1
   

You mean I'm not the only one????

 
 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 07:45 am
BernardR wrote:


But, first of all, you are apparently unaware that, by law, no Hospital in the US can turn away anyone in need of care.


If an American hospital refuses emergency treatment to an individual, he lacks money, that hospital risks closure as well as loss of all federal funding.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 07:53 am
Miller wrote:
we don't have to wait 2 days for an appointment, when our medical condition dictates otherwise.


I suppose that nowhere you have to wait ... if your medical condition dictates otherwise.
(For instance, for a complete cardiologic check-up at the local specilist in our villages you have to wait , three, four weeks if it's your first appointment there.
If your family doctor - who either comes to home, when you call him or you just walk in his praxis - thinks, an urgent check-up has to done, it's made the same day in the hopsital. Costs nothing.
Worst case scenario: you have to undergo an heart operation. It's done either at the university hopsital or another speicalised clinic.
Afterwards, you stay 6 to 8 weeks for rehabilitation in a sanotorium.
Costs nothing [though you have to pay $18 per day for a period of two weeks for staying in hopsital].)

What did you say you have to pay for those services?

I just read (Chicago Tribune, page 4), that it costs more than $ 1,600 to vaccanise one child. Such is totally free here .... and not only "mostly covered by health insurences" like in the USA.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 09:05 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Miller wrote:
we don't have to wait 2 days for an appointment, when our medical condition dictates otherwise.


I suppose that nowhere you have to wait ... if your medical condition dictates otherwise.
(For instance, for a complete cardiologic check-up at the local specilist in our villages you have to wait , three, four weeks if it's your first appointment there.
If your family doctor - who either comes to home, when you call him or you just walk in his praxis - thinks, an urgent check-up has to done, it's made the same day in the hopsital. Costs nothing.
Worst case scenario: you have to undergo an heart operation. It's done either at the university hopsital or another speicalised clinic.
Afterwards, you stay 6 to 8 weeks for rehabilitation in a sanotorium.
Costs nothing [though you have to pay $18 per day for a period of two weeks for staying in hopsital].)

What did you say you have to pay for those services?

I just read (Chicago Tribune, page 4), that it costs more than $ 1,600 to vaccanise one child. Such is totally free here .... and not only "mostly covered by health insurences" like in the USA.


But you have to live with Germans to get all those benefits. Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
Paaskynen
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 12:25 pm
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
Paaskynen wrote:
pachelbel wrote:
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
Out of curiosity though, what are the centrals themes of American culture than you believe run through all of its television programs and all of its products?


Baseball, hotdogs, applepie and Chevrolet. Elvis, infantile sexual themes, the latest hollywood star (American royalty, sadly), happy endings, must haves, keep up with the Joneses, people with the attention span of a gnat, rampant consumerism, logos, credit cards (can't leave home without it, right?), marketing that is aimed at 2 year olds, propaganda thru TV, I'm sure I'll think of more...... Laughing or someone else will.....


Whoa, I think my (Dutch) mother and her ancestors can lay claim to applepie much more than Americans (must be their cultural imperialism!Laughing) and hotdogs is just a "polictically rectified" (just like "freedom fries") word for Frankfurter sausage (which as the name indicates came from Germany). And wasn't keeping up with the Joneses invented by the class-conscious British?

Now if I were to consider American cultural influences that I observe here it would include rampant consumerism and fast food (both short term materialist goals), a focus on the superficial (the wrapping sells more than the content, special effects before depth of plot, cosmetic surgery and reality TV), an obsession with pubescent sex and with crime (nudity is sex (nipplegate!), sex is evil and (armed) criminals are heroes (gansta rap!)), a total disregard for those who do not win and, finally, a tendency to oversimplify complex issues and make them into black and white matters where there is no middle ground (i.e. the place where organisations like the UN can operate) leading to an inability to accept dissenting views ("they do/see things differently and therefore they do/see it wrong", "You are either with us, or with the terrorrists").

