Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 06:56 am
Immigrant Rights Protests Held Across the Country May 1st

Permitted Rally in Los Angeles Brutally Attacked by Police

On May 1st, tens of thousands of immigrants and supporters of immigrant rights took to the streets across the country. They demanded to be treated with dignity, rather being hunted down, have their homes and workplaces raided, deported with families torn apart, and exploited in the worst jobs.

Since massive immigrant rights protest swept the country a year ago, the Bush regime has brought some of the most intense repression toward immigrants, with a dramatic increase in raids and deportations (often with armed agents sweeping people up in raids all too reminiscent of 1930's Germany), a wall being built along the border, and an increase in increased border patrol agents and right-wing vigilantes.

For immigrants to come out and protest in such a repressive climate shows tremendous courage to fight for a better world, and this is a lesson everyone who is sitting on the sidelines while the Bush regime carries out war crimes, torture, and fascistic repression inside the US.

In Los Angeles, protesters at a permitted rally were brutally attacked by police shooting rubber bullets and swinging billy clubs. In a rare turn of events, FOX News showed some of the brutality of the police after their reporter and camera person were brutalized and forced into their truck (so they couldn't continue to film.

WorldCantWait.org hopes to have more coverage of the May 1st protests soon. And we'd like to encourage everyone reading this to find the ways to support immigrants who are right now facing a wave of repression by the Bush regime.

Watch the video below:

http://www.worldcantwait.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4070&Itemid=220

0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 07:03 am
lostnsearching wrote:
thank you
but i'm very very disturbed right now...
i don't think those were worth reading (or even posting)
some memories just don't seem to go away....


I understand - you know i do.
I'll be thinking of you, Naima - and hoping that you'll be kind to yourself.

Speak to you later
Peace
E
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 07:26 am
http://www.antiwar.com/photos/marine-girl.jpg

U.S. Marines unlikely to report civilian abuse: study
By David Morgan Fri May 4, 3:33 PM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Only 40 percent of Marines and 55 percent of U.S. Army soldiers deployed in
Iraq say they would report a fellow serviceman for killing or injuring an innocent Iraqi, a
Pentagon report released on Friday shows.

The Army survey, which showed increasing rates of mental health problems for troops on extended or multiple deployments, also said well over one-third of soldiers and Marines believe torture should be allowed to elicit information that could save the lives of American troops or gain knowledge about Iraqi insurgents.

Overall, about 10 percent of the 1,320 soldiers and 447 Marines covered in the survey said they had mistreated civilians, either through physical violence or damage to their personal property. The survey was conducted by U.S. Army medical experts between August 28 and October 3, 2006.

"Soldiers with high levels of anger, who had experienced high levels of combat or who screened positive for mental health symptoms were nearly twice as likely to mistreat noncombatants," acting Army Surgeon General Gale Pollock told reporters.

The findings, which included the first survey of ethics among U.S. troops in combat, were released Friday in an 89-page report posted on the Web site www.armymedicine.army.mil. It was delivered to senior military officials in November.

Claims of U.S. mistreatment of Iraqi detainees and civilians have shadowed American forces in Iraq from revelations of abuse at
Abu Ghraib prison in 2004 to reports of the November 19, 2005, killing of 24 Iraqi civilians by Marines in Haditha.

EXTENDED TOURS

The survey data came out a month after Defense Secretary Robert Gates extended tours for U.S. soldiers in Iraq and
Afghanistan to up to 15 months instead of one year as U.S. forces increase their numbers in Iraq under a plan ordered by
President George W. Bush.

The extended tours were widely seen as the latest sign of strain placed on the U.S. military by the two wars.

There are currently some 145,000 U.S. troops in Iraq and 25,000 in Afghanistan. Bush's plan calls for boosting the U.S. deployment in Iraq by 28,000 combat and support troops.

The report, the fourth prepared by the Army's Mental Health Advisory Team since the war in Iraq began in 2003, showed that mental health problems such as acute stress, anxiety and depression rose among troops facing longer deployments or their second or third tour in Iraq.

