Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 22 Apr, 2007 07:10 pm
Winds of change again blowing across America


April 20, 2007
by Steve Hammons

"Today, several years into the 21st Century, some people say we Americans find ourselves in a similar situation as that of our ancestors in the mid-1700s."

http://www.populistamerica.com/winds_of_change_again_blowing_across_america
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 22 Apr, 2007 07:14 pm
No Hero



The hero isn't in me
Although it would be Good
To step from a telephone box
On a Bright Blue Day
With the ability to stop Bullets
Imagine if you could fly to the Rescue
Of those who do not deserve their Fate
The dirt-poor farmers, whose lands are Stolen
By Company Mongers
The sweatshop women who Slave for
NEXT to nothing
The children brought up in Violence
The wrong side of a Racist wall
Child soldiers Manipulated
Whole countries Torn to pieces
Imagine if you could stand in front of them All
And when the Big Company Guns come rolling in
You could show them the Palm of your Hand
And make them Understand
No. Never again



Endymion 2007
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 23 Apr, 2007 03:24 am
Bangladesh: A Nation in Fear of Drowning
By Ann McFerran, Independent UK. Posted April 23, 2007.


The once lush island of Aralia in Bangladesh is disappearing under rising waters as flooding becomes more frequent, temperatures increase and disease spreads.

http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/50780/


*************************************************************
New Labour, New Britain: Taking liberties with our liberties
By Ed Caesar
Published: 23 April 2007

Tony Blair has not heeded the advice of Tacitus. The great historian warned that "the more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the state." In the past decade, the Labour Government has pumped out 3,000 new laws - one for every day in power. Impersonating a traffic warden; selling a grey squirrel; detonating a nuclear bomb - these have all, comfortingly, become illegal.

More laws mean more transgressions. More transgressions mean more people criminalised by the state. As a result, our prisons are bursting. In April 2007, a record 80,000 Britons are residing at Her Majesty's pleasure.


More here
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/article2474406.ece
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 24 Apr, 2007 06:58 pm
http://staging.michaelmoore.com/_images/splash/bookcheneykey.jpg


BOOK HIM

http://www.michaelmoore.com/

Congressman Kucinich Introduces Impeachment Articles Against Dick Cheney
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 24 Apr, 2007 07:50 pm
US firm cleared of pollution charge


A US gold-mining company accused of poisoning people and marine life by dumping toxic waste into a bay in Indonesia has been cleared by a court in the country.

Newmont Mining, the world's biggest gold-mining company, and Richard Ness, the president of its local unit, had been charged with dumping waste from a mine in North Sulawesi.

The waste was alleged to have contained arsenic and mercury and entered the food chain.

Newmont had threatened to reconsider its investments in Indonesia if its executive was found guilty.

Prosecutors said they would appeal against the verdict.

The case had been seen as a key test of attitudes towards foreign firms and environmental protection in the country.

Conflicting studies

Chief judge Ridwan Damanik told Manado's provincial court: "Pollution charges against Newmont Minahasa Raya and Richard Ness cannot be proven."

The US embassy in Jakarta also welcomed the decision, saying: "This positive resolution will undoubtedly have a beneficial effect on Indonesia and foreign investor confidence."

Analysts had said a defeat for Newmont would have deterred investors from the mining sector, which has not seen fresh investment for years.

Villagers living around Buyat Bay said they had suffered tumours, headaches and skin rashes.

The allegations led to a police inquiry and charges against Newmont in August 2005.

Studies of waters around the bay have shown conflicting results.

A World Health Organisation-backed report and others found no evidence of pollution, but government tests showed high levels of toxins.

'Unjust'

Around 100 environmentalists, who had gathered outside the court, chanted slogans against the decision while armed riot police stood guard.

Some 100 villagers, both supporters and opponents of Newmont, were also on hand.

"This is unjust," said one, Janiah Ompi, who claims the pollution caused her tumour and eye problems.

"This is proof that justice is difficult to enforce for small people like us in our own country," said Anwar Stirman, a villager.

Richard Ness, in court with his wife and son to hear the verdict, said he was "delighted that justice and truth had prevailed".

Prosecution call

Newmont had denied the charges, saying it disposed of toxins safely and levels of mercury and arsenic were within acceptable levels.

"I am thrilled that after two-and-a-half years of false allegations, my name and that of my fellow employees have been cleared and our reputation restored," Ness said.

He called for organisations that levelled claims of pollution against Newmont to be prosecuted.

"I do feel that there was a crime committed and many people in the community suffered because of that crime," he said.

Newmont's operations in Indonesia account for 6 per cent of its worldwide gold sales and 8.5 per cent of its reserves, according to its website.


http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/4/24/1_218359_1_5.jpg

how do they sleep at night?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  0  
Reply Tue 24 Apr, 2007 08:02 pm
Keep it going, endy. I may not be noticed on here, but I pop in to read along fairly regularly.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 24 Apr, 2007 08:58 pm
That's appreciated Edgar



Here's the link to the above
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/4E161CB0-47C6-491C-AFDA-14B9F5B6BF2D.htm
I don't normally forget
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2007 06:58 pm
http://staging.michaelmoore.com/_images/splash/bloodlustwarmonger.jpg

April 26th, 2007 11:29 pm
Congress challenges Bush to veto pullout

By Richard Cowan / Reuters

WASHINGTON - In an unprecedented slap at President George W. Bush's war policy, the U.S. Congress on Thursday approved legislation that links withdrawal of combat troops from Iraq to paying for the war, ensuring a veto.

By a vote of 51-46, the Senate joined the House of Representatives in backing the bill that would provide about $100 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan this year while setting a deadline to withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq over the next 11 months.

It was the first time that the entire Congress, controlled by Democrats since January, has defied the president. Bush has repeatedly said he will not accept "surrender" dates.

"The president will veto this legislation," White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said. "The president is determined to win in Iraq. The bill they sent us today is mission defeated."

Democrats might arrange to deliver their bill to the White House on Tuesday, the fourth anniversary of Bush declaring aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln: "Major combat operations in Iraq have ended."

The aircraft carrier was decorated with a large "mission accomplished" banner.

Calling for a "new direction in Iraq," Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Robert Byrd, a West Virginia Democrat, said U.S. troops "had the courage and the strength to win the war, but the president has not had the wisdom to win the peace."

