Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 30 Apr, 2007 06:19 pm
http://staging.michaelmoore.com/_images/splash/thenightwatchman.jpg

April 9th, 2007 2:35 pm
Striking a blow for freedom

Tom Morello's politically charged Nightwatchman persona a departure from his Rage and Audioslave days

By Jim DeRogatis / Chicago Sun-Times

Born and raised in the Chicago suburb of Libertyville, Tom Morello will always be best known to legions of rock fans as a supreme shredder -- the musician who developed a new vocabulary for lead guitar by evoking falling bombs, bursts of machine-gun fire and scratching turntables with '90s rap-rockers Rage Against the Machine and the post-alternative supergroup Audioslave.

The 42-year-old musician has always worked just as hard as a political activist, however -- he is a co-founder and driving force behind the organization Axis of Justice -- and for the last four and a half years, he's quietly been building a solo career, singing and playing acoustic guitar as the Nightwatchman. On April 24, Epic will release his first album as a one-man band, and "One Man Revolution" is as much of a surprise for his rich baritone and minimalist but moving songs as it is an expected forum for his views.

"The event that kind of pushed me out of the nest to begin with was the day after the 2004 presidential election, where I thought, 'I really enjoy doing the arena rock, and also the organizing and educating work of Axis of Justice, but I'm a musician, and I really need to be using my voice as a musician to strike a blow for freedom,'" Morello says, laughing. "That's when I really got the idea in my head that I would make a record, but it was still a secondary thing. It was really only about seven months ago when there was a reorganizing of priorities.

"I played an Amnesty International benefit show with Incubus up in Portland, and Incubus was in the studio with Brendan O'Brien [Pearl Jam, Bob Dylan, Neil Young]. They came back and gave a favorable review of the Nightwatchman show to Brendan, and he called me up and said, 'What's this Nightwatchman thing?' So I sent him some demos and he called me back the next day and said, 'Let's make a record.' And I went down to Atlanta and made the record down there."

As the Nightwatchman, Morello draws on his personal experiences to add resonance to his rousing calls to arms: "On the streets of Havana / I got hugged and kissed / At the Playboy Mansion / I wasn't on the list," he sings in the title track. But it's never easy for a successful musician to reinvent himself in a world where record companies prefer their artists to stick with the expected, and he laughs again when I ask if he feels like Coca-Cola when it tried to launch New Coke.

"That's why it was important to me to have a real firewall between this and, like, the Daywatchman. I would always do it anonymously; I would never do it under my own name. Part of that was hiding behind it, because I had never sung before, and I was just trying to remember the words to the songs. But it was a process: I gained confidence doing that. So then it was opening up for Billy Bragg and Steve Earle, then opening up on Michael Moore's speaking tour, and then playing with Anti-Flag.

"After that, you just couldn't stop me, because one thing this has taught me is to be absolutely fearless in performance, whether it's in a theater full of 16-year-old high school hard-core punk-rock kids, or a seated audience there to hear Michael Moore speak, or being tear-gassed at the FTAA demonstrations in Miami. I believe in every note I'm playing and every word I'm singing, and I just will not flinch."

Morello is also generally unflinching in interviews, but the Nightwatchman is uncharacteristically sketchy when asked about his other endeavors at the moment. After three increasingly disappointing albums released between 2002 and 2006, former Soundgarden singer Chris Cornell recently announced that he was splitting with Morello and the rhythm section of Tim Commerford and Brad Wilk. "Due to irresolvable personality conflicts as well as musical differences, I am permanently leaving the band Audioslave," Cornell wrote in a statement released on Feb. 15.

"As far as Audioslave goes, I have yet to hear from Chris Cornell," Morello says, chuckling anew. "I understand he's left the band; I have not yet heard from him about that."

Around the same time, however, Morello, Commerford and Wilk announced they were reuniting with the long missing-in-action singer Zack de la Rocha for four Rage Against the Machine reunion shows, including appearances at the Coachella Festival on April 28-29. "Right now, there are only the four Rage Against the Machine shows -- there are no plans beyond that -- but I'm very excited to do them, and it's sounding great in the rehearsal room," is all the guitarist says about that, though I do try to draw him out on how the bands fit in with his solo career.

"I tell ya, whether you're talking about Rage, Audioslave or the Nightwatchman, each of them has scratched a very important itch for me. With Rage Against the Machine, I really believed in the music and the mission, but the band always got along horribly, and daily existence in the band was really difficult. With Audioslave, it was like a beautiful trip to Jamaica, where everyone enjoyed the music and enjoyed each other and we were able to function as musicians in a setting that felt great on a daily basis.