I guess that if I think hard I can come up with some more. One must add the footnote, though, that such tendencies exist in many cultures, but they do not have the means of transmission that the American economy and popular culture have.


That's rather odd, not a single uplifting or sublime influence. Sort of brings your objectivity into question wouldn't you say?


I am describing my observations of the prevailing themes in the American culture that influence via TV, film and other media the local culture where I live. I am glad you agree that those prevailing themes are not uplifting. (I do reserve the right, incidentally, to disagree with you about what does or does not constitute an uplifting influence of American culture on the culture of my home country.)

I do not deny that there have been uplifting elements in American culture. We owe the (F.D.) Roosevelt administration, for example, for convincing the Soviets to leave us alone after WWII, and for setting up the UN and drafting the Declaration of Human Rights, but respect for the UN and Human Rights are not prevailing themes in the American culture that reaches us today, are they?

What do you, objectively or not, consider to be uplifting influences of American culture on Finnish culture?
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 06:54 pm
Miller wrote:
pachelbel wrote:
Now, how about your health care?


THere is no better health care in the whole world than what one will find in New York, Chicago, Minnesota, Boston, etc. Are there better trained physicians than those who graduate from Harvard Medical School and then practice in the USA ?

Is there a better hospital with care for all, than the Johns Hopkins Medical Center?

Pachelbel: Why don't I see Americans rushing to Canada for medical care?

By the way, those Americans who can't afford health insurance receive "FREE CARE", because this is the LAW in the greatest country on God's earth ( USA...USA...USA )and we don't have to wait 2 days for an appointment, when our medical condition dictates otherwise.


We have world famous doctors in Canada, of course. Do you think America has the patent on that?

Why don't you see Americans rushing to Canada for medical care?
Because they would be turned away unless they are citizens of Canada who pay for national health care with their taxes.

I notice Americans rush to Canada to get presciption drugs, which have suddenly become safe since your President needed some of our flu vaccine.

I don't have to wait 2 days unless I want to. If I need to get in there's a walk in clinic available or after hours the ER, which costs us nothing.

You pay an awful lot for your medical care. I notice no one is bragging about that....... Laughing
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 07:00 pm
McGentrix wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Miller wrote:
we don't have to wait 2 days for an appointment, when our medical condition dictates otherwise.


I suppose that nowhere you have to wait ... if your medical condition dictates otherwise.
(For instance, for a complete cardiologic check-up at the local specilist in our villages you have to wait , three, four weeks if it's your first appointment there.
If your family doctor - who either comes to home, when you call him or you just walk in his praxis - thinks, an urgent check-up has to done, it's made the same day in the hopsital. Costs nothing.
Worst case scenario: you have to undergo an heart operation. It's done either at the university hopsital or another speicalised clinic.
Afterwards, you stay 6 to 8 weeks for rehabilitation in a sanotorium.
Costs nothing [though you have to pay $18 per day for a period of two weeks for staying in hopsital].)

What did you say you have to pay for those services?

I just read (Chicago Tribune, page 4), that it costs more than $ 1,600 to vaccanise one child. Such is totally free here .... and not only "mostly covered by health insurences" like in the USA.


But you have to live with Germans to get all those benefits. Twisted Evil


Yes McGen, you are twisted.
You got a problem with Germans?
If you said the same thing about Jews you'd get trampled and called nasty names. Why is it ok to trash Germans, or any race? Is your race super special? Laughing

I've always found Germans to be fun, smart, industrious, clean, etc etc. and I find your comment ignorant and rude.

You better watch out, you'll be called a terrorist. The Men in Black are looking for you as we speak.

Bush is a German name, dufus. Shocked Shocked
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 07:05 pm
Miller wrote:
BernardR wrote:


But, first of all, you are apparently unaware that, by law, no Hospital in the US can turn away anyone in need of care.


If an American hospital refuses emergency treatment to an individual, he lacks money, that hospital risks closure as well as loss of all federal funding.


