Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 06:56 am
Immigrant Rights Protests Held Across the Country May 1st

Permitted Rally in Los Angeles Brutally Attacked by Police

On May 1st, tens of thousands of immigrants and supporters of immigrant rights took to the streets across the country. They demanded to be treated with dignity, rather being hunted down, have their homes and workplaces raided, deported with families torn apart, and exploited in the worst jobs.

Since massive immigrant rights protest swept the country a year ago, the Bush regime has brought some of the most intense repression toward immigrants, with a dramatic increase in raids and deportations (often with armed agents sweeping people up in raids all too reminiscent of 1930's Germany), a wall being built along the border, and an increase in increased border patrol agents and right-wing vigilantes.

For immigrants to come out and protest in such a repressive climate shows tremendous courage to fight for a better world, and this is a lesson everyone who is sitting on the sidelines while the Bush regime carries out war crimes, torture, and fascistic repression inside the US.

In Los Angeles, protesters at a permitted rally were brutally attacked by police shooting rubber bullets and swinging billy clubs. In a rare turn of events, FOX News showed some of the brutality of the police after their reporter and camera person were brutalized and forced into their truck (so they couldn't continue to film.

WorldCantWait.org hopes to have more coverage of the May 1st protests soon. And we'd like to encourage everyone reading this to find the ways to support immigrants who are right now facing a wave of repression by the Bush regime.

Watch the video below:

http://www.worldcantwait.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4070&Itemid=220

0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 07:03 am
lostnsearching wrote:
thank you
but i'm very very disturbed right now...
i don't think those were worth reading (or even posting)
some memories just don't seem to go away....


I understand - you know i do.
I'll be thinking of you, Naima - and hoping that you'll be kind to yourself.

Speak to you later
Peace
E
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 07:26 am
http://www.antiwar.com/photos/marine-girl.jpg

U.S. Marines unlikely to report civilian abuse: study
By David Morgan Fri May 4, 3:33 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Only 40 percent of Marines and 55 percent of U.S. Army soldiers deployed in
Iraq say they would report a fellow serviceman for killing or injuring an innocent Iraqi, a
Pentagon report released on Friday shows.

The Army survey, which showed increasing rates of mental health problems for troops on extended or multiple deployments, also said well over one-third of soldiers and Marines believe torture should be allowed to elicit information that could save the lives of American troops or gain knowledge about Iraqi insurgents.

Overall, about 10 percent of the 1,320 soldiers and 447 Marines covered in the survey said they had mistreated civilians, either through physical violence or damage to their personal property. The survey was conducted by U.S. Army medical experts between August 28 and October 3, 2006.

"Soldiers with high levels of anger, who had experienced high levels of combat or who screened positive for mental health symptoms were nearly twice as likely to mistreat noncombatants," acting Army Surgeon General Gale Pollock told reporters.

The findings, which included the first survey of ethics among U.S. troops in combat, were released Friday in an 89-page report posted on the Web site www.armymedicine.army.mil. It was delivered to senior military officials in November.

Claims of U.S. mistreatment of Iraqi detainees and civilians have shadowed American forces in Iraq from revelations of abuse at
Abu Ghraib prison in 2004 to reports of the November 19, 2005, killing of 24 Iraqi civilians by Marines in Haditha.

EXTENDED TOURS

The survey data came out a month after Defense Secretary Robert Gates extended tours for U.S. soldiers in Iraq and
Afghanistan to up to 15 months instead of one year as U.S. forces increase their numbers in Iraq under a plan ordered by
President George W. Bush.

The extended tours were widely seen as the latest sign of strain placed on the U.S. military by the two wars.

There are currently some 145,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and 25,000 in Afghanistan. Bush's plan calls for boosting the U.S. deployment in Iraq by 28,000 combat and support troops.

The report, the fourth prepared by the Army's Mental Health Advisory Team since the war in Iraq began in 2003, showed that mental health problems such as acute stress, anxiety and depression rose among troops facing longer deployments or their second or third tour in Iraq.