Democrats, however, doubt they have two-thirds support in Congress to overturn a presidential veto. The House passed the bill on Wednesday 218-208 on a mostly partisan vote.

If there is a veto and it is not overturned, lawmakers would likely craft another bill sending money to the troops in Iraq, possibly with some watered-down conditions that Bush could accept, and leave the withdrawal fight for the future.

Just two Republican senators voted for the withdrawal bill, but Democrats hope that as 2008 elections approach, more Republicans will join the push to wind down the war.

Indeed, one Republican who voted against the bill warned she did not support an open-ended commitment.

"If the president's new strategy does not demonstrate significant results by August, then Congress should consider all options including a redefinition of our mission and a gradual but significant withdrawal of our troops next year," Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, who is up for re-election in 2008, said in a statement.

More

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php?id=9697

A failure in generalship
By Lt. Col. Paul Yingling

"You officers amuse yourselves with God knows what buffooneries and never dream in the least of serious service. This is a source of stupidity which would become most dangerous in case of a serious conflict."- Frederick the Great

04/27/07 "Armed Forces Journal" -- -For the second time in a generation, the United States faces the prospect of defeat at the hands of an insurgency. In April 1975, the U.S. fled the Republic of Vietnam, abandoning our allies to their fate at the hands of North Vietnamese communists. In 2007, Iraq's grave and deteriorating condition offers diminishing hope for an American victory and portends risk of an even wider and more destructive regional war.

These debacles are not attributable to individual failures, but rather to a crisis in an entire institution: America's general officer corps. America's generals have failed to prepare our armed forces for war and advise civilian authorities on the application of force to achieve the aims of policy. The argument that follows consists of three elements. First, generals have a responsibility to society to provide policymakers with a correct estimate of strategic probabilities. Second, America's generals in Vietnam and Iraq failed to perform this responsibility. Third, remedying the crisis in American generalship requires the intervention of Congress.

more
("Armies do not fight wars; nations fight wars.")
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article17613.htm
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2007 07:17 pm
Alex Salmond: The next King of Scotland?

He wants a seat in the Council of Europe, as head of government of the latest independent state to join the EU
By Andy McSmith
Published: 28 April 2007

The story goes that Alex Salmond had a student girlfriend called Debbie Horton, back in 1973, who supported Labour. He had grown up on a Linlithgow council estate, and thought of himself as Labour too, but at the culmination of a heated argument, she exclaimed: "If you feel like that, go and join the bloody SNP."

So he did. In no time, he was president of the Scottish Nationalist Students. The SNP thus gained one of the most effective leaders they have ever had, the man who is being called the Next King of Scotland.

http://news.independent.co.uk/people/profiles/article2491827.ece
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2007 07:23 pm
Gatwick Protest: No More Immigration Prisons

21-04-2007 12:54

Over 100 people held a lively protest in Crawley, West Sussex, on 21 April, 2007, against a new planned detention centre nearby. The protest, called by the No Borders network in the UK, aimed to show opposition to the new purpose-built Immigration Removal Centre (as it's called by the government) which is being built at Gatwick Airport. The new prison for asylum seekers will have a capacity of 420 places for male and female detainees and is another step in the Labour government's efforts to meets its target of 4,000 places in detention centres throughout the country.

The demonstration, which was mainly made of two large groups from Brighton and London, marched through Crawley town centre in the high of Saturday's shopping spree. Many leaflets were given out, informing locals about the reasons for the demonstration, whilst pointing out the fact that a new concentration camp for innocent people is about to be built on their doorsteps. Policing was relatively low but the level of surveillance and 'information gathering' was incredibly high and intimidating.

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 27 Apr, 2007 07:34 pm
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/images/masthead.gif


'Grave concern' as Putin freezes defence pact

27apr07

A DISPUTE over US plans to station anti-missile bases in eastern Europe escalated dramatically today following Russia's call for a freeze of a key European defence treaty.

In heated NATO talks in Oslo, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned that Russia was to halt its application of the Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) treaty and could even pull out if the allies did not endorse it.

"It means that we will halt the compliance of our obligations under the treaty," he told reporters, after launching what was described by a US official as a 20-minute "diatribe" against NATO.

His remarks came after Russian President Vladimir Putin, in a state of the nation address, called for the freeze in response to the US missile shield plans.

The CFE treaty was signed in 1990 in Paris by the countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) and the former Warsaw Pact to limit troop and hardware deployments in Europe.

It was adapted in Istanbul in 1999 following the collapse of the Warsaw Pact, in order to limit deployments on a country-by-country basis.

NATO states have refused to ratify the new pact on the grounds that Moscow has failed to honour commitments made in Istanbul to withdraw Russian forces from the former Soviet republics of Georgia and Moldova.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that Russia's involvement in the CFE was a treaty obligation "and everyone is expected to live up to treaty obligations."

She had earlier complained that Russia was applying Cold War logic to the missile defence issue, and said any suggestion the system was directed at Moscow was "ludicrous".

In Washington, a White House official who refused to be named, said: "We regret President Putin's comments today on the CFE Treaty which inaccurately portray US and NATO adherence to the treaty."

Mr Lavrov insisted that "the balance has been impaired for a long time and seriously in favour of NATO. The CFE was a very valuable treaty and that has been made valueless".

He expressed hope that the allies would eventually ratify the adapted pact, but said: "I didn't hear today any kind of desire for the urgency of that.

"All I heard today was the same old tune about the Istanbul commitments, about the situation of Moldova and Georgia."

Mr Lavrov said that Russia, one of only four countries to have ratified the adapted CFE, found itself "in a position where we don't want to be the only actors in a theatre of the absurd."

NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, who described the two-hour session of the informal NATO Russia Council as lively, said the allies were deeply concerned by Moscow's move to place a "de facto moratorium" on the treaty.

"That message was met by concern, grave concern, disappointment and deep regret because the allies are of the opinion that the CFE treaty is one of the cornerstones of European security," he said.

US officials said Lavrov had railed against NATO over issues ranging from enlargement to the planned missile shield extension, which will see 10 interceptors based in Poland and a radar tracker in the Czech Republic.

"He listed a litany of complaints about NATO," a senior official said, but added that the remarks may have backfired on Russia by consolidating support among the allies for the shield, meant to counter "rogue states" like Iran.

