0
   

THE BRITISH THREAD

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 03:13 pm
This thread needs a rename. LOL
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 03:13 pm
That IS true, spends...

You wouldn't exactly qualify for a Plain English award now would you?

And you like it that way, you enjoy being enigmatic (and it is sexy).

That's why you got the 'funnies' when I dared suggest you were 'ordinary'.

x
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 03:15 pm
Mathos wrote:
spendius wrote:
The problem is Steve that all Mathos does is take the rhetorical device known as "the assertion" into higher spheres than such simple things as "tedious" and "pompous" and the like. On that score he is deserving of recognition although I fear he is in need of more practice on the finer points of insulting invective. He is also a boxer or an ex-boxer and he may well be suffering from the effects. All boxers are assertive and aggressive.

He is against the war and is thus not entirely without virtue I think you will admit.

I have gathered from a few things he has said that he is a city person and the blurted assertion is a common mode of discourse in cities perhaps due to the general cacophony and continuous hullabaloo with which city people are assailed throughout the day and night.



Listen you, you bloody parrot faced wazzock, if you start getting cocky I'll rip every word you print into a thousand pieces and bring them down on your bloody big, over-read, self opinionated, bombastic, bellicose skull like a mighty oak tree.

You sound like a bloody lake of hungry ducks, quacking every time somebody comes into view or the fox appears. Well let me make it very plain to you Yorkie, you pathetic snotty nosed, prick manipulating perverted sot, that your treading on vary thin ice.

The other jerk, spits **** from page to page from his government office
because his phucking wage packet will be there regardless. He had received no insults from me, and when he started with his chirpy little **** stirring remarks, he got whacked. I'd left it alone, he came back on board today like a ruptured crab on a pebbly beach, and he can lick his wounds, have another rant or apologise, I couldn't give two shakes of an Asian elephants prick (and they are big) which avenue he goes down.

I've heard hens fart before like you and him together, so thats another fine mess you got yourself in oink!
well give credit where it is due. lol.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 03:21 pm
You made me choke on my diet coke, mathos

You funny baaaastaaard!

x
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 03:23 pm
Mathos wrote:
Hi Pete, evening folks, it was interesting reading until I discovered Lord S for B's meanderings.

LORD **** FOR BRAINS

I have had an extremely hard and difficult day, out very early this morning and returned home some thirty minutes since, only to be greeted by your masochism like a lost poussin twittering to an orchestra playing The Bhomeian Rhapsody.

It's possible, the midwife could be responsible: Not being able to determine the real you: You, were discarded into the nearest sluice leaving me having to resort to script conversation with a mature piece of after-birth.

Your cumbersome, somewhat irksome attitude enlikens you to a riotous parvenue with limited knowledge and even less common sense.

I note your still fiddling my tax contributions as well,! Typical.

In the confines of my mentioning your lack of spunk, I was of course refering to your inherent quality of character and temperament.
In short, I was calling you a gutless, cockney, ball-less, yellow bellied runt, but I held back from the expletives so as not to offend any of the members of a nervous disposition or of young and tender years.

I most certainly would never have lowered myself to discussion regarding your sperm count, which would no doubt have great difficulty in siring a handful of frog spawn.

In fact, you might just have a fanny wedged between your thighs, but I'm not in the least curious, I simply take it as read.

Notwithstanding your mythomania, I am somewhat concerned that any attempt by yourself to prove different would make for a very amusing topic. I will therefore, perhaps later this evening commence a thread amongst these European pages, a thread to determine how Lord **** for Brains is viewed in general. After all, they can't all think of you as a first rate plonker. Or can they?

How would you like to start, Mavis?

The realism towards a pragmatic, practical and material way of life is obviously lost in the outer spheres of your ever expandable search for recognition.

Forget it!

You never made first base.


Now, I could sit here and give thought to my reply: As I have previously done, but only ever with Spendi and Aidan, two worthy opponents at one stage of their miserable existence, but like the senate of The Roman Empire, their spirit and defences have long since been reduced to the sands of time. Blown away across a misty, stormy ocean of also rans.

On a strictly personal basis, were you to be handy to grab, I would have no hesitation in ramming a stout brush steele up your piley arse, and renaming you Lord Lollipop.

That is an excellent title, you could make poetry and songs from that.

You could of course apologise for your attack on me, which, although petty in substance, was carried out in a vile and most venomous manner.

Considering the possibility that you could see common sense and make apologies, I will not deride you at all for the present.

The ball Lord **** for Brains has been lobbed firmly into your court. Be careful how you serve.

So mote it be.


Skim read (about 3 lines.)

Bellowing troll-like odd person, I shall feed you no more.
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 03:27 pm
smorgs wrote:
If you boys take some viagra and stop wasting time seeing who can piss highest up the wall...

We might make 3000 posts tonight!

x


2900=bellowing
100=Various good stuff.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 03:32 pm
smorgsie wrote-

Quote:
Takes me back to the summer of '76, I wore a green combat jacket and had multi-coloured hair with one long red plait at the back (complete with bead) smoked a lot of weed and protested against Pershing, and considered joining The Solcialist Worker Party.


