1
   

The Last Supper

 
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2006 09:11 am
BPB! Cornbread for quiche?
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2006 09:43 am
BiPolarBear wrote:
To state either by belief or inference that the current crop of blacks in high position are there because they Tomed their way to it is innaccurate and unfair IMO.


I agree. However, I was referring specifically to the blacks in Snood's post. And while I am sure these people got their education attainments on pure merit, their fame is largely based on statements and opinions which white conservative audiences love and which almost no blacks agree with.

There are many black PhD's and wealthy businessmen, but we hear about very few of them. The people in Snood's post are not representative of them either, as well as not being representative of any of the rest of the black population.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2006 01:14 pm
gotcha.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2006 01:16 pm
snood wrote:
BPB! Cornbread for quiche?



is that sweet or corn cornbread? that'll make a difference. Quiche is like a major staple at my house.








if you believe that **** you'll believe anything
0 Replies
 
Tai Chi
 
  1  
Reply Sat 7 Oct, 2006 06:30 pm
Any hamentaschen left?
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 07:57 am
kelticwizard wrote:


JP, have you ever actually talked a black person about politics? Do you know any? I mean outside of whoever might show up at your local Republican club meeting.


What a dumbass statement that only a dumb ass would make.


kelticwizard wrote:
Snood made fun of these black "achievers" because their "achievements" consist exclusively of telling white people what they want to hear about blacks. These people have no standing-none-in the black community at all. They just put on their little show for their white audiences and collect the money. Their conservative audiences lap it up, then go listen to their favorite talk show host rail against the latest "outrage" of the Black Congressional Caucus, Jesse Jackson, and just about any group or individual with actual support among the black population.


Actually their achievements consist of a lot more than that.

Here is a short bio on Clarence Thomas. He was born in the south and lived with his mother after his father abandoned them. His grandfather helped instill a work ethic in him and often told him things such as "never let the sun catch you in bed in the morning."

Here is a brief bio of Sowell, one of Thomas's early role models. He also grew upp in the south where he says "his encounters with white people were so limited that he didn't believe that "yellow" was a possible color for human hair." Soon after moving to Harlem, he dropped out of school. He, like Walter Williams, soon realized that nobody was going to give them a free pass at success. They both grew out of poor urban families (I believe Williams was from Philly), worked their way through school to become highly successful, highly educated people. "Williams is a champion of black education, frequently indicting the educational systems of inner city schools for perpetuating, in his words, a fraud against African-American students and families by lowered standards." bio Both have written numerous books on what they feel are societal ills or hurdles facing todays black community.

Condi had a similar upbringing. Born in the south as well to a Minister father and teacher mother, she "experienced firsthand the injustices of Birmingham's discriminatory laws and attitudes. She was instructed to walk proudly in public and to use the facilities at home rather than subject herself to the indignity of "colored" facilities in town. As Rice recalls of her parents and their peers, 'they refused to allow the limits and injustices of their time to limit our horizons.' However, Rice recalls various times in which she suffered discrimination and persecution on account of her skin color, which include being relegated to a storage room at a department store instead of a regular dressing room, being barred from going to the circus or the local amusement park, being denied hotel rooms, and even being given bad food at restaurants." (bio

Of course, snood can still call them hankyheads, and GW can still get her information from two ladies down at the co-op talking over a bag of white rice, and you can still assert that "their 'achievements' consist exclusively of telling white people what they want to hear about blacks," but I'd just like you all to answer me two questions:

1.) What, in your opinion, constitutes a "successful black person?
2.) Which of the attributes, these so called "hankyheads" have, in your opinion, "have no standing-none-in the black community at all?"
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 08:59 am
kelticwizard wrote:
JP, have you ever actually talked a black person about politics? Do you know any? I mean outside of whoever might show up at your local Republican club meeting.


jpinMilwaukee wrote:
What a dumbass statement that only a dumb ass would make.