Mr Lavrov noted that the shield left gaps in its coverage of Europe, with Bulgaria, Greece, Romania and Turkey undefended.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Lavrov tried to use this gap as proof that Washington was not interested in defending Europe, but he was met with "universal" opposition from NATO representatives.

Earlier today, Dr Rice urged Moscow to "be real" about the system and reiterated that it posed no threat to Russia.

"Let's be real about this," she said.

"The idea that somehow 10 interceptors and a few radars in eastern Europe are going to threaten the Soviet strategic return is purely ludicrous and everybody knows it."

AFP

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/printpage/0,5942,21628711,00.html
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2007 06:59 am
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Robert_Kennedy_speaking_before_a_crowd%2C_June_14%2C_1963.jpg/180px-Robert_Kennedy_speaking_before_a_crowd%2C_June_14%2C_1963.jpg

Quote:
"Few men are willing to brave the disapproval of their fellows, the censure of their colleagues, the wrath of society.
Moral courage is a rarer commodity than bravery in battle or great intelligence. Yet it is the one essential, vital, quality for those who seek to change a world which yields most painfully to change."


Quote:

"The problem of power is how to achieve its responsible use, rather than its irresponsible and indulgent use- how to make people of power live for the public, rather than off the public."


Quote:

"How do you tell if Lyndon is lying? If he wiggles his ears, that doesn't mean he's lying. If he raises his eyebrows, that doesn't mean he's lying. But when he moves his lips, he's lying." (On President Johnson)


More on Robert kennedy soon - if anyone has anything to add about his speeches/life/death - or just remember him and have a thought - please leave it here. I'm only just discovering the man (he's been over-shadowed here in Britain by his brother).




Quote:
One of the concepts in the market economy that surely needs close examination is growth. The orthodox view, of course, is that the pursuit of economic growth is what drives wealth-creators and secures prosperity for nations and their people. And of course that's true - up to a point!
As Senator Robert Kennedy put it so succinctly in the 1960s, GDP "is indifferent to the decency of our factories and the safety of our streets alike. It does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials. GDP measures neither our wit nor our courage, neither our wisdom nor our learning, neither our compassion nor our devotion to our country. It measures everything in short, except that which makes life worthwhile."
And I would add that it doesn't deliver environmental sustainability either. The Prince of Wales
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2007 01:42 pm
Even though I have declared George Bush and co 'nazis' myself,
it still came as a shock to me to look on Alternet today and see this:


http://www.alternet.org/images/managed/topstories_picture2.jpg
Fascist America, in 10 Easy Steps

By Naomi Wolf, Chelsea Green Publishing. Posted April 28, 2007.

There are some things common to every state that's made the transition to fascism. Author Naomi Wolf argues that all of them are present in America today.

http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/51150/

If this is as it says it is, make the most of this article now - because when Alternet goes - so does this.

There are six pages of this - I'm going to post them up. It needs to be read - however frightening. I'm not sure where we're going from here - but I'd rather follow the example of Robert Kennedy - and pay for trying to help stop nazism/racism... than be too afraid to even share this information.


(but it's starting to get to me)


[size=125]Fascist America, in 10 Easy Steps[/size]

By Naomi Wolf, Chelsea Green Publishing. Posted April 28, 2007.

There are some things common to every state that's made the transition to fascism. Author Naomi Wolf argues that all of them are present in America today.

Last autumn, there was a military coup in Thailand. The leaders of the coup took a number of steps, rather systematically, as if they had a shopping list. In a sense, they did. Within a matter of days, democracy had been closed down -- the coup leaders declared martial law, sent armed soldiers into residential areas, took over radio and TV stations, issued restrictions on the press, tightened some limits on travel and took certain activists into custody.

They were not figuring these things out as they went along. If you look at history, you can see that there is essentially a blueprint for turning an open society into a dictatorship. That blueprint has been used again and again in more and less bloody, more and less terrifying ways. But it is always effective. It is very difficult and arduous to create and sustain a democracy, but history shows that closing one down is much simpler. You simply have to be willing to take the 10 steps.

As difficult as this is to contemplate, it is clear, if you are willing to look, that each of these 10 steps has already been initiated in the United States by the Bush administration.

Because Americans like me were born in freedom, we have a hard time even considering that it is possible for us to become as unfree, domestically, as many other nations. Because we no longer learn much about our rights or our system of government -- the task of being aware of the Constitution has been outsourced from citizens to professionals such as lawyers and professors -- we scarcely recognise the checks and balances that the founders put in place, even as they are being systematically dismantled. Because we don't learn much about European history, the setting up of a department of "homeland" security -- remember who else was keen on the word "homeland"? -- didn't raise the alarm bells it might have.

It is my argument that, beneath our very noses, George Bush and his administration are using time-tested tactics to close down an open society. It is time for us to be willing to think the unthinkable -- as the author and political journalist Joe Conason has put it -- that it can happen here. And that we are further along than we realize.

Conason eloquently warned of the danger of American authoritarianism. I am arguing that we need also to look at the lessons of European and other kinds of fascism to understand the potential seriousness of the events we see unfolding in the United States.

1. Invoke a terrifying internal and external enemy.

After we were hit on Sept. 11 2001, we were in a state of national shock. Less than six weeks later, on Oct. 26, 2001, the USA Patriot Act was passed by a Congress that had little chance to debate it; many said that they scarcely had time to read it. We were told we were now on a "war footing"; we were in a "global war" against a "global caliphate" intending to "wipe out civilization." There have been other times of crisis in which the United States accepted limits on civil liberties, such as during the Civil War, when Lincoln declared martial law, and the Second World War, when thousands of Japanese-American citizens were interned. But this situation, as Bruce Fein of the American Freedom Agenda notes, is unprecedented: All our other wars had an endpoint, so the pendulum was able to swing back toward freedom; this war is defined as open-ended in time and without national boundaries in space -- the globe itself is the battlefield. "This time," Fein says, "there will be no defined end."

Creating a terrifying threat -- hydralike, secretive, evil -- is an old trick. It can, like Hitler's invocation of a communist threat to the nation's security, be based on actual events (one Wisconsin academic has faced calls for his dismissal because he noted, among other things, that the alleged communist arson, the Reichstag fire of February 1933, was swiftly followed in Nazi Germany by passage of the Enabling Act, which replaced constitutional law with an open-ended state of emergency). Or the terrifying threat can be based, like the National Socialist evocation of the "global conspiracy of world Jewry", on myth.

