Reply
Sat 11 Nov, 2006 02:49 pm
All W had to do was:
1 ) Bom the hell out of Iraq 's military infrastructure,
2 ) Go IN, take out Saddam n his sadistic sons,
3 ) Check for any WMDs
4 ) Leave the place in shambles, and
5 ) Get OUT.
Then turn our attention to North Korea.
If he did that, he 'd still have both houses of Congress
David
So far, he succeeded only in point 4: he left the place in shambles.
He didn't succeed in leaving the place in shambles, David? Where'd all that rubble come from?
And those body parts strewn around in a rather unsightly fashion?
gustavratzenhofer wrote:He didn't succeed in leaving the place in shambles, David?
Ha ha, what a funny misunderstanding. No, see, the distinction is that we haven't LEFT the place at all!
Dubya's still got lots and lots of shamble-making to do before we leave.
I guess you're right, David, that does look rather tidy.
I'm sorry for questioning you.
There weren't any WMDs either, and actually the UN checked several times
and assured Bush there aren't any. But Bush had an agenda and would
not listen to anyone but the little voices in his head.
He hasn't gotten out either - he's still terrorizing the Iraqi people while
scarifying young Americans who were too young and gullible to realize
what an enlistment in the military meant for them.
"Leaving in shambles" has such a negative connotation-- perhaps we could all agree on something like "occupying in dishabille."
It should be a negative connotation. There is nothing positive about
the Iraq war, absolutely nothing.
CJane-- I agree, I'se just goofing on the whole Newspeak thing the W's administration likes to do.
The phrase "urban renewal" might make a comeback.
OmSigDAVID wrote:gustavratzenhofer wrote:
Where'd all that rubble come from?
And those body parts strewn around in a rather unsightly fashion?
That 's OK; no problem.
David
Yeppers, body parts strewn around are nooo problemo! Too true...
I just SETTLED for them.
I am a Goldwater libertarian-conservative.
David