1
   

Military Meets, Exceeds Goals

 
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Dec, 2006 10:56 pm
love is when a serve is returned and no one scores.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Dec, 2006 11:01 pm
In a game, you're correct, this ain't no game.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 13 Dec, 2006 11:13 pm
LoneStarMadam wrote:
In a game, you're correct, this ain't no game.

au contraire, it's the main game. It's the only game in town.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 06:25 am
Of course it's a game. The game of Lust For Power.

bush and other world leaders are the back row pieces, the youngsters and civilians are the front row expendable pawns.

The game will never end until we run out of pawns.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 07:00 am
Fiscal 2005-2006 Recruiting Results

Fiscal 2004-2005 Recruiting Results

Fuscal 2003-3004 Recruiting Results
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 09:02 am
LoneStarMadam wrote:
No, I did not serve. Did you?
Why do you ask if I served?


Just curious.
No.
Just curious.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 09:06 am
dyslexia wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
In a game, you're correct, this ain't no game.

au contraire, it's the main game. It's the only game in town.

The military is not a game, it's serious stuff.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 10:55 pm
Most military members don't have time to post here much, or anyplace else, IF they're performing their duties. In fact, it's against the UCMJ for military to go online on a gov't computer for anything other than official business.
I wonder if NCOs tell their troops that, or if they can tell them that when they themselves are breaking UCMJ regs. Hmmmm
One exception here, maybe, the JROTC at Ft Polk might be allowed to go online for study purposes.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Dec, 2006 05:18 am
LoneStarMadam wrote:
ebrown_p wrote:
CoastalRat wrote:
None. They are all Americans wishing to serve their country in military service. Sorry if I tend to look at people and see their potential while you seem to want to classify people by their status/IQ/race or whatever you mean by "bottom of the barrel."


People who are in political public life need to gloss over the obvious reality like this. People here (who aren't in public life) can tell the truth. We know better than this Coastal.

Military service is largely seen as a way out of poverty for many young kids who join. These are kids who join the service because they don't have many other opportunities.

Poverty is largely seen as a way to reach recruitment goals for many military recruiters. Kids who haven't succeeded in high school and don't have good employment prospects are seen as targets because recruiters know they don't hve many other opportunities.

Don't play the head-in-the-sand patriotism card Coastal. The majority of the kids signing up aren't the kids of Wealthy Americans (or Congress members). Or are you saying kids from lower class neighborhoods are more patriotic than your kids?

What a crock. The post was in answer to someone saying "they're from the bottom of the barrel". you apparently agree with that sentiment. Is Webbs son from the bottom of that barrel as well? Rolling Eyes


If Americans join for patriotic reasons then what do you suppose the recruitment levels would be if the recruitment bonus was not offered? The bonsus average $11,000 per recruit and can go as high as $40,000.

What would the recruitment levels be if they maintained the pre-Bush's War standards for new recruits?

From a June 11, 2005 WaPo article;

Quote:
The Army announced yesterday that it missed its recruiting goal for the fourth consecutive month, a deepening manpower crisis that officials said would require a dramatic summer push for recruits if the service is to avoid missing its annual enlistment target for the first time since 1999.

Quote:
The Pentagon is also considering asking Congress to double the enlistment bonus it can offer to the most-prized recruits -- from $20,000 to $40,000 -- and to raise the age limit for Army active-duty service from 35 to 40, he said.


Quote:
Army officials stress that they are not lowering standards in the push for recruits. But they acknowledge they are slightly less selective in some areas -- for example, by taking more enlistees who lack high school diplomas.

The Army also moved this month to take a harder look at keeping first-term soldiers in the force who might otherwise have been kicked out for problems such as drug abuse, poor conduct, or for failure to meet fitness or body-fat standards.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/10/AR2005061001897.html
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 17 Dec, 2006 05:33 am
LoneStarMadam wrote:
dyslexia wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
In a game, you're correct, this ain't no game.

au contraire, it's the main game. It's the only game in town.

The military is not a game, it's serious stuff.


really it's just chess or risk, with people instead of pieces

the only other difference is you can't just tip the board over to end the game

well you can, the enola gay proved that, tipped the board over real good
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 06:35:05