0
   

THE BRITISH THREAD

 
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 03:09 am
You've got a point there, Spendy old bean.
0 Replies
 
Dutchy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 03:52 am
Spendius wrote "most of that income would be lost if it was stuck in some dump down under where its" etc.etc.etc

http://img457.imageshack.us/img457/5016/melbournecricketgroundto8.jpg
Melbourne Cricket Ground.

So you call this a "dump" eh. This is where the "Ashes" were on display during the recent test. Show me a cricket ground anywhere in the UK which can seat 100.000 spectators, and holds the world record for a cricket match: 90.800 against the West Indies.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 04:24 am
Dutchy wrote:
Spendius wrote "most of that income would be lost if it was stuck in some dump down under where its" etc.etc.etc

http://img457.imageshack.us/img457/5016/melbournecricketgroundto8.jpg
Melbourne Cricket Ground.

So you call this a "dump" eh. This is where the "Ashes" were on display during the recent test. Show me a cricket ground anywhere in the UK which can seat 100.000 spectators, and holds the world record for a cricket match: 90.800 against the West Indies.


Parts of Spendy's charm are his lack of grasp on reality, flights of fancy, and use of terminological inexactitudes.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 04:59 am
Morning Brit Pack.

Mornin' Ozzies.

I see you're suitably smug.

x
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 05:04 am
Okay, I'm gonna bash in here without an invite nor a read of the thread.

Smorgs sent me a PM alerting me to the Pomgolian boards, but my n00b status didn't allow me to reply to her message, so I came over here to reply.

As you were gentleman. At ease ladies. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Dutchy
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 05:04 am
Morning smorgs, you must have good eyes. Smile
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 05:08 am
smorgs wrote:
Morning Brit Pack.

Mornin' Ozzies.

I see you're suitably smug.

x


Who us 3? nah we're just here to support youse guys in your time of need.
and to collect the urn.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 05:10 am
So Smorgs know a builder in Southern Persia.

That's nothing, I know a yak-herder in Outer Mongolia.

Welcome, Builder. How are things in Persia, where you are?
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 05:10 am
Oh, the ashes? Flintoff couldn't manage a greasy stick up a kyhber pass.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 05:12 am
McTag wrote:
So Smorgs know a builder in Southern Persia.

That's nothing, I know a yak-herder in Outer Mongolia.

Welcome, Builder. How are things in Persia, where you are?


It's been raining pretty solid for a week or so. We need it. I can't complain.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 05:18 am
Just for comment's sake, what let down the Pomgolian cricket side was not a lack of talent, but a lack of direction.

That doofus couldn't place a field if his life depended on it. His bowlers were left guessing with the field placings, and several easy catches dropped short of the hands that could have mattered.

Flintoff should be placed in the stocks in the Town square, so everyone can hate on him equally. He's a fricken German anyways. Get more Panesars in the team. He should have been there from the start.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 06:52 am
OI!

You can bugger off back to the boring threads if you start dissin' Germans (unless it's about Football).

Even though they bombed our chippy, we hold at least one of them (Walter) in high esteem on BT.

Quote:
Pomgolian


Laughing

x
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 07:15 am
Mornin' Dutch!

We have plenty of fossiking opportunities in Blighty you know, just in case you fancy bringing your tools to the land of plenty.

Have you met Builder?

He's a touch cheeky... but I like that.

Quote:
At ease ladies.


...always, B

x
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 07:44 am
Flintoff's major mistakes were-

1- Declaring in No 2 and then losing. He underestimated the opposition. He should have batted to 650.

2- Choosing to bat in No 4 because he hadn't the bottle to risk putting the Australians in and losing.

Talking about field placings when catchables dropped harmlessly is talking after the event.

He can't be expected to win against a far superior side on their home grounds but he could possibly have averted a whitewash. To go for victory at all was foolish. After hubris comes nemesis.

Still- it might inspire a rethink and next time there will be no McGrath, Warne, Langer and probably not Gilchrist. And we will be at home which is a bigger advantage than many people are aware of.

But I'll still want us to lose badly because I just can't stand bloody rate-busters pulling the lookers just because they train hard, practice a lot, suffer injections and soak themselves in ice-baths. I can't understand fat Australian slobs wanting their own side to be anything other than splatted for the same reason.

What's sexy about training hard, bloody practicing (nightmares both), being needled and pulverised and reclining in ice? I'll bet there's 50,000 guys here who would be better than that lot if they were prepared to undergo a lifestyle like that during the very best years of a young man's life. And having to dive at the boundary rope at full speed crashing into the BREATHFRESH hoarding and a cameraman to try to save one run and next ball is a no-ball wide for four and the one after a long-hop which goes for six. And be a sandwich-board man into the bargain for HEALY'S SAUSAGES.