Overall, about 20 percent of Army soldiers and 15 percent of Marines showed mental health symptoms of either anxiety, depression or acute stress. The rate was at 30 percent among troops with high combat experience.

Among Army soldiers, 27 percent of those with more than one tour of duty tested positive for a mental health problem, versus 17 percent for soldiers on their first deployment.

The rate of anxiety, depression and acute stress stood at 22 percent among soldiers deployed for more than six months and at 15 percent for troops in Iraq for less than six months.

Army experts recommended that the Pentagon extend the interval between deployments to 18 to 36 months so that troops could recover mentally.

Gates said last month that troops in the region covered by the U.S. Central Command -- from East Africa to Central Asia -- could expect to spend 12 months at home between deployments


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070504/us_nm/iraq_usa_civilians_dc

http://www.antiwar.com/


*************************************

12 months between deployments? Is Gates expecting another 10 years of war?
12 months to 'get over' the trauma? Well, Gates let me tell you - 12 months between deployments isn't going to do it - 12 years isn't going to do it! They'll never get over it - none of them. All, to some extent are traumatised. Live with it - war is traumatic
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 07:31 am
yeah! i know you always understand(which is also disturbing because there are certain things i think noone should understand)...but you are emotionally more capable!

Be kind to myself...
that's the problem!!!
I 'have' been kind to myself but now....
you see the 'real' Naima Tashfeen is very different...i've been controlling her through writing and shutting her up but now things are getting out of hand....She has started to control the writings and has started to come out... i knew this would happen...and i dreaded it....Cause if the real me is out then she'd want a lot of revenge and payback....
no worries, i'm working on it!!!

thanks,
rock on
Naima
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 07:40 am
No US-Iran talks at Iraq conference


Iran and the US have failed to hold widely-anticipated talks on the sidelines of an international conference held to discuss ways to stabilise Iraq.

As the conference drew to a close on Friday, Manouchehr Mottaki, Iran's foreign minister, instead attacked US policy and said Washington should take responsibility for the growing chaos in Iraq.

"There should be no doubt that the continuation of and increase in terrorist acts in Iraq originates from the flawed approaches adopted by the foreign troops," Mottaki said.

"The United States must accept the responsibilities arising from the occupation of Iraq.


"To create a safe haven for those terrorists who try to turn Iraqi territory into a base for attacking Iraq's neighbours should be condemned."

http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/5/4/1_218975_1_2.jpg


http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/66568D1F-9FB8-400B-A4F2-C176E7A127CE.htm
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/736515E4-37CE-4242-8A5F-854381D9DFEE.htm
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 07:44 am
Quote:
"To create a safe haven for those terrorists who try to turn Iraqi territory into a base for attacking Iraq's neighbours should be condemned."



ha! Tell me about it!
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 08:16 am
lostnsearching wrote:
yeah! i know you always understand(which is also disturbing because there are certain things i think noone should understand)...but you are emotionally more capable!

Be kind to myself...
that's the problem!!!
I 'have' been kind to myself but now....
you see the 'real' Naima (*) is very different...i've been controlling her through writing and shutting her up but now things are getting out of hand....She has started to control the writings and has started to come out... i knew this would happen...and i dreaded it....Cause if the real me is out then she'd want a lot of revenge and payback....
no worries, i'm working on it!!!

thanks,
rock on
Naima



Revenge?

You mean revenge like the US took after 9/11?
Revenge that leads to hate and more revenge?

"The greatest revenge you can have on your enemy is to forgive him."

(I don't know who said that, but I know it's right.
As soon as you forgive them, they have no power over you.
They no longer hurt you - hard, down deep in your guts.

Revenge is an abuse of yourself, because you can never be satisfied by it
and in the end it will turn you into everything you hate in the one you only really want to make understand.

You have to accept the way they are and make a decision. Either you accept them - or you don't. Maybe you don't really need them. That's how I felt when I was 15.