When you get done with your bluster-filled irrelevancies, will you PLEASE answer the question? Because you haven't. Are you afraid to answer?


kelticwizard wrote:
Snood made fun of these black "achievers" because their "achievements" consist exclusively of telling white people what they want to hear about blacks. These people have no standing-none-in the black community at all.


jpinMilwaukee wrote:
Actually their achievements consist of a lot more than that.

Here is a short bio on Clarence Thomas. He was born in the south and lived with his mother after his father abandoned them. His grandfather helped instill a work ethic in him and often told him things such as "never let the sun catch you in bed in the morning."

Here is a brief bio of Sowell, one of Thomas's early role models. He also grew upp in the south where he says "his encounters with white people were so limited that he didn't believe that "yellow" was a possible color for human hair." Soon after moving to Harlem, he dropped out of school. He, like Walter Williams, soon realized that nobody was going to give them a free pass at success. They both grew out of poor urban families (I believe Williams was from Philly), worked their way through school to become highly successful, highly educated people. "Williams is a champion of black education, frequently indicting the educational systems of inner city schools for perpetuating, in his words, a fraud against African-American students and families by lowered standards." bio Both have written numerous books on what they feel are societal ills or hurdles facing todays black community.

Condi had a similar upbringing. Born in the south as well to a Minister father and teacher mother, she "experienced firsthand the injustices of Birmingham's discriminatory laws and attitudes. She was instructed to walk proudly in public and to use the facilities at home rather than subject herself to the indignity of "colored" facilities in town. As Rice recalls of her parents and their peers, 'they refused to allow the limits and injustices of their time to limit our horizons.' However, Rice recalls various times in which she suffered discrimination and persecution on account of her skin color, which include being relegated to a storage room at a department store instead of a regular dressing room, being barred from going to the circus or the local amusement park, being denied hotel rooms, and even being given bad food at restaurants." (bio


Actually, I was only dealing with the people in Snood's which you brought up yourself.
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 09:05 am
Ummm.. so was I.

Now, will you PLEASE answer the question? Because you haven't. Are you afraid to answer?
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 09:11 am
Oh, and yes I have talked to black people about politics.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 09:17 am
No, you were NOT referring to the people in Snood's post.

jpinMilwaukee wrote:
They both grew out of poor urban families (I believe Williams was from Philly), worked their way through school to become highly successful, highly educated people. "Williams is a champion of black education, frequently indicting the educational systems of inner city schools for perpetuating, in his words, a fraud against African-American students and families by lowered standards." bio Both have written numerous books on what they feel are societal ills or hurdles facing todays black community.


Sure Sowell's picture was in Snood's post. But Walter Williams' picture most assuredly was NOT.

Armstrong Williams is the person in Snood's post!


Hah. Hah.

Here is the conservative white man giving us lectures on the achievements of black conservatives, like he knows what the hell he is talking about, and he can't tell one from the other.

That's okay, one Williams is the same as another, right? Especially if they're black.

Having trouble telling black people apart, JP?
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 09:22 am
They are: Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Armstrong Williams, Ken Hamblin, Condi and Ward Connerly.

That is 3 of six. I used Walter Williams because his life parallels Sowells in many respects. I'm sure snood thinks of him the same that he thinks of Sowell.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 09:47 am
Gee, that would have been such a nice,cute explanation if only you had given it before your blunder was exposed.

Let's face it, JP. You clicked on the Properties of each of the pics in Snood's post, you saw Williams listed in the URL, and you automatically assumed it was Walter Williams.

so in your recitation of the achievements of these black conservatives, you praised Walter Williams and gave his bio in the Wilipedia as part of your argument.

You had no idea that was Armstrong Williams' picture, or else you would have praised him and included Armstrong Williams' bio, not Walter's.

The part that is so dismaying is that in the Wikipedia article YOU gave the link to, Walter Williams' picture is right in the article. And you STILL couldn't tell the difference from Armstrong Williams's picture which led you to the article!

