That does sound good, dadpad.
Soup is also a good choice. I'm sure you can find a suitable recipe on A2K somewhere. Do you feel up to baking some homemade bread? If not get some from the local artisan bread shop. Serve with a crisp salad and a nice wine and you've got a very impressive meal.
Then you can focus on a showstopper dessert. Maybe a flan or something your European friend might not find too sweet.
A friend sent me the link to this thread.
I will read it and be back later.
I just read the thread title as "The Art of the Donner Party."
Should I be worried?
That was probably "process art"...
There was just a great no-knead bread in the NYT that makes an amazing boule. It's truly a no-brainer and looks and tastes like a phenomenal French bread. There are a couple of discussion forums (including on the NYT site itself) that have wide-ranging discussions on what can be done with the basic recipe.
A coupla fresh boules and you'll have people oohing and aahing. A stew/chili kinda thing with the boule, some cold veggie thing, and then fruit and cheese for dessert - you'll have a major score on your hands.
(I can recommend figs and a blue cheese as part of the afters mmmmmmm)
Ah, I saved that article...
haven't tried making the bread yet..
(I'm rather stuck on my old way of breadmaking,
but plan to try the new way...)
Try it, OssoB. It's amazing.
I could fall in love with the photos of some of the boules.
One of my local foodie friends made it with her 7 y.o. daughter in charge - gorgeous gorgeous tasty bread. The crust on that thing ... to die for.
ehBeth, Soz said she did chili last time. I found a recipe online for beef burgundy. (I'd spell it the French way if I knew how.)
This sounds pretty good and would satisfy the guy who likes meat. It's hearty, which makes it a good cold-weather dish.
Burgundy Beef and Vegetable Stew
1 tablespoon vegetable oil
2 pounds stew beef, cut in 1-inch pieces
2 cloves garlic, finely minced
1 teaspoon dried thyme leaves
1/2 teaspoon salt
1/4 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper
1 can beef broth, or about 1 1/2 cups
1/2 cup burgundy wine
1 1/2 cups sliced carrots
2 cups frozen whole pearl onions
2 tablespoons cornstarch combined with 1 tablespoon cold water
1 cup frozen peas, thawed
In a Dutch oven or stock pot, heat oil over medium heat until hot; add half of beef and garlic and brown evenly, stirring occasionally; repeat with remaining beef and garlic. Pour off excess fat; season beef with thyme, salt and pepper. Add beef broth and wine; bring to a boil, reduce heat to low, cover tightly, and simmer 1 1/2 hours, or until beef is tender. Add carrots and onions; cover and cook 25 minutes. Stir in cornstarch mixture, along with peas; bring to a boil. Cook, stirring, for 3 minutes or until thickened.
This would go well over wide noodles.
Soz, you said it, cook ahead. Italian always works, like lasagna, chicken or veal parmagian, shrimp creole over rice.
You know, those people will enjoy you and your family. Stop worrying. Why am I saying that, when I turn into a real bear until we sit down to eat. Afterward, it just feels so great to think you pulled the whole thing off, it's over with, and he house is spotless. Keep seeing it that way each time you panic. We all panic.
Yeah, that's a classic. Boeuf Bourg (I can't spell it either).
I'm going to look up my copy of the new way to make bread and post it - It's amazingly easy, I can tell.
I'm partial to my italian country breads (well, not mine, but Carol Fields') which I've never tasted anything as good as. I may end up fooling with the mix of old and new, once I try the new.
Back in a bit.
This article had all sorts of how to do it photos with it. One can see them by paying a small fee - in this case I think well worth it - by looking at the link and then following through to the article and photos.
Alas I don't want to give my link as it has my name all over it - so you'd have to look the title up in the NYT archives. Or, ehBeth's food forums may have more to look at.
I do really like Bittman's columns, and wonder if he has a book either out or in the works.
The Secret of Great Bread: Let Time Do the Work
By MARK BITTMAN
Published: November 8, 2006
INNOVATIONS in bread baking are rare. In fact, the 6,000-year-old process hasn't changed much since Pasteur made the commercial production of standardized yeast possible in 1859. The introduction of the gas stove, the electric mixer and the food processor made the process easier, faster and more reliable. I'm not counting sliced bread as a positive step, but Jim Lahey's method may be the greatest thing since.
This story began in late September when Mr. Lahey sent an e-mail message inviting me to attend a session of a class he was giving at Sullivan Street Bakery, which he owns, at 533 West 47th Street in Manhattan. His wording was irresistible: "I'll be teaching a truly minimalist breadmaking technique that allows people to make excellent bread at home with very little effort. The method is surprisingly simple ?- I think a 4-year-old could master it ?- and the results are fantastic."