I decided that I would 'rebel' by 'dismissing' my enemy. Not revenge, but just a turning away. I decided that I would be a different kind of person - one that people didn't hate and were afraid of.

You are a bright and intellegent person, Naima
And a caring one, too.
Please don't give up on the good side - we need more like you.

* be safe

Peace
Endy
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 08:19 pm
Published on Saturday, May 5, 2007 by the Guardian/UK
Saved by the Bomb: Senator McCain has Hit Upon a Solution to All the Republican Party's Woes: A Nuclear War with Iran

by Terry Jones

Campaigning in Oklahoma the other day, the Republican senator John McCain was asked what should be done about Iran. He responded by singing, "Bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran", to the tune of the Beach Boys' Barbara Ann. (Join the hilarity and see for yourself on YouTube.) How can any thinking person disagree? I mean, any country with a president who doesn't shave properly and never wears a tie deserves what's coming to it - a lot of American bombs, with a few British ones thrown in to ensure we don't miss out on the ensuing upsurge in terrorism.

The problem is how to unload enough bombs on Iran before next year's US election to bring about enough flag-waving to get the Republican party re-elected. This is essential if we are to safeguard the revenues of companies such as Halliburton - particularly at a time when the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction is discovering what a shoddy job Halliburton has been doing. In projects at Nasiriya, Mosul and Hilla - declared successes by the US - inspectors have discovered buckled floors, crumbling concrete, failed generators and blocked sewage systems - due not to sabotage but largely to poor construction and lack of maintenance.

The trouble is that the re-election of the GOP is becoming more problematic as opinion turns against George Bush's little invasion of Iraq. Even Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah recently condemned the US action as "an illegal foreign occupation"; his nephew, Prince Bandar, hasn't been returning calls for weeks.

More worrying is the plummeting popularity of the party, as White House corruption becomes ever more difficult to disguise. The LA Times reports that what Representative Thomas M Davis III called a "poisonous" environment has begun to dent fundraising - an unheard-of problem for the Republicans.

So the only solution is to bomb Iran, as Senator McCain so wisely and amusingly suggests. The real issue is whether to use regular weapons or do the job properly and go nuclear.

Nuclear bombs have the advantage of being much bigger, and they will also pollute vast swathes of Iran and make much of the country uninhabitable for years. With a bit of luck some of the fallout will sweep into Iraq and finish off the job the US and UK have begun without incurring more costs.

But the biggest advantage of nuclear weapons is that the repercussions would be so enormous, the upsurge in terrorism so overwhelming, that the world would be totally changed. A year before 9/11, Paul Wolfowitz and Lewis "Scooter" Libby signed a statement for the Project for the New American Century, a neoconservative thinktank. They rather hoped for "some catastrophic and catalysing event like a new Pearl Harbor" to kickstart their dream of a world run by US military might. A nuclear war would do the trick in spades. The Republican party could expect to stay in power for the next 50 or even 100 years.

Of course, a large proportion of the human race could be wiped out in the process, but that shouldn't be a problem as long as there are anti-radiation suits for White House and Pentagon staff. Such a shake-up would give the US a golden opportunity to corner what's left of the world's oil reserves.

In 1955 Albert Einstein and Bertrand Russell said the world was faced by a "stark and dreadful and inescapable" choice: "Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?" Senator McCain wasn't bothered by such questions; the human race may be standing on a precipice, but the Republicans have a chance of permanent re-election.

Terry Jones is a film director, actor and Python. Terry-jones.net


© Guardian News and Media Limited 2007
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 08:44 pm
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/wp-content/photos/thumb_0506_03.jpg


Published on Saturday, May 5, 2007 by Associated Press

by William J. Kole

VIENNA, Austria - In some ways, Hiasl is like any other Viennese: He indulges a weakness for pastry, likes to paint and enjoys chilling out watching TV.But he doesn't care for coffee, and he isn't actually a person-at least not yet.
In a case that could set a global legal precedent for granting basic rights to apes, animal rights advocates are seeking to get the 26- year-old male chimpanzee legally declared a "person.

