Cycloptichorn wrote: I think there could be an argument made if the cops had tazed the kid, and then picked him up and carried him out of there civil-disobediance style.
I couldn't tell by the video how much resistance to being carried out civil-disobedience style the kid was putting up; but could tell by his words that he was clearly playing to the crowd and perpetuating his own problem. They must have told him to get up 50 times in a five minute span. I've had authority issues all my life, but you wouldn't have to tase me 6 times to get me to comply. I don't think tasing can be considered barbaric (isn't the opposite the reason they use them now?) and since there is no accusation of any other type of abuse, I can't consider it like a malicious beating.
Cycloptichorn wrote: But they didn't. They continued to use the taser on him while he was on the ground. And then they picked him up, and did it some more.
If a single tase was acceptable in the face of resistance, why wouldn't additional tasings be acceptable in the face of continued resistance?
Cycloptichorn wrote:Demanding that a cop stops abusing someone isn't obstruction of justice, not in the slightest. Demanding that they identify themselves isn't either. I'm really surprised to see you write this.
Perhaps you misunderstand me. Interfering with police in the process of arresting someone (or acting in any official capacity) is considered obstruction of justice. While they're in the process of arresting someone who is obviously resisting, is the wrong
time to start demanding their attention for any purpose save a more compelling need for police assistance. Were I a cop in that situation, I'd probably be weary of any superior number of people who were closing in and getting agitated. Who knows what kind of experiences they have had in similar situations with angry crowds? While a demand for an investigation is most certainly reasonable, interference while the situation was still in progress, IMO, is not. I can only assume that a cop, being human, will have his adrenaline pumping to the max as soon as a situation starts to spiral out of control. Making the necessary threats to prevent further escalation seems quite reasonable to me. Indeed, the situation didn't spiral out of control... and beyond the use of what authorities will decide is excessive force (or not)... the situation was handled without further incident... and the only person who was tased after much warning brought it on himself with his own actions. Unless further evidence is brought to bear, I don't see wrong doing here by anyone but the offender himself.