1
   

How Big is Your Carbon Footprint?

 
 
cjhsa
 
Reply Wed 19 Jul, 2006 01:54 pm
What if you sell your carbon allocation to buy lots of beans?



http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/carbon-rations-for-consumers/2006/07/19/1153166454930.html


Carbon rations for consumers


Britain is devising a plan to curb greenhouse gas emissions by rationing individuals' carbon use.
The scheme could force people to carry a swipe card that records their carbon allocation, with points knocked off each time they buy petrol or air tickets.

Under the scheme, citizens from the Queen down would be allocated an identical annual carbon allowance, stored as points on an electronic card similar to air miles schemes or supermarket loyalty cards.

Points would be deducted at point of sale for every purchase of non-renewable energy. People who did not use their full allocation, such as families who do not own a car, would be able to sell their surplus carbon points into a central bank.

High energy users could then buy the points. Motorists who had used their allocation would still be able to buy petrol, with the carbon points drawn from the bank and the cost added to their fuel bills.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 518 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jul, 2006 02:38 pm
From the BBC report about Environment Secretary David Miliband's speech at the Audit Commission's annual lecture:
Quote:
[...]
Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrats' environment spokesman, welcomed "any discussion about household carbon allowances".

But he stressed: "What David Miliband must realise, however, is that proposals such as these are years away from being practically possible.

"Rather than using blue sky thinking to give the impression of doing something, green action is needed now.

"Green taxes have fallen to their lowest level since Mrs Thatcher was prime minister. This is a shocking indictment of a government that claims to care about the environment."

The government is also investigating the potential for carbon loyalty cards, league tables, and awareness-raising through labelling and carbon calculations to get people involved in saving their planet.




The Department of Communities and Local Government along with the Departments of the Environment, Trade and Industry and the Treasury are looking at the role of "community level" approaches to mobilising individuals.

The study will report back its findings to ministers during the first half of 2007.
0 Replies
 
Tryagain
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jul, 2006 04:21 pm
Another form of indirect taxation that will befall us all.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jul, 2006 04:21 pm
Interesting.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Jul, 2006 04:22 pm
Tryagain wrote:
Another form of indirect taxation that will befall us all.


Huh?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 10:17 am
I guess this means no more summits, or conferences.

Al Gore once burned something like $400,000 worth of jet fuel to attend some environmental whacko meeting.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 11:09 am
What is 'whacko' about environmentalism?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 11:20 am
The people who support the notions while forgetting their history and heritage.

Whacknuts.

For 100 years conservation efforts in the U.S. have been led and paid for by hunters and fisherman. What's been accomplished is nothing short of outstanding. But the Sierra Club doesn't want you to know that.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 11:40 am
cjhsa wrote:
The people who support the notions while forgetting their history and heritage.


You mean, Blair and his government have forgotten their history and heritage?

Well, I agree here ... a bit, indeed.
0 Replies
 
plainoldme
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Jul, 2006 11:58 am
cjhsa wrote:
The people who support the notions while forgetting their history and heritage.

Whacknuts.

For 100 years conservation efforts in the U.S. have been led and paid for by hunters and fisherman. What's been accomplished is nothing short of outstanding. But the Sierra Club doesn't want you to know that.



A generalization and not true. Besides, you are talking apples and oranges because strictly speaking environmentalism is not conservation and vice versa.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » How Big is Your Carbon Footprint?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 05/19/2024 at 01:09:49