2
   

Why does the god of the Bible consider slavery to be moral??

 
 
Talkactive
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Jul, 2007 07:08 am
mesquite wrote:
Talkactive wrote:
Here is what Wikipedia inform about slavery in the Scriptures, which was strictly regulated and merely a form of social ordinance/welfare, totally different from kidnapping of people for slavery and the cruel and evil way slaves have been treated, e.g. the Jews in former Egypt and black people in America.


Oh really, just a form of social welfare? I'll ask you the same question I asked neo's other buddy here. Is your deception intentional or out of ignorance? For someone that quotes scripture as much as you two do I can only assume intentional.

Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT
However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way.

Please explain to me what you see that is different in that description from what was practiced in the early days of the US.


First of all I like to state that God is against every form of slavery and that is also my view, as I stated in a previously post, even religious slavery. Only because we have got our free will, with a possibility to choose between evil and good, an universal question, it was necessary to make regulations or laws, like we have laws today based at much from the Scriptures and it's quite interesting to notice what Solomon wrote about control over others in Eccleasiates 8:9.

8:9 All this have I seen, and applied my heart unto every work that is done under the sun: there is a time wherein one man ruleth over another to his own hurt.

It has never been Gods intension and meaning that slavery should occur and maybe you can understand the principles in and when Jesus he said to the Jews, that it was only because of their stone hearts that God had admitted them to divorce from their spouses, which wasn't alloved from the beginning.

So there is a big difference between kidnapping persons to be sold for slavery, without any regulations as it was in e.g. Egypt and the former US, opposite those at the time of the Scriptures, with clear regulations as stated in the Scriptures, who have ended up in or put themself and their family in situations where they have to labour for others, (like mostly of us today have to do) to be able to pay back, take care of their families, to get a place to live and food to survive, instead of today get coupons or other forms of social welfare without any obligations.

Will you pls. describe and define how you look at and observe slavery, since there are many forms of slavery, e.g. you can be a slave of your own demands, gambling, sex, alcohol, drugs, stuffs and money or even at the company you work for, or people or cooperates who have lend you money.

In our part of the world, for some hundred years ago, if someone was unable to pay his/her depts, the court ruled that people has to go to prison and in this situation, they was definitely cut of from paying of their depts, take care of and pay the expenses for their families, opposite those mentioned in the Scriptures, which got a possibility to work and pay of their debts, a place to live and food and was free after a certain period.

What unfortunately is valid, are that there have always been humans who have treated other humans cruel and evil without compassion and love, thereforer we need laws and regulations, but the Scriptures promise that this will be brought to and end in the future, physical and religious slavery.

It is therefore interesting to se and have in mind what Isaiah wrote in chapter 65:20-25 and John in Revelation 21:4 opposite all the unjustness in the world.

65:20 There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days: for the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.

65:21 And they shall build houses, and inhabit them; and they shall plant vineyards, and eat the fruit of them.

65:22 They shall not build, and another inhabit; they shall not plant, and another eat: for as the days of a tree are the days of my people, and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands.

65:23 They shall not labour in vain, nor bring forth for trouble; for they are the seed of the blessed of the LORD, and their offspring with them.

65:24 And it shall come to pass, that before they call, I will answer; and while they are yet speaking, I will hear.

65:25 The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD.

21:4 And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.

This is what the Scriptures promise for the future and I believe that this hope is better than every promise political and religious leaders have been and are going to give and I'm not defending slavery in any form but in the meantime we have to deal with troublesome situations which we have put ourselves in or others have created which brings us in a certain situation or a form of slavery, even that we like to call ourselves free agents under responsibility.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jul, 2007 08:12 pm
xingu wrote:
Another great contradiction in the Bible?

The Golden Rule is universal among different religions.

So how many slave owners would like to be slaves?

None you think?

Why does God endorse slavery?

Maybe God doesn't; it's the men who wrote the Bible that do; and they're not God nor did they get their message from God.


You are inventing wheels to spin... Smile
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jul, 2007 08:21 pm
We need only look back a brief while to find how varied cultures are and why these customs were practiced.

For instance the earliest "civilized" cultures did not bury their dead but left them out for days for the birds to eat at their flesh. Also they did not cook their meats and they lived in squalor and without even basic laws, social justice or common language.

