1
   

Do We Have Free Will?

 
 
NNY
 
  1  
Reply Sun 20 Jul, 2003 11:54 pm
We have no true free will because whatever we do, even my rebellion of the idea, is all created by the media, the structures of life, and the controlling nature of mankind.


Futilism lumps in with Time.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2003 09:59 am
When I make plans to travel around the world on tour, is that free will or not? What makes it not free will? c.i.
0 Replies
 
fancytickler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2003 11:04 am
You Have to believe in Free Will.

You have no choice.

[Isaac Bashival Singer]
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2003 11:25 am
I've believed in free will/choice most of my life, but according to some in this forum, that's not so. c.i.
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2003 11:48 am
fancytickler wrote:
You Have to believe in Free Will.

You have no choice.

[Isaac Bashival Singer]


Tickler, that I liked. Good to see you here.
0 Replies
 
Charli
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2003 08:28 pm
SCHOPENHAUER
A favorite quote from Schopenhauer, Arthur - 1788-1860:

"Man will do what he will, but he cannot will what he'll do."

A noted German philosopher of pessimism, Schopenhauer believed life was a curse of endless craving and endless unhappness. Pleasure is not happiness, but merely the momentary satisfying of desire. To secure happiness, he believed men must give up all their desires and try to reach a condition of denial similar to the Nirvana of Buddhism. The only reality in the universe is a blind universal force he called "will." But the "will" seemed to him to be often unreasonable and irresponsible, and so he decided that things would never improve.
[/color]
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2003 08:35 pm
truth
I thought this dictum of Schopenhauer was "Man can do as he will, but he cannot will as he wills." Nevermind the point's the same. His pessimism is famous and that is not what I appreciate about him; it's his idealism, that our experienced life is more a function of our consciousness than of anything else. We make our world. By the way, his use of the Upanishads was, I think, imperfect. The Buddha was NOT a pessimist; he was a realist. He did note that life is predomiantly sorrow (dukkha) or disattisfaction,and that he could show us the way out of it. This way out was nothing like Schopenhauer's ascetic suicide.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2003 08:37 pm
Charli, I beg to differ. Happiness is not a momentary satisfaction of desire. Rather, it's a balance against all the other emotions we experience in our give and take of life. I think it depends a great deal upon our environment, and how the majority of people that one comes in contact with on a daiily basis determines the level of happiness, sadness, anger, and all the emotions of life. It may be true that some on this earth struggle with unhappiness most of their waking lives, because they lack food, shelter, and the other pleasures that are availble to humans. c.i.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2003 08:37 pm
truth
I thought this dictum (one of my favorites too) of Schopenhauer was "Man can do as he will, but he cannot will as he will." Nevermind, the point's the same. His pessimism is famous and that is not what I appreciate about him; it's his idealism, that our experienced life (our phenomenal world) is a function of our consciousness: we make our world. By the way, his use of the Upanishads was seminal but, I think, imperfect. The Buddha was NOT a pessimist; he was a realist. He did note that life is predomiantly sorrow (dukkha) or disattisfaction, but that he could show us the way out of that sorrow. This way out was nothing like Schopenhauer's ascetic suicide.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2003 08:46 pm
truth
C.I., sorry to have surrounded you here. By the way, you are right: the misery we all want to mitigate in life is not the existential dissattisfaction addressed by the Buddha (dukkha); it is the suffering caused by disease and starvation and tyranny everywhere we look. I don't like to see American buddhists focusing only on their own personal angst while they give no thought to the physical miseries in the world, abroad and at home. But the point is that even if those miseries are abolished we would still not be existentiallly fulfilled. THAT is a spiritual problem, and a real one...not for world travellers, of course, but the day will come when we cannot LEAVE our problems at home and travel. Smile Smile Smile Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil :wink: :wink: :wink:
0 Replies
 
Charli
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Jul, 2003 09:26 pm
AND . . .
And, another great "philosopher" said, "For whosoever will save his life shall lose it (for a Greater Power beyond oneself)," which somehow doesn't seem to me to agree with that companion belief of "predestination." If one is predestined, how can one make a choice of whether to lose their life for a Greater Good? Tomorrow I'll check Plato's philosophy on this matter. Too late tonight - unless y'all know and will post those ideas/teachings here. As most are aware, the story of the Good Samaritan and JFK's famous "Ask Not What . . . ," etc., can be found in Plato. "There's nothing new under the sun"? 'Tis the witching hour. Until tomorrow . . . [/color]
0 Replies
 
Robwill
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Jul, 2003 12:51 am
I always find these boards when they already have so many posts I can't possibly find the strength, or desire, to read them.

So much education here. So many well read people. But, in free-will is there not original thought?

From what I have read, all base opinions on the writing of another. You might as well take the bibles word and decide were are all hell bound.

These writers, philosophers, psychoanalysts; mere mortal men, may not be the ones who knew.

Free will vs. predestination? Hmm.

From a completely uneducated point of view it comes down to this;
Which had you rather?

If you decide you are predestined, it is easy to be. If you decide you have freewill, that too is easily accomplished. If you decide it doesn't matter, you will probably live as you see fit.

An arguement for freewill? Maybe.

Or maybe I simply had to say that.

Either way, it happened, is now history, and no longer can serve its purpose in such a discussion.
0 Replies
 
wolf
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2003 05:07 pm
Very Happy Very Happy
0 Replies
 
BoGoWo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Aug, 2003 07:56 pm
this thread is deja vue;
didn't somebody already free Willy?
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Aug, 2003 09:22 pm
truth
Free will? When I look back I see that all was (in a sense) inevitable; but when I look forward I see that all is (in a sense) open to choice. It's a paradox to me.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Aug, 2003 10:04 pm
Robwill, WELCOME to A2K. The way to cheat is to read the last page or two, then proceed with your post. It works almost every time - for me. Wink c.i.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 18 Aug, 2003 10:07 pm
"Freewill" is rationed out in different volumes for everybody. How we cope and think outside the box is a struggle, and most of us do not succeed in accomplishing freewill. c.i.
0 Replies
 
CodeBorg
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2003 02:00 am
Expectation is a premonition
while determination is a gaurentee.
Persistence determines luck and fate
yet how we judge our selves creates an iron destiny.

Free will springs from our intention and planning,
dedicated execution kept open to serendipity.
Slavery is within our own linearity,
the habit of thoughtless blind reactioning.

Thy will be done, but it costs so much
awareness, value, movement graced by clarity,
such deliberation
that it certainly is not free.



----------
PS -- That's Code for "Yes", tired and silly me.
0 Replies
 
THe ReDHoRN
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2003 07:11 pm
Codeborg I want to argue with you but I just don't know how! ice cream or pizza?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 22 Aug, 2003 07:29 pm
We reallydon't have freewill do we? Most life on this earth is based on economics or working on the farm to grow your own food and shelter. Unless we comply with those imperatives, we starve or die from exposure.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 02:56:25