0
   

9/11 was an inside job

 
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Sep, 2006 06:25 am
Fairy tales in your little minds.
0 Replies
 
dupre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Sep, 2006 07:35 am
a reference to that German pole.

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:85JeTGEXslMJ:www.strategypage.com/militaryforums/93-2965.aspx+%22germans%22+%22pole%22+%229/11%22&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Sep, 2006 07:40 am


A German of Polish descent?
0 Replies
 
dupre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Sep, 2006 07:42 am
I'm just wondering about Bush reading to the children.

He was supposedly "hosting a conversation" at the Institute of Health on children's education.

I mean, when was it determined that Bush would be "hosting a conversation" at that event?

The Great American Read-Aloud Day occurs in April.

Do presidents routinely read aloud to children? Has any other president read aloud to children other than on the Great American Read Aloud Day?

I ask because we are always talking about terrorists hiding behind children so they don't get bombed.

I admit I haven't done loads of research on the conspiracy theories, just hear / read some here and there and haven't come to any ideas on it either way ...

But this thing about reading to the children has just stuck in my craw SINCE 9/11/01. FIVE YEARS now.

Was Bush hiding behind children as a last-minute planned event, because he knew (or had reason to believe) something was going to happen.

Were his plans to be at that school common, public knowledge?
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Sep, 2006 07:49 am
Bush could have been anywhere, at any event, with any number of men women and children surrounding him--or he could have stashed himself in any number of secure places.
Of all things fishy about 9/11, I wouldn't think this is one of them.
The fact that he continued reading after the confirmation that America was under attack is just an odd reaction that would garner more of my attention than anything else.
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Sep, 2006 07:56 am
dupre wrote:
I'm just wondering about Bush reading to the children.

He was supposedly "hosting a conversation" at the Institute of Health on children's education.

I mean, when was it determined that Bush would be "hosting a conversation" at that event?

The Great American Read-Aloud Day occurs in April.

Do presidents routinely read aloud to children? Has any other president read aloud to children other than on the Great American Read Aloud Day?

I ask because we are always talking about terrorists hiding behind children so they don't get bombed.

I admit I haven't done loads of research on the conspiracy theories, just hear / read some here and there and haven't come to any ideas on it either way ...

But this thing about reading to the children has just stuck in my craw SINCE 9/11/01. FIVE YEARS now.

Was Bush hiding behind children as a last-minute planned event, because he knew (or had reason to believe) something was going to happen.

Were his plans to be at that school common, public knowledge?


Read : The Dog Did Not Bark Because The Criminal Was Its Master
0 Replies
 
dupre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Sep, 2006 08:03 am
Thanks. That was an interesting take on it. I appreciate it!
0 Replies
 
MarionT
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Sep, 2006 02:37 pm
freedom 4 free tells the truth. I have read that before and nobody has proven that the details are not correct. The conservative hate mongers must be removed from office. We all have to vote against them. It is our duty as Americans!
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Sep, 2006 03:06 pm
MarionT wrote:
freedom 4 free tells the truth. I have read that before and nobody has proven that the details are not correct. The conservative hate mongers must be removed from office. We all have to vote against them. It is our duty as Americans!


Marion, read this interesting piece and click on the link to watch the video.

Quote:
Long-sought 9/11 videotape didn't capture attack

RAW STORY
Published: Friday September 15, 2006


A convenience store videotape long-sought by September 11 conspiracy theorists does not actually show the attack on the Pentagon, RAW STORY has learned.

Many believed the video would show American Airlines Flight 77 -- or something else -- striking the Pentagon. The videotape, which depicts views from the gas station's six security cameras, shows that the CITGO cameras did not seem to capture the actual attack.

Conservative organization Judicial Watch obtained the footage through a Freedom of Information Act request filed December 15, 2004. The request sought all records pertaining to September 11, 2001 camera recordings of the Pentagon attack from the Nexcomm/CITGO gas station, Pentagon security cameras and the Virginia Department of Transportation.

In May 2006, The Department of Defense released a number of videos depicting the attack in response to a Judicial Watch lawsuit. The group filed another lawsuit against the FBI on June 22, 2006.

The FBI has also agreed to release to Judicial Watch a videotape obtained from the Doubletree Hotel near the Pentagon by November 9, 2006.

"With the release of this videotape, we are one step closer to completing the public record on the September 11 terrorist attacks," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton in a statement. "The CITGO tape evidently does not show the Pentagon attack, which the American people can now see for themselves. This videotape was the subject of intense public debate. Now that it has been released to the public, there is no reason for further speculation about what it does or does not show."

