0
   

THE BRITISH THREAD

 
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 04:30 am
McTag wrote:
Hey did you see that article recently by Dominic Lawson I think it was in the Guardian, about the Barmy Army?

Absolutely spot on.
No, anything to do with General Sir Mike Jackson?
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 04:41 am
Steve 41oo wrote:
McTag wrote:
Hey did you see that article recently by Dominic Lawson I think it was in the Guardian, about the Barmy Army?

Absolutely spot on.
No, anything to do with General Sir Mike Jackson?


No, silly, the cricket-supporting oiks.

Sorry, not the Grauniad, the Indy

http://comment.independent.co.uk/columnists_a_l/dominic_lawson/article2040151.ece
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 06:18 am
I happen to know two regulars in the Barmy Army and they tell me that the whole thing is a business and that the majority of their number are quite respectable in the normal course of events with a good number of solicitors, barristers, accountants etc in their midst. The costs of being a member are beyond the capacity of most ordinary working people.

They are basically middle-class people letting their hair down and networking and there are other activities taking place when the day's play has finished and in between matches the principle characteristic of which is the absence of their wives.

But what on earth is Mr Lawson doing writing in The Guardian? His old friend and mentor Mr Conrad Black is currently arraigned on charges in the US courts which make the activities of the BA look like playing with the playdough.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 06:35 am
I dont actually object to the Barmy Army. If we cant beat the Aussies at least we can spoil their enjoyment of the game. And they have quite a memorable little theme tune Barmy Army, Barmy Army etc. (infinite regression).

I wonder if they fly BA?
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 07:10 am
dadpad wrote:
McTag wrote:
This thread has got too nice.

How un-British. :wink: Laughing Very Happy Shocked Rolling Eyes Laughing


I can fix that for you mctag.

What a bunch of wingeing pasty faced POMS the lot of you are. Get a grip and give it a tug, you'll feel much calmer afterward I'm sure.


Feck Off, Dadpad!

Hi McT!
Hi Walter!

So nice to have you back...

Lunch sometime soon McT? (xmas menu's on - yum)

x
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 07:28 am
Steve 41oo wrote:
I dont actually object to the Barmy Army. If we cant beat the Aussies at least we can spoil their enjoyment of the game. And they have quite a memorable little theme tune Barmy Army, Barmy Army etc. (infinite regression).

I wonder if they fly BA?


Fly BA....good one.

Like you, Steve, I have no problem with them. Possibly the odd few hangers on have caused some of this rpoblem, but from what I've seen, they have great fun out there, there's been no fighting that I've heard of (quite the reverse, they actually hold an alternative cricket match between the two "armies") and most of it seems good natured enough.

Good luck to 'em !
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 07:37 am
Hi Ellpus!

You wasting tax payers money again?

...so am I!

x
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 07:38 am
Hi, Sarah.

Nope. 'Tis lunch break, and I will make sure that there can be no case for whingeing, as I intend to take ten minutes less than my allotted hour.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 08:10 am
spendius wrote:
I happen to know two regulars in the Barmy Army and they tell me that the whole thing is a business and that the majority of their number are quite respectable in the normal course of events with a good number of solicitors, barristers, accountants etc in their midst. The costs of being a member are beyond the capacity of most ordinary working people.

They are basically middle-class people letting their hair down and networking and there are other activities taking place when the day's play has finished and in between matches the principle characteristic of which is the absence of their wives.

But what on earth is Mr Lawson doing writing in The Guardian? His old friend and mentor Mr Conrad Black is currently arraigned on charges in the US courts which make the activities of the BA look like playing with the playdough.


Principal.

The Indy, you great steaming nit.

Being solicitors, barristers, and accountants evidently does not prevent them from behaving like oiks. Did you read the article?
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 08:21 am
Lord Ellpus wrote:
Hi, Sarah.

Nope. 'Tis lunch break, and I will make sure that there can be no case for whingeing, as I intend to take ten minutes less than my allotted hour.


Correction. Eight minutes early.

Catch you later, smorgasbord.
0 Replies
 
dadpad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 08:21 am
scrotes and toe-rags like you lot are welcome on the Aussie threads anytime LE. you cant win the cricket and your debating skills are lousy.
We love the Barmy Army and their money. Spend up pommy gits.

Quote:
Feck Off, Dadpad!


and a cordial "up yours" to you too smorgy.
Now make yourself usefull for a change and get someone a cuppa.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 08:34 am
One lump or two, DP?

Flaming Gular! (is that how you spell it? what the hell does it mean?)

x
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 09:02 am
Mac wrote, in a fit of righteousness-

Quote:
The Indy, you great steaming nit.

Being solicitors, barristers, and accountants evidently does not prevent them from behaving like oiks. Did you read the article?


Easy mistake to make which hardly affects what was said, if at all, and not something worth jumping all over.

Of course I read the article.

I had a longish correspondence with Mr Lawson when he was editor of The Spectator, the hallowed colums of which have been graced by my prose.

I'm surprised that he writes for that rag as well.

He prefers cricket on the village green with a few deckchairs on the pavillion lawn where another level of networking takes place of the type I think you would disapprove of and where a Brett Lee delivery would pass the batsmen by unseen.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 09:12 am
smorgs wrote:
One lump or two, DP?

Flaming Gular! (is that how you spell it? what the hell does it mean?)

x


Galah? A bird? I think we should be told.
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 09:35 am
He'll be in bed...

They keep funny hours, Australians...

Bet he's snoring away in the outback somewhere, alarming flocks of budgies...

And his beat-up old hat with corks hanging of it, resting on a pile of tinnies next to his bed...

x
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 09:38 am
suspendy wrote:

Quote:
I had a longish correspondence with Mr Lawson when he was editor of The Spectator, the hallowed colums of which have been graced by my prose.


spends, you pompous bugger!

x
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 09:44 am
dadpad wrote:
scrotes and toe-rags like you lot are welcome on the Aussie threads anytime LE. you cant win the cricket and your debating skills are lousy.
We love the Barmy Army and their money. Spend up pommy gits.

Quote:
Feck Off, Dadpad!


and a cordial "up yours" to you too smorgy.
Now make yourself usefull for a change and get someone a cuppa.
nice to see the usual bonhommie

or should that be pommiebastardshommie..
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 10:04 am
smorgs wrote:
suspendy wrote:

Quote:
I had a longish correspondence with Mr Lawson when he was editor of The Spectator, the hallowed colums of which have been graced by my prose.


spends, you pompous bugger!

x
My missus get the Spectator. I get New Scientist and used to subscribe to New Statesman. Werent you also writing for the Times Literary Review Spendiperson? ps. good cartoons in the Spectator.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 10:19 am
particularly like the chav reading the queens xmas txt msg
0 Replies
 
smorgs
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Dec, 2006 10:54 am
steve4165000 wrote:

Quote:
My missus get the Spectator. I get New Scientist and used to subscribe to New Statesman.


You should go and join spends on the pompous step...

x
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

THE BRITISH THREAD II - Discussion by jespah
FOLLOWING THE EUROPEAN UNION - Discussion by Mapleleaf
The United Kingdom's bye bye to Europe - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
Sinti and Roma: History repeating - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
[B]THE RED ROSE COUNTY[/B] - Discussion by Mathos
Leaving today for Europe - Discussion by cicerone imposter
So you think you know Europe? - Discussion by nimh
 
  1. Forums
  2. » THE BRITISH THREAD
  3. » Page 148
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/13/2025 at 11:20:59