JTT wrote:Ya might as well bang your head against a wall, for all the good it'll do you, Cy. This pathology, [explained in the following article] runs deep in RWAs like Brandon, Foxy, Tico, GS, McG, etc [I had to include McG because this describes him to a T]
It's as if there's a mental switch that turns off the ability to perceive facts, surrendering their brains to authority figures, no matter how wicked or corrupt these AFs might be....
If this is true, then it's awfully odd that whenever you folks are asked to specify one and only one lie that Bush has told, in your own words, not a cut and paste job, together with a bit of evidence that it is a lie, so that it can be debated in an orderly way, you can almost always be counted on to give an evasion or distraction, rather than the requested example.
The mere fact that you call someone a liar, or that you talk mostly to people who agree with you, should not be construed as indicating that it's actually the truth.
Cyclops has found one statement by the President that may be a lie, is apparently factually false, and which at the very least is an incomplete statement. This doesn't prove that Bush is a deliberate liar. If tens of thousands of people who hate you followed you around all day, every day, recording every single thing you said and trying to find some kind of contradiction, you'd look like a liar too.
You Bush haters are exceptionally resistant to simply listing his so-called lies, one at a time, in your own words, and responding on topic to on-topic arguments by his supporters. You can almost always be counted on to respond to a request for a citation with a personal comment about the poster making the request, and this is hardly a characteristic of people in the right.