The video may be viewed below. Images from inside the store have been partially obscured by the FBI to protect the privacy of store customers and employees.

source


... which raises the question of why the FBI withheld the tape all this time claiming it was critical to their investigation.
0 Replies
 
freedom4free
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Sep, 2006 01:37 pm
9/11 an Inside Job

Half of New Yorkers believe US leaders had foreknowledge of impending 9-11 attacks and consciously failed to act; 66% call for new probe of unanswered questions by congress or New York's Attorney General, see Zogby, and thousands of Americans have signed a petition for a new probe.

A poll shows 89% of CNN Internet users feel this way and over 63% of Canadians feel similarly. On the 3 year anniversary of the 9/11 attacks 80% Al-Arabia satellite TV viewers thought others, besides Bin Ladin, were behind 9/11.

source
0 Replies
 
MarionT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Sep, 2006 01:46 pm
Not only that, Freedom, but the head of a large and liberated Nation. Venezuela, declared that the Bushies and the Mossad had conspired to create 9/11. He certainly is not a minor figure. He is the head of a state!
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Sep, 2006 02:38 pm
MarionT wrote:
He is the head of a state!

There's a lot of those in the world... I wouldnt believe what half of em said.
0 Replies
 
MarionT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Sep, 2006 02:44 pm
Well, Who do you believe? Bushie? Blair? The bootlicker heads of state in Australia or Canada? Go to Europe and talk to the people there. Most of them say that the USA and Israel caused 9/11.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Sep, 2006 03:23 pm
MarionT wrote:
Go to Europe and talk to the people there. Most of them say that the USA and Israel caused 9/11.

Ha. Have you looked at my "location", Marion? I actually LIVE in Europe.. so dont go telling me what "most of" us here think. Most of us Europeans do not think "USA and Israel caused 9/11".

MarionT wrote:
Well, Who do you believe? Bushie? Blair? The bootlicker heads of state in Australia or Canada?

You've actually inspired me (with your previous post already) to start a new thread - asking, who would you trust soonest?

I'll make my own list later, some time I need to revive that thread. But by ways of preview: politicians I'd trust would be people like Joschka Fischer, Lionel Jospin, Vaclav Havel and Romano Prodi. None of them are rightwingers - and none of them believes "USA and Israel caused 9/11".
0 Replies
 
MarionT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Sep, 2006 03:36 pm
A friend told me that the most popular book in France now is something called-"A Horrifying Fraud" by someone named Messian. It is a best sellet and it says that the US caused 9/11 with a missle. Do you know about this? I will bet you do not!
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Sep, 2006 03:45 pm
Yes, there was a German book that caused quite a stir and shifted a lot of copies for a while too. But no, that doesnt mean "most of" the Europeans subscribe to these theories.

Case in question: in the Netherlands, pollster Maurice de Hond asked respondents last week to give their "judgement about the veracity of the attack on the WTC in New York on 11 September 2001". The results:

62% Has definitely happened
24% Has probably really happened
6% Was probably staged
3% Was definitely staged.

Though the percentage of people who thought the 9/11 attacks were staged increased on the far right and the far left, it was a small minority even there (13% of the List Fortuyn and Group Wilders voters on the far right, and 16% of Green Left and 19% of Socialist voters on the far left).

There was more ambiguity on the question whether America had itself to blame for the attack:

16% Yes, completely
28% Yes, a little bit
52% No
0 Replies
 
MarionT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Sep, 2006 11:16 pm
How can the people vote intelligently when they can't find out the truth? Do all of them visit the blogs proving that 9/11 was set up by Bushie and the Jews? Do all of them think, before the vote, of why the investigation of 9/11 did not even begin until a whole year had passed? That stinks of conspiracy and cover up!
0 Replies
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 09:54 am
MarionT wrote:
A friend told me that the most popular book in France now is something called-"A Horrifying Fraud" by someone named Messian. It is a best sellet and it says that the US caused 9/11 with a missle. Do you know about this? I will bet you do not!
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 10:15 am
MarionT wrote:
Not only that, Freedom, but the head of a large and liberated Nation. Venezuela, declared that the Bushies and the Mossad had conspired to create 9/11. He certainly is not a minor figure. He is the head of a state!


You don't see the fallaciousness of your logic.
X is a head of state therefore what X says must be accepted as a valid truth.

Now, substitute "X" with "Bush".
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Sep, 2006 10:30 am
Yep, that George Bush is quite the rascal, isn't he?

He wins the election in 2000 and makes sure there is a close vote in Florida to create a distraction while he rounds up 19 knuckleheads to hi-jack airplanes to fly into the WTC and Pentagon, and what the heck, why not the White House or Capital Building. He hires some folks to plant bombs in the WTC on the 80th Floor and 70 th floor because the rookie pilots are going to hit the WTC right about there. Then he remembers, Laura might be home so he tells the one pilot to crasch the plane in PA using code during a story book reding to children.

Once this is done, now he can go to war with Afganistan and Iraq.

Yep, this guy Bush is a rascal.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/08/2024 at 06:47:53