Here, JP, I'll help you out.

Here is Armstrong Williams' picture as shown in Snood's post:

http://www.kepplerspeakers.com/speakers/pics/Williams-a.jpg


Now, below is Walter Williams' picture as given in the Wikipedia article you gave yourself:


http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v645/kelticwizard100/180px-.jpg


Look at them, JP. There really are differences between the two men. It may take awhile for someone of your ilk to see it-in your case it might take hours-but they are there.
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 10:02 am
KW... you are more than welcome to think whatever you want. I did not include armstrong, hamblin or connerly because I know less about them than I do about the others. i am fully aware of what Walter Williams looks like.

If you want to think I made a mistake... fine, but I don't see what that proves, other than the fact that you are ignoring the three people I did speak of that did match up with snoods post and are instead focusing on the one person he didn't list thereby completely avoiding the topic. I think it is because you don't want to answer the questions I asked or actually talk on subject.

Now if you want to continue with this childish NAH NAH game, just let me know and I'll stop wasting my time. If you want to get back on topic and answer my questions, I'd be happy to continue.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 10:20 am
Re: The Last Supper
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v288/stevetheq/therepublicanlastsupper.jpg



sometimes words just don't do it
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 10:58 am
jpinMilwaukee wrote:
I used Walter Williams because his life parallels Sowells in many respects. I'm sure snood thinks of him the same that he thinks of Sowell.


Baloney!

After I saw Walter Williams' biography in your post, (Walter Williams was not pictured in Snood's post, Armstrong Williams was), I posted the following mesage:
kelticwizard wrote:
Actually, I was only dealing with the people in Snood's which you brought up yourself.



Your answer?
jpinMilwaukee wrote:
Ummm.. so was I.


If you were ever going to explain that you posted the bio of a black conservative NOT in Snood's post, that was the time to do it. You didn't. Because you had no idea that the Williams whose bio you were posting was NOT the Williams in the picture Snood posted! The same Snood you were criticizing for not knowing enough about black conservatives.

For years, conservatives have been telling blacks that the Republicans are the ones who represent their interests and needs. That it was time for the blacks to "get off the plantation" and come over to the Republican Party-the same Republican Party which gladly accepted Strom Thurmond and all the other Dixiecrats who left the Democrats because the Democratic Party had become too pro-civil rights.

One of the biggest stereotypes used to ostracize blacks from the mainstream for all those years was the idea that "they all look alike". How dehumanizing an attitude that was. Blacks "looked alike" to whites because whites did not choose to look closely at the person, they just stopped at the color. If you weren't white, you didn't really count anyway, so why look more closely?

Now, in the year 2006, we have a perfect example of a Republican, ostensibly sticking up for his buddies in the almost nonexistent "black conservative movement", essentially displaying that same attitude.

And when it is pointed out to him, he glibly continues posting, thinking he can gloss over the significance of it. For Chrissakes, the picture of Walter Williams was right on the bio page JP linked to-and it still never hit JP that the man in the bio did not resemble the man Snood pictured.

It isn't too often when things are brought out so clearly into focus in politics and national affairs. This has been one of those moments.
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 12:35 pm
I never said that snood posted Walter Williams picture. I explained the reason why I included Walter Wiliams and left out armstrong, hamblin and connerly. I don't really give a rats ass if you think I didn't know the difference between the two. I also pointed out that I did post about 3 people that snood did post pictures of... a fact that you continue to gloss over yourself.
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 01:07 pm
To repeat-Snood's post, (which you brought up for discussion), consisted of the unlabelled pictures of six black conservatives. Your response to him and me went into detail about 3 of those conservatives, plus great detail about Walter Williams-who was not even pictured in Snood's post.

When I saw no reason to deal with Walter Williams, since he was not in Snood's post, I wrote the following response to you:
kelticwizard wrote:
Actually, I was only dealing with the people in Snood's [post] which you brought up yourself.


