constitutional amendment

Forums: News
Email this Topic • Print this Page

I am convinced that members of PETA are wacko stupid, I want (just like my right-wingnut friends here on a2k) to support a constitutional amendment to ban them from voting.

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,365 • Replies: 25

No top replies

Socialists or people with socialist tendencies should also not be allowed to vote.

0 Replies

ebrown_p wrote:

Socialists or people with socialist tendencies should also not be allowed to vote.

or people with green hair.

0 Replies

dyslexia wrote:

ebrown_p wrote:
Socialists or people with socialist tendencies should also not be allowed to vote.

or people with green hair.

Isn't that an hendiadys? (I've green hair there where there is any!)

0 Replies

Walter Hinteler wrote:

dyslexia wrote:
ebrown_p wrote:
Socialists or people with socialist tendencies should also not be allowed to vote.

or people with green hair.

Isn't that an hendiadys? (I've green hair there where there is any!)

No idea, I've always been blond.

0 Replies

Atheists should certainly not be allowed to vote.

0 Replies

hendiadys

SYLLABICATION: hen·di·a·dys
PRONUNCIATION: hn-d-ds
NOUN: A figure of speech in which two words connected by a conjunction are used to express a single notion that would normally be expressed by an adjective and a substantive, such as grace and favor instead of gracious favor.
ETYMOLOGY: Late Latin, from Greek hen dia duoin, one by means of two : hen, neuter of heis, one; see sem-1 in Appendix I + dia, through + duoin, genitive of duo, two; see dwo- in Appendix I.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the older i get the more i learn - but i don't understand :wink: Shocked

!
now , what do i do with my newly aquired knowledge ?
hbg

0 Replies

Sounds like another insegrevious paradigm, to me.

0 Replies

roger wrote:

Sounds like another insegrevious paradigm, to me.

rofl

0 Replies

I think that the whole lot of A2Kers should be prohibiting from voting. But we SHOULD be given a stake of land, (preferably in a pleasant area) where we could start a new country.

Our flag would be picture of a hamster running around in a wheel, going nowhere. The national bird would be a pink plastic flamingo. The national motto would be, "fuggedaboudit", and to take things to perfection,

I hereby nominate dyslexia for president!

0 Replies

Can an anarchist be president?

0 Replies

I recommend the Possum for King.

0 Replies

Phoenix32890 wrote:

I think that the whole lot of A2Kers should be prohibiting from voting. But we SHOULD be given a stake of land, (preferably in a pleasant area) where we could start a new country.

Our flag would be picture of a hamster running around in a wheel, going nowhere. The national bird would be a pink plastic flamingo. The national motto would be, "fuggedaboudit", and to take things to perfection,

I hereby nominate dyslexia for president!

40 acres and amule wil be demanded

0 Replies

dyslexia wrote:

40 acres and amule wil be demanded

A mule? Aren't there enough asses on A2K already???

0 Replies

And some very wise acres.

0 Replies

Phoenix32890 wrote:

dyslexia wrote:
40 acres and amule wil be demanded

A mule? Aren't there enough asses on A2K already???

Who you calling an ass? I have less ass than is legally allowable.

0 Replies

roger wrote:

Sounds like another insegrevious paradigm, to me.

Consultation with 3 computer-based dictionaries
fails to reveal a listing for insegrevious.

David

0 Replies

OmSigDAVID wrote:

roger wrote:
Sounds like another insegrevious paradigm, to me.

Consultation with 3 computer-based dictionaries
fails to reveal a listing for insegrevious.

David

i bet your the type of guy who likes to point out "it's only a movie"

0 Replies

I support the right of EVERY American citizen
to vote, regardless of age.

Every citizen who is subjected to the control
of law is rightfully entitled to participate in its formulation,
( tho this is not the extant law ).

There was a time when taxation
without representation was the extant law.

David

0 Replies

djjd62 wrote:

OmSigDAVID wrote:
roger wrote:
Sounds like another insegrevious paradigm, to me.

Consultation with 3 computer-based dictionaries
fails to reveal a listing for insegrevious.

David

i bet your the type of guy who likes to point out "it's only a movie"

U win your bet; sort of.
I have done that, when I 've deemed the occasion
to be appropriate; not that I " likes to " as u put it,
but I believe that we need to keep sound reasoning in proper perspective.

" Here we come with our candy and our guns "
Yeah; candy and guns can be good,
some better than others; ( I never cared much for the English Webley; ungainly thing )

" And our corporate muscle marches in behind us "
Yeah, when people unite their finances,
thay can show strength in numbers.

" For freedom's just another world for nothing left to sell "
No; FREEDOM is a lot more than that;
ask the slaves of communism or nazism,
even if thay had no merchandise.

" And if you want narcotics we can get you those as well "
I guess that 's good for pharmacists and their customers.

I don 't see that any citizen 's choice of what to ingest
( including destructive substances of which he is aware )
is anyone else 's business; ESPECIALLY not government.

Remember: government was NOT created
to protect the citizens from their own poor judgment,
nor did the citizens ever grant government the authority to do so.

David

0 Replies

constitutional amendment

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know