"Doing this Nightwatchman stuff, it feels like total freedom. ... With this, my anarchist friends call me from San Francisco -- there's been four arrests and they need to do a show for bail money -- and I just drive up there!"

Indeed, the logo on Morello's Nightwatchman Web site depicts a lone figure marching with a guitar case, and he'll be strolling into his old 'hoods for two shows next week, performing at Lake Forest College on Friday and at a "Carnival and Parade for Fair Food, Real Rights, and Dignity" sponsored by the Immokalee Workers on Saturday. (See www.nightwatchmanmusic.com.)

"My thoughts about the Nightwatchman are summed up pretty succinctly in one of the lyrics in the song 'Maximum Firepower': 'If you take a step towards freedom / It'll take two steps towards you,' " Morello concludes. "This is music that I've believed in from the first time I put pen to paper, and again, it was seven months or so ago where I had a chance to really look at my priorities, and this is what I want to do. ... It really feels like one night at a time, at every single show, I'm creating a little bit of the world I'd like to see."

http://www.michaelmoore.com/




http://www.stopwar.org.uk/images/downloadflyerfinal.jpg


www.scala-london.co.uk
Scala Box office (10 am - 6 pm) Mon-Fri: T: 020 7833 2022
www.ticketweb.co.uk
T: 08700 600 100

A benefit for Stop the War Coalition


Further information from:
David Wilson
Stop the War Coalition Press / Events
[email protected]
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 30 Apr, 2007 06:48 pm
Lest we forget

http://www.world-war-pictures.com/images/britain-world-war-posters/wargbp003.jpg

Battersea, London 1945 (End of World War Two).

Baghdad or London - it's always the kids that end up paying for adult crimes



"War"

Lyrics Edwin Starr



War, huh, yeah
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Uh-huh
War, huh, yeah
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Say it again, y'all

War, huh, good God
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Listen to me

Ohhh, war, I despise
Because it means destruction
Of innocent lives

War means tears
To thousands of mothers eyes
When their sons go off to fight
And lose their lives

I said, war, huh
Good God, y'all
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Say it again

War, whoa, Lord
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Listen to me

War, it ain't nothing
But a heartbreaker
War, friend only to the undertaker
Ooooh, war
It's an enemy to all mankind
The point of war blows my mind

War has caused unrest
Within the younger generation
Induction then destruction
Who wants to die?

Aaaaah, war-huh
Good God y'all
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Say it, say it, say it
War, huh
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Listen to me

War, huh, yeah
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Uh-huh
War, huh, yeah
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Say it again y'all
War, huh, good God
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Listen to me

War, it ain't nothing but a heartbreaker
War, it's got one friend
That's the undertaker
Ooooh, war, has shattered
Many a young mans dreams
Made him disabled, bitter and mean
Life is much to short and precious
To spend fighting wars these days
War can't give life
It can only take it away

Ooooh, war, huh
Good God y'all
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Say it again

War, whoa, Lord
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing!
Listen to me

War, it ain't nothing but a heartbreaker
War, friend only to the undertaker
Peace, love and understanding
Tell me, is there no place for them today?
They say we must fight to keep our freedom
But Lord knows there's got to be a better way

Ooooooh, war, huh
Good God y'all
What is it good for?
You tell me
Say it, say it, say it, say it

War, huh
Good God y'all
What is it good for?
Stand up and shout it
Nothing!
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 30 Apr, 2007 07:06 pm
Meanwhile.....

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=2636133#2636133
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 30 Apr, 2007 09:01 pm

ORANGE ALERT: Set the Captives Free!!! (or at least give them their day in court)


No Mo' Gitmo

A coalition of attorneys representing those detained at Guantánamo Bay have selected May 1st as the launch date of a major lobbying push to restore habeas corpus and close the U.S. prison camp once and for all.

For more than five years, hundreds of men and boys have languished at Guantánamo. Only a small minority was captured by U.S. forces "on the battlefield," fewer still have been formally charged with a crime. Isolation and despair have fueled gruesome hunger strikes and attempted (and successful) suicides. It is time for the madness to end.

On Tuesday May 1st, lawyers from across the country will travel to Washington D.C. to meet with lawmakers and urge them to close Guantánamo and undo the harm done when the last Congress passed the Military Commissions Act and abolished the great Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Pressure from constituents will be essential to this struggle. On May 1st, please call your senators and representatives and let them know that ending the injustice of the Bush administration's detention policies is a matter of the greatest urgency. Ask them to restore Habeas Corpus and close Guantánamo, now.[/color]


Get Mo' Gitmo Litigation News at http://gtmoblog.blogspot.com/


http://www.michaelmoore.com/mustread/index.php?id=869
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2007 06:23 am
Hi Endy,
That last article got me up and researching for a long time...