It is not that global Islamist terrorism is not a severe danger; of course it is. I am arguing rather that the language used to convey the nature of the threat is different in a country such as Spain, which has also suffered violent terrorist attacks, than it is in America. Spanish citizens know that they face a grave security threat; what we as American citizens believe is that we are potentially threatened with the end of civilization as we know it. Of course, this makes us more willing to accept restrictions on our freedoms.

2. Create a gulag

Once you have got everyone scared, the next step is to create a prison system outside the rule of law (as Bush put it, he wanted the American detention centre at Guantánamo Bay to be situated in legal "outer space") -- where torture can take place.

At first, the people who are sent there are seen by citizens as outsiders: troublemakers, spies, "enemies of the people" or "criminals." Initially, citizens tend to support the secret prison system; it makes them feel safer, and they do not identify with the prisoners. But soon enough, civil society leaders -- opposition members, labor activists, clergy and journalists -- are arrested and sent there as well.

This process took place in fascist shifts or anti-democracy crackdowns ranging from Italy and Germany in the 1920s and 1930s to the Latin American coups of the 1970s and beyond. It is standard practice for closing down an open society or crushing a pro-democracy uprising.

With its jails in Iraq and Afghanistan, and, of course, Guantánamo in Cuba, where detainees are abused and kept indefinitely without trial and without access to the due process of the law, America certainly has its gulag now. Bush and his allies in Congress recently announced they would issue no information about the secret CIA "black site" prisons throughout the world, which are used to incarcerate people who have been seized off the street.

Gulags in history tend to metastasize, becoming ever larger and more secretive, ever more deadly and formalized. We know from firsthand accounts, photographs, videos and government documents that people, innocent and guilty, have been tortured in the U.S.-run prisons we are aware of and those we can't investigate adequately.

But Americans still assume this system and detainee abuses involve only scary brown people with whom they don't generally identify. It was brave of the conservative pundit William Safire to quote the anti-Nazi pastor Martin Niemöller, who had been seized as a political prisoner: "First they came for the Jews." Most Americans don't understand yet that the destruction of the rule of law at Guantánamo set a dangerous precedent for them, too.

By the way, the establishment of military tribunals that deny prisoners due process tends to come early on in a fascist shift. Mussolini and Stalin set up such tribunals. On April 24, 1934, the Nazis, too, set up the People's Court, which also bypassed the judicial system: Prisoners were held indefinitely, often in isolation, and tortured, without being charged with offences, and were subjected to show trials. Eventually, the Special Courts became a parallel system that put pressure on the regular courts to abandon the rule of law in favor of Nazi ideology when making decisions.

3. Develop a thug caste.

When leaders who seek what I call a "fascist shift" want to close down an open society, they send paramilitary groups of scary young men out to terrorize citizens. The Blackshirts roamed the Italian countryside beating up communists; the Brownshirts staged violent rallies throughout Germany. This paramilitary force is especially important in a democracy: You need citizens to fear thug violence, and so you need thugs who are free from prosecution.

The years following 9/11 have proved a bonanza for America's security contractors, with the Bush administration outsourcing areas of work that traditionally fell to the U.S. military. In the process, contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars have been issued for security work by mercenaries at home and abroad. In Iraq, some of these contract operatives have been accused of involvement in torturing prisoners, harassing journalists and firing on Iraqi civilians. Under Order 17, issued to regulate contractors in Iraq by the one-time U.S. administrator in Baghdad, Paul Bremer, these contractors are immune from prosecution.

Yes, but that is in Iraq, you could argue; however, after Hurricane Katrina, the Department of Homeland Security hired and deployed hundreds of armed private security guards in New Orleans. The investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill interviewed one unnamed guard who reported having fired on unarmed civilians in the city. It was a natural disaster that underlay that episode, but the administration's endless war on terror means ongoing scope for what are in effect privately contracted armies to take on crisis and emergency management at home, in U.S. cities.

Thugs in America? Groups of angry young Republican men, dressed in identical shirts and trousers, menaced poll workers counting the votes in Florida in 2000. If you are reading history, you can imagine that there can be a need for "public order" on the next election day. Say there are protests, or a threat, on the day of an election; history would not rule out the presence of a private security firm at a polling station "to restore public order."

4. Set up an internal surveillance system.

In Mussolini's Italy, in Nazi Germany, in communist East Germany, in communist China -- in every closed society -- secret police spy on ordinary people and encourage neighbors to spy on neighbors. The Stasi needed to keep only a minority of East Germans under surveillance to convince a majority that they themselves were being watched.

In 2005 and 2006, when James Risen and Eric Lichtblau wrote in the New York Times about a secret state program to wiretap citizens' phones, read their emails and follow international financial transactions, it became clear to ordinary Americans that they, too, could be under state scrutiny.

In closed societies, this surveillance is cast as being about "national security"; the true function is to keep citizens docile and inhibit their activism and dissent.

5. Harass citizens' groups.

The fifth thing you do is related to step four -- you infiltrate and harass citizens' groups. It can be trivial: a church in Pasadena, whose minister preached that Jesus was in favor of peace, found itself being investigated by the Internal Revenue Service, while churches that got Republicans out to vote, which is equally illegal under U.S. tax law, have been left alone.

Other harassment is more serious: The American Civil Liberties Union reports that thousands of ordinary American anti-war, environmental and other groups have been infiltrated by agents, and a secret Pentagon database includes more than four dozen peaceful anti-war meetings, rallies or marches by American citizens in its category of 1,500 "suspicious incidents." The equally secret Counterintelligence Field Activity (Cifa) agency of the Department of Defense has been gathering information about domestic organizations engaged in peaceful political activities: Cifa is supposed to track "potential terrorist threats" as it watches ordinary U.S. citizen activists. A little-noticed new law has redefined activism such as animal rights protests as "terrorism." So the definition of "terrorist" slowly expands to include the opposition.

