Reply
Mon 15 Jan, 2007 07:21 pm
KINGSTON, Jamaica: Preoccupation with Iraq has drawn attention from another unwinnable American war that has been far more destructive of life both at home and abroad and has caused far greater collateral damage in other countries, in addition to spreading contempt for American foreign engagements. This is the failed war on drugs.
It was Nixon who, in 1971, first declared war on drugs. As with Iraq, the strategy is flawed in its conception and execution, made worse by a refusal to change course in the face of failure.
It strongly emphasizes eradicating the source of drugs, interdiction of traffic and draconian punishment for offenders. It neglects what nearly every expert believes ?- and European experience has shown ?- to be the only successful strategy: a demand-side emphasis on preventive programs and rehabilitation of addicts.
The present administration's claims of a shift to preventive measures is belied by the budget of its drug control office, which allocates a 94 percent share to disrupting the supply, mainly through environmentally hazardous spraying in Latin America and the Caribbean that alienates local farmers.
The domestic results are tragic: an enormous increase in the incarceration of young, disproportionately minority Americans, resulting in the waste of human resources and the creation of a prison culture that converts nonviolent addicts into hardened criminals, without any impact on drug use. Within a year of release, 43.5 percent of drug offenders are rearrested.
Today in Opinion
Bush's nuclear busywork Earning a bad reputation Catch a falling star
Recent surveys indicate a steady increase in the use of illicit drugs: More than 40 percent of Americans over 12 have used them at some point. Nearly all Caribbean societies are involved with narcotrafficking and, in the case of Jamaica, large-scale production and export of marijuana. In 2001, illicit drug shipments in the region were worth more money than the top five legitimate exports combined.
The results have been devastating. Political corruption and payment in arms threatens the sovereignty and stability of many states. In 1985, the chief minister and minister of commerce of the Turks and Caicos Islands were arrested in Miami and imprisoned in America for drug offenses.
Drug addiction and violent crime are now endemic in Jamaica, Puerto Rico and even small islands like St. Kitts. The corruption of the police and other security forces has reached a crisis point in Jamaica, where an officer can earn the equivalent of half a year's salary by simply looking the other way. Last year, 1,300 people were murdered here, in a population of only 3 million ?- and that was an improvement on the previous year.
Dr. Peter Phillips, Jamaica's very competent minister of national security, estimates that 60 percent of the murders are drug-related. Calling cocaine trafficking and use the "taproot" of a "web of criminality," he said drugs sustain a "self-perpetuating culture of extreme violence" extending to many areas of the society.
The drug culture is highly transnational and organized, exemplified by the Jamaican "posses" that terrorized America in the 1980s with some 4,900 murders. Traffickers increasingly operate offshore, taking advantage of better arms, faster boats and more efficient tracking equipment than those available to local security forces.
Phillips is puzzled by America's inflexible emphasis on eradication and interdiction, and its refusal to provide help where it is most needed, like the rebuilding of corrupted police forces. He provided a telling example of the futility of current approaches. With Americans and Jamaicans working closely together recently, the percentage of trans-shipments of Colombian cocaine to the United States that went through Jamaica was reduced from 20 to 2. But this had no effect on the amount of cocaine entering America ?- the traffickers simply changed routes ?- and it increased violent crime in Jamaica. Drug dons became more murderous in turf wars, as there was less cocaine and money to go around.
America's unwillingness to recognize the socioeconomic context of the drug crisis at home and abroad, to see that being surrounded by failing states threatens its security, to provide aid where it is most effective, and to acknowledge that the root cause of this hemispheric disaster is not supply but its own citizens' insatiable demand for illicit drugs, is as incomprehensible as the quagmire in Iraq.
I've said this before, at least a dozen times, and I may as well say it again. Get it through your skulls, folks that there is no war on drugs. There is a concerted (if sneaky) attack on our civil liberties. There is a mechanism for providing well-paying jobs for the relatives of Washington insiders who are furnished with badges and police powers. It seems that we learned nothing from the failed attempt at Prohibition. The 18th Amendment was what made organized crime profitable and led to the Mafia getting a foothold in North America in the 1920s. Today it's the drug trade which is responsible for most of the murders and gang warfare in our inner cities and the serious overcrowding in our prisons. We have made criminals out of people who are merely sick -- addicted to a substance which should be controlled and taxed the same way alcohol and tobacco products are. It would go a long way toward alleviating the crime statistics in this country.
(In the interests of full disclosure, I neither use drugs nor consume alcohol. I do smoke cigarettes.)
Agree with every word... save I drink and have been known to occasionally smoke strong cigarettes. :wink: Tried lots of stuff as a kid and the only thing that ever addicted me was these friggin cigarettes.
OCCOM BILL wrote:Agree with every word... save I drink and have been known to occasionally smoke strong cigarettes. :wink: Tried lots of stuff as a kid and the only thing that ever addicted me was these friggin cigarettes.
I used to drink fairly heavily and if somebody was passing a bone around at a party, I'd gladly take a hit. Found that it wasn't that hard to give it up when I decided that it was interfering with clear thinking. The butts, now, that's a different matter. Probably the most addictive substance available without a prescription.
I think you're right. Pot and Booze are nothing more than gateway drugs to the real killer; cigarettes.
OCCOM BILL wrote:I think you're right. Pot and Booze are nothing more than gateway drugs to the real killer; cigarettes.
There's a reason pot is a gateway drug. When we tell kids that all drugs are bad and they try pot for the first time and it leaves them not wanting more right away then they see no harm. They think we adults lied about every drug and they try it. That is where the harm comes from.