Hiasl's supporters argue he needs that status to become a legal entity that can receive donations and get a guardian to look out for his interests.

"Our main argument is that Hiasl is a person and has basic legal rights," said Eberhart Theuer, a lawyer leading the challenge on behalf of the Association Against Animal Factories, a Vienna animal rights group.

"We mean the right to life, the right to not be tortured, the right to freedom under certain conditions," Theuer said.
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sun 6 May, 2007 12:30 am
Endymion wrote:



You have to accept the way they are and make a decision. Either you accept them - or you don't. Maybe you don't really need them. That's how I felt when I was 15.

I decided that I would 'rebel' by 'dismissing' my enemy. Not revenge, but just a turning away.
**********************
Please don't give up on the good side - we need more like you.
**********************
* be safe
**********************
Peace
Endy


I did reject them... but they're like wounds on your body....which leave scars, which remind you of memories from forgotten times that have effected you eternally...
forgive, Iraqi's can't forgive Bush untill he 'stops'... some loosers don't stop...and if you forgive them before that, it's like you're accepting their power and your weekness.
Still struggling for what the suits call a 'win-win'
Do i not need them? oh i definately don't...but why do they keep budding in?
Again, i'm working on it!
*********************
And i'm NEVER giving up on the side i'm on(be it good, evil, crazy, or unreal) Twisted Evil
*********************
Always safe, thank you! Very Happy
*********************
Peace to you too...
and thanks for those kind words(and working along!)...I hope they have an effect on my subconcious! :wink:

Always Rock on!
Naima
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sun 6 May, 2007 12:36 am
You Are Blessed


Endymion wrote:

I decided that I would be a different kind of person - one that people didn't hate and were afraid of.

This got me interested in something… I checked the *numerological vibrations of your name: Endymion… and you'd be amazed (though it's already obvious, it's fun to check anyway) by this:
Endymion adds up to the number 32
[E=5 N=5 D=4 Y=1 M=4 I=1 O=7 N=5]= 32
Here's a little explanation on those blessed by it:


32
Communication


This compound number has the same magical power to sway masses of people as the *14, the same help from those in high positions as the *23. Add all this to the natural ability to charm others with magnetic speech, and it's clear why 32 is sometimes known, by modernizing the symbolism of the ancients as "The Politician's Vibration." The complexities of advertising, writing, publishing, radio, and television are not always, but usually are an open book to the 32 person, who tends to work well under pressure. But there's a warning note sounded within this seemingly happy melody. 32 is a very fortunate number if the person it represents holds inflexibly to his or her own opinions and judgment in both artistic or intangible matters and material matters. If not, the plans are liable to be wrecked by the stubbornness and stupidity of others.

~ Source: Linda Goodman's Star Signs

********************************************
* Numerology is a metaphysical Science
*14= movement-challenge
*23= the Royal Star of the Lion

********************************************
Hope you found it interesting! ( I found it 'destined' obvious!)
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  0  
Reply Sun 6 May, 2007 06:14 am
Endy- some really interesting articles.

First of all, I like the juxtaposition of article outlining the plight of the immigrants, and the article about the fact that only 40% of marines and 55% of US soldiers would report a comrade for killing a human being who happened to be Iraqi, but that on the other hand, some Americans want to mount a campaign to grant human rights to an Ape- an ape for god's sake-gets a legal team in the US, but American people, native, non-native, whatever- are living in substandard housing, lacking medical care and if non-native,are being hunted down and shipped out like animals.

But you know, that brings me to the fact that this ape is an immigrant, isn't it? Unless I'm mistaken, apes are not native to North America. Why does this immigrant animal deserve better treatment than immigrant human beings? Oh I'm sorry- it must have been brought into the country legally- all of its papers must be in order. Give me a f**** break.

Does anyone else feel like we've traveled from the ridiculous to the sublime and that the inmates are now running the asylum?

Quote:
We in the U.S. have a smirking chimp as president, so what's the problem here?