Just think though snoggie- you could have been taking deportment and eloqution lessons, practicing ballroom dancing and attending courses in advanced cookery instead and you would be in clover now considering those skills in alliance with your other assets.
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 03:58 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
This thread needs a rename. LOL


The "Won't get fooled again" Thread. (The Who - very British)
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 04:04 pm
...but I didn't sasparelli

I was shut away in a convent school, wearing navy blue, 100% wool knickers - that chaffed.

x
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 04:05 pm
Lord Ellpus, Too many of "those" on a2k to differentiate this one. Wink
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 04:13 pm
I have no inclination to re-name the thread. To do so would be tantamount to a slap round the head with a wet haddock to our estimable, and no doubt delicious, hostess.

Actually I think that cicerone imposter should change his title because he isn't an imposter. What you see is what you get like you do with a pile of bricks.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 04:15 pm
A 'pile of bricks' won the Turner Prize...

x
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 04:18 pm
I think our smorgs is usually the one to do the slapping, Spendi.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 04:22 pm
And you can stop right there, Ellpus!

Or you'll get a real slap...

I'll see YOU in the P.M.s

x
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 04:27 pm
smorgsie wrote-

Quote:
A 'pile of bricks' won the Turner Prize...


To make the same point maybe. "As thick as a brick" was going before the Turner Prize was invented for the purpose of allowing "artists", and their lackspittals and lickies, (hey that's pretty good even if I do say so myself) to take the piss out of the rest of us and at our own expense.

It's part of the constellation Arts Council Grant Bullshit so sucked up to by newspapers like The Grauniad and The Windie.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 04:31 pm
Quote:
hey that's pretty good even if I do say so myself


Yes, that would come in the suspiria pomptastic top ten..

x
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 11:16 pm
Mathos wrote:
spendius wrote:
The problem is Steve that all Mathos does is take the rhetorical device known as "the assertion" into higher spheres than such simple things as "tedious" and "pompous" and the like. On that score he is deserving of recognition although I fear he is in need of more practice on the finer points of insulting invective. He is also a boxer or an ex-boxer and he may well be suffering from the effects. All boxers are assertive and aggressive.

He is against the war and is thus not entirely without virtue I think you will admit.

I have gathered from a few things he has said that he is a city person and the blurted assertion is a common mode of discourse in cities perhaps due to the general cacophony and continuous hullabaloo with which city people are assailed throughout the day and night.



Listen you, you bloody parrot faced wazzock, if you start getting cocky I'll rip every word you print into a thousand pieces and bring them down on your bloody big, over-read, self opinionated, bombastic, bellicose skull like a mighty oak tree.

You sound like a bloody lake of hungry ducks, quacking every time somebody comes into view or the fox appears. Well let me make it very plain to you Yorkie, you pathetic snotty nosed, prick manipulating perverted sot, that your treading on vary thin ice.

The other jerk, spits **** from page to page from his government office
because his phucking wage packet will be there regardless. He had received no insults from me, and when he started with his chirpy little **** stirring remarks, he got whacked. I'd left it alone, he came back on board today like a ruptured crab on a pebbly beach, and he can lick his wounds, have another rant or apologise, I couldn't give two shakes of an Asian elephants prick (and they are big) which avenue he goes down.

I've heard hens fart before like you and him together, so thats another fine mess you got yourself in oink!


Bellowing troll-like odd person,
I can actually see, believe it or not, how totally impartial bystanders like Steve, Smorgs and anyone else who happens to drop by, can find this nasty stuff quite amusing.

I, however, will still not feed you. It only encourages you to carry on.
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 11:34 pm
Just for any of you who may be interested in this sort of stuff, there are two things on Radio 2 that sound very good this weekend.

Saturday (check schedules) - Very good programme about Punk music and the way it has influenced the music scene, and...

Sunday (10pm) Tribute to Alan Freeman. They are re-broadcasting a "Pick of the Pops" of his from 1970, then an hour later, one from 1980.

Alright?.....Stay bright. Not'arf.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 11:55 pm
Lord E,

You're still feeding the belly. Peanuts taste just as good as a gourmet meal to the starved, and they too make gas pains when eaten in quantity.
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Dec, 2006 12:21 am
Butrflynet, good point, but people who may read future bellowing, say in ten or twenty pages time, because it WILL carry on regardless (IMO), may not realise that the person concerned possesses remarkable troll like qualities.
I feel that if I highlight this on each personal attack, at least they will have a fuller picture.
It may be a new member or two, who just get seduced by the obvious talent for humour, and therefore fail to see how hurtful this troll like behaviour can be.
After all, this seems to have already happened with some present and long standing members.

Maybe I'll think about it.

Thank you for your good advice, and taking the time to post this.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION - Discussion by Mapleleaf
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
  1. Forums
  2. » THE BRITISH THREAD
  3. » Page 150
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/13/2025 at 06:19:27