1
   

Dental Implants?

 
 
Miller
 
Reply Sat 2 Dec, 2006 11:24 am
Are dental implants really worth a cost of $1000-$3000 per tooth?

With many individuals now living well into their 90s, shouldn't health insurance be covering at least a portion of the cost of this type of dental work?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 880 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Dec, 2006 12:01 pm
Implants are elective procedures. There are a number of far less costly options, such as dentures, removable bridges, caps and permanent bridges. I really don't see why health insurance should pay for them, unless a policy is offered that would pay a part of the total cost, in line with what the insurance would pay for the more economical procedures.
0 Replies
 
NickFun
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Dec, 2006 12:24 pm
That's like saying insurance should pay for face lifts, boob jobs, tummy tucks and botox. I agree with Phoenix.
0 Replies
 
Eva
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Dec, 2006 01:54 pm
I disagree. It should be handled on a case-by-case basis.

My 12 year old son, for instance, will require a couple of implants in the next few years due to the fact that he is missing two permanent teeth. They just didn't grow. Without implants, the other teeth will shift positions and cause further problems for him in the future. Problems that insurance would cover, to be sure, but it would cost the insurance company less to pay for implants to begin with.

Dental implants are not necessarily comparable to cosmetic surgery.
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Dec, 2006 02:58 pm
Eva- In the case of your son, the implants are necessary for a medical reason. There are cases where tummy tucks and breast reductions will be paid for by insurance, if a medical necessity can be shown. In thEse cases, the procedures were NOT for cosmetic purposes.

The way Miller couched the thread, the implication was that implants should be covered simply because people are living longer. THAT is not a medical reason for insurance companies laying out a great deal of money, when other options are available.
0 Replies
 
eoe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Dec, 2006 03:46 pm
I worked with a woman who, after searching for years, found a doctor willing to perform her nose job and claim that it was done for medical purposes. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Dec, 2006 04:54 pm
Years ago, I had to have a deviated septum operation. When I spoke to the doctor, I asked him if, while he was at it, would he thin my nose out a bit?

He answered that he did "inside jobs, not outside jobs". He also said that a good part of his practice was correcting cosmetic nosejobs where the patient may have looked better, but the breathing was worse. Ah, the price of beauty!
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 07:42 am
Eva wrote:
I disagree. It should be handled on a case-by-case basis.

My 12 year old son, for instance, will require a couple of implants in the next few years due to the fact that he is missing two permanent teeth. They just didn't grow. Without implants, the other teeth will shift positions and cause further problems for him in the future. Problems that insurance would cover, to be sure, but it would cost the insurance company less to pay for implants to begin with.

Dental implants are not necessarily comparable to cosmetic surgery.


I agree that in may cases they may be medically necessary. By the way, most dentists advise against getting dentures, if few teeth are not in good condition.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 07:47 am
Phoenix32890 wrote:


The way Miller couched the thread, the implication was that implants should be covered simply because people are living longer. THAT is not a medical reason for insurance companies laying out a great deal of money, when other options are available.[/color][/b]


But are those options really good ones, if many individuals aged 65 will now live well into their 90s?
Are dentures really the way to go, if you can afford to do otherwise?
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 08:54 am
Miller wrote:
Are dentures really the way to go, if you can afford to do otherwise?


You are changing horses in mid stream. Your original thread spoke to the idea of insurance companies paying for implants. I disagreed. I have found that most people who opt for dentures do so for economic reasons. I believe that the vast majority of middle income people would choose caps.

If a person has the money to pay for implants privately, he always has that option. As they say, "The man who pays the piper, calls the tune".

A number of years ago, I was given that choice. At the time, the dentist reccommended permanent capping, as he felt that the implants would subject me to some unnecessary potential problems. I chose the caps. I don't know if the implant procedure has improved since then, but I still think that permanent capping is a safe, relatively inexpensive way to deal with the problem.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 09:05 am
How can any capping be permanent, when the tooth can rot under the cap?
0 Replies
 
Phoenix32890
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Dec, 2006 09:12 am
Miller wrote:
How can any capping be permanent, when the tooth can rot under the cap?


Miller- There is permanent, and permanent. If the tooth rots, you can always go back and have the work redone. I have had caps that have held up for many decades, and if one "goes", I will simply replace it.

Once I had a tooth that need to be extracted. It was next to a permanent bridge. The dentist simply added another tooth to the existing bridge. I have had root canal through a cap. I also have had dental surgery in the gum over a cap. There is no end to the options that people have with their dental work.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Dec, 2006 11:37 pm
I'm wondering what can be done with a tooth that has had a root canal and is now capped, but is showing an infection in the gum surrounding the tooth, if the infection is actually in the root canal area.

If the tooth can be saved, that's one thing. However, if not then
an implant might have to be done, since it's an end tooth.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Dec, 2006 12:05 am
Who says insurance won't pay? My wife is getting some implants, and our dental insurance is paying for the first $1250 of her dental expenses this year, like every year, without regard to whether the work is for implants, for fillings, or for something else. Of course, this is the tiniest fraction of what implants cost. I pick up the rest of the tab.
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Dec, 2006 09:26 am
Your wife is lucky.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Immortality and Doctor Volkov - Discussion by edgarblythe
Sleep Paralysis - Discussion by Nick Ashley
On the edge and toppling off.... - Discussion by Izzie
Surgery--Again - Discussion by Roberta
PTSD, is it caused by a blow to the head? - Question by Rickoshay75
THE GIRL IS ILL - Discussion by Setanta
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Dental Implants?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 03:38:17