0
   

Bloomberg for President?

 
 
nimh
 
Reply Sun 10 Dec, 2006 05:43 pm
There's been talk, on and off, of the prospect of New York mayor Michael Bloomberg waging a run for President in 2008. As Independent.

It's not been taken all too seriously by all too many people yet - but as the below snippet shows, he's not exactly eager to dispel the speculation.

In the still unlikely case that he were to run, what would you think? Personally, of him? And about the impact on the Democratic and Republican campaigns?

Bloomberg formally won his office as the Republican candidate, but appears to be somewhere to the left of Lincoln Chafee. My guess is that any run of his, even if it would just gather a few percentage points, would be to the detriment of the Democrat.

Here's the entertaining little, highly lighthearted snippet:

Quote:
NEW YORK (AP) ?- New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who repeatedly denies he's running for president, clearly enjoys the song and dance of speculation.

The Republican billionaire dressed up as Bruce Springsteen and entertained guests at a holiday party with a rendition of "Born to Run."

Dressed in a white T-shirt, jeans with a red bandanna over a mullet wig, Bloomberg and his backup band of deputy mayors and senior staffers performed the song at Thursday night's party, with lyrics that fantasize about him launching an independent candidacy and winning the White House.

"I say 'Next stop: Washington!' Cause folks like us, baby we were born to run. We'll win, you'll see, and beat the GOP and Democrats," they sang, according to those present.

The group, who called themselves Mike Bloomsteen and the Bullpen Band, jammed on inflatable toy saxophones and guitars during the musical portions of the hit song. The party was for City Hall staff and was not open to the media.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 631 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
Sturgis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Dec, 2006 06:40 am
His success or failure as a Presidential candidate would hinge entirely on the person/s running against him. As a mayor he is something different, not exactly the warmest or most accessible character, but good with management skills which to some degree is what New York City needed when he stepped in and still needs now. Is this management style suited for the National front? I do not believe so. Bloomberg, similar to his predecessor Rudolph Giuliani is not known for working with others. He is the power and expects all to bow at his knees and acknowledge him as ruler (or at least supreme leader of the region), The city of New York is in many ways better due to the governing style of both Bloomberg and Giuliani but not necessarily happier. Neither man has the needed component for Presidency which is flexibility...an ability to work well with others and listen to their ideas openly.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Dec, 2006 09:16 am
Sturgis wrote:
Neither man has the needed component for Presidency which is flexibility...an ability to work well with others and listen to their ideas openly.

Well, Bush won two elections without showing any of that skill..
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Dec, 2006 01:29 pm
Nothing in the poll fits me, so I will say, as an American that votes for the person, not the party, that i would never vote for Bloomberg. He has shown a willingness to be discriminatory, & has done so.
Even if he wasn't a bigot I'd never vote for him, he's waaaay too liberal for this conservative.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Dec, 2006 04:30 pm
Are you registered to vote, LSM?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Dec, 2006 04:49 pm
I think Sturgis has posted very cogently--Mayor is not an office which gives credibility for the type of leadership needed at the national level. Governors do best, by far, of all of those who run for the office of President. They have some claim to management experience, and dealing with and reconciling political opponents. Mayors, once in office, are in most cases, beyond the reach of political parties until they are obliged to run again.
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Dec, 2006 05:03 pm
nimh wrote:
Are you registered to vote, LSM?

Yes, in Texas, one does not have to register with a political party.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Dec, 2006 05:20 pm
LoneStarMadam wrote:
Yes, in Texas, one does not have to register with a political party.

OK, gotcha.

You dont consider yourself a Republican? Nor an independent?
0 Replies
 
LoneStarMadam
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Dec, 2006 05:36 pm
nimh wrote:
LoneStarMadam wrote:
Yes, in Texas, one does not have to register with a political party.

OK, gotcha.

You dont consider yourself a Republican? Nor an independent?

No, I'm an American.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Dec, 2006 06:21 pm
Umm.. Republicans are Americans too, last I checked.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Dec, 2006 06:37 pm
I rather like Bloomberg, but I don't know the breadth of his points of view.

I thought Sturgis' post was helpful.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Bloomberg for President?
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/20/2026 at 11:55:50