Here's a joke for you:

"Question: How many Bush-administration officials does it take to screw in a light bulb?

Answer: None. There is nothing wrong with the light bulb; its conditions are improving every day. Any report of its lack of incandescence is a delusional spin by the liberal media. That light bulb has served honorably, and anything you say about its going out undermines the lighting effect. And finally, WHY DO YOU HATE FREEDOM?"
(Source unknown)

This kind of stuff has led me to change my signature for a while. This will be my new one: "I got the blues thinking of the future, so I left off and made some marmalade. It's amazing how it cheers one up to shred oranges and scrub the floor." D.H. Lawrence

Because really, what else are you gonna do? Except what you're doing- excellently, I might add. You're definitely a 32. And I'm really happy and proud that you're getting outside recognition for your efforts here. You deserve it.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 05:01 am
Hi Naima

Thank you for your very interesting post.

It's true that I try and 'communicate' through my poetry/writing and that it has led to me 'talking' with people from right around the world…

But blimey - don't you think it's strange that I'm number 32 "Communication" - when I have such a problem verbally communicating? (The stammer etc)

Mostly want to say thanks - I think you took my suggestion that "The greatest revenge you can have
on your enemy - is to forgive them," very well.

(Much better than I did the first time someone said something similar to me).
I was so angry…. Laughing

You're one of three wise women around here - hope you know that!

Peace Naima - to you and Pakistan

Keep writing - I'm still reading your poetry
Endy
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 05:23 am
aidan wrote:

Does anyone else feel like we've traveled from the ridiculous to the sublime and that the inmates are now running the asylum?


Rebecca, yes, you're not alone there. Gradually...gradually....I think people are starting to face up to some terrible truths. But I guess a lot of people are very afraid (and of course, that's how dictatorships begin, with fear).
I bet if you did a survey in UK/US and asked everyone what they are more afraid of - being blown to pieces by a 'terrorist' in their local shop - or incarcerated by their own Government for questioning it's moral/ethical values - they'd say they feared the latter (why else not march for an end the Iraq tragedy).
And with both countries running out of prison space, they'd be sensible to see it that way.

I think I might look back at some historical, social revolutions, such as the Women's Movement here in Britain. (when I get time) I know I keep saying it - but I really think our ancestors can help us...

Thanks for your kind words Rebecca
Enjoy Somerset in the spring

Peace
E
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 05:36 am
May 8th, 2007 2:15 am
Iraq is last in child survival rankings

When ten million children (humans) under age 5 die every year - I think every adult on the planet needs to take some responsibility for that.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 05:56 am
Hold on a minute.....

TEN MILLION?
Ten f*cking MILLION every year - dead?
And that's just the under 5s?

What are we running here on earth? A human poverty farm for the inhuman rich and powerful?
[/color]
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  0  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 06:13 am
endymion, i think you hit that nail directly on the head, if i say so myself.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  0  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 06:54 am
http://www.ngoabroad.com/images/Bolivia--kids%20napping--nick_073.jpg

New study shows one billion children in poverty
Posted: 14 Nov 2003

Drawing from the largest, most accurate survey sample of children ever assembled, a new UNICEF-sponsored report has found that over one billion children (more than half of those living in developing countries) suffer from the severe effects of poverty and 674 million (over a third) are living in conditions of absolute poverty.
Using a pioneering methodology, the survey measures the extent of child poverty, not only in terms of income, but also of deprivation of basic human rights such as shelter, food, water, sanitation, health, education and information. The researchers analysed survey data on nearly 1.2 million children from 46 countries collected mainly during the late 1990's.

Over one billion children suffer from the severe effects of poverty and 674 million are living in conditions of absolute poverty.
© UNICEF

The data is published in the UNICEF-comissioned report, Child Poverty in the Developing World. The research team included Dave Gordon of the Centre for International Poverty Research at the University of Bristol and Peter Townsend of the London School of Economics.


