned, the fact that I am not willing to speculate does not mean there is no explanation. If it's so important, I will spend some time on it.

It is important because it is given as the reason for booting A&E out of Eden. lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
Not the reason - a reason, perhaps, but the (apparently metaphorical) flaming sword would have sufficed in case they tried to sneak back in. (Genesis 3:24)

According to the Bible it is the reason. There may have been others, but that requires speculation. Keeping them away from the tree of life is the only reason given for their banishment.

Gen 3:22-24 (ESV)
[22]Then the Lord God said, "Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. "

[23]therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken.

[24]He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.
If banishing them from the Garden was sufficient, why the cherubs?
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Jul, 2007 05:42 am
Neo wrote:
Moses is generally considered the author of all five books and the book of Job. God is referred to as perfect throughout the bible.


I love those "perfect" Gods that slaughters children and gives little virgin girls to soldiers to be "married"; a politically correct Biblical term for rape.

If that's perfection than no one has the right to complain about out the wars and genocide that periodically takes here on earth.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 12:15 am
neologist wrote:
mesquite wrote:

Yes, really. Day (yom) can have multiple meanings in English as well as in Hebrew. It can mean a solar day or a longer period of time. If I were to say "back in my day things were done differently", day would be referring to a longer period of time. Context is what determines the meaning. In Genesis 2:4 the context is obviously rolling together a longer period of time and not a specific event that occurred on a singular day. Note the lack of a number assignment also. Genesis 2:17 however does tie it to a specific event (eating the fruit) so the context sets it to a single day.

Are you aware of the importance of the lack of the definite article in Genesis 1:5, Genesis 1:8, Genesis 1:13, Genesis 1:19, Genesis 1:23, and Genesis 1:31?

All of those verses use similar phrasing assigning a numerical order and using evening and morning to tie it to the solar day. i.e. 5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

neologist wrote:
mesquite wrote:

Don't blame me because your authors can't keep their stories straight. Within the context of the story we are discussing "very good" is the operative term. Deuteronomy is a different book, different style and almost certainly a different author. WHO WROTE THE PENTATEUCH?

Moses is generally considered the author of all five books and the book of Job. God is referred to as perfect throughout the bible.

Generally considered because the Bible says so? That may be true for conservative and fundamentalist sects that believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, but mainline and liberal theologians generally accept the "Documentary Hypothesis" which asserts that four authors over a period of centuries and from different locations in Palestine wrote the Moses books. There also was a fifth individual that assembled the other fours works into the present Pentateuch.
neologist wrote:
mesquite wrote:

According to the Bible it is the reason. There may have been others, but that requires speculation. Keeping them away from the tree of life is the only reason given for their banishment.

Gen 3:22-24 (ESV)
[22]Then the Lord God said, "Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. "

[23]therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken.

[24]He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.

If banishing them from the Garden was sufficient, why the cherubs?

Sufficient is your word, but what is your point? As the Bible says, they were booted from Eden to keep them from the tree of life and the cherubs and the flaming swords were to guard the way to the tree of life.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Sun 15 Jul, 2007 12:53 am
When you choose to use the bible to examine the bible, it dilutes your argument when you resort to the speculations of "mainline and liberal theologians".

Your argument about the 24 hour day fails again when you contemplate the time it must have taken for Adam to have named all the animals. (Genesis 2:19, 20) If you imagine that Moses gullibly believed the six creative days lasted only 144 hours under the 'all things possible with God' speculation, then how would it be possible for a human to name the animals in only 24 hours?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 01:53:57