Overall, about 20 percent of Army soldiers and 15 percent of Marines showed mental health symptoms of either anxiety, depression or acute stress. The rate was at 30 percent among troops with high combat experience.

Among Army soldiers, 27 percent of those with more than one tour of duty tested positive for a mental health problem, versus 17 percent for soldiers on their first deployment.

The rate of anxiety, depression and acute stress stood at 22 percent among soldiers deployed for more than six months and at 15 percent for troops in Iraq for less than six months.

Army experts recommended that the Pentagon extend the interval between deployments to 18 to 36 months so that troops could recover mentally.

Gates said last month that troops in the region covered by the U.S. Central Command -- from East Africa to Central Asia -- could expect to spend 12 months at home between deployments


http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070504/us_nm/iraq_usa_civilians_dc

http://www.antiwar.com/


*************************************

12 months between deployments? Is Gates expecting another 10 years of war?
12 months to 'get over' the trauma? Well, Gates let me tell you - 12 months between deployments isn't going to do it - 12 years isn't going to do it! They'll never get over it - none of them. All, to some extent are traumatised. Live with it - war is traumatic
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 07:31 am
yeah! i know you always understand(which is also disturbing because there are certain things i think noone should understand)...but you are emotionally more capable!

Be kind to myself...
that's the problem!!!
I 'have' been kind to myself but now....
you see the 'real' Naima Tashfeen is very different...i've been controlling her through writing and shutting her up but now things are getting out of hand....She has started to control the writings and has started to come out... i knew this would happen...and i dreaded it....Cause if the real me is out then she'd want a lot of revenge and payback....
no worries, i'm working on it!!!

thanks,
rock on
Naima
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 07:40 am
No US-Iran talks at Iraq conference


Iran and the US have failed to hold widely-anticipated talks on the sidelines of an international conference held to discuss ways to stabilise Iraq.

As the conference drew to a close on Friday, Manouchehr Mottaki, Iran's foreign minister, instead attacked US policy and said Washington should take responsibility for the growing chaos in Iraq.

"There should be no doubt that the continuation of and increase in terrorist acts in Iraq originates from the flawed approaches adopted by the foreign troops," Mottaki said.

"The United States must accept the responsibilities arising from the occupation of Iraq.


"To create a safe haven for those terrorists who try to turn Iraqi territory into a base for attacking Iraq's neighbours should be condemned."

http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/images/2007/5/4/1_218975_1_2.jpg


http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/66568D1F-9FB8-400B-A4F2-C176E7A127CE.htm
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/736515E4-37CE-4242-8A5F-854381D9DFEE.htm
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 07:44 am
Quote:
"To create a safe haven for those terrorists who try to turn Iraqi territory into a base for attacking Iraq's neighbours should be condemned."



ha! Tell me about it!
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 08:16 am
lostnsearching wrote:
yeah! i know you always understand(which is also disturbing because there are certain things i think noone should understand)...but you are emotionally more capable!

Be kind to myself...
that's the problem!!!
I 'have' been kind to myself but now....
you see the 'real' Naima (*) is very different...i've been controlling her through writing and shutting her up but now things are getting out of hand....She has started to control the writings and has started to come out... i knew this would happen...and i dreaded it....Cause if the real me is out then she'd want a lot of revenge and payback....
no worries, i'm working on it!!!

thanks,
rock on
Naima



Revenge?

You mean revenge like the US took after 9/11?
Revenge that leads to hate and more revenge?

"The greatest revenge you can have on your enemy is to forgive him."

(I don't know who said that, but I know it's right.
As soon as you forgive them, they have no power over you.
They no longer hurt you - hard, down deep in your guts.

Revenge is an abuse of yourself, because you can never be satisfied by it
and in the end it will turn you into everything you hate in the one you only really want to make understand.

You have to accept the way they are and make a decision. Either you accept them - or you don't. Maybe you don't really need them. That's how I felt when I was 15.

I decided that I would 'rebel' by 'dismissing' my enemy. Not revenge, but just a turning away. I decided that I would be a different kind of person - one that people didn't hate and were afraid of.

You are a bright and intellegent person, Naima
And a caring one, too.
Please don't give up on the good side - we need more like you.