6. Engage in arbitrary detention and release.

This scares people. It is a kind of cat-and-mouse game. Nicholas D. Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn, the investigative reporters who wrote "China Wakes: the Struggle for the Soul of a Rising Power," describe pro-democracy activists in China, such as Wei Jingsheng, being arrested and released many times. In a closing or closed society there is a "list" of dissidents and opposition leaders: You are targeted in this way once you are on the list, and it is hard to get off the list.

In 2004, America's Transportation Security Administration confirmed that it had a list of passengers who were targeted for security searches or worse if they tried to fly. People who have found themselves on the list? Two middle-aged women peace activists in San Francisco, liberal Sen. Edward Kennedy, a member of Venezuela's government (after Venezuela's president had criticized Bush), and thousands of ordinary U.S. citizens.

Professor Walter F. Murphy is emeritus of Princeton University; he is one of the foremost constitutional scholars in the nation and author of the classic "Constitutional Democracy." Murphy is also a decorated former Marine, and he is not even especially politically liberal. But on March 1 this year, he was denied a boarding pass at Newark, "because I was on the Terrorist Watch list," he said.

"Have you been in any peace marches? We ban a lot of people from flying because of that," asked the airline employee.

"I explained," said Murphy, "that I had not so marched but had, in September 2006, given a lecture at Princeton, televised and put on the Web, highly critical of George Bush for his many violations of the Constitution."

"That'll do it," the man said.

Anti-war marcher? Potential terrorist. Support the Constitution? Potential terrorist. History shows that the categories of "enemy of the people" tend to expand ever deeper into civil life.

James Yee, a U.S. citizen, was the Muslim chaplain at Guantánamo who was accused of mishandling classified documents. He was harassed by the U.S. military before the charges against him were dropped. Yee has been detained and released several times. He is still of interest.

Brandon Mayfield, a U.S. citizen and lawyer in Oregon, was mistakenly identified as a possible terrorist. His house was secretly broken into and his computer seized. Though he is innocent of the accusation against him, he is still on the list.

It is a standard practice of fascist societies that, once you are on the list, you can't get off.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 28 Apr, 2007 01:48 pm
7. Target key individuals.

Threaten civil servants, artists and academics with job loss if they don't toe the line. Mussolini went after the rectors of state universities who did not conform to the fascist line; so did Joseph Goebbels, who purged academics who were not pro-Nazi; so did Chile's Augusto Pinochet; so does the Chinese communist Politburo in punishing pro-democracy students and professors.

Academe is a tinderbox of activism, so those seeking a fascist shift punish academics and students with professional loss if they do not "coordinate," in Goebbels' term, ideologically. Since civil servants are the sector of society most vulnerable to being fired by a given regime, they are also a group that fascists typically "coordinate" early on: the Reich Law for the Re-establishment of a Professional Civil Service was passed on April 7, 1933.

Bush supporters in state legislatures in several states put pressure on regents at state universities to penalize or fire academics who have been critical of the administration. As for civil servants, the Bush administration has derailed the career of one military lawyer who spoke up for fair trials for detainees, while an administration official publicly intimidated the law firms that represent detainees pro bono by threatening to call for their major corporate clients to boycott them.

Elsewhere, a CIA contract worker who said in a closed blog that "waterboarding is torture" was stripped of the security clearance she needed in order to do her job.

Most recently, the administration purged eight U.S. attorneys for what looks like insufficient political loyalty. When Goebbels purged the civil service in April 1933, attorneys were "coordinated" too, a step that eased the way of the increasingly brutal laws to follow.

8. Control the press.

Italy in the 1920s, Germany in the '30s, East Germany in the '50s, Czechoslovakia in the '60s, the Latin American dictatorships in the '70s, China in the '80s and '90s -- all dictatorships and would-be dictators target newspapers and journalists. They threaten and harass them in more open societies that they are seeking to close, and they arrest them and worse in societies that have been closed already.

The Committee to Protect Journalists says arrests of U.S. journalists are at an all-time high: Josh Wolf (no relation), a blogger in San Francisco, has been put in jail for a year for refusing to turn over video of an anti-war demonstration; Homeland Security brought a criminal complaint against reporter Greg Palast, claiming he threatened "critical infrastructure" when he and a TV producer were filming victims of Hurricane Katrina in Louisiana. Palast had written a bestseller critical of the Bush administration.

Other reporters and writers have been punished in other ways. Joseph C. Wilson accused Bush in a New York Times op-ed of leading the country to war on the basis of a false charge that Saddam Hussein had acquired yellowcake uranium in Niger. His wife, Valerie Plame, was outed as a CIA spy, a form of retaliation that ended her career.

Prosecution and job loss are nothing, though, compared with how the United States is treating journalists seeking to cover the conflict in Iraq in an unbiased way. The Committee to Protect Journalists has documented multiple accounts of the U.S. military in Iraq firing upon or threatening to fire upon unembedded (meaning independent) reporters and camera operators from organizations ranging from al-Jazeera to the BBC. While Westerners may question the accounts by al-Jazeera, they should pay attention to the accounts of reporters such as the BBC's Kate Adie. In some cases reporters have been wounded or killed, including ITN's Terry Lloyd in 2003. Both CBS and the Associated Press in Iraq had staff members seized by the U.S. military and taken to violent prisons; the news organizations were unable to see the evidence against their staffers.

Over time in closing societies, real news is supplanted by fake news and false documents. Pinochet showed Chilean citizens falsified documents to back up his claim that terrorists had been about to attack the nation. The yellowcake charge, too, was based on forged papers.

You won't have a shutdown of news in modern America -- it is not possible. But you can have, as Frank Rich and Sidney Blumenthal have pointed out, a steady stream of lies polluting the news well. What you already have is a White House directing a stream of false information that is so relentless that it is increasingly hard to sort out truth from untruth. In a fascist system, it's not the lies that count but the muddying. When citizens can't tell real news from fake, they give up their demands for accountability bit by bit.

9. Dissent equals treason.

Cast dissent as "treason" and criticism as "espionage." Every closing society does this, just as it elaborates laws that increasingly criminalize certain kinds of speech and expand the definition of "spy" and "traitor." When Bill Keller, the publisher of the New York Times, ran the Lichtblau/Risen stories, Bush called the Times' leaking of classified information "disgraceful," while Republicans in Congress called for Keller to be charged with treason, and right-wing commentators and news outlets kept up the "treason" drumbeat. Some commentators, as Conason noted, reminded readers, smugly, that one penalty for violating the Espionage Act is execution.