I set up a time to visit Mr. Lahey, and we baked together, and the only bad news is that you cannot put your 4-year-old to work producing bread for you. The method is complicated enough that you would need a very ambitious 8-year-old. But the results are indeed fantastic.
Mr. Lahey's method is striking on several levels. It requires no kneading. (Repeat: none.) It uses no special ingredients, equipment or techniques. It takes very little effort.
It accomplishes all of this by combining a number of unusual though not unheard of features. Most notable is that you'll need about 24 hours to create a loaf; time does almost all the work. Mr. Lahey's dough uses very little yeast, a quarter teaspoon (you almost never see a recipe with less than a teaspoon), and he compensates for this tiny amount by fermenting the dough very slowly. He mixes a very wet dough, about 42 percent water, which is at the extreme high end of the range that professional bakers use to create crisp crust and large, well-structured crumb, both of which are evident in this loaf.
The dough is so sticky that you couldn't knead it if you wanted to. It is mixed in less than a minute, then sits in a covered bowl, undisturbed, for about 18 hours. It is then turned out onto a board for 15 minutes, quickly shaped (I mean in 30 seconds), and allowed to rise again, for a couple of hours. Then it's baked. That's it.
I asked Harold McGee, who is an amateur breadmaker and best known as the author of "On Food and Cooking" (Scribner, 2004), what he thought of this method. His response: "It makes sense. The long, slow rise does over hours what intensive kneading does in minutes: it brings the gluten molecules into side-by-side alignment to maximize their opportunity to bind to each other and produce a strong, elastic network. The wetness of the dough is an important piece of this because the gluten molecules are more mobile in a high proportion of water, and so can move into alignment easier and faster than if the dough were stiff."
That's as technical an explanation as I care to have, enough to validate what I already knew: Mr. Lahey's method is creative and smart.
But until this point, it's not revolutionary. Mr. McGee said he had been kneading less and less as the years have gone by, relying on time to do the work for him. Charles Van Over, author of the authoritative book on food-processor dough making, "The Best Bread Ever" (Broadway, 1997), long ago taught me to make a very wet dough (the food processor is great at this) and let it rise slowly. And, as Mr. Lahey himself notes, "The Egyptians mixed their batches of dough with a hoe."
What makes Mr. Lahey's process revolutionary is the resulting combination of great crumb, lightness, incredible flavor ?- long fermentation gives you that ?- and an enviable, crackling crust, the feature of bread that most frequently separates the amateurs from the pros. My bread has often had thick, hard crusts, not at all bad, but not the kind that shatter when you bite into them. Producing those has been a bane of the amateur for years, because it requires getting moisture onto the bread as the crust develops.
To get that kind of a crust, professionals use steam-injected ovens. At home I have tried brushing the dough with water (a hassle and ineffective); spraying it (almost as ineffective and requiring frequent attention); throwing ice cubes on the floor of the oven (not good for the oven, and not far from ineffective); and filling a pot with stones and preheating it, then pouring boiling water over the stones to create a wet sauna (quite effective but dangerous, physically challenging and space-consuming). I was discouraged from using La Cloche, a covered stoneware dish, by my long-standing disinclination to crowd my kitchen with inessential items that accomplish only one chore. I was discouraged from buying a $5,000 steam-injected oven by its price.
It turns out there's no need for any of this. Mr. Lahey solves the problem by putting the dough in a preheated covered pot ?- a common one, a heavy one, but nothing fancy. For one loaf he used an old Le Creuset enameled cast iron pot; for another, a heavy ceramic pot. (I have used cast iron with great success.) By starting this very wet dough in a hot, covered pot, Mr. Lahey lets the crust develop in a moist, enclosed environment. The pot is in effect the oven, and that oven has plenty of steam in it. Once uncovered, a half-hour later, the crust has time to harden and brown, still in the pot, and the bread is done. (Fear not. The dough does not stick to the pot any more than it would to a preheated bread stone.)
The entire process is incredibly simple, and, in the three weeks I've been using it, absolutely reliable. Though professional bakers work with consistent flour, water, yeast and temperatures, and measure by weight, we amateurs have mostly inconsistent ingredients and measure by volume, which can make things unpredictable. Mr. Lahey thinks imprecision isn't much of a handicap and, indeed, his method seems to iron out the wrinkles: "I encourage a somewhat careless approach," he says, "and figure this may even be a disappointment to those who expect something more difficult. The proof is in the loaf."
The loaf is incredible, a fine-bakery quality, European-style boule that is produced more easily than by any other technique I've used, and will blow your mind. (It may yet change the industry. Mr. Lahey is experimenting with using it on a large scale, but although it requires far less electricity than conventional baking, it takes a lot of space and time.) It is best made with bread flour, but all-purpose flour works fine. (I've played with whole-wheat and rye flours, too; the results are fantastic.)
