khorrami wrote:Hi. My question is: Can we use the auxiliary "might" in both first and second conditional sentences? If yes, imagine a student who should decide whether it is a first or second conditional when the "result clause" contain "might" but the "if clause" contains a blank to be filled with a suitable tense, present simple or past simple. What should s/he do?
Yes, you can use 'might'.
As to your second question, it's impossible to tell what "tense" should be used because we don't know the context that surrounds the situation. If a teacher is trying to make students decide without giving them enough info then that is unfair.
Let me use your example sentence from your next posting.
1. If I had more money, I might lend you some.
2. If I have more money, I might lend you some.
For #1 the meaning is [basically], "I don't have any more money, but if I did, there's a small chance that I would lend you some.
For #2 the meaning is [basically], "I may/might/could have some more money, and if I do, there's a small chance that I will/would lend you some.
You should always try to provide some example sentences if you can, Khorrami.
khorrami wrote:Wow, Shapeless, don't you want to stop this being silly, giving vague answers? We DO have simple past in the "if clause":
If I had more money, I would lend you some.
This sentence refers to a present situation, not at all to a past one.
Now could you please consider my own question above? THANKS
Khorrami, Shapeless was trying to help you with a difficult area of language and your remarks were, though you may not have realized it due to cultural differences, a bit too, shall we say, frank.
While grammars have not always been careful, the simple past is not actually used. The simple past FORM is used. I know the distinction may seem small but it is important.