By law? Since when does America go by laws? I personally know of someone who was refused medical treatment because he had no insurance. You explain it.

The US is a nation of laws badly written and randomly enforced. (F. Zappa)

It would seem to be so.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 08:13 pm
Paaskynen wrote:


I am describing my observations of the prevailing themes in the American culture that influence via TV, film and other media the local culture where I live. I am glad you agree that those prevailing themes are not uplifting. (I do reserve the right, incidentally, to disagree with you about what does or does not constitute an uplifting influence of American culture on the culture of my home country.)

I do not deny that there have been uplifting elements in American culture. We owe the (F.D.) Roosevelt administration, for example, for convincing the Soviets to leave us alone after WWII, and for setting up the UN and drafting the Declaration of Human Rights, but respect for the UN and Human Rights are not prevailing themes in the American culture that reaches us today, are they?

What do you, objectively or not, consider to be uplifting influences of American culture on Finnish culture?


I don't have the slightest idea what cultural influences America exerts over Finland, uplifting or otherwise. Other than reindeers, Nokia, and a very interesting mythology, I don't know much at all about Finland.

One assumes you have seen American television. Is that because you have spent a lot of time in the US, or because American TV is broadcast in Finland? One also assumes that you have seen a fair number of American films. I'm curious, are people in Finland forced to watch American TV and American films? Have the ubiquitous American fastfood joints reached your country, and if so is it mandatory for Finns to purchase food from them? Likewise American products, is there a quota all Finnish citizens must purchase?

I certainly can appreciate that you yourself are far too erudite to be contaminated by the base American culture, but based on your comments it appears your countrymen are not so immune.

It's peculiar, but the same sort of thing appears to be happening in most of the countries in the world. Only a handful of discerning natives are able to resist the strange compulsion that causes their countrymen to buy American fastfoods, and disposable products; to listen to American music and watch American films; to sit in front of their televeisions and be absorbed by American TV. Surely the American military or the CIA must be involved, since we know no self-respecting Frenchman would voluntarily eat a Big Mac, no scion of Finland would willingly pay to see The Dukes of Hazzard (The Movie) and no Canadian patriot would ever watch Friends without a gun to his head or a micky in his LaBatt.

It must be coercion, overt or covert, because how else can we explain why these proud and noble cultures cannot withstand the insidious influence of the Americans?

I like Canada, although there are a few Canadians I can do without, and I think I might like Finnland if only because it is the birthplace of the Kalevala, but here too I suspect I would meet a Finn or two who I found unappealing. I'm not sure there are any cultures for which, to me, the good would outweigh the bad. Even the culture of France, despite the French, is pretty admirable. But then I'm an American and so I don't have to worry about my culture being absorbed by a more dynamic one; I get to enjoy them all.
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Tue 1 Aug, 2006 09:46 pm
America is the world digested and then vomited back onto the planet.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 12:02 am
I do not know if Mr. Pacelbel has ever visited Rochester Minnesota, the home of the world famous Mayo Clinic. If he had, he would find it served a great many Canadians. I wonder why? Could it be that it is one of the world's premier Medical Centers. Anyone who is served by the Mayo Clinics world renown staff and is on campus for any length of time will notice that the world comes to Mayo. The number of dignitaries from other nations who go there for treatment is astounding.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 12:24 am
Children whose parents do not have employer provided insurance or whose parents buy their own insurance do not need to miss any vaccinations. Note below for one US city's procedures:




HEALTH : THE DIVISION OF DISEASE CONTROL

Immunization Program

Immunization Services for Parents and Health Care Providers
The DDC Immunization Program is committed to preventing vaccine-preventable disease among infants, children, adolescents, and adults in Philadelphia.

For general information about immunizations, please call (215) 685-6748.

What Immunizations Does a Child Need?
Children in the United States should routinely receive vaccinations against eleven diseases: diptheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus Influenzae type b, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, hepatitis B, and streptococcus pneumoniae.

