1
   

Mass Moves to Ban BB Guns....

 
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 09:59 am
cjhsa wrote:
DrewDad wrote:
I think you missed this bit, cj:

Quote:
Firearms were the instrument of death in over 80 percent of teen homicides....


You conveniently left out the part about gang violence. I don't really care much about gang related deaths, they're just going to wind up in prison anyway robbing the taxpayer. In Australia they took away guns so the gang bangers took up sword fighting. So they banned swords too. I suppose razors and knives are next, so lots of beards and stir fry...

Goodness. Praise the lord and pass the ammunition.
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 10:14 am
You challenged the facts and when they were cited, then began this nonsensical rambling about gangs and swords. If, as you contend, debate is based on perception, then the reason you're so bad at it is thus made abundantly clear... your own imperceptivity.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 10:21 am
Your facts are f--ked. Admit it.
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 10:29 am
The only thing which is in that condition is your own ability to refute the facts.

Try harder.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 10:36 am
I hope this works.

Homicide Type by Age, 1976-2004
Victims Offenders
Under 18 18-34 35-49 50+ Under 18 18-34 35-49 50+
All homicides 9.8% 52.7% 22.8% 14.7% 10.9% 65.0% 17.3% 6.9%
Victim/offender
relationship
Intimate 1.7% 46.8% 34.1% 17.5% 1.1% 46.6% 34.7% 17.7%
Family 19.5% 32.1% 26.5% 21.9% 6.1% 49.2% 28.0% 16.7%
Infanticide 100.0%


8.2% 81.1% 9.6% 1.1%
Eldercide


100.0% 10.4% 49.5% 18.9% 21.2%
Circumstances
Felony murder 7.6% 46.8% 21.7% 23.9% 14.9% 72.9% 10.2% 2.0%
Sex related 19.7% 45.2% 16.6% 18.6% 10.7% 73.8% 13.4% 2.0%
Drug related 5.4% 71.5% 19.8% 3.2% 10.6% 76.8% 11.3% 1.2%
Gang related 24.5% 68.3% 6.0% 1.3% 29.4% 68.8% 1.6% .3%
Argument 5.4% 56.2% 26.2% 12.1% 6.9% 60.2% 23.1% 9.8%
Workplace 2.0% 27.4% 31.5% 39.1% 4.9% 53.0% 27.1% 15.0%
Weapon
Gun homicide 7.4% 59.2% 22.4% 10.9% 11.9% 64.6% 15.9% 7.6%
Arson 28.2% 27.1% 19.2% 25.5% 11.6% 57.8% 23.5% 7.1%
Poison 26.7% 23.9% 16.6% 32.7% 4.5% 50.9% 26.2% 18.4%
Multiple victims
or offenders
Multiple victims 18.4% 46.2% 19.1% 16.4% 9.5% 66.1% 18.6% 5.8%
Multiple offenders 11.3% 55.4% 19.8% 13.6% 18.4% 73.0% 7.4% 1.2%


http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/teens.htm
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 10:39 am
What it shows is that unless you are 18-34 (perfect gang banger age) you're more likely to die of arson or poisoning. Most victims were victims of rape or gang violence no matter what was used to commit the crime.

Go ahead and BS that BS.
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 10:49 am
What you missed, Sparky, was this, from your own source:

Homicides By Age and Weapon

"Homicides of teens and young adults are more likely to be committed with a gun than homicides of persons of other ages"

You really do need to read this stuff before you try citing it.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 10:54 am
And again you confuse victims with perps. That's to be expected.
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 11:00 am
Again, you confuse yourself with your own data.

Now THAT'S to be expected!
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 11:06 am
cjhsa wrote:
Your facts are f--ked. Admit it.

This from someone that started this thread by claiming BB guns were on the verge of being banned in Mass?

Laughing
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 11:12 am
If it wasn't for all those 34 yr old 'teens' out there being poisoned you might have been accurate with your statement blacksmith. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 11:25 am
Maybe they were poisoned with Massachusetts BBs...
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 11:27 am
Again, if a bunch of gang banging punks wanna play that game fine - with any luck it will remove them from the gene pool - you do believe in natural selection, don't you?
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 11:44 am
Your position seems to rely on the belief that most gun related homicides under discussion occur in inter-gang or intra-gang violence. Even assuming for the sake of argument that this ridiculous position is true, what makes you believe that gang members firing at rivals always hit what (or who) they aim at?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 11:45 am
I already posted the stats. Read 'em and weep. You're done, and I'm done with you.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 11:52 am
blacksmith wrote
Quote:

Perhaps when Bunsen burners become the cause of 80% of teen homicides and 50% of teen suicides, somebody will suggest that.


20-34 are NOT teens cj. I don't care how desperate you are to make your stats work. Until you can show me how a 34 year old is a teen, blacksmith is more accurate based on the doj website than you are.
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 11:57 am
cjhsa wrote:
I already posted the stats. Read 'em and weep. You're done, and I'm done with you.


In other words, you can neither refute nor rationally discuss your own data and positions.

You are, indeed, "done."
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 12:00 pm
Parados, your logic is like someone who's only reading the top half of a bar chart.

Please ignore the troll.
0 Replies
 
blacksmithn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 12:09 pm
Have you even read the information you so breathlessly cite? Beyond looking at, and misinterpreting, the pretty graphs?

I repeat, try harder.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 12:33 pm
Really cj?
Your logic is what? Other than complete BS not backed up by any facts.

Here is all the information broken out in easy to read form.

http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/offenses/expanded_information/murder_homicide.html

68% of all murders in 2005 were committed with a gun.


In table 9 you will find....

Only 754 of total murders were juvenile gang violence.



From table 8
There were 3,605 murders of those under 22.
68% of those under 22 were killed with a gun. But that includes infants and children not teens.

table 8
In the ages from 13-19 82% of those killed were killed with a gun. (It seems Blacksmith was off on his stat. He was too low when he said 80%)

So, even if we assume that every juvenile gang killing was someone in their teens, (Something we know is not true. I can find multiple stories of children younger being killed in the crossfire.) that still only accounts for 41% of the murders of teens.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 11:20:16