Compared to their neighbors they were considered barbarians but over time most assimilated. Yet assimilation is the best course it is not always available. Some social rifts go so deep that no amount of organic unions will bring peace to the table.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jul, 2007 08:34 pm
So now we learn that "culture" is the culprit; not the god who made the laws. So, god makes laws subservient to what humans do. That's a very interesting take on interpretation.
0 Replies
 
IFeelFree
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jul, 2007 09:04 pm
RexRed wrote:
For instance the earliest "civilized" cultures did not bury their dead but left them out for days for the birds to eat at their flesh. Also they did not cook their meats and they lived in squalor and without even basic laws, social justice or common language.

How do you know this?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jul, 2007 09:28 pm
IFF: How do you know this?


He was there. LOL
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jul, 2007 10:02 pm
IFeelFree wrote:
RexRed wrote:
For instance the earliest "civilized" cultures did not bury their dead but left them out for days for the birds to eat at their flesh. Also they did not cook their meats and they lived in squalor and without even basic laws, social justice or common language.

How do you know this?


I just saw it just recently on a program on the discovery channel, there are ancient writings describing the heathens and their lack of virtuous social customs. In some cases they assimilated and in others genocide occurs.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 05:01 am
Rex

Some early humans, heathens, as you call them, did practice human sacrifice. Some never did. To make a blanket statement that all early humans practiced human sacrifice is wrong.

You say they lacked "virtuous social customs." This is really a stupid statement. Are you, pompous and arrogant, to sit in judgement of early humans with the advantage of thousands of years of mistakes and learning made by your ancestors? If so you are an ass.

RexRed wrote:
For instance the earliest "civilized" cultures did not bury their dead but left them out for days for the birds to eat at their flesh. Also they did not cook their meats and they lived in squalor and without even basic laws, social justice or common language.


This is not true. Again your making a blanket statement without knowing what your talking about. You didn't identify any of the "civilized" cultures meaning you have no idea what your talking about. I might also point out that your Christian ancestors in Europe lived in squalor. Try reading a little history about 17th century London, for example.

Your showing your ignorant prejudices and in doing so making yourself look stupid.

Let's go back to the Neanderthals. They became extinct before the conservative fundamentalist Christian earth was formed.

Quote:
Neanderthals
There is evidence to suggest that even as far back as prehistoric times, Neanderthal man buried their dead with flowers. This suggests a certain emotional concern for the well being of the dead and might indicate a belief in an afterlife of some kind. Another piece of evidence that backs up this theory is the fact that Neanderthals also buried their dead in a curled position facing the sunrise. They probably believed that the dead would eventually wake up into a new life.


How about the American Indians?
Quote:
Dakota Indian Tribe
The Dakota Indians bury their dead with much wailing and mourning. It is common for women to cut their arms and legs until they bleed. Meanwhile the men blacken their face with ash.The deceased is dressed in fine clothes and the face is painted red to symbolise life. The Dakota Indians believe that their dead will be reborn into a better life. When the deceased has been dressed and painted, he is taken to a platform which has been specially prepared for the occasion. The body is placed on the platform with all of his favourite things in life so that he does not have to come back for anything that he has forgotten.


Quote:
Aborigine Tribes
Aborigines do not recognise any form of natural death and as a consequence they treat all deaths as a type of murder. When a person dies, the rest of the tribe show their pain and mourning by wailing. This is also a way of showing their innocence regarding the murder. The dead body is covered with red earth and painted with yellow and white tribal markings. The earth represents the blood of birth, indicating a belief in the afterlife. The markings transform the dead body into a sacred being.


http://www.britishcouncil.org/learnenglish-central-magazine-death.htm

Different cultures and religions had different ways of expressing grief and reacting to death. Your pompous ass seems to think that anything not Christian or like us is barbaric. You have no right to sit in judgement of them, denigrate them, when you have not walked their walk.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 08:13 am
No need for non believers to create straw men when the 'believers' provide them in abundance.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 08:16 am
You can't seem to say anything except strawmen Neo. Not much contribution on your part.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 08:24 am
I can't help Rex out of the hole he has dug for himself. You have answered him as I would.

Humans have always shown evidence of compassion and empathy. In fact, it is often the religionists who provide the perversions.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 08:26 am
xingu wrote:
Rex

Some early humans, heathens, as you call them, did practice human sacrifice. Some never did. To make a blanket statement that all early humans practiced human sacrifice is wrong.