* be safe

Peace
Endy
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 08:19 pm
Published on Saturday, May 5, 2007 by the Guardian/UK
Saved by the Bomb: Senator McCain has Hit Upon a Solution to All the Republican Party's Woes: A Nuclear War with Iran

by Terry Jones

Campaigning in Oklahoma the other day, the Republican senator John McCain was asked what should be done about Iran. He responded by singing, "Bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran", to the tune of the Beach Boys' Barbara Ann. (Join the hilarity and see for yourself on YouTube.) How can any thinking person disagree? I mean, any country with a president who doesn't shave properly and never wears a tie deserves what's coming to it - a lot of American bombs, with a few British ones thrown in to ensure we don't miss out on the ensuing upsurge in terrorism.

The problem is how to unload enough bombs on Iran before next year's US election to bring about enough flag-waving to get the Republican party re-elected. This is essential if we are to safeguard the revenues of companies such as Halliburton - particularly at a time when the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction is discovering what a shoddy job Halliburton has been doing. In projects at Nasiriya, Mosul and Hilla - declared successes by the US - inspectors have discovered buckled floors, crumbling concrete, failed generators and blocked sewage systems - due not to sabotage but largely to poor construction and lack of maintenance.

The trouble is that the re-election of the GOP is becoming more problematic as opinion turns against George Bush's little invasion of Iraq. Even Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah recently condemned the US action as "an illegal foreign occupation"; his nephew, Prince Bandar, hasn't been returning calls for weeks.

More worrying is the plummeting popularity of the party, as White House corruption becomes ever more difficult to disguise. The LA Times reports that what Representative Thomas M Davis III called a "poisonous" environment has begun to dent fundraising - an unheard-of problem for the Republicans.

So the only solution is to bomb Iran, as Senator McCain so wisely and amusingly suggests. The real issue is whether to use regular weapons or do the job properly and go nuclear.

Nuclear bombs have the advantage of being much bigger, and they will also pollute vast swathes of Iran and make much of the country uninhabitable for years. With a bit of luck some of the fallout will sweep into Iraq and finish off the job the US and UK have begun without incurring more costs.

But the biggest advantage of nuclear weapons is that the repercussions would be so enormous, the upsurge in terrorism so overwhelming, that the world would be totally changed. A year before 9/11, Paul Wolfowitz and Lewis "Scooter" Libby signed a statement for the Project for the New American Century, a neoconservative thinktank. They rather hoped for "some catastrophic and catalysing event like a new Pearl Harbor" to kickstart their dream of a world run by US military might. A nuclear war would do the trick in spades. The Republican party could expect to stay in power for the next 50 or even 100 years.

Of course, a large proportion of the human race could be wiped out in the process, but that shouldn't be a problem as long as there are anti-radiation suits for White House and Pentagon staff. Such a shake-up would give the US a golden opportunity to corner what's left of the world's oil reserves.

In 1955 Albert Einstein and Bertrand Russell said the world was faced by a "stark and dreadful and inescapable" choice: "Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?" Senator McCain wasn't bothered by such questions; the human race may be standing on a precipice, but the Republicans have a chance of permanent re-election.

Terry Jones is a film director, actor and Python. Terry-jones.net


© Guardian News and Media Limited 2007
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 08:44 pm
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/wp-content/photos/thumb_0506_03.jpg


Published on Saturday, May 5, 2007 by Associated Press
Activists Want Chimp Declared a ?'Person'
by William J. Kole

VIENNA, Austria - In some ways, Hiasl is like any other Viennese: He indulges a weakness for pastry, likes to paint and enjoys chilling out watching TV.But he doesn't care for coffee, and he isn't actually a person-at least not yet.
In a case that could set a global legal precedent for granting basic rights to apes, animal rights advocates are seeking to get the 26- year-old male chimpanzee legally declared a "person.

Hiasl's supporters argue he needs that status to become a legal entity that can receive donations and get a guardian to look out for his interests.

"Our main argument is that Hiasl is a person and has basic legal rights," said Eberhart Theuer, a lawyer leading the challenge on behalf of the Association Against Animal Factories, a Vienna animal rights group.

