1
   

Hungarian Uprising 50 years ago.

 
 
Reply Mon 23 Oct, 2006 07:16 am
Hungarians remember the revolution 1956 and the bitter defeat that followed. The US, as usual, did certain things that disappointed the brave Hungarians. Prime Minister Imre Nagy turned out to be a brave and admired politician.
..................................
The defeat of the Hungarian revolution was one of the darkest moments of the Cold War. At certain points since its outbreak on October 23 the revolt looked like it was on the verge of an amazing triumph. The entire nation appeared to have taken up arms against the regime. Rebels, often armed with nothing more than kitchen implements and gasoline, were disabling Soviet tanks and achieving other -- sometimes small but meaningful -- victories throughout the country. On October 31, the tide seemed to turn overwhelmingly in the revolution's favor when Pravda published a declaration promising greater equality in relations between the USSR and its East European satellites. One sentence was of particular interest. It read: "[T]he Soviet Government is prepared to enter into the appropriate negotiations with the government of the Hungarian People's Republic and other members of the Warsaw Treaty on the question of the presence of Soviet troops on the territory of Hungary." To outside observers, the Kremlin statement came as a total surprise. CIA Director Allen Dulles called it a "miracle." The crisis seemed on the verge of being resolved in a way no-one in Hungary or the West had dared to hope.
..........
Meanwhile, in Washington, U.S. officials observed the tidal wave of events with shock and no small degree of ambivalence as to how to respond. The main line of President Eisenhower's policy was to promote the independence of the so-called captive nations, but only over the longer-term. There is little doubt that he was deeply upset by the crushing of the revolt, and he was not deaf to public pressure or the emotional lobbying of activists within his own administration. But he had also determined, and internal studies backed him up, that there was little the United States could do short of risking global war to help the rebels. And he was not prepared to go that far, nor even, for that matter, to jeopardize the atmosphere of improving relations with Moscow that had characterized the previous period.
.
Yet Washington's role in the Hungarian revolution soon became mired in controversy. One of the most successful weapons in the East-West battle for the hearts and minds of Eastern Europe was the CIA-administered Radio Free Europe. But in the wake of the uprising, RFE's broadcasts into Hungary sometimes took on a much more aggressive tone, encouraging the rebels to believe that Western support was imminent, and even giving tactical advice on how to fight the Soviets. The hopes that were raised, then dashed, by these broadcasts cast an even darker shadow over the Hungarian tragedy that leaves many Hungarians embittered to this day.
.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB76/
.
http://www.channel4.com/news/special-reports/special-reports-storypage.jsp?id=3684
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 722 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Oct, 2006 09:16 pm
The meat of the matter is in your third paragraph: Washington was not about to risk a third world war and thus a possible nuclear confrontation with the USSR. While Eisenhower (and everyone else in Washington) deeply sympathized with the Hungarians, military assistance was out of the question. The best they could do was to give moral support and encouragement to the rebels via Radio Free Europe and Voice of America broadcasts. It's easy to see why Hungarians would be disappointed by this, but it's also easy to see that the Eisenhower administration had no other choice short of a new war.
0 Replies
 
talk72000
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Oct, 2006 09:21 pm
It's like a tease, isn't? Pretends to offer much but delivers little.
0 Replies
 
detano inipo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Oct, 2006 06:49 am
It's called realpolitik: politics based on realities and material needs, rather than on morals or ideals.
.
Any country acting like that for a century will eventually be despised throughout the world.
0 Replies
 
trancer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Nov, 2006 06:53 am
HUNGARIAN HERO'S
Could i point out here that most countries aid first of all their allies and last of all their enemies... in the second world war i think you might find that the hungarians wore nazi uniforms ... so why would the western alliance aid them...ok with hindsight we should have done something... but i fear you might find that the older generations did not view the hungarians as friends...trancer Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
detano inipo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Nov, 2006 12:38 pm
You are right, the Hungarians were not US allies and didn't merit strong sympathy or help in their struggle against communism.
US radio broadcasts made it look that an uprising will get help from the USA. That is what makes Hungarians bitter.
.
We have seen the same scenario in 1991 in Iraq. The South and the North started fighting Saddam Hussein and the US forces stood by and watched the slaughter. Bitter feelings among the Shias and the Kurds.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Hungarian Uprising 50 years ago.
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 03:54:39