@rosborne979,
Quote:There is no evidential necessity for the existence of God.
Obviously, for those who rely solely on instruments for their evidence. The evidence the statement itself provides is sufficient for logical purposes because it could not exist without the concept. God is necessary to make the statement.
Or, at least, the contemplation of the existence of God. Which only makes sense if the existence of God is allowed for. An intelligent person does not contemplate things which he is not allowing the existence of. According to Henry Fielding at least.
Then it's Pascal.
And history shows that God/s are a necessity just as the trees having bark is a necessary destiny. Temporary experiments by left-wing dingbats notwithstanding.
What you lot want is a God who approves of wanking, pre-marital sex, perversion, pornography, adultery, divorce, homosexuality, abortion and other forms of birth control.
And you're quite well on in finding such a God.
Isn't it an obvious condition of Godness that there is no scientific evidence. If there was you're all blown out of the water.