"We mean the right to life, the right to not be tortured, the right to freedom under certain conditions," Theuer said.

"We're not talking about the right to vote here."

The campaign began after the animal sanctuary where Hiasl (pronounced HEE-zul) and another chimp, Rosi, have lived for 25 years went bankrupt.

Activists want to ensure the apes don't wind up homeless if the shelter closes. Both have already suffered: They were captured as babies in Sierra Leone in 1982 and smuggled in a crate to Austria for use in pharmaceutical experiments. Customs officers intercepted the shipment and turned the chimps over to the shelter.

Their food and veterinary bills run about $6,800 a month. Donors have offered to help, but there's a catch: Under Austrian law, only a person can receive personal donations.

Organizers could set up a foundation to collect cash for Hiasl, whose life expectancy in captivity is about 60 years. But without basic rights, they contend, he could be sold to someone outside Austria, where the chimp is protected by strict animal cruelty laws.

"If we can get Hiasl declared a person, he would have the right to own property. Then, if people wanted to donate something to him, he'd have the right to receive it," said Theuer, who has vowed to take the case to the European Court of Human Rights if necessary.

Austria isn't the only country where primate rights are being debated. Spain's parliament is considering a bill that would endorse the Great Ape Project, a Seattle-based international initiative to extend "fundamental moral and legal protections" to apes.

If Hiasl gets a guardian, "it will be the first time the species barrier will have been crossed for legal ?'personhood,'" said Jan Creamer, chief executive of Animal Defenders International, which is working to end the use of primates in research.

Paula Stibbe, a Briton who teaches English in Vienna, petitioned a district court to be Hiasl's legal trustee. On April 24, Judge Barbara Bart rejected her request, ruling Hiasl didn't meet two key tests: He is neither mentally impaired nor in an emergency.

Although Bart expressed concern that awarding Hiasl a guardian could create the impression that animals enjoy the same legal status as humans, she didn't rule that he could never be considered a person.

Martin Balluch, who heads the Association Against Animal Factories, has asked a federal court for a ruling on the guardianship issue.

"Chimps share 99.4 percent of their DNA with humans," he said. "OK, they're not homo sapiens. But they're obviously also not things-the only other option the law provides."

Not all Austrian animal rights activists back the legal challenge. Michael Antolini, president of the local Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, said he thinks it's absurd.

"I'm not about to make myself look like a fool" by getting involved, said Antolini, who worries that chimpanzees could gain broader rights, such as copyright protections on their photographs.

But Stibbe, who brings Hiasl sweets and yogurt and watches him draw and clown around by dressing up in knee-high rubber boots, insists he deserves more legal rights "than bricks or apples or potatoes."

"He can be very playful but also thoughtful," she said. "Being with him is like playing with someone who can't talk."

A date for the appeal hasn't been set, but Hiasl's legal team has lined up expert witnesses, including Jane Goodall, the world's foremost observer of chimpanzee behavior.

"When you see Hiasl, he really comes across as a person," Theuer said.

"He has a real personality. It strikes you immediately: This is an individual. You just have to look him in the eye to see that."


Copyright 2007 The Associated Press.




A Few Comments



NMBill May 5th, 2007 1:32 pm

Wow I looked this up and found it pretty commercialized. But Koko's story first came out in National Geographic, and we realized that Koko (gorilla) has emotions just like we do!

http://www.koko.org/index.php


daveg955 May 5th, 2007 9:38 pm

"We mean the right to life, the right to not be tortured, the right to freedom under certain conditions," Theuer said.

Hey, if giving a chimp the status of a ?'person' is some sort of guarantee of these rights, go for it… and how about giving the rest of us that same status and guarantee?

And let's not insult the poor chimp by comparing him to a Shrub.


sonobono May 5th, 2007 2:34 pm

The United States has awarded corporations the status of "Personhood"; it seems that a chimpanzee with such intelligence and cool might logically be given the same honor.


PowerofLove May 5th, 2007 3:11 pm

We in the U.S. have a smirking chimp as president, so what's the problem here?



http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/05/05/1000/
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sun 6 May, 2007 12:30 am
Endymion wrote:



You have to accept the way they are and make a decision. Either you accept them - or you don't. Maybe you don't really need them. That's how I felt when I was 15.

