0
   

THE BRITISH THREAD

 
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2006 04:35 pm
That was a terrible explanation Mac.

I would have took it on but I know viewers find long posts difficult to cope with. A reader of your explanation would be totally baffled if he were watching a match with it for guidance.

How could I be expected to paint walls with smorgsie on the premises and no way I'm doing it while she's off gadding about.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2006 05:16 pm
spendius wrote:
That was a terrible explanation Mac.

I would have took it on but I know viewers find long posts difficult to cope with. A reader of your explanation would be totally baffled if he were watching a match with it for guidance.

How could I be expected to paint walls with smorgsie on the premises and no way I'm doing it while she's off gadding about.


I was quite pleased with it.
If you think you can do better, you miserable moaning git, put up or shut up.
It's "I would of taken", by the way.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2006 06:05 pm
mac wrote-

Quote:
It's "I would of taken", by the way.


which he says is better than-

Quote:
I would have took it on


I'm not so sure you are right there old chap. I think your construction is a boit bourgoisese and suggests that not only do you read The Guardian but also have a delicate palate for fine wines, have tart's knicker's curtains up at your windows and wipe your arse on Charmin bog rolls @ £2.99 a six pack.
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2006 06:14 pm
Francis there is no point asking an Englishman how to play cricket, they dont know.

fielding positions
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Dec, 2006 06:35 pm
We do know how to play cricket.

It is a matter of our determination.

Australians are like rats in a corner down there. No joining the comforts of the EEC for them.

Obviously they have more spirit that we do. If China invaded Northern Territories they would soon be on the blower.

Anybody with more spirit is always going to win.

Methinks they try too hard.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 01:31 am
McTag wrote:
smorgs wrote:
How can I answer?

That's a spendy type question.

I know nothing about cricket...

Sorry, Francis x


You are from Liverpool, so you're excused, dear Smorgs.

Liverpool is a different country. :wink:


...and we do things differently there.

I assume you were quoting from one of my favourite books, or were you just being cheeky?

x

x
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 01:37 am
Quote:
How could I be expected to paint walls with smorgsie on the premises and no way I'm doing it while she's off gadding about.


I don't 'gad' - I sashay.

Anyway, I WILL do it myself...

That's why God gave me tits.

x
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 01:42 am
smorgs wrote:


That's why God gave me tits.

x


Prove it!
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 03:07 am
...and I read The Guardian

...and I wipe my delicate arse with Charmin!

DaddyP, it's a question of faith...

x
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 04:52 am
spendius wrote:
mac wrote-

Quote:
It's "I would of taken", by the way.


which he says is better than-

Quote:
I would have took it on


I'm not so sure you are right there old chap. I think your construction is a boit bourgoisese and suggests that not only do you read The Guardian but also have a delicate palate for fine wines, have tart's knicker's curtains up at your windows and wipe your arse on Charmin bog rolls @ £2.99 a six pack.


Goodness gracious, Holmes! However do you do it?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 06:33 am
spendius wrote:
Charmin bog rolls @ £2.99 a six pack.


Charmin Comfort 4-layers £3.15 for nine rolls here.
0 Replies
 
Dorothy Parker
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 07:08 am
smorgs wrote:
What if we got nekked?

...and you dropped your brush?

x


must you smorgs?
0 Replies
 
Dorothy Parker
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 07:21 am
Calm down fellas, smorgs would never seriously expect any man to help her with anything. That would be asking nature to go against instinct. You lot are pathetic.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 09:17 am
You guys are nice. Thank you all for your explanations about cricket. I begin to understand this delightful game...
0 Replies
 
Dorothy Parker
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 10:05 am
Oh yes, need help with understanding cricket? No problem.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 12:33 pm
Tonight, 31 of December 2006, by way of celebration...

I'm going to knit a tea cosy!

I bought a fab bright red tea pot in the sale for £3.00 and you can't find tea cosys in the shop for love nor money.

I found a brilliant pattern. It's a W.I. WW2 pattern.

It was making me laugh, as this site has a 'french tickler cosy' and IPod cosies, in fact it has cosies for everything???

Laughing Laughing Laughing

x

PS It's so funny - especially the second paragraph...

http://www.knitty.com/ISSUEsummer04/PATTcozies.html
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 12:43 pm
I'm taking orders for these:

http://www.knitty.com/ISSUEsummer04/PATTthong.html

Could be a nice little earner...

Just PM me with your size.

Do you think they would chaff?

x
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 01:53 pm
Francis-

Cricket began as a ritual to encourage exogamy.

When it was discovered that keeping all the village girls to themselves resulted in increasing stupidity it was decided to find a way of bringing in chaps from afar to do the inseminating.

Obviously a test of manhood was required.

The girls were placed behind a wicket gate and their own boys mounted a defence. Only those who breached that defence were entitled. At first this caused bloodshed and loss of life and was thus ritualised into a process the evolution of which you now see.

That is my intellectual justification for always supporting England's opponents and enjoying seeing our team get splattered.

I take the part of the girls behind the gate because I believe exogamy to be an important vehicle for progress and I also like to see the girls having a change because they thrive on it for well established biological reasons.

It gets complicated after that and would take months,if not years, to explain.

It is a manhood test as you would discover with Brett Lee running in and sending a 93 mph missile at your defences on a green pitch or one with cracks in it.

If the ball is not allowed to bounce and there is no wicket to protect there is very little danger which is why baseball hasn't caught on in the civilised world. It only gives an appearence of being a manhood test.

If you study the fielding positions which dadpad provided you should be able to deduce a few of the simpler sexual connotations.

When an umpire adjudicates a defender of the wicket to be "out" he puts his finger up.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 03:40 pm
smorgs wrote:
Quote:
How could I be expected to paint walls with smorgsie on the premises and no way I'm doing it while she's off gadding about.


I don't 'gad' - I sashay.

Anyway, I WILL do it myself...

That's why God gave me tits.

x
Yeah! Beats a roller any day.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Dec, 2006 03:52 pm
stevie2007 wrote:

Quote:
Yeah! Beats a roller any day.


Laughing

...yes, they do cover a large area, without having to 're-dip'

you also need a full, natural brush for cutting in...

x
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION - Discussion by Mapleleaf
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
  1. Forums
  2. » THE BRITISH THREAD
  3. » Page 182
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 07/15/2025 at 05:25:13