You say they lacked "virtuous social customs." This is really a stupid statement. Are you, pompous and arrogant, to sit in judgement of early humans with the advantage of thousands of years of mistakes and learning made by your ancestors? If so you are an ass.

RexRed wrote:
For instance the earliest "civilized" cultures did not bury their dead but left them out for days for the birds to eat at their flesh. Also they did not cook their meats and they lived in squalor and without even basic laws, social justice or common language.


This is not true. Again your making a blanket statement without knowing what your talking about. You didn't identify any of the "civilized" cultures meaning you have no idea what your talking about. I might also point out that your Christian ancestors in Europe lived in squalor. Try reading a little history about 17th century London, for example.

Your showing your ignorant prejudices and in doing so making yourself look stupid.

Let's go back to the Neanderthals. They became extinct before the conservative fundamentalist Christian earth was formed.

Quote:
Neanderthals
There is evidence to suggest that even as far back as prehistoric times, Neanderthal man buried their dead with flowers. This suggests a certain emotional concern for the well being of the dead and might indicate a belief in an afterlife of some kind. Another piece of evidence that backs up this theory is the fact that Neanderthals also buried their dead in a curled position facing the sunrise. They probably believed that the dead would eventually wake up into a new life.


How about the American Indians?
Quote:
Dakota Indian Tribe
The Dakota Indians bury their dead with much wailing and mourning. It is common for women to cut their arms and legs until they bleed. Meanwhile the men blacken their face with ash.The deceased is dressed in fine clothes and the face is painted red to symbolise life. The Dakota Indians believe that their dead will be reborn into a better life. When the deceased has been dressed and painted, he is taken to a platform which has been specially prepared for the occasion. The body is placed on the platform with all of his favourite things in life so that he does not have to come back for anything that he has forgotten.


Quote:
Aborigine Tribes
Aborigines do not recognise any form of natural death and as a consequence they treat all deaths as a type of murder. When a person dies, the rest of the tribe show their pain and mourning by wailing. This is also a way of showing their innocence regarding the murder. The dead body is covered with red earth and painted with yellow and white tribal markings. The earth represents the blood of birth, indicating a belief in the afterlife. The markings transform the dead body into a sacred being.


http://www.britishcouncil.org/learnenglish-central-magazine-death.htm

Different cultures and religions had different ways of expressing grief and reacting to death. Your pompous ass seems to think that anything not Christian or like us is barbaric. You have no right to sit in judgement of them, denigrate them, when you have not walked their walk.


I never even mentioned human sacrifice... (but I should have) Smile
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 08:29 am
Romans 12:1
I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.


Comment: We (Christians) are to present our bodies as a "living sacrifice" not a dead sacrifice of the flesh...
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 08:46 am
RexRed wrote:
Romans 12:1
I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.


Comment: We (Christians) are to present our bodies as a "living sacrifice" not a dead sacrifice of the flesh...


So tell me Rex, when was Romans written?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 09:10 am
xingu wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Romans 12:1
I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service.


Comment: We (Christians) are to present our bodies as a "living sacrifice" not a dead sacrifice of the flesh...


So tell me Rex, when was Romans written?


Most of it was written sometime in the first century...
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 09:14 am
Therefore what you claim your God said when Romans was written does not apply in any way to events that happened before it was written.

BTW, did your God at any time in the past demand human sacrifice?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 09:17 am
xingu wrote:
. . . BTW, did your God at any time in the past demand human sacrifice?
No. Christ offered himself up willingly.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 09:28 am
neologist wrote:
xingu wrote:
. . . BTW, did your God at any time in the past demand human sacrifice?
No. Christ offered himself up willingly.


Interesting...

Not his own will but God's will he obeyed...

So that is still willingly but with a slight twist.

It was Jesus' willingness to disobey his own will (or legal nature) that saved him.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 09:49 am
If he gave himself willingly, why did he cry "why hast thou forsaken me?"
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Jul, 2007 09:50 am
neologist wrote:
xingu wrote:
. . . BTW, did your God at any time in the past demand human sacrifice?
No. Christ offered himself up willingly.


So 4,000 years ago Christ offered himself up?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/03/2025 at 06:10:15