I decided that I would 'rebel' by 'dismissing' my enemy. Not revenge, but just a turning away.
**********************
Please don't give up on the good side - we need more like you.
**********************
* be safe
**********************
Peace
Endy


I did reject them... but they're like wounds on your body....which leave scars, which remind you of memories from forgotten times that have effected you eternally...
forgive, Iraqi's can't forgive Bush untill he 'stops'... some loosers don't stop...and if you forgive them before that, it's like you're accepting their power and your weekness.
Still struggling for what the suits call a 'win-win'
Do i not need them? oh i definately don't...but why do they keep budding in?
Again, i'm working on it!
*********************
And i'm NEVER giving up on the side i'm on(be it good, evil, crazy, or unreal) Twisted Evil
*********************
Always safe, thank you! Very Happy
*********************
Peace to you too...
and thanks for those kind words(and working along!)...I hope they have an effect on my subconcious! :wink:

Always Rock on!
Naima
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Sun 6 May, 2007 12:36 am
You Are Blessed


Endymion wrote:

I decided that I would be a different kind of person - one that people didn't hate and were afraid of.

This got me interested in something… I checked the *numerological vibrations of your name: Endymion… and you'd be amazed (though it's already obvious, it's fun to check anyway) by this:
Endymion adds up to the number 32
[E=5 N=5 D=4 Y=1 M=4 I=1 O=7 N=5]= 32
Here's a little explanation on those blessed by it:


32
Communication


This compound number has the same magical power to sway masses of people as the *14, the same help from those in high positions as the *23. Add all this to the natural ability to charm others with magnetic speech, and it's clear why 32 is sometimes known, by modernizing the symbolism of the ancients as "The Politician's Vibration." The complexities of advertising, writing, publishing, radio, and television are not always, but usually are an open book to the 32 person, who tends to work well under pressure. But there's a warning note sounded within this seemingly happy melody. 32 is a very fortunate number if the person it represents holds inflexibly to his or her own opinions and judgment in both artistic or intangible matters and material matters. If not, the plans are liable to be wrecked by the stubbornness and stupidity of others.

~ Source: Linda Goodman's Star Signs

********************************************
* Numerology is a metaphysical Science
*14= movement-challenge
*23= the Royal Star of the Lion

********************************************
Hope you found it interesting! ( I found it 'destined' obvious!)
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  0  
Reply Sun 6 May, 2007 06:14 am
Endy- some really interesting articles.

First of all, I like the juxtaposition of article outlining the plight of the immigrants, and the article about the fact that only 40% of marines and 55% of US soldiers would report a comrade for killing a human being who happened to be Iraqi, but that on the other hand, some Americans want to mount a campaign to grant human rights to an Ape- an ape for god's sake-gets a legal team in the US, but American people, native, non-native, whatever- are living in substandard housing, lacking medical care and if non-native,are being hunted down and shipped out like animals.

But you know, that brings me to the fact that this ape is an immigrant, isn't it? Unless I'm mistaken, apes are not native to North America. Why does this immigrant animal deserve better treatment than immigrant human beings? Oh I'm sorry- it must have been brought into the country legally- all of its papers must be in order. Give me a f**** break.

Does anyone else feel like we've traveled from the ridiculous to the sublime and that the inmates are now running the asylum?

Quote:
We in the U.S. have a smirking chimp as president, so what's the problem here?


Here's a joke for you:

"Question: How many Bush-administration officials does it take to screw in a light bulb?

Answer: None. There is nothing wrong with the light bulb; its conditions are improving every day. Any report of its lack of incandescence is a delusional spin by the liberal media. That light bulb has served honorably, and anything you say about its going out undermines the lighting effect. And finally, WHY DO YOU HATE FREEDOM?"
(Source unknown)

This kind of stuff has led me to change my signature for a while. This will be my new one: "I got the blues thinking of the future, so I left off and made some marmalade. It's amazing how it cheers one up to shred oranges and scrub the floor." D.H. Lawrence

Because really, what else are you gonna do? Except what you're doing- excellently, I might add. You're definitely a 32. And I'm really happy and proud that you're getting outside recognition for your efforts here. You deserve it.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 05:01 am
Hi Naima

Thank you for your very interesting post.

