Reply
Mon 9 Jun, 2003 09:29 am
Many of us have already determined that John Ashcroft is a danger to democracy and our freedoms. It's incumbant upon all of us to make sure this administration disappears after 2004. The biggest hurdle is that GWBush enjoys a high performance rating. c.i.
no need to worry John is praying for us/ or is that preying on us?
Preying, Dys. However, once word of this gets out, I suspect the reactionaries are gonna run with it...you know how suspicious they are about technology and how emotional they get about government control.
We can effect individual parts of the government and individual companies,
but the technology overall is inevitable.
For less than a buck anyone will be able to spy on anyone, with
500 video cameras the size of mosquitos, that you let fly all over the city.
So just like various Caller ID features on your phone today,
there will an arms race of measures and counter-measures,
products to purchase that combat other products.
It's a salesperson's nirvana!
The average citizen will be overwhelmed with all the complications,
and organized marketting campaigns will have the upper hand.
People will be as sheep.
That's why hand-made goods will become in such demand.
Not only are they unique, one of a kind, with real human spirit in them,
but they'll have the advantage of not containing RFID chips
or such organized spyware.
RFID chips greatly benefit the huge, centralized organization more than anybody else.
The only way they would become irrelevant and discarded is if we move
towards a distributed cottage-goods economy,
where people buy what they need from their close neighbors.
If large franchises, although super-cheap and hyper-efficient, were
shunned and avoided in favor of character and human integrity.
Many small but human communities.
I would pay three times the price for something that has real character
and that keeps me out of somebody's mass production and monitoring system.
But just like the discount card at your supermarket today,
if you want privacy you will have to pay extra for it.
I don't see any other way around ubiquitous technology like this.
the ghost in the machine is here to stay
Much too intrusive. It's usage must be controlled.
That's what Ashcroft wants to do - he wants total control to eliminate terrorism. c.i.
Ashcroft needs to be put back on a leash.
The only people that can do that is the pres and congress. It's out of the people's control. c.i.
au1929 wrote:Much too intrusive. It's usage must be controlled.
I agree completely, but I'm afraid the only way you will control it is to pay extra. Isn't that just capitalism and free markets?
Maybe the best we could do -- is to use this technology to spy on John Ashcroft, et al.
AshcroftCam.com could charge a little fee...
CodeBorg, Count me in on a contribution to spy on Ashcroft. That will be money well spent. c.i.
Uh huh, just as I predicted last week, the conservatives are jumping all over this. And I still think we're gonna see a reactionary response...