DDC recognizes that immunization is truly a lifelong process -- beginning with hepatitis B vaccine at birth and continuing through pneumococcal and influenza vaccination in older adulthood -- and as such has pursued the following initiatives:

Vaccines For Children (VFC) Program
The DDC Immunization Program provides government-purchased vaccine to the more than 400 pediatric medical providers in Philadelphia to administer to children 18 years and younger whose families have no medical insurance for vaccinations or who have insurance through the 4 HealthChoices Medicaid HMOs. Since providers can not charge families of eligible children for these vaccines, cost should not be an issue in assuring that all children 18 years of age and younger in the city are fully vaccinated.

For more information about the VFC program, call (215)
0 Replies
 
Paaskynen
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 02:05 am
Finn d'Abuzz wrote:
Paaskynen wrote:
What do you, objectively or not, consider to be uplifting influences of American culture on Finnish culture?


I don't have the slightest idea what cultural influences America exerts over Finland, uplifting or otherwise. Other than reindeers, Nokia, and a very interesting mythology, I don't know much at all about Finland.

One assumes you have seen American television. Is that because you have spent a lot of time in the US, or because American TV is broadcast in Finland? One also assumes that you have seen a fair number of American films. I'm curious, are people in Finland forced to watch American TV and American films? Have the ubiquitous American fastfood joints reached your country, and if so is it mandatory for Finns to purchase food from them? Likewise American products, is there a quota all Finnish citizens must purchase?

I certainly can appreciate that you yourself are far too erudite to be contaminated by the base American culture, but based on your comments it appears your countrymen are not so immune.

It's peculiar, but the same sort of thing appears to be happening in most of the countries in the world. Only a handful of discerning natives are able to resist the strange compulsion that causes their countrymen to buy American fastfoods, and disposable products; to listen to American music and watch American films; to sit in front of their televeisions and be absorbed by American TV. Surely the American military or the CIA must be involved, since we know no self-respecting Frenchman would voluntarily eat a Big Mac, no scion of Finland would willingly pay to see The Dukes of Hazzard (The Movie) and no Canadian patriot would ever watch Friends without a gun to his head or a micky in his LaBatt.

It must be coercion, overt or covert, because how else can we explain why these proud and noble cultures cannot withstand the insidious influence of the Americans?

I like Canada, although there are a few Canadians I can do without, and I think I might like Finnland if only because it is the birthplace of the Kalevala, but here too I suspect I would meet a Finn or two who I found unappealing. I'm not sure there are any cultures for which, to me, the good would outweigh the bad. Even the culture of France, despite the French, is pretty admirable. But then I'm an American and so I don't have to worry about my culture being absorbed by a more dynamic one; I get to enjoy them all.


Your irony is misplaced. You accuse me of anti-Americanism because I list influences from American popular culture that you yourself consider to be less than uplifting. I would like to point out however what I wrote in my original message:
Quote:
One must add the footnote, though, that such tendencies exist in many cultures, but they do not have the means of transmission that the American economy and popular culture have.

Of course there are films and TV programmes made in Finland and some of them are not so bad, but the Finnish media market (serving but 5 million people) cannot begin to compete with the American market, something you do not seem to appreciate (how many Finnish films have you seen in your life?). Works like like the Kalevala cannot be created anymore if your "dynamic" culture rides roughshoud over others. There will be less for you to enjoy.

FYI; MacDonalds is not ubiquitous in Finland since the market has been cornered by a Finnish chain, which uses a similar formula, but it is the insiduous idea of fastfood that is propagated into the living rooms that makes people frequent these places. After all, it has already destroyed much of the local food culture (and the health of a generation of young people) in the US (without anyone forcing any burger quota on them). We are not yet at a point where school restaurants are run by Ronald MacDonald and serve macwhoppers and coke (The restaurant at my school serves salad and local bread, a square meal and water, milk or kotikalja (a traditional malt drink, so now you know four things about Finland Very Happy ).)