It's true that I try and 'communicate' through my poetry/writing and that it has led to me 'talking' with people from right around the world…

But blimey - don't you think it's strange that I'm number 32 "Communication" - when I have such a problem verbally communicating? (The stammer etc)

Mostly want to say thanks - I think you took my suggestion that "The greatest revenge you can have
on your enemy - is to forgive them," very well.

(Much better than I did the first time someone said something similar to me).
I was so angry…. Laughing

You're one of three wise women around here - hope you know that!

Peace Naima - to you and Pakistan

Keep writing - I'm still reading your poetry
Endy
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 05:23 am
aidan wrote:

Does anyone else feel like we've traveled from the ridiculous to the sublime and that the inmates are now running the asylum?


Rebecca, yes, you're not alone there. Gradually...gradually....I think people are starting to face up to some terrible truths. But I guess a lot of people are very afraid (and of course, that's how dictatorships begin, with fear).
I bet if you did a survey in UK/US and asked everyone what they are more afraid of - being blown to pieces by a 'terrorist' in their local shop - or incarcerated by their own Government for questioning it's moral/ethical values - they'd say they feared the latter (why else not march for an end the Iraq tragedy).
And with both countries running out of prison space, they'd be sensible to see it that way.

I think I might look back at some historical, social revolutions, such as the Women's Movement here in Britain. (when I get time) I know I keep saying it - but I really think our ancestors can help us...

Thanks for your kind words Rebecca
Enjoy Somerset in the spring

Peace
E
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 05:36 am
May 8th, 2007 2:15 am
Iraq is last in child survival rankings

By Maria Cheng / Associated Press

LONDON - The chance that an Iraqi child will live beyond age 5 has plummeted faster than anywhere else in the world since 1990, according to a report released Tuesday, which placed the country last in its child survival rankings.

One in eight Iraqi children died of disease or violence before reaching their fifth birthday in 2005, according to the report by Save the Children, which said Iraq ranked last because it had made the least progress toward improving child survival rates.

Iraq's mortality rate has soared by 150 percent since 1990. Even before the latest war, Iraq was plagued by electricity shortages, a lack of clean water and too few hospitals.

The publication, which used data from 1990-2005, also determined that gains in survival rates in some of the world's poorest countries ?- including Botswana, Zimbabwe and Swaziland ?- were declining.

The vast majority of child deaths ?- more than nine in 10 ?- occur in just 60 developing countries, the report said. Of the approximately 10 million children under age 5 who die every year, most could be saved with cheap solutions, like nets to protect against mosquito-borne malaria or antibiotics to treat pneumonia, according to the report.

"These aren't intractable problems," Dr. William Foege, of the Emory University School of Public Health, wrote in a foreword to the report. "It is simply wrong for only the few to have access to all of the tools for survival because of where they live."

About 4 million children die of complications in the first month after birth every year, according to Save the Children. Other causes of death for young children include diarrhea, pneumonia and measles, the group reported.

Among industrialized countries, Iceland had the best child survival rate, and Romania the worst. The U.S. placed 26th, tied with Croatia, Estonia and Poland. Nearly seven children die for every 1,000 live births in the United States. That was more than double the rate in Iceland, and 75 percent higher than rates in the Czech Republic, Finland, Japan and Slovenia.

Among developing countries, Egypt fared the best ?- lowering its child mortality rate by 68 percent largely by improving care for pregnant women, ensuring the presence of a skilled attendant during childbirth, and providing better family planning help.

Since 1994, Egypt has also increased health spending by more than 200 percent.

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/latestnews/index.php?id=9768


When ten million children (humans) under age 5 die every year - I think every adult on the planet needs to take some responsibility for that.
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 05:56 am
Hold on a minute.....

TEN MILLION?
Ten f*cking MILLION every year - dead?
And that's just the under 5s?