To which you replied:
jpinMilwaukee wrote:
Ummm.. so was I.


A clear admission on your part that you felt that the people you dealt with WERE in Snood's post.

And the clear reason you thought Walter Williams was in Snood's post was that if you click on Snood's pic of ARMSTRONG Williams, the URL has the word "Wiliams" in it-but no first name. That's how you got the idea that Walter Williams was in Snood's pic. And that is why you were defending Walter Williams when I made my comments about the people in Snood's post as a group.

So to defend who you thought was Walter Williams, you go to Wikipedia's bio, read and link to it-oblivious to the fact that the pic on the Wiki bio has no resemblance to the face in Snood's post.

Just can't tell them apart, can you JP?

And then you pretend to wonder why more blacks don't vote conservative. You just supplied the answer yourself.
0 Replies
 
jpinMilwaukee
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 01:46 pm
I can certainly understand why you are stuck on this, KW.

Afterall, I am the one advocating that intelligent successful blacks are still black and should be used as examples of what hard work and dedication can achieve, while snood, GW, two ladies at the co-op, the artist of the illustration and yourself are advocating that they are merely whites in blackface, or hankyheads... some how not really black because they don't fit into some stereotype that you think they should fit into. Because they don't think/act/vote like you think they should... it somehow makes them hankyhead uncle toms.

So don't lecture me about "not being able to tell the differnce" when you are the ones that are ostracizing them for them being different. You are the one that said, their "'achievements' consist exclusively of telling white people what they want to hear about blacks." You are the one that is stereotyping and wanting them to falll in lock-step with the democrats and act how you think blacks are supposed to act.

So, to answer your question again, Yes I can tell the differnce between the two. Yes only williams was listed in the properties (no first name) and yes I checked them. I also, however went back a little further than that to the url: http://www.kepplerspeakers.com/speakers/pics/Williams which clearly links to Armstrong Williams not Walter Williams. As I stated before, I know less about Armstrong Williams, hamblin and connerly than I do about Sowell, Thomas and Walt Williams which is why included the former (2 of which were in snoods post) and excluded the latter. Now you can either take my explantion or not... I don't really care. But hopefully you can get off this immaterial, incosequesntial topic and actually move onto something of substance.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Oct, 2006 04:15 pm
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v288/stevetheq/therepublicanlastsupper.jpg


This just says so much more, so much better.....
0 Replies
 
kelticwizard
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 05:25 am
jpinMilwaukee wrote:
I can certainly understand why you are stuck on this, KW.

You certainly can, though you are not going to admit it. The Right has been keeping up this ridiculous claim that they represent the true interests of blacks, even as their spokesmen bash every single black leader who has any support in the black community whatsoever.



jpinMilwaukee wrote:
So don't lecture me about "not being able to tell the differnce"

But you can't tell the difference, that has become obvious. The picture in Snood's post was of Armstrong Williams. Your answer to criticism of Snood's unlabelled pics of black conservatives included praise and a bio for Walter Williams. Your bio page included Walter Williams' picture. You couldn't tell the difference between the two men, even though the two pictures were staring you in the face!



jpinMilwaukee wrote:
As I stated before, I know less about Armstrong Williams, hamblin and connerly than I do about Sowell, Thomas and Walt Williams which is why included the former (2 of which were in snoods post) and excluded the latter. Now you can either take my explantion or not... I don't really care.


Nonsense. JP, when it became clear that you had mistaken Armstrong Williams for Walter Williams, I decided to give you a break. On my next post, I quoted your passage which contained Walter Williams' bio,and clearly said that I was dealing ONLY with the people Snood pictured. This group included Armstrong Williams, not Walter Williams.

Your answer? A rather snide,
jpi9nMilwaukee wrote:
Ummm.. so was I.

Proof positive that at that time, you had NO IDEA that you had included the bio of someone who was not in Snood's post.

I gave you just enough rope to hang yourself, and you did.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Last Supper
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 02/12/2025 at 09:00:12