Only really ugly, stupid blokes would stoop to such desperate tactics to get the better of us Jack-the-lads. Eh lads?

And is it not just the money anyway. It's odd how similar all their WAGS look. And behave.

And us normals have to have the leavings who are not posh.

Aren't we lucky and we get to moan and groan as well.

Wasn't it funny when Strauss (is that an English name- come to think of it is Pieterson. Or Panasar. ) got poleaxed by a Brett Lee special. I would have stood a bit farther off myself.

The excuses are good though.

It's LADYTV stupid.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 07:45 am
smorgs wrote:
OI!

You can bugger off back to the boring threads if you start dissin' Germans (unless it's about Football).

Even though they bombed our chippy, we hold at least one of them (Walter) in high esteem on BT.

Quote:
Pomgolian


Laughing

x


Meh, I'm one quarter German myself. The Brit royalty is 100% Germanic stock. Bloody horse won't run.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 08:08 am
spendius wrote:
Flintoff's major mistakes were-


Thinking he knew how to captain a team effort.

spendius wrote:
1- Declaring in No 2 and then losing. He underestimated the opposition. He should have batted to 650.


Ponting declared twice. History will show that he knew what he was doing.

spendius wrote:
2- Choosing to bat in No 4 because he hadn't the bottle to risk putting the Australians in and losing.


The only good batsmen in the side got clean bowled. You can't blame him for that.

spendius wrote:
Talking about field placings when catchables dropped harmlessly is talking after the event.


This is the real issue. He never talked to his bowlers about field positions. That is why the team struggled in the field.

spendius wrote:
He can't be expected to win against a far superior side on their home grounds but he could possibly have averted a whitewash. To



That's a pisspoor attempt at an apology. In the leadup to the Test, the Pomgolians were confident and poised to win.

spendius wrote:
go for victory at all was foolish. After hubris comes nemesis.


It would be nice if you could field a team next time.

spendius wrote:
Still- it might inspire a rethink and next time there will be no McGrath, Warne, Langer and probably not Gilchrist. And we will be at home which is a bigger advantage than many people are aware of.


Clark is just good as McGrath, and Gillie might play on. As for Warnie, he's an anomoly. I never liked him anyways. Tubby little substance abuser. Reminds me of me. LOL.

spendius wrote:
But I'll still want us to lose badly because I just can't stand bloody rate-busters pulling the lookers just because they train hard, practice a lot, suffer injections and soak themselves in ice-baths. I can't understand fat Australian slobs wanting their own side to be anything other than splatted for the same reason.


Damn, you're a fixated firker. I haven't met many of them before. Pleased to meet you spendius.

spendius wrote:
What's sexy about training hard, bloody practicing (nightmares both), being needled and pulverised and reclining in ice? I'll bet there's 50,000 guys here who would be better than that lot if they were prepared to undergo a lifestyle like that during the very best years of a young man's life.


Hard training is part of being an all-rounder. Get over it. You think becoming an internationally famous sportsman, and earning enough money to retire at thirty years of age is a bad thing?


spendius wrote:
And having to dive at the boundary rope at full speed crashing into the BREATHFRESH hoarding and a cameraman to try to save one run and next ball is a no-ball wide for four and the one after a long-hop which goes for six.


Dude, don't ever play indoor cricket. You will die in there.

spendius wrote:
And be a sandwich-board man into the bargain for HEALY'S SAUSAGES.


Ola. Send me some input.

spendius wrote:
Only really ugly, stupid blokes would stoop to such desperate tactics to get the better of us Jack-the-lads. Eh lads?


D'uh. That's pretty shallow dudess.

spendius wrote:
And is it not just the money anyway. It's odd how similar all their WAGS look. And behave.


Yeah, not as "special" as Flintoff looked taking a walk on two runs.


spendius wrote:
And us normals have to have the leavings who are not posh.


Suck it up.

spendius wrote:
Aren't we lucky and we get to moan and groan as well.


Good practice for next time. Keep moaning.

spendius wrote:
Wasn't it funny when Strauss (is that an English name- come to think of it is Pieterson. Or Panasar. ) got poleaxed by a Brett Lee special. I would have stood a bit farther off myself.


Backseat batsmen? You have them in Pomgolia too? That's too cute.

spendius wrote:
The excuses are good though.



Good enough for whom? You? LOL

spendius wrote:
It's LADYTV stupid.