What are we running here on earth? A human poverty farm for the inhuman rich and powerful?
[/color]
0 Replies
 
OGIONIK
 
  0  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 06:13 am
endymion, i think you hit that nail directly on the head, if i say so myself.
0 Replies
 
aidan
 
  0  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 06:54 am
http://www.ngoabroad.com/images/Bolivia--kids%20napping--nick_073.jpg

New study shows one billion children in poverty
Posted: 14 Nov 2003

Drawing from the largest, most accurate survey sample of children ever assembled, a new UNICEF-sponsored report has found that over one billion children (more than half of those living in developing countries) suffer from the severe effects of poverty and 674 million (over a third) are living in conditions of absolute poverty.
Using a pioneering methodology, the survey measures the extent of child poverty, not only in terms of income, but also of deprivation of basic human rights such as shelter, food, water, sanitation, health, education and information. The researchers analysed survey data on nearly 1.2 million children from 46 countries collected mainly during the late 1990's.

Over one billion children suffer from the severe effects of poverty and 674 million are living in conditions of absolute poverty.
© UNICEF

The data is published in the UNICEF-comissioned report, Child Poverty in the Developing World. The research team included Dave Gordon of the Centre for International Poverty Research at the University of Bristol and Peter Townsend of the London School of Economics.


Dave Gordon, Professor of Social Justice at the University of Bristol and one of the authors of the report, Child poverty in the developing world, says: "Many of the children surveyed who were living in absolute poverty will have died or had their health profoundly damaged by the time the report is published, as a direct consequence of their appalling living conditions. Many others will have had their development so severely impaired that they may be unable to escape from a lifetime or grinding poverty."

The researchers found that:

Over six hundred million (34 per cent) children are living in dwellings with more than five people per room or which have a mud floor;

Over half a billion children (31 per cent) have no kind of toilet facility;

Nearly 376 million (20 per cent) of children use unsafe water sources or have more than a 15-minute walk to water;

134 million children aged between 7 and 18 (13 per cent) have never been to school;

91 million children under 5 (15 per cent) are severely malnourished;

265 million children (15 per cent) have never received any immunisations or have chronic, untreated diarrhoea;

The study found significant differences between regions, with Sub-Saharan Africa having the highest rates of severe deprivation with respect to four of the seven indicators - shelter, water, education and health. There were also clear gender differences, particularly with regards to education deprivation, with girls 60 per cent more likely to be severely educationally deprived. Girls in the Middle East and North Africa region are three times more likely than boys to be educationally deprived. Children in rural areas are much more likely to be severely deprived than urban children, particularly with regards to water, sanitation and education. In a number of countries, absolute poverty rates among children in rural areas are as high as 90 per cent.

Rural neglect

The report calls for anti-poverty strategies to respond to local conditions, and argues against blanket solutions to eradicating child poverty. Instead, it emphasises the need to improve basic infrastructure and social services for families with children, particularly with regards to shelter and sanitation in rural areas. An international investment fund for payment towards national schemes of child benefit in cash or kind is also suggested.


Shailen Nandy at the University of Bristol and one of the co-authors of the report says: "At this rate the UN Millennium Development Goals are unlikely to be met, given declining international commitment to development aid. The results of cutting public spending on basic social services have been an increase in poverty and inequality, a fact which organisations like the World Bank need to acknowledge."

Source: UNICEF-UK, 12 November 2003.

For copies of the report please go to:
http://www.policypress.org.uk or call The Policy Press: +44 (0)117 331 4054.
© People & the Planet 2000 - 2007


Endy, this study is four years old- so it doesn't even address the children in Iraq, US, UK, etc. who have been affected either by being directly in the line of fire or because their parents have been deployed to serve.

and in our own back yard:
Study: Child abuse, troop deployment linked
By Robert Davis and Gregg Zoroya, USA TODAY

Sending soldiers to war puts their children left at home at higher risk of abuse and neglect, says a study out Tuesday.
The study among military families shows that reports of emotional, physical and sexual abuse and child neglect peaked during the main deployment of troops to Iraq. When deployments began, reports of abuse quickly jumped from 5 in 1,000 children to 10 in 1,000.