If the prevailing cultural influences that reach us through the media would be French, the fast food industry would struggle and bistros would be booming and the youths would play cool by engaging in boundless political discussions and sipping wine at lunch would be hip. Would you then accuse me of French bashing if I pointed out those influences?

Now, let me rephrase my question: What do you consider uplifting elements in American popular culture of today? (let's leave aside whether those are transmitted abroad or not).
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 02:36 am
There are not enough "Uplifting" elements in American culture today, Mr. Paaskaynen, because, in my opinion, the large part of American Culture has been captured by the left wing relativists.

American pop culture, sir, is based on the profit motive. It relentlessly seeks out THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR.

If you will seek out the threads on A2K, you will notice that even among the obviously well read and supposedly intelligent people who can write about Books and Culture, that the mediocre and politically correct garbage prevail.

Idiocies like American Idol and the adolescent garbage on MTV are among the most popular items because they appeal to the lowest common denominator. As you may be aware, sir, programs on TV must be sponsored by companies who purchase advertising space and pay heavily for that space. This means numbers are king. The programs who draw the most morons to view them are the ones which prevail.

I have long been a fan of your magnificent composer, Sibelius. You would have to search far and wide to find him either on TV. our radio or even performed in classical venues.

But search for the trashy Madonna or an incredibly air-headed type like Britany Spears, and you will have no difficulty.

There are still outposts in the US( hidden and covert) which supply affcionados with GREAT literature instead of the moronic "Da Vinci Code" trash and there are also great restaurants which indeed copy French and Italian cusines, but you won't get them transported to Finland. They are not as ubiquitous as the McDonald's or the KFC's

Please try to understand that large majority of the US culture that actually arrives in Europe is the culture crafted for the masses.
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 03:08 pm
BernardR wrote:
Children whose parents do not have employer provided insurance or whose parents buy their own insurance do not need to miss any vaccinations. Note below for one US city's procedures:




HEALTH : THE DIVISION OF DISEASE CONTROL

Immunization Program

Immunization Services for Parents and Health Care Providers
The DDC Immunization Program is committed to preventing vaccine-preventable disease among infants, children, adolescents, and adults in Philadelphia.

For general information about immunizations, please call (215) 685-6748.

What Immunizations Does a Child Need?
Children in the United States should routinely receive vaccinations against eleven diseases: diptheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus Influenzae type b, measles, mumps, rubella, varicella, hepatitis B, and streptococcus pneumoniae.

DDC recognizes that immunization is truly a lifelong process -- beginning with hepatitis B vaccine at birth and continuing through pneumococcal and influenza vaccination in older adulthood -- and as such has pursued the following initiatives:

Vaccines For Children (VFC) Program
The DDC Immunization Program provides government-purchased vaccine to the more than 400 pediatric medical providers in Philadelphia to administer to children 18 years and younger whose families have no medical insurance for vaccinations or who have insurance through the 4 HealthChoices Medicaid HMOs. Since providers can not charge families of eligible children for these vaccines, cost should not be an issue in assuring that all children 18 years of age and younger in the city are fully vaccinated.

For more information about the VFC program, call (215)


Shocked

Note ONE US city's procedure?? Only ONE? That's pretty pathetic, Bernie.
Everyone in Canada is covered, regardless. It is not based upon whether one is employed, but upon basic human needs.

Our healthcare system may be experiencing growing pains, but it works a heck of a lot better than your system. People without insurance in the US: estimates put it at 40 million. The population of Canada? About 30 million. In a wealthy industrialized country such as the US, there is no excuse for the neglect of so many people.

Maybe the Finnish poster here would like to add his commets about health care in Finland, which is similar to Canada's? It's time for the US to get over their paranoia with socialized healthcare. It works and its affordable, as the rest of the world knows.

BTW, to continue my America trashing - guess who's getting wealthy off of the Tamiflu scare? Your friend, Don Rumsfeld!