Dave Gordon, Professor of Social Justice at the University of Bristol and one of the authors of the report, Child poverty in the developing world, says: "Many of the children surveyed who were living in absolute poverty will have died or had their health profoundly damaged by the time the report is published, as a direct consequence of their appalling living conditions. Many others will have had their development so severely impaired that they may be unable to escape from a lifetime or grinding poverty."

The researchers found that:

Over six hundred million (34 per cent) children are living in dwellings with more than five people per room or which have a mud floor;

Over half a billion children (31 per cent) have no kind of toilet facility;

Nearly 376 million (20 per cent) of children use unsafe water sources or have more than a 15-minute walk to water;

134 million children aged between 7 and 18 (13 per cent) have never been to school;

91 million children under 5 (15 per cent) are severely malnourished;

265 million children (15 per cent) have never received any immunisations or have chronic, untreated diarrhoea;

The study found significant differences between regions, with Sub-Saharan Africa having the highest rates of severe deprivation with respect to four of the seven indicators - shelter, water, education and health. There were also clear gender differences, particularly with regards to education deprivation, with girls 60 per cent more likely to be severely educationally deprived. Girls in the Middle East and North Africa region are three times more likely than boys to be educationally deprived. Children in rural areas are much more likely to be severely deprived than urban children, particularly with regards to water, sanitation and education. In a number of countries, absolute poverty rates among children in rural areas are as high as 90 per cent.

Rural neglect

The report calls for anti-poverty strategies to respond to local conditions, and argues against blanket solutions to eradicating child poverty. Instead, it emphasises the need to improve basic infrastructure and social services for families with children, particularly with regards to shelter and sanitation in rural areas. An international investment fund for payment towards national schemes of child benefit in cash or kind is also suggested.


Shailen Nandy at the University of Bristol and one of the co-authors of the report says: "At this rate the UN Millennium Development Goals are unlikely to be met, given declining international commitment to development aid. The results of cutting public spending on basic social services have been an increase in poverty and inequality, a fact which organisations like the World Bank need to acknowledge."

Source: UNICEF-UK, 12 November 2003.

For copies of the report please go to:
http://www.policypress.org.uk or call The Policy Press: +44 (0)117 331 4054.
© People & the Planet 2000 - 2007


Endy, this study is four years old- so it doesn't even address the children in Iraq, US, UK, etc. who have been affected either by being directly in the line of fire or because their parents have been deployed to serve.

and in our own back yard:
Study: Child abuse, troop deployment linked You're such a catalyst Endy. While I was looking at articles and images I found this volunteer organization:
Opportunities for service google: www.ngosabroad.co.uk


(The link was ridiculously long and all tied up with the image- and I was afraid it wouldn't work) but there are some incredible opportunities all over the world for people with all sorts of varying skills to work for children-right now they need builders and brick masons and plumbers....
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 08:46 am
Endymion wrote:
But blimey - don't you think it's strange that I'm number 32 "Communication" - when I have such a problem verbally communicating? (The stammer etc)
Endy


Well i don't really know what you're like speaking 'verbally,' however, there are many things we never know about ourselves...or sometimes we're better off that way! :wink:
Anyways, You're awesome when it comes to cyber talk. Everyone around would agree on that!

Endymion wrote:
You're one of three wise women around here - hope you know that!

Good to hear it at a time like this!(with exams comin' up an' all Laughing )

Endymion wrote:
Peace Naima - to you and Pakistan

Thanks, We'll make it....'both' of us always seem to find a way around! Twisted Evil

Rock On, dude!
Naima
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 05:43 pm
Hey, Rebecca

Thanks for posting that -

None of it seems fair to me. We wouldn't need charities to help these people, if things were simply shared fairly. If human rights meant anything. If ordinary people had a vote that counted for something.
If world leaders cared a f*ck.
We're here in the 21Century - and millions dying from poverty - just like the dark ages.

That's what I really don't understand.
Actually, I think it's a disgrace.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Revolution
  3. » Page 21
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/19/2025 at 05:17:00