Anyways, i was in need for some more guidance or opinion or whatever!
(and i certainly hope you don't get annoyed Confused )

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Okay, so I've been observing people lately. And it's wierd! As you must've noticed, there are so many humans out there that don't even know what the hell is going on in the world, ok forget the world, they don't even have a clue about what's happening in the society that they live in....LET ALONE THINKING about making a difference.
and in these people are included the youth....which, like you said sometime earlier, is going to 'make this difference'
so i started to plan on 'making' these people think. I started by sending critical emails to certain class mates and friends etc/( and i'm also thinking of starting an underground newpaper at school next term)

Well anyways, now that i've actually started to implement, there's this wierd problem... or maybe it's just my thinking...

and this gets me to my point:

is it right(or okay or acceptable...) to 'make' people think??? Idea
cause, i mean it's there life, right? they can choose to be ignorant, can't they? and it really shouldn't be my problem if they don't care about anything, should it?(although in the long run it's going to effect all of us...)

Although.... okay, now, i seriously don't know what to say...
See these people don't even have an opinion yet so much potential in them. they don't have direction yet so much talent. they don't have purpose yet so much ability. so it's not wrong to give them wider choices...but then again back to what i just said few lines back...

Evil or Very Mad WHICH WAY IS IT??? Evil or Very Mad

Whew!!!
okay thank you in advance... and have an interesting Labour Day!
Naima

ps i really like your latest on the 'Death Diary'. Very pure, Again! Cool
0 Replies
 
J-B
 
  0  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2007 06:51 am
I think it's never wrong to think.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2007 08:51 pm
Naima - I am certainly not going to get annoyed by your very important question. (I may be a bit freaked out on the death diary sometimes, but here on the revo-thread, I'm a much more chilled out bloke).

If I have sounded annoyed before, it was never at you (or anybody else)- only really at myself.
I'm sorry if I've made you feel uncertain about any of that.

I can't pretend I have the answers (I can only tell you what I think myself) but you ask

Quote:
s it right(or okay or acceptable...) to 'make' people think??? Idea
cause, i mean it's there life, right? they can choose to be ignorant, can't they? and it really shouldn't be my problem if they don't care about anything, should it?(although in the long run it's going to effect all of us...)


I think people have the right to make their own minds up about something.
Problems arise when people are purposefully kept ignorant of the facts - or plain lied to. Or if they've been brainwashed.

I'm a great believer in questioning motive (including/most importantly my own). Why do I do what I do here- What is my motive? - That's a question I have asked myself.

Here's my answer

If I was standing in the middle of the road with a friend, and he was looking in the opposite direction to me, (going, "Oh, what a lovely view,") and I saw a truck hurling towards us at top speed, wouldn't I try and warn my friend of the danger, before diving for cover?
Seems to me - people just need to be warned
My friend might ignore me and go on staring at the view until he's squashed flat - but at least I tried!

Here's someone who tried to warn us all

Quote:
The chain reaction of evil--wars producing more wars -- must be broken, or we shall be plunged into the dark abyss of annihilation.

~Martin Luther King, Jr.


I'm sure that Dr King had only honourable motives when he said this.
(And he was right).


Quote:

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.

~Margaret Mead



Quote:
It is unpatriotic not to tell the truth, whether about the president or anyone else.

~Theodore Roosevelt


I guess we each have to decide for ourselves, Naima... I'm sorry if I'm not much help.
Good talking to you

Take Care out there
Peace
E
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 1 May, 2007 08:53 pm
J-B wrote:
I think it's never wrong to think.


I think you're right Smile
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 2 May, 2007 09:49 am
http://www.freewayblogger.com/A28/a28l18.JPG


http://www.freewayblogger.com/A28/a28129.JPG

http://www.freewayblogger.com/A28/a28l17.JPG

for instructions and legal advice
http://www.freewayblogger.com/freewaybloggerA28.htm
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Wed 2 May, 2007 11:31 am
God, do i feel like i deserve nine thousand more lives or what?! Laughing
Hey Endy
Thanks for that...

Endymion wrote:
I'm sorry if I'm not much help.

no, you are very much help...you actually coated what i was looking for in a bunch of detracking(or was it meant to be? Surprised ) words...

anyways, this:
Endymion wrote:

Quote:

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.