Conason is right to note how serious a threat that attack represented. It is also important to recall that the 1938 Moscow show trial accused the editor of Izvestia, Nikolai Bukharin, of treason; Bukharin was, in fact, executed. And it is important to remind Americans that when the 1917 Espionage Act was last widely invoked, during the infamous 1919 Palmer Raids, leftist activists were arrested without warrants in sweeping roundups, kept in jail for up to five months, and "beaten, starved, suffocated, tortured and threatened with death," according to the historian Myra MacPherson. After that, dissent was muted in America for a decade.

In Stalin's Soviet Union, dissidents were "enemies of the people." National Socialists called those who supported Weimar democracy "November traitors."

And here is where the circle closes: Most Americans do not realise that since September of last year, when Congress wrongly, foolishly, passed the Military Commissions Act of 2006, the president has the power to call any U.S. citizen an "enemy combatant." He has the power to define what "enemy combatant" means. The president can also delegate to anyone he chooses in the executive branch the right to define "enemy combatant" any way he or she wants and then seize Americans accordingly.

Even if you or I are American citizens, even if we turn out to be completely innocent of what he has accused us of doing, he has the power to have us seized as we are changing planes at Newark tomorrow, or have us taken with a knock on the door, ship you or me to a navy brig and keep you or me in isolation, possibly for months, while awaiting trial. (Prolonged isolation, as psychiatrists know, triggers psychosis in otherwise mentally healthy prisoners. That is why Stalin's gulag had an isolation cell, like Guantánamo's, in every satellite prison. Camp 6, the newest, most brutal facility at Guantánamo, is all isolation cells.)

We U.S. citizens will get a trial eventually -- for now. But legal rights activists at the Center for Constitutional Rights say that the Bush administration is increasingly and aggressively trying to find ways to get around giving even U.S. citizens fair trials. "Enemy combatant" is a status offence -- it is not even something you have to have done. "We have absolutely moved over into a preventive detention model -- you look like you could do something bad, you might do something bad, so we're going to hold you," says a spokeswoman of the CCR.

Most Americans surely do not get this yet. No wonder: It is hard to believe, even though it is true. In every closing society, at a certain point there are some high-profile arrests -- usually of opposition leaders, clergy and journalists. Then everything goes quiet. After those arrests, there are still newspapers, courts, TV and radio, and the facades of a civil society. There just isn't real dissent. There just isn't freedom. If you look at history, just before those arrests is where we are now.

10. Suspend the rule of law.

The John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007 gave the president new powers over the national guard. This means that in a national emergency -- which the president now has enhanced powers to declare -- he can send Michigan's militia to enforce a state of emergency that he has declared in Oregon, over the objections of the state's governor and its citizens.

Even as Americans were focused on Britney Spears's meltdown and the question of who fathered Anna Nicole's baby, the New York Times editorialized about this shift: "A disturbing recent phenomenon in Washington is that laws that strike to the heart of American democracy have been passed in the dead of night … Beyond actual insurrection, the president may now use military troops as a domestic police force in response to a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, terrorist attack or any 'other condition.'"

Critics see this as a clear violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, which was meant to restrain the federal government from using the military for domestic law enforcement. The Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy says the bill encourages a president to declare federal martial law. It also violates the very reason the founders set up our system of government as they did: Having seen citizens bullied by a monarch's soldiers, the founders were terrified of exactly this kind of concentration of militia power over American people in the hands of an oppressive executive or faction.

Of course, the United States is not vulnerable to the violent, total closing down of the system that followed Mussolini's march on Rome or Hitler's roundup of political prisoners. Our democratic habits are too resilient, and our military and judiciary too independent, for any kind of scenario like that.

Rather, as other critics are noting, our experiment in democracy could be closed down by a process of erosion.

It is a mistake to think that early in a fascist shift you see the profile of barbed wire against the sky. In the early days, things look normal on the surface; peasants were celebrating harvest festivals in Calabria in 1922; people were shopping and going to the movies in Berlin in 1931. Early on, as W.H. Auden put it, the horror is always elsewhere -- while someone is being tortured, children are skating, ships are sailing. "Dogs go on with their doggy life … How everything turns away/ Quite leisurely from the disaster."

As Americans turn away quite leisurely, keeping tuned to Internet shopping and American Idol, the foundations of democracy are being fatally corroded. Something has changed profoundly that weakens us unprecedentedly: Our democratic traditions, independent judiciary and free press do their work today in a context in which we are "at war" in a "long war," a war without end, on a battlefield described as the globe, in a context that gives the president -- without U.S. citizens realizing it yet -- the power over U.S. citizens of freedom or long solitary incarceration, on his say-so alone.

That means a hollowness has been expanding under the foundation of all these still free-looking institutions, and this foundation can give way under certain kinds of pressure. To prevent such an outcome, we have to think about the "what ifs."

What if, in a year and a half, there is another attack -- say, God forbid, a dirty bomb? The executive can declare a state of emergency. History shows that any leader, of any party, will be tempted to maintain emergency powers after the crisis has passed. With the gutting of traditional checks and balances, we are no less endangered by a President Hillary than by a President Giuliani, because any executive will be tempted to enforce his or her will through edict rather than the arduous, uncertain process of democratic negotiation and compromise.

What if the publisher of a major U.S. newspaper were charged with treason or espionage, as a right-wing effort seemed to threaten Keller with last year? What if he or she got 10 years in jail? What would the newspapers look like the next day? Judging from history, they would not cease publishing, but they would suddenly be very polite.

Right now, only a handful of patriots are trying to hold back the tide of tyranny for the rest of us -- staff at the Center for Constitutional Rights, who faced death threats for representing the detainees yet persisted all the way to the Supreme Court; activists at the American Civil Liberties Union; and prominent conservatives trying to roll back the corrosive new laws, under the banner of a new group called the American Freedom Agenda. This small, disparate collection of people needs everybody's help, including that of Europeans and others internationally who are willing to put pressure on the administration because they can see what a United States unrestrained by real democracy at home can mean for the rest of the world.

We need to look at history and face the "what ifs." For if we keep going down this road, the "end of America" could come for each of us in a different way, at a different moment; each of us might have a different moment when we feel forced to look back and think: That is how it was before, and this is the way it is now.