Here's the following article excerpted from CNN/Fortune magazine. The article in full is available at www.money.cnn.com There are many more sites about this but I assumed you'd only trust CNN & Fortune as being unliberal in their views.

Rumsfeld's growing stake in Tamiflu
Defense Secretary, ex-chairman of flu treatment rights holder, sees portfolio value growing.
October 31, 2005: 10:55 AM EST
By Nelson D. Schwartz, Fortune senior writer

NEW YORK (Fortune) - The prospect of a bird flu outbreak may be panicking people around the globe, but it's proving to be very good news for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and other politically connected investors in Gilead Sciences, the California biotech company that owns the rights to Tamiflu, the influenza remedy that's now the most-sought after drug in the world.

Rumsfeld served as Gilead (Research)'s chairman from 1997 until he joined the Bush administration in 2001, and he still holds a Gilead stake valued at between $5 million and $25 million, according to federal financial disclosures filed by Rumsfeld.

The forms don't reveal the exact number of shares Rumsfeld owns, but in the past six months fears of a pandemic and the ensuing scramble for Tamiflu have sent Gilead's stock from $35 to $47. That's made the Pentagon chief, already one of the wealthiest members of the Bush cabinet, at least $1 million richer.

Cool A bit of collusion here eh? Are you naive enough to think these BAS***DS aren't into war-for-profit, too?

Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 03:32 pm
That was an example of One city's procedures. But since you asked, I will locate federal guidelines.

In the meantime, You have not been able to explain why the Canadians rank so low on the Gross Domestic Product per person. You dodge questions. I do not and will answer the one you just posted.

I will ask again, why is Canada a laggard in the GDP per person when compared to the USA? It is at least $8,000 behind per person.

I can wait for your answer. You will have to wait for mine. I do not think I will get one from you on the GDP QUESTION!
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 05:15 pm
BernardR wrote:
That was an example of One city's procedures. But since you asked, I will locate federal guidelines.

In the meantime, You have not been able to explain why the Canadians rank so low on the Gross Domestic Product per person. You dodge questions. I do not and will answer the one you just posted.

I will ask again, why is Canada a laggard in the GDP per person when compared to the USA? It is at least $8,000 behind per person.

I can wait for your answer. You will have to wait for mine. I do not think I will get one from you on the GDP QUESTION!


I did not ask for an answer from you. I was simply posting some facts about Rumsfeld that I see you are trying to sidestep. You want facts about Canada? Can't you get them yourself? Sigh. Here, Bernie:

www.cia.gov

Economy - overview:
As an affluent, high-tech industrial society in the trillion dollar class, Canada resembles the US in its market-oriented economic system, pattern of production, and affluent living standards. Since World War II, the impressive growth of the manufacturing, mining, and service sectors has transformed the nation from a largely rural economy into one primarily industrial and urban. The 1989 US-Canada Free Trade Agreement (FTA) and the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) (which includes Mexico) touched off a dramatic increase in trade and economic integration with the US. Given its great natural resources, skilled labor force, and modern capital plant, Canada enjoys solid economic prospects. Top-notch fiscal management has produced consecutive balanced budgets since 1997, although public debate continues over how to manage the rising cost of the publicly funded healthcare system. Exports account for roughly a third of GDP. Canada enjoys a substantial trade surplus with its principal trading partner, the US, which absorbs more than 85% of Canadian exports. Canada is the US' largest foreign supplier of energy, including oil, gas, uranium, and electric power.
GDP (purchasing power parity):
$1.114 trillion (2005 est.)
GDP (official exchange rate):
$1.035 trillion (2005 est.)
GDP - real growth rate:
2.9% (2005 est.)
GDP - per capita (PPP):
$34,000 (2005 est.)


Sounds good to me. When you factor in your US GDP, did you figure in those Americans spending over $800 a month for medical? And the people who have to pay their 20% of medical costs out of pocket? We don't have that here.