~Margaret Mead


is something i definately needed!!!

Endymion wrote:

My friend might ignore me and go on staring at the view until he's squashed flat - but at least I tried!


And how crappy it feels like to know someone is ignoring you on something like that Mad ... (plus: is the view of ignorants THAT lovely... :wink: )

Thankyou!
I am safe(its just that that fire on the hospital really pissed me off!!! Evil or Very Mad )

Naima
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 2 May, 2007 07:51 pm
lostnsearching wrote:
God, do i feel like i deserve nine thousand more lives or what?! Laughing


Just remember, Naima. You only have one.
And it's valuable.

stay safe
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 3 May, 2007 08:34 am
Remember -
It is unpatriotic not to tell the truth, whether about the president or anyone else.

~Theodore Roosevelt



A President Gone AWOL
By John Nichols, TheNation.com. Posted May 3, 2007.

In a sad attempt to justify his veto, the president says he is listening to military commanders while Congress plays politics. Here's what top military men who commanded troops in Iraq say.

George Bush, the most ideologically-driven and politically calculating president in American history, wants Americans to believe that he has suddenly discovered a moral high ground from which to make grand declarations about why he must maintain the occupation of Iraq.

After vetoing legislation Tuesday that gave him the money to continue his war but required that he accept loose limits of its ultimate duration, the president told the nation, "I recognize that many Democrats saw this bill as an opportunity to make a political statement about their opposition to the war. They sent their message, and now it is time to put politics behind us and support our troops with the funds they need."

Bush has made his position clear: Democrats, many of whom rightly argued four years ago that going to war in Iraq would be the huge mistake it has turned out to be, and who have since been far ahead of the White House in identifying the nature of the crisis that has since developed, are now to be dismissed as the players of political games when they advocate for a strategy that would begin bringing US troops home from the conflict on a schedule beginning October 1.

That's a remarkable line of analysis from a president whose inability to recognize the flaws in his own neo-conservative vision has rendered his wrong at every turn, and whose determination to play politics with life-and-death decisions has defined not just his approach to the Iraq war but his tenure as president.

Yet Bush is not giving up on his faith that he can frame the argument about Iraq as a fight between Congressional Democrats who are out to score political points and a presidential administration that is motivated merely by a desire to respond appropriately to practical realities on the ground in Iraq.

"Twelve weeks ago, I asked the Congress to pass an emergency war spending bill that would provide our brave men and women in uniform with the funds and flexibility they need," said Bush in framing his veto message. "Instead, members of the House and the Senate passed a bill that substitutes the opinions of politicians for the judgment of our military commanders."

The problem with Bush's "I'm-so-above-politics" line is that he has been disregarding advice from military commanders since before the war began.

Consider the response to his veto from top military men who commanded troops in Iraq.

"The President vetoed our troops and the American people," says retired Maj. Gen. John Batiste. "His stubborn commitment to a failed strategy in Iraq is incomprehensible. He committed our great military to a failed strategy in violation of basic principles of war. His failure to mobilize the nation to defeat world wide Islamic extremism is tragic. We deserve more from our commander-in-chief and his administration."

Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton: "This administration and the previously Republican-controlled legislature have been the most caustic agents against America's Armed Forces in memory. Less than a year ago, the Republicans imposed great hardship on the Army and Marine Corps by their failure to pass a necessary funding language. This time, the President of the United States is holding our Soldiers hostage to his ego. More than ever [it is] apparent [that] only the Army and the Marine Corps are at war -- alone, without their President's support."

Retired military commanders associated with the Washington-based National Security Network have been blunt about their sense that Bush is not just wrong about Iraq but that he is failing the troops he purports to support.

Some make historical comparisons.

Says retired Lt. Gen. Robert Gard: "With this veto, the president has doomed us to repeating a terrible history. President Bush's current position is hauntingly reminiscent of March 1968 in Vietnam. At that time, both the Secretary of Defense and the President had recognized that the war could not be won militarily -- just as our military commanders in Iraq have acknowledged. But not wanting to be tainted with losing a war, President Johnson authorized a surge of 25,000 troops. At that point, there had been 24,000 U.S. troops killed in action. Five years later, when the withdrawal of US troops was complete, we had suffered 34,000 additional combat deaths.

Others offer a straightforward assessment of Bush's failure as the commander-in-chief. "By vetoing this bill and failing to initiate an immediate and phased withdrawal, the President has effectively gone AWOL, deserting his duty post, leaving American forces with an impossible mission, suffering wholly unnecessary casualties," argues retired Lt. Gen. William E. Odom.