"The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive and judiciary, in the same hands … is the definition of tyranny," wrote James Madison. We still have the choice to stop going down this road; we can stand our ground and fight for our nation, and take up the banner the founders asked us to carry.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 29 Apr, 2007 05:37 am
Saturday, April 28th, 2007

GONZALES PUT TO SHAME AT HARVARD REUNION

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Attorney General Surprise Visit at 25th Reunion Met by Student Protests


http://staging.michaelmoore.com/_images/splash/GonzalesProtest3.jpg

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Harvard Law class of 1982 and holding number 588, poses for a reunion photo as Thomas Becker, a second-year law student, looks on.

Cambridge, Mass. - Alberto Gonzales was confronted by student protesters and forced to leave through a back door on Saturday during a visit to Harvard Law School for his 25th reunion. After two weeks clinging to save his job and defending allegations that he fired eight U.S. Attorneys for political reasons, what might have been a relaxed day of reminiscing with old classmates became instead yet another reminder that both his job and his reputation are in serious jeopardy.

The Attorney General was on campus, unannounced to students, to deliver a lunchtime speech. But word quickly spread that a suspicious motorcade had been spotted by the campus center, and by the time Gonzales and his fellow classmates assembled on the law library steps for their class photo, a group of current students were there to greet him, having donned black hoods and orange jumpsuits. As the photographer told the class of 1982 to smile and say "cheese," the students yelled out that saying "torture," "resign" or "I don't recall" might be more appropriate.

The Attorney General's visit to his alma mater coincided with the third anniversary of the release of photos depicting the torture of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, and came the day after a German federal prosecutor dismissed a case alleging that Gonzales was responsible for approving the policies that resulted in those abuses. These facts were not lost on Deborah Popowski, a second-year law student who had just finished organizing a nationwide student sit-in urging Congress to pass pending legislation that would restore detainees' rights to habeas corpus. "When I heard he was on campus, I was stuffing envelopes with letters to Congress in an office two floors above. I dropped everything. Gonzales needs to know that after approving poorly-reasoned memos that distort the rule of law and justify torture, he is simply not welcome here."

At a time when many in the nation are calling for Gonzales to resign, one third-year student managed to communicate the mood of his own alma mater directly to Gonzales. While the Attorney General's security detail kept protestors at bay and the photographer prepared the class photo, she slipped though the law library's front doors and approached Gonzales from behind. "On behalf of many other Harvard Law students," she said, "I'd like to tell you that we are ashamed to have you as an alumnus of this school. And we're glad you're here to be able to tell you that." Gonzales thanked the student and offered to shake her hand, but was refused. After the class photo was taken, several of the Attorney General's classmates clapped and approached the protesting students to thank them for their efforts.

Following the group photo, Gonzales ducked into the library to take a stroll around the main reading room, which, on the weekend before final exams, was full of students going over their notes. When the protestors caught up with Gonzales, the cavernous reading room, ordinarily a place of hushed whispers, echoed with chants of "shame" and "resign." Gonzales was quickly whisked down a back staircase, out a basement emergency exit and into a waiting SUV. As the motorcade pulled off from in front of historic Austin Hall, Thomas Becker, a second-year law student, stood in an orange jumpsuit and black hood, waving goodbye. When the cars were out of sight, Becker pulled off his hood, smiled, and said "good riddance."

http://staging.michaelmoore.com/_images/splash/GonzalesProtest2.jpg

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, holding number 588, poses with classmates from the Harvard Law School class of 1982 as law student protester Thomas Becker looks on.

http://staging.michaelmoore.com/_images/splash/GonzalesProtest1.jpg

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, second row from top, center, poses with members of the Harvard Law School class of 1982 as law student protester Thomas Becker looks on.

http://www.michaelmoore.com/mustread/index.php?id=870
0 Replies
 
J-B
 
  0  
Reply Sun 29 Apr, 2007 06:49 am
Quote:
As Americans turn away quite leisurely, keeping tuned to Internet shopping and American Idol, the foundations of democracy are being fatally corroded. Something has changed profoundly that weakens us unprecedentedly: Our democratic traditions, independent judiciary and free press do their work today in a context in which we are "at war" in a "long war," a war without end, on a battlefield described as the globe, in a context that gives the president -- without U.S. citizens realizing it yet -- the power over U.S. citizens of freedom or long solitary incarceration, on his say-so alone.


Nice essay regarding "human follies" (I'd prefer this word to authoritarianism)
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sun 29 Apr, 2007 10:40 am
Hey Endy,
you might of gone 'cross this before...

Quote:
Dreams
As children bring their broken toys
with tears for us to mend
I brought my broken dreams to God
Because he was my friend

but instead of leaving him
in peace to work alone
i hung around and tried to help
with ways that were my own

Atleast i snatched them back and cried
"how could you be so slow?"
"My child," he said "what could i do"
"For you never let them go"

-Lauretta Burns (i think!)

(might be a bit messed up, recalled it from memory)

...these people, thinking they've got it all right and stuff, facists, racists,
what ever they maybe... can be related to it...
even worst though...their dreams were never dreamt in the first place...just thought of(who knows not even that!)

oh and thanks for sharing those steps...i find them quite amusing actually!

Regards
Naima
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  0  
Reply Sun 29 Apr, 2007 02:49 pm
What a dreamer- what a writer. Thanks again Endy for the inspiration.

http://myhero.com/images/Freedom/Kennedy/g1_u14811_rfk5.jpg


"Few will have the greatness to bend history; but each of us can work to change a small portion of events, and in the total of all those acts will be written the history of this generation ... It is from numberless diverse acts of courage and belief that human history is thus shaped. Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope...and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance."