Awww, okay.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 08:32 am
Looks like you met your match, suspendy.

fnar fnar.

I'm off to the shops to buy female ecoutrements and then I'm going to lie on the settee watching LadyTV, eating chocolate in a basque.

laters

x
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 08:52 am
spendius wrote:
Steve wrote-

Quote:
as I am to be described in such terms. What does materialistic mean?


Given over to the exclusive preoccupation of the gross appetites the flesh is subject to.

In its modern sophisticated city form it grants credibility to snobbish variations learned from glossy Sunday magazines and such like in order to provide an easily seen through disguise. It cannot be said to eschew the consolations of philosophy because it is unaware of them due to the noise of its gobblings and slurpings and friggings and humpings.

Materialism-"Opinion that nothing exists but matter and its movements and modifications; doctrine that consciousness and will are wholly due to material agency: tendency to prefer material possessions and physical comfort to spiritual values."

I don't care for "tendency" and "prefer". It is wholly sold out. A pig is a perfect example.
Thanks for the answer Spendy. I thought you might. I'm also curious to know why you think I'm an atheist...but we can leave that for the moment.

I want to announce here, for the first time in the public domain, that I have solved The Parsley Paradox.

OK what is it? Briefly it is an apparant contradiction of the general rule that if x is a non imaginary variable greater than zero, then its rate of change can only be positive negative or zero.

The price of parsley is an exception as I demonstrated to the "Customer Services" lady at ASDA yesterday.

I pointed that I bought 2 packs of parsley from the "Fresh Herbs" counter. All herbs were priced around 60 -70 pence, but all had a sticker saying "any two for £1". Further one pack of parsley was labelled reduced (from 68 pence) to 44 pence.

But the total cost to me was not £1 or as I expected 96 pence but £1.12. They had reduced the price of parsley and increased it at the same time. This defies all logic common sense and mathematics as Russell himself has shown in Principia which I pointed out to the "Customer Services Lady" using some more packs of parsley. She was struck dumb. Or just dumb. Not only could she not refute my argument, but could give no explanation for the existence of the parsley price paradox. Instead she insisted £1.12 was correct.


....ok footy time more later
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 08:59 am
Come on Macclesfield. Kick'em to hell. And take the money.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 6 Jan, 2007 10:07 am
smorgsie wrote gleefully-

Quote:
Looks like you met your match, suspendy.


I hope so. And Steve does quite well apart from having admitted that he likes bloody parsley. He must have been reading Delia Smith. On the rare occasions when I have been inexplicably required to go into a shop I simply place the goods on the conveyor belt and, after having a good look down the checkout girl's uniform which she has unbuttoned a bit to provide some style to the dump, I wait for her to tell me how much she requires me to give her and then I give it her. But I'm a carrot and peas and cabbage man myself so that might explain why I don't bother with parsley. It's Constable print on the wall stuff. Maybe a flight of pot ducks of different sizes.

But most of what Builder has said is pretty predictable banter of the type we have come to understand.

It was the selectors who thought Flintoff was the best captain. Most people think themselves the best captain as Builder obviously does himself.

Ponting declared twice and won. There's a difference. Flintoff should have recognised that he couldn't win. Played for 5 draws and hope to get 2. Maybe 3. Subdue the enthusiasm of the crowd. Get 'em slow hand-clapping. Viewers turning off.

Quote:
This is the real issue. He never talked to his bowlers about field positions. That is why the team struggled in the field.


How do you know that? Most of it is agreed beforehand in those interminable team meetings. (No booze-no fags etc).

Quote:
That's a pisspoor attempt at an apology. In the leadup to the Test, the Pomgolians were confident and poised to win.


I wasn't in the least confident. They have to give an appearence of confidence. No-hopers do that all the time. Us betting men don't bother with that. I made a little money actually. "Poised" he says. Flintoff poised!!

Quote:
Hard training is part of being an all-rounder. Get over it. You think becoming an internationally famous sportsman, and earning enough money to retire at thirty years of age is a bad thing?


I meant hard. Some people's idea of hard training is a long way off what I mean by it. And you are welcome to it.

I don't think becoming an internationally famous sportsman, and earning enough money to retire at thirty years of age is a good thing automatically. I have an idea what it takes to do it. I valued my slob side.

I once saw a black and white movie scene with Chips Rafferty singing Waltzing Matilda after a long period in the bush. I knew then that you were an 'ornery bunch. Look at Germaine Greer.

Neighbours was pretty funny though.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION - Discussion by Mapleleaf
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
  1. Forums
  2. » THE BRITISH THREAD
  3. » Page 192
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 07/17/2025 at 09:57:12