Add the public statements of the retired generals together with the behind-the-scenes expressions of frustration from current commanders and they form the most powerful tool that Congressional Democrats have in what will ultimately be a negotiation not with Bush but with the American people -- a negotiation that, the president well understands, is about the question of which side is playing politics and which side is listening to military commanders and supporting the troops.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid should take the message of these retired generals -- along with the anti-war statements of thousands of current and returned Iraq soldiers -- into the fight with Bush. And, to borrow a slightly impolitic phrase from Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair Joe Biden, they should "shove it down his throat."




The above is is featured on Alternet
First up to reply was Tom Degan- one angry American

Posted by: Tom Degan on May 3, 2007 1:25 AM (Alternet)
Send it back!
The half-witted little frat boy. Did you see that speech from the White House the other night? With the Jefferson Memorial in the back ground!!!! Can you even imagine what Thomas Jefferson would have thought of this disgusting little piece of ****??? Can you - in your wildest, wierdest dreams - even imagine???`

The number of dead in Iraq are are going up. It will skyrocket even further as the months go by. By summer's end, the publice will be demanding an end to this obscenity. The Bush administration will very soon be out of view - History - A thing of the past. By summer's end, the First Fool will be out of office and on his way to federal prison for the rest of his f*cking life for his crimes against humanity. Dick Cheney (1941-2007) will drop dead any day now. But of this you may be absolutely certain: you and I will be living with George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney for the rest of our natural lives. The damage that these two evil bastards have done to our once-great nation will be palpable a century and a half from now.

You can take that to the bank.


Tom Degan
Goshen, NY.


*******************

Here's another reply i found interesting

Why don't the dems at least THREATEN impeachment
Posted by: grim ripper on May 3, 2007 3:51 AM
...as a little leverage to get their withdrawl bill passed? I mean if they don't have the decency to ACTUALLY impeach and bring charges...
It all feels like a dog and pony show
I can't believe these thugs aren't physically removed from office, if not by democrats, then by regular folk--if not by regular folk, then by our resurrected forefathers, reanimated by the rage of injustice
I'm about ready to lay down in the street
[/i]


http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/51367/?page=1
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 05:58 am
Endymion wrote:
lostnsearching wrote:
God, do i feel like i deserve nine thousand more lives or what?! Laughing


Just remember, Naima. You only have one.
And it's valuable.

stay safe


oh!? Crying or Very sad
and i just start to believe in the tooth fairy...
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 06:18 am
Quote:

oh!? Crying or Very sad
and i just start to believe in the tooth fairy...


Naima, I don't understand this - can you give me some straight talk?
Help me understand.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 06:20 am
http://rawstory.com//images/other/impeachment050107b.jpg



Groups believe impeachment is 'more on the table than people think'

Miriam Raftery

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/DFA_head_Impeachment_more_on_table_0502.html
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 06:31 am
Endymion wrote:
Quote:

oh!? Crying or Very sad
and i just started to believe in the tooth fairy...


Naima, I don't understand this - can you give me some straight talk?
Help me understand.


straight talk....
it's not worth understanding
forget it!
i was too messed up that day(still am...so i won't say much, or i might have to regret it!!!)
not okay today!(considering what i've been writing lately: definately not okay)
i might get back to you later.
thanks for everything
oh yeah: ROCK ON DUDE!!! ROCK ON!!!!
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 06:39 am
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/steve_bell/2007/05/04/stevebell040507a.jpg

I heard a Labour spokeswoman say the trashing they took wasn't as bad as predicted - and the interviewer came right back with, "Yeh - you predicted greater losses - so that it wouldn't seem so bad, that's true isn't it?"
And she more or less admitted it.

All I can say is - it's horrible to see so much blue out there - the death of the Labour Party has opened a new highway for the Conservatives - and they are getting on it! Rolling Eyes

The people have voted 'against' Blair right across the country and it is a sign that the British people want to see this man tried for crimes of agression.
Now if we'd been voting on THAT .........
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 06:45 am
Naima - come back and talk soon.
I may no be the tooth- fairy
(and sometimes I'm a bit slow on the up take)
but I'd like to understand and help if I can
You say it's 'not worth understanding'
but i'd like to try.

Peace
E
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 06:48 am
I've been reading your poems, Naima - i'll write there soon....
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 06:50 am
thank you
but i'm very very disturbed right now...
i don't think those were worth reading (or even posting)
some memories just don't seem to go away....
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Revolution
  3. » Page 20
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/19/2025 at 08:25:14