"Our future may lie beyond our vision, but it is not completely beyond our control. It is the shaping impulse of America that neither fate nor nature nor the irresistible tides of history, but the work of our own hands, matched to reason and principle, that will determine our destiny. There is pride in that, even arrogance, but there is also experience and truth. In any event, it is the only way we can live. "


" Our answer is the world's hope; it is to rely on youth. The cruelties and the obstacles of this swiftly changing planet will not yield to obsolete dogmas and outworn slogans. It cannot be moved by those who cling to a present which is already dying, who prefer the illusion of security to the excitement and danger which comes with even the most peaceful progress. This world demands the qualities of youth: not a time of life but a state of mind, a temper of the will, a quality of imagination, a predominance of courage over timidity, of the appetite for adventure over the life of ease -- a man like the Chancellor of this University. It is a revolutionary world that we all live in; and thus, as I have said in Latin America and Asia and in Europe and in my own country, the United States, it is the young people who must take the lead. Thus you, and your young compatriots everywhere have had thrust upon you a greater burden of responsibility than any generation that has ever lived."

The second danger is that of expediency; of those who say that hopes and beliefs must bend before immediate necessities. Of course if we must act effectively we must deal with the world as it is. We must get things done. But if there was one thing that President Kennedy stood for that touched the most profound feeling of young people across the world, it was the belief that idealism, high aspiration and deep convictions are not incompatible with the most practical and efficient of programs -- that there is no basic inconsistency between ideals and realistic possibilities -- no separation between the deepest desires of heart and of mind and the rational application of human effort to human problems. It is not realistic or hard-headed to solve problems and take action unguided by ultimate moral aims and values, although we all know some who claim that it is so. In my judgement, it is thoughtless folly. For it ignores the realities of human faith and of passion and of belief; forces ultimately more powerful than all the calculations of our economists or of our generals. Of course to adhere to standards, to idealism, to vision in the face of immediate dangers takes great courage and takes self-confidence. But we also know that only those who dare to fail greatly, can ever achieve greatly."
Robert F. Kennedy
Excerpts from:
Day of Affirmation Address, University of Capetown, South Africa, June 6, 1966
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  0  
Reply Sun 29 Apr, 2007 03:52 pm
Reading about Bobby Kennedy, brought back so many memories. I was in second grade when Martin Luther King was killed in April l968, and then barely two months later, Bobby Kennedy was killed in June 1968. I remember hearing about both of the assassinations in school- my teacher, Mrs. Wentzel, who was in her late twenties or early thirties at the time, cried as she spoke to the class on both occasions. And I remember thinking the world (or at least my world) was going crazy.

There'd been such a feeling of change in the air and so much hope, and even though I was only eight years old, it excited and inspired me, even at that age. I remember hearing about the civil rights movement and all that was happening in the south, and I was so perplexed- as I was living in the north and had never heard the word segregation and certainly didn't know what it meant for so many in our country. But I recognized even at that age, the ridiculous injustice and again, I felt excited and inspired when I learned what Martin Luther King Jr. was doing to try to change things.

And then the assassinations just seemed to put an end to it all. But I read these excerpts to my daughter tonight and as we read them, I thought to myself, my god-forty years later and it all still applies. It could have been written yesterday. And I could see the inspiration and hope in her eyes.
I alway wished I was ten years older. I was too young to march in Selma and Montgomery and I was too young to go to Woodstock Laughing so I just told myself, I was born too late to be a freedom fighter, though I would have loved to have been.
But I actually have some hope now that with the right combination of leadership- the world could change- and then we won't have to feel that these men died for nothing. It'd be good to show our children that there is something to believe in and fight for and that they can effect positive change.

Endy- you're such an inspiration. Do you know this song- or was it before your time?

Abraham, Martin and John
(Dion)

Has anybody here seen my old friend Abraham?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
He freed a lot of people,
But it seems the good they die young.
You know, I just looked around and he's gone.

Anybody here seen my old friend John?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
He freed a lot of people,
But it seems the good they die young.
I just looked around and he's gone.

Anybody here seen my old friend Martin?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
He freed a lot of people,
But it seems the good they die young.
I just looked 'round and he's gone.

Didn't you love the things that they stood for?
Didn't they try to find some good for you and me?
And we'll be free
Some day soon, and it's a-gonna be one day ...

Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up over the hill,
With Abraham, Martin and John.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 29 Apr, 2007 06:34 pm
That's strange, Rebecca, because I too have been thinking about Robert Kennedy today.
This poem is hardly worthy of him or King- but it's what I have right now.
Thought I'd post it.
Thanks for contributing. I recognise the song - the lyrics - I might have heard them on a documentary.
(I've watched a lot of stuff about the 60s- early 70s recently,
including "Sir! No Sir!" (Vietnam Vet protests- which had some amazing songs in it.)

Please feel free to add

Peace
Endy



Vision
>>>>>>

http://www.americansc.org.uk/images/mlk3.jpg

Martin Luther King
There was something 'bout him
You know what I mean?
That man was brave as they come
And could he speak?
That man could speak to angels
Like Jesus preaching
Out there standing up for folks
Pointing with one finger at the truth
Telling the people to be strong
in their resolve
Bit like Robert Kennedy
who took the late night calls
from Mrs King
when her husband was being cuffed
and taken to the cells
We shall overcome, they sang
And the people wanted it, oh yes
Two voices of wisdom
Two men with great hope and vision

I had a dream
that they never shot dead
Robert Kennedy or Martin Luther King
That instead
these two men, one black, one white
live with us today in a world where they
have taught us all to over-come
the evil that is racism

Two voices of wisdom
Two men with one great hope and vision



Endymion 2007


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Thanks for contributing J-B and Naima

I think maybe now's the time to get positive.

Recently I sent an e-mail to one of my favourite Bloggers Tom Degan - http://tomdegan.blogspot.com/
He wrote back thanking me for my support and saying it had made his day - *
i realised something - that supporting the protestors of smaller demonstrations is crucial. - They get hardly any coverage and I know from experience that the bigger the demo the less hassle - it takes guts to stand up and be singled out.

For a while, I'm looking for all the 'little campaigners' - the hardly heard of protesters.

I'm giving starting place to

Thomas Becker, American Law Student Protester, who has made it possible for me to hope that justice has not been forgotten, nor the true spirit of the law destroyed.

http://staging.michaelmoore.com/_images/splash/GonzalesProtest1sp.jpg

"Show me a hero and I will write you a tragedy."
(F. Scott Fitzgerald (1896-1940), U.S. author.

The hero here is Becker, who speaks for law and justice and the tragedy is his need to do so silently


*Tom Degan has added this thread to his list of favourites - if I haven't pissed him off already - so careful what you say :wink:
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Revolution
  3. » Page 19
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/19/2025 at 11:04:17