I notice, and I quote from the article: 'Top-notch fiscal management has produced consecutive balanced budgets since 1997'

So much for your snide remark about how Canadians manage fiscally. Americans do not have a surplus or anything approaching a balanced budget.

We're all managing quite well here in our igloos Laughing thank you very much.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 08:23 pm
Paaskynen wrote:
Your irony is misplaced. You accuse me of anti-Americanism because I list influences from American popular culture that you yourself consider to be less than uplifting. I would like to point out however what I wrote in my original message:
Quote:
One must add the footnote, though, that such tendencies exist in many cultures, but they do not have the means of transmission that the American economy and popular culture have.

Of course there are films and TV programmes made in Finland and some of them are not so bad, but the Finnish media market (serving but 5 million people) cannot begin to compete with the American market, something you do not seem to appreciate (how many Finnish films have you seen in your life?). Works like like the Kalevala cannot be created anymore if your "dynamic" culture rides roughshoud over others. There will be less for you to enjoy.

FYI; MacDonalds is not ubiquitous in Finland since the market has been cornered by a Finnish chain, which uses a similar formula, but it is the insiduous idea of fastfood that is propagated into the living rooms that makes people frequent these places. After all, it has already destroyed much of the local food culture (and the health of a generation of young people) in the US (without anyone forcing any burger quota on them). We are not yet at a point where school restaurants are run by Ronald MacDonald and serve macwhoppers and coke (The restaurant at my school serves salad and local bread, a square meal and water, milk or kotikalja (a traditional malt drink, so now you know four things about Finland Very Happy ).)

If the prevailing cultural influences that reach us through the media would be French, the fast food industry would struggle and bistros would be booming and the youths would play cool by engaging in boundless political discussions and sipping wine at lunch would be hip. Would you then accuse me of French bashing if I pointed out those influences?

Now, let me rephrase my question: What do you consider uplifting elements in American popular culture of today? (let's leave aside whether those are transmitted abroad or not).


It's unfortunate for you that there seems to be a market in Finland for American entertainment products and not those of France, England, India or Canada (among others), but American television shows and movies are not addictive drugs. Finns do not have to watch them. If fastfood was not convenient and tasty, it's unlikely that all the advertising in the world could sustain its popularity.

You've characterized American cultural influence in a totally negative manner. It's difficult for me to believe that this is an informed and objective opinion, but you are entitled to your opinions and your fears as well. I don't think you'll be able to stop your fellow citizens from enjoying aspects of the American culture, and as much as a smarmy critique of that culture posted on a cyper-forum may make you feel just a little but better, it's not going to stem whatever cultural tide is rushing over your country.

Anti-Americanism, and that is what you are displaying, is, in many ways, understandable. To some extent, it may even be warranted, but if American culture is so shallow and bare as you suggest, then if I were you I think I might find more fault with my fellow countrymen who consume it in such great quantities, rather than the people who send it their way.

I'm really not interested in defending American culture to you or pachy for that matter so I'll pass on your rephrased question.
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 09:54 pm
quote from BernardR:

'American pop culture, sir, is based on the profit motive. It relentlessly seeks out THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR.'


In this case I agree with BernardR Laughing
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 09:58 pm
Miller wrote:
BernardR wrote:


But, first of all, you are apparently unaware that, by law, no Hospital in the US can turn away anyone in need of care.


If an American hospital refuses emergency treatment to an individual, he lacks money, that hospital risks closure as well as loss of all federal funding.


You're right. They certainly can't turn anyone down. But they sure in hell can bill them, attach their wages or otherwise find ways to collect.

I know of a few cases where the hospital has written off a certain amount of the bill if they are very sure it'll be like getting blood out of a turnip.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Aug, 2006 10:05 pm
The immigrants treated in the Hospitals of the US do not, I repeat do not pay for their treatment. Pachelbel is just ignorant on this subject.

And, very few people pay $800 per month OUT OF POCKET for their medical, Where did you get that notion? That is ridiculous.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/13/2025 at 10:10:11