1
   

Is Bi-Polar Bear doomed?

 
 
Reply Wed 23 Aug, 2006 04:49 pm
Is our Bi-Polar Bear doomed? What will Squinney think of his new manhood? ---BBB

Study: Polar Bear Genitals are Shrinking
By Charles Q. Choi
Special to LiveScience
posted: 23 August 2006

The icecap may not be the only thing shrinking in the Arctic. The genitals of polar bears in east Greenland are apparently dwindling in size due to industrial pollutants.

Scientists report this shrinkage could, in the worst case scenario, endanger polar bears there and elsewhere by spoiling their love lives and causing their numbers to peter out.

In fact, all marine mammals could get affected by these pollutants, "especially the Arctic fox, killer whale and pilot whales," wildlife veterinarian and toxicologist Christian Sonne at the National Environmental Research Institute of Denmark in Roskilde told LiveScience. These animals bodies also carry extremely high levels of these contaminants.

Polar bears from northernmost Norway, western Russia and east Greenland are among the most polluted animals in the Arctic, as they feast on ringed seals and bearded seals. The blubber of these seals accumulates high levels of organic pollutants loaded with halogens such as chlorine. These organohalogens can act like hormones.

Sonne and his colleagues looked at formaldehyde-preserved genitals from 55 male and 44 female east Greenland polar bears, collected from 1999 to 2002 by about 30 polar bear subsistence hunters regulated by the Greenland government.

Harrowing expedition

The researchers experienced harrowing times on their expeditions with dog sleds into the wilds of Greenland to study polar bears.

"One evening a bear came just next to us in the night when we were doing the toilette," Sonne recalled. "They shot and it ran." Another time, "we almost had to eat the dogs as we ran out of food and seals. It was cold sleeping in -50 degrees C [-58 Fahrenheit] in five weeks with no heater."

The adult polar bear testicles the researchers examined were on average roughly three inches across and 1.8 ounces in weight, although they could dramatically enlarge during the height of sexual activity from January to July. Their bacula, or penis bones, were on average nearly seven inches long.

The scientists found the higher the level of organohalogens in polar bear, the smaller testicle and baculum size and weight likely were. Ovary size and weight decreased as organohalogen levels rose as well.

Slow to mate

Polar bears have among the lowest reproductive rates for terrestrial mammals. The scientists say reducing polar bear penis size would make sex less successful, upsetting naturally slow-to-grow polar bear numbers. Testicle and ovary shrinkage would upset polar bear reproduction too.

Future research should examine the effects of low levels of organohalogen contamination, Sonne said. "How long do we have to go down in exposure levels to obtain no-effect levels? Is it possible at all?" he explained.

Sonne and his colleagues reported their findings online Aug. 16 via the journal Environmental Science & Technology.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 375 • Replies: 8
No top replies

 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Aug, 2006 08:33 pm
Squinney will go nuts when she reads this.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Aug, 2006 09:12 pm
My balls are grandfathered in beeyatches....
0 Replies
 
Eva
 
  1  
Reply Wed 23 Aug, 2006 09:58 pm
Re: Is Bi-Polar Bear doomed?
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
The genitals of polar bears in east Greenland are apparently dwindling in size due to industrial pollutants.


Whew! Good thing the polar bears in North Carolina haven't been affected!
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Aug, 2006 06:39 am
Re: Is Bi-Polar Bear doomed?
Eva wrote:
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
The genitals of polar bears in east Greenland are apparently dwindling in size due to industrial pollutants.


Whew! Good thing the polar bears in North Carolina haven't been affected!


Do you know this for a fact, Eva? And, if so, how?
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Aug, 2006 09:18 am
Re: Is Bi-Polar Bear doomed?
Merry Andrew wrote:
Eva wrote:
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
The genitals of polar bears in east Greenland are apparently dwindling in size due to industrial pollutants.

Whew! Good thing the polar bears in North Carolina haven't been affected!

Do you know this for a fact, Eva? And, if so, how?


Yeah! Drop yer pants, Bear, so we can prove Eva is not a liar.

BBB
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Aug, 2006 06:22 pm
Bear
Bear, I'm still waiting for your pants to hit the floor. Are you being shy?

BBB
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Aug, 2006 06:29 pm
I'm still waiting for answer from Eva -- how did she come across this information? And does Squinney know?
0 Replies
 
Eva
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Aug, 2006 09:35 pm
Purely my opinion, MA, but judging by some of his posts lately, I'd say the Bear's balls are still humongous. Cool Laughing
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Is Bi-Polar Bear doomed?
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/30/2025 at 09:54:31