I say god is dead...

Intrepid wrote:

You made an assersion. You are the one who should provide specifics to backup your claim.

Are you Frank's little helper?

Well then:

"1. If any god existed there would be no need to prove otherwise."

Save him tomorrow's trouble when we'll really have a go at it. :wink:

It amuses me how the theists in this thread have latched onto the absurd line of reasoning 'if you are saying god is dead you are saying he must have lived'
Go read some Neitzche you ignorant heathens.

You're going to have to endeavor to make a LOT more sense before you pull off that 'smug' thing, newbie.



Intrepid, Frank's helper?

Intrepid wrote:

selfruled wrote:

Frank wrote:

"I'm probably gonna sign off here. Gotta get some sleep. I've got a very early tee time tomorrow. But I will be back tomorrow. Not that I expect anything of substance from you...but for the pure enjoyment of this discussion. "

Very well pops; when you come back we'll start by sorting out which god is it that we're talking about here... there are so many...

1 - You may want to take a look at using the quote function.

2 - You started this thread by referring to God. Are you now asserting that you have changed your original purpose of the thread? Are you now suggesting that multiple Gods are dead?

3 - Could you pass the popcorn, hephzibah?

Yeah; I have no choice. I proposed that god was dead but Frank wants to get into specifics so we'll have to start by discovering his personal concept of god; that is, if I really want to kill all his yearning for emotional crutches. :wink:

selfruled wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

selfruled wrote:

Frank wrote:

"I'm probably gonna sign off here. Gotta get some sleep. I've got a very early tee time tomorrow. But I will be back tomorrow. Not that I expect anything of substance from you...but for the pure enjoyment of this discussion. "

Very well pops; when you come back we'll start by sorting out which god is it that we're talking about here... there are so many...

1 - You may want to take a look at using the quote function.

2 - You started this thread by referring to God. Are you now asserting that you have changed your original purpose of the thread? Are you now suggesting that multiple Gods are dead?

3 - Could you pass the popcorn, hephzibah?

Yeah; I have no choice. I proposed that god was dead but Frank wants to get into specifics so we'll have to start by discovering his personal concept of god; that is, if I really want to kill all his yearning for emotional crutches. :wink:

Could your assertion that God is dead be somehow filling a yearning for an emotional 'crutch' of your own?

Is that possible? Are you without emotional crutches of any kind?

Oh I see!!

This is the "new guy" treatment then...

Funny; I've actually sensed more than one "local" already holding back his tears.

selfruled wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

selfruled wrote:

Frank wrote:

"I'm probably gonna sign off here. Gotta get some sleep. I've got a very early tee time tomorrow. But I will be back tomorrow. Not that I expect anything of substance from you...but for the pure enjoyment of this discussion. "

Very well pops; when you come back we'll start by sorting out which god is it that we're talking about here... there are so many...

1 - You may want to take a look at using the quote function.

2 - You started this thread by referring to God. Are you now asserting that you have changed your original purpose of the thread? Are you now suggesting that multiple Gods are dead?

3 - Could you pass the popcorn, hephzibah?

Yeah; I have no choice. I proposed that god was dead but Frank wants to get into specifics so we'll have to start by discovering his personal concept of god; that is, if I really want to kill all his yearning for emotional crutches. :wink:

Could your assertion that God is dead be somehow filling a yearning for an emotional 'crutch' of your own?

Is that possible? Are you without emotional crutches of any kind?

You must like trouble selfruled... LOL :wink:

Bartikus wrote:

selfruled wrote:

Intrepid wrote:

selfruled wrote:

Frank wrote:

"I'm probably gonna sign off here. Gotta get some sleep. I've got a very early tee time tomorrow. But I will be back tomorrow. Not that I expect anything of substance from you...but for the pure enjoyment of this discussion. "

Very well pops; when you come back we'll start by sorting out which god is it that we're talking about here... there are so many...

1 - You may want to take a look at using the quote function.

2 - You started this thread by referring to God. Are you now asserting that you have changed your original purpose of the thread? Are you now suggesting that multiple Gods are dead?

3 - Could you pass the popcorn, hephzibah?

Yeah; I have no choice. I proposed that god was dead but Frank wants to get into specifics so we'll have to start by discovering his personal concept of god; that is, if I really want to kill all his yearning for emotional crutches. :wink:

Could your assertion that God is dead be somehow filling a yearning for an emotional 'crutch' of your own?

Is that possible? Are you without emotional crutches of any kind?

Hmmm I think you could be on to something here bartikus!

It is quickly becoming obvious to me that you have only come hear to cause YOUR OWN BRAND OF CRAP. You even alluded to that when you mentioned other forums. Your childishness is quickly becoming boring. Plus, you have not provided evidence of one claim that you have made on any thread that I have read.

How come so many haven't noticed?

Intrepid wrote:

It is quickly becoming obvious to me that you have only come hear to cause YOUR OWN BRAND OF CRAP. You even alluded to that when you mentioned other forums. Your childishness is quickly becoming boring. Plus, you have not provided evidence of one claim that you have made on any thread that I have read.

Haven't we all?

You seem fixed on "claims" when I've actually asked more questions than stated arguments. That's actually very amusing you know? Sometimes questions have a much more disturbing effect...