real life wrote:Really, Timber?
You think Barna is more objective than UC Berkeley?
Another straw man from rl, amusingly, if predictably, presented in defense of an earlier presented straw man of his. If nothing else, rl is consistent in the practice of forensics as slapstick ... one pratfall after another.
xingu wrote:Looks like the two surveys are showing the same thing. In the Berkeley survey it's the youth that are more conservative and as they become older they lose their religious fervor and become more moderate.
Is that what the Barna survey is saying?
Pretty much. The Berkeley survey in no way supports the thesis rl attempted to present - in fact the article rl cited is irrelevant to his point, while the Barna survey, which goes directly to the point of rl's failed thesis, counters rl's point, and considered together the pair clearly refutes rl's ridiculous proposition.