The study found that victims were typically age 4 or younger and the abuser was usually the parent who remained at home while a spouse was deployed. Military families had lower rates of child maltreatment than civilian families before war. The study found that abuse rates soared when parents were sent to active duty.

"Among military personnel with at least one dependent, the rate of child maltreatment in military families increased by approximately 30% for each 1% increase in the percentage of active-duty personnel departing to or returning from operation-related deployment," according to the study, in the May 15 issue of American Journal of Epidemiology, out today.

"The stress of war extends beyond the soldier and the military personnel to impact the family," said lead researcher Danielle Rentz, now an epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. She conducted the study while at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

The potential for greater maltreatment as deployments increase "is something that we have been concerned about for quite some time," says Barbara Cohoon, a medical care expert with the National Military Family Association.

Army spokesman Paul Boyce says much has improved since the 2002-03 period reflected in the study, including support programs in medicine, counseling, schools and the work of chaplains.

At Texas' Fort Hood, home to about 70,000 military family members, the post is now working with the Military Child Education Coalition to improve community involvement with military families, Boyce said. "The U.S. Army, like many American communities, takes a solid teamwork approach to assisting families who have a soldier deployed," he said.

Previous studies have linked military deployment to higher divorce rates and spousal violence, but this study is the first to suggest a link to child abuse.

The scope of the study was limited, analyzing data from a Texas registry of verified child abuse cases in military and other families in that state from 2000 to 2003, the most recent data available. Researchers found that after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the rate of child abuse stayed relatively stable among both military and non-military families, with the rate among military families lower than non-military.

That changed in 2002. The rate of abuse within military families steadily increased through the latter half of that year as the nation mobilized for war. And it dramatically increased in January 2003, shortly before the invasion of Iraq.

The rate of abuse dipped after the fighting started in Iraq but stayed above the rate of non-military families. Then it spiked again three months into the war. Rentz says it is unclear why it dropped: anything from education campaigns to a drop in reported cases over the winter holidays could have played a role, she says.

The researchers used Texas data because it was very complete. The state is home to several military installations, including one of the Army's largest at Fort Hood, home of two divisions ?- the 4th Infantry and 1st Cavalry. Fort Hood has suffered more casualties in the Iraq war than any other military base in the country.

Rentz says more detailed studies are needed to determine what leads to the abuse, but she says there is no reason to think the situation is better in other states today.

"Families are still under stress, and that is one of the key points," she says. "We really need more data to see what is going on."



You're such a catalyst Endy. While I was looking at articles and images I found this volunteer organization:
Opportunities for service google: www.ngosabroad.co.uk


(The link was ridiculously long and all tied up with the image- and I was afraid it wouldn't work) but there are some incredible opportunities all over the world for people with all sorts of varying skills to work for children-right now they need builders and brick masons and plumbers....
0 Replies
 
lostnsearching
 
  0  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 08:46 am
Endymion wrote:
But blimey - don't you think it's strange that I'm number 32 "Communication" - when I have such a problem verbally communicating? (The stammer etc)
Endy


Well i don't really know what you're like speaking 'verbally,' however, there are many things we never know about ourselves...or sometimes we're better off that way! :wink:
Anyways, You're awesome when it comes to cyber talk. Everyone around would agree on that!

Endymion wrote:
You're one of three wise women around here - hope you know that!

Good to hear it at a time like this!(with exams comin' up an' all Laughing )

Endymion wrote:
Peace Naima - to you and Pakistan

Thanks, We'll make it....'both' of us always seem to find a way around! Twisted Evil

Rock On, dude!
Naima
0 Replies
 
Endymion
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 05:43 pm
Hey, Rebecca

Thanks for posting that -

None of it seems fair to me. We wouldn't need charities to help these people, if things were simply shared fairly. If human rights meant anything. If ordinary people had a vote that counted for something.
If world leaders cared a f*ck.
We're here in the 21Century - and millions dying from poverty - just like the dark ages.

That's what I really don't understand.
Actually, I think it's a disgrace.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Revolution
  3. » Page 21
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.25 seconds on 02/26/2026 at 11:18:24