Reply
Mon 24 Jul, 2006 11:34 pm
Quote:Exclusive ICM poll 63% say PM has tied Britain too close to White House
Julian Glover Ewen MacAskill
Britain should take a much more robust and independent approach to the United States, according to a Guardian/ICM poll published today, which finds strong public opposition to Tony Blair's close working relationship with President Bush.
Source: The Guardian, 25.07.2006, pages 1 & 2
Online:
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/foreignaffairs/story/0,,1828225,00.html
The common response I have had in speaking to brits over the last three years when I've inquired as to their perception of why Blair has chosen to follow the policies we all know, has been a slow head shaking, a furrowed brow and a rather sad, "I don't know".
All of which suggests to me that we need a few more Downing Street memos to emerge into the light.
I'm so disgusted with things, I doubt 5 more Downing St memos would serve to shake the sleeping majority to action against this evil dunce of a president.
snood
I meant that in order to understand the actual forces which led Blair to take the position he took - which even Brits themselves were against and which they seem to have no further clue as to 'why?' Blair took such a position - we'll need more information on the behind-scenes discussions.
It really isn't even clear why the US headed into Iraq. There are lots of clues and well-argued/documented theories, but it still remains unclear (look at the variety of opinions on why even within the community of very smart foreign policy analysts and specialists).
Partly, that seems to be because there was no single motive or rationale. But equally or more critical in this confusion and uncertainty is, I think, purposeful secrecy and attendent distraction tricks.