1
   

W 's Key to Success

 
 
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 02:49 pm
All W had to do was:

1 ) Bom the hell out of Iraq 's military infrastructure,
2 ) Go IN, take out Saddam n his sadistic sons,
3 ) Check for any WMDs
4 ) Leave the place in shambles, and
5 ) Get OUT.

Then turn our attention to North Korea.

If he did that, he 'd still have both houses of Congress
David
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 952 • Replies: 17
No top replies

 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 02:53 pm
Chill out, David.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 02:56 pm
So far, he succeeded only in point 4: he left the place in shambles.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 03:00 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
So far, he succeeded only in point 4: he left the place in shambles.

No.
Read them again.
He 's succeeded in the first 3.

David
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 03:02 pm
He didn't succeed in leaving the place in shambles, David? Where'd all that rubble come from?

And those body parts strewn around in a rather unsightly fashion?
0 Replies
 
cyphercat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 03:08 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
He didn't succeed in leaving the place in shambles, David?


Ha ha, what a funny misunderstanding. No, see, the distinction is that we haven't LEFT the place at all!

Dubya's still got lots and lots of shamble-making to do before we leave.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 03:08 pm
http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/pressclipsextra/archives/images/iraq-damage-karablila-IRIN.jpg

I guess you're right, David, that does look rather tidy.

I'm sorry for questioning you.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 03:13 pm
There weren't any WMDs either, and actually the UN checked several times
and assured Bush there aren't any. But Bush had an agenda and would
not listen to anyone but the little voices in his head.

He hasn't gotten out either - he's still terrorizing the Iraqi people while
scarifying young Americans who were too young and gullible to realize
what an enlistment in the military meant for them.
0 Replies
 
cyphercat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 03:15 pm
"Leaving in shambles" has such a negative connotation-- perhaps we could all agree on something like "occupying in dishabille."
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 03:18 pm
It should be a negative connotation. There is nothing positive about
the Iraq war, absolutely nothing.
0 Replies
 
cyphercat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 03:21 pm
CJane-- I agree, I'se just goofing on the whole Newspeak thing the W's administration likes to do.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 05:05 pm
The phrase "urban renewal" might make a comeback. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 06:30 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
He didn't succeed in leaving the place in shambles, David?

Yes.
He did not succeed in LEAVING.
That 's Y he wasted our troops,
wasted our treasure,
and wasted both houses of Congress.





Quote:

Where'd all that rubble come from?

And those body parts strewn around in a rather unsightly fashion?

That 's OK; no problem.

David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 06:32 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/pressclipsextra/archives/images/iraq-damage-karablila-IRIN.jpg

I guess you're right, David, that does look rather tidy.

I'm sorry for questioning you.

I forgive u.
David
0 Replies
 
cyphercat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 06:50 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
gustavratzenhofer wrote:



Where'd all that rubble come from?

And those body parts strewn around in a rather unsightly fashion?

That 's OK; no problem.

David


Yeppers, body parts strewn around are nooo problemo! Too true...
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 07:11 pm
cyphercat wrote:
CJane-- I agree, I'se just goofing on the whole Newspeak thing the W's administration likes to do.

Note that I don 't represent the Bushes,
tho I voted for them,
to stave off much worse, anti-freedom alternatives.

I never really liked the Bushes too much.
In 1980, I thought that Reagan made a mistake,
and I believe that now.
Neither one of them is or was a conservative.

David
0 Replies
 
cyphercat
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 07:20 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Note that I don 't represent the Bushes . . .


Small favors...*ahem*
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 11 Nov, 2006 07:28 pm
I just SETTLED for them.

I am a Goldwater libertarian-conservative.
David
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » W 's Key to Success
Copyright © 2023 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 02/03/2023 at 10:51:45