I smoke I'll be honest. I have a dog in the legalization fight. Pot is the only drug that should be legalized. It doesn't create the same types of issues that other drugs do. It doesn't cause you to be physically addicted but it does have a mental component. I have never had a negative effect from pot to include wanting to rob someone so that I could get more. Other drugs have this effect but not pot. This past election here in CO we had to vote for legalization and I voted yes. It didn't pass but that is going to be a not yet. I don't support the legalization of the dangerous drugs like meth, coke, herion, crack and pcp. Those have a negative effect on society and destroy families.
Pot or ciggies, your still sucking smoke, which I cannot believe is ever a real good idea.
Baldimo wrote:OCCOM BILL wrote:I think you're right. Pot and Booze are nothing more than gateway drugs to the real killer; cigarettes.
There's a reason pot is a gateway drug. When we tell kids that all drugs are bad and they try pot for the first time and it leaves them not wanting more right away then they see no harm. They think we adults lied about every drug and they try it. That is where the harm comes from.
I smoke I'll be honest. I have a dog in the legalization fight. Pot is the only drug that should be legalized. It doesn't create the same types of issues that other drugs do. It doesn't cause you to be physically addicted but it does have a mental component. I have never had a negative effect from pot to include wanting to rob someone so that I could get more. Other drugs have this effect but not pot. This past election here in CO we had to vote for legalization and I voted yes. It didn't pass but that is going to be a not yet. I don't support the legalization of the dangerous drugs like meth, coke, herion, crack and pcp. Those have a negative effect on society and destroy families.
Agree ++++1000%
You described exactly my situation above - I didn't move on to trying coke and the other harder drugs (I could see what it did to my friends, no thanks) but I felt betrayed as well when I tried pot and it didn't do anything too bad to me.
Bill,
THe cigs. Jeesh. Took me years to quit, now it's been almost three. You are correct, they are the most insiduous and dangerous drug you can get here in America, and they're legal!
Our system is so screwy...
Cycloptichorn
Gosh, we seem to have found some common ground. Though I have never smoked any substance, I don't see why pot is not legalized. That said, I don't think legalizing pot would do anything to alleviate the problems with other drugs that this thread opened with. And legalizing something (heroin, pcp, etc) just because it causes problems as an illegal substance is not the way I would want our legal system to start thinking proper. (Hmm, awful lot of people out there driving drunk. Maybe if we just legalize drunk driving...)
CoastalRat wrote:Gosh, we seem to have found some common ground. Though I have never smoked any substance, I don't see why pot is not legalized. That said, I don't think legalizing pot would do anything to alleviate the problems with other drugs that this thread opened with. And legalizing something (heroin, pcp, etc) just because it causes problems as an illegal substance is not the way I would want our legal system to start thinking proper. (Hmm, awful lot of people out there driving drunk. Maybe if we just legalize drunk driving...)
It could be legalized with restrictions, like only in your own home, no driving except to the corner to get snacks, and having to wait a minimum 24 hours before implimenting any "great" ideas.
squinney wrote:CoastalRat wrote:Gosh, we seem to have found some common ground. Though I have never smoked any substance, I don't see why pot is not legalized. That said, I don't think legalizing pot would do anything to alleviate the problems with other drugs that this thread opened with. And legalizing something (heroin, pcp, etc) just because it causes problems as an illegal substance is not the way I would want our legal system to start thinking proper. (Hmm, awful lot of people out there driving drunk. Maybe if we just legalize drunk driving...)
It could be legalized with restrictions, like only in your own home, no driving except to the corner to get snacks, and having to wait a minimum 24 hours before implimenting any "great" ideas.
I agree. Same rescritctions as drinking.
at the very least decriminalize simple possesion, a fine for a small amount makes more sense than jail time
djjd62 wrote:at the very least decriminalize simple possesion, a fine for a small amount makes more sense than jail time
CO where I live has fines for anything under on ounce. Over an ounce and you are considered selling.
100 dollar ticket for anything under an Oz here.
Of course, you could always get your license... and then it's smooooth sailing. Up to 8 oz legal, bagged however; 16 or so plants legalized and 24 immature plants. Nice
Cycloptichorn
cyclo
What happens if a fed catches you. Took me 35 years to break my cig addiction. I've been free of it for 20 years and whenever I smell one I still want one.
Ah.. so good to see left and right come together.. appropriate too. Peace and love man..
rabel22 wrote:cyclo
What happens if a fed catches you. Took me 35 years to break my cig addiction. I've been free of it for 20 years and whenever I smell one I still want one.
My guess is that you go to jail if a Fed catches you. But that's exceedingly rare.
I hate the cigs, and love them.
Cycloptichorn
Cycloptichorn wrote:rabel22 wrote:cyclo
What happens if a fed catches you. Took me 35 years to break my cig addiction. I've been free of it for 20 years and whenever I smell one I still want one.
My guess is that you go to jail if a Fed catches you. But that's exceedingly rare.
I hate the cigs, and love them.
Cycloptichorn
The problem with all the state laws that either legalize or decriminalize pot (either outright or through licensing on doctor's prescription) is that the stuff is still illegal under Federal law. No DEA narc is likely to target a recreational smoker but, technically, they could. In theory you could be brought up on Federal charges for having a nickel bag in your possession. And the downside of getting licensed to possess grass for medicinal purposes is that now your name's on a register. Feds have easy access to that information. If they're ever in the mood to make a clean sweep, you'll be among the first to be brought up on Federal charges; the fact that you broke no state laws will cut no ice whatever.
Anybody notice the poll results at the top of the page? The consensus seems clear every time the subject comes up; so why is there no politician willing to go to bat for the will of the people?