You or your 8-year-old may hit this perfectly on the first try, or you may not. Judgment is involved; with practice you'll get it right every time.
The baking itself is virtually foolproof, so the most important aspect is patience. Long, slow fermentation is critical. Mr. Lahey puts the time at 12 to 18 hours, but I have had much greater success at the longer time. If you are in a hurry, more yeast (three-eighths of a teaspoon) or a warmer room temperature may move things along, but really, once you're waiting 12 hours why not wait 18? Similarly, Mr. Lahey's second rising can take as little as an hour, but two hours, or even a little longer, works better.
Although even my "failed" loaves were as good as those from most bakeries, to make the loaf really sensational requires a bit of a commitment. But with just a little patience, you will be rewarded with the best no-work bread you have ever made. And that's no small thing.
Recipe: No-Knead Bread
Published: November 8, 2006
Adapted from Jim Lahey, Sullivan Street Bakery
Time: About 1½ hours plus 14 to 20 hours' rising
3 cups all-purpose or bread flour, more for dusting
¼ teaspoon instant yeast
1¼ teaspoons salt
Cornmeal or wheat bran as needed.
1. In a large bowl combine flour, yeast and salt. Add 1 5/8 cups water, and stir until blended; dough will be shaggy and sticky. Cover bowl with plastic wrap. Let dough rest at least 12 hours, preferably about 18, at warm room temperature, about 70 degrees.
2. Dough is ready when its surface is dotted with bubbles. Lightly flour a work surface and place dough on it; sprinkle it with a little more flour and fold it over on itself once or twice. Cover loosely with plastic wrap and let rest about 15 minutes.
3. Using just enough flour to keep dough from sticking to work surface or to your fingers, gently and quickly shape dough into a ball. Generously coat a cotton towel (not terry cloth) with flour, wheat bran or cornmeal; put dough seam side down on towel and dust with more flour, bran or cornmeal. Cover with another cotton towel and let rise for about 2 hours. When it is ready, dough will be more than double in size and will not readily spring back when poked with a finger.
4. At least a half-hour before dough is ready, heat oven to 450 degrees. Put a 6- to 8-quart heavy covered pot (cast iron, enamel, Pyrex or ceramic) in oven as it heats. When dough is ready, carefully remove pot from oven. Slide your hand under towel and turn dough over into pot, seam side up; it may look like a mess, but that is O.K. Shake pan once or twice if dough is unevenly distributed; it will straighten out as it bakes. Cover with lid and bake 30 minutes, then remove lid and bake another 15 to 30 minutes, until loaf is beautifully browned. Cool on a rack.
Yield: One 1½-pound loaf.
There was a video with that article. I guess they don't archive the videos. Too bad because it was great. I haven't tried that technique mainly because I don't have a Dutch oven anymore.
The one-dish meal is ideal for casual parties. What ever you decide to do, lasagne, beef burgundy (gotta have mashed potatoes with that one IMHO), coq au vin, shepherd's pie, chili, a thick hearty soup can be made in advance and either cooked all day at a low temp or made the day before and reheated.
I like the cheese and fruit for dessert idea.
Both of those look extremely promising, thanks!! (The bread and the stew.) (And I love the endless variations possible with the bread... cooool.)
Tons of ideas in one paragraph there Swimpy, thanks.
soz - you know where I hang out for food talk - there are four or five threads (one with over 700 posts) on variations/additions/technique for the no-knead bread. Apparently, it's really a very old, traditional technique. Someone may have archived the video there.
There was a follow-up article in the NYT based on all the web discussions of the original article.
Seriously <swoon> seeing that boule, and knowing my hostess had made it (and not guessing how dirt simple it is), I'd be beyond wildly impressed.
Swimpy - a couple of people have tried making it in clay bakers ... and I believe you may have one of those on hand.
<nightrider is the toronto poster at the food forum I go to who posted about making the boule in her clay baker to great success>
I'll definitely be following up on that.
Have been doing the "real menus for everyday meals" thing for the last couple of days, going well so far. Made one recipe I've tried twice before (first time for a dinner party), and third time is the charm -- that was good! One of the very first times I've made something that I could imagine ordering at a fine restaurant. (Pork chops with mustard crumbs -- the pork was super moist, super tender, super flavorful. And totally easy recipe.)
Quote:Swimpy - a couple of people have tried making it in clay bakers ... and I believe you may have one of those on hand.
No, don't have one of those either
Have you decided on a menu?
Have you ever made beer butt chicken? The best roast chicken you'll ever make.
Is that where you roast the chicken with a beer can up its backside?
Swimpy wrote:Is that where you roast the chicken with a beer can up its backside?
That would make sense. And here I've been using huge cask of beer!