cjhsa wrote:Apparently the loonie left considers taking it up the rear "depth of knowledge".
Apparently all the Right Wingers can think about when homosexaul marrige is discussed is sodomy. I would venture from such obvious obsession that you show about it that anal intercourse is an important feature of your own marriage. But one wonders, are you the bottom or the top?
Quote:At present, same-sex marriages are recognized in the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, and the U.S. state of Massachusetts for same-sex marriages performed within that state under its laws.
On December 1, 2005, South Africa's Constitutional Court extended marriage to include same-sex couples. The court mandated that changes go into effect by the end of 2006.
Civil unions, domestic partnerships, and other legal recognitions of same-sex couples which offer varying amounts of the benefits of marriage are available in: Andorra, Argentina, Brazil, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Israel, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom; the Australian states of New South Wales, Queensland, Tasmania and Western Australia; and the U.S. states of California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, New Jersey, Vermont, and the U.S. capital of Washington, D.C.. The first same-sex union in modern history with government recognition was obtained in Denmark in 1989
I think frank apisa (golf clap, young man!) dealt directly with the lunatic antics of our resident homophobe and bumblebee with the details of what Sweden did over ten years ago (cheers, dear lady)
But more important it appears from time to time that the ugly core of conservatives is riped open and seething beneath the surface of their outward appearance of civility is a snarling and oozing mess of fear of the unknown. doutless brandon can tumesce in the presence of his sweetie and pleasure her without worrrying about the affect homosexual anal intercourse or fellatio has upon his duties as a husband or boy friend.
It is just that he thinks such behavior is scary and wrong, and his Bible tells him so. And like anyone in arrested adolescence who remains in the intellectual and emotional state of someone at the ages of 7-14 he kowtows to the cultural rules with which he was indoctrinated. But, there are those of us who as we mature into adults move on and begin asking questions about the cultural rules by which we humans live; questions about whether the present circumstances demand a re-examination of age old social habits. Such a re-examination of the state of being of all humans was behind the push for the abolition of slavery, and which Jesus himself did not question its right to exist.
As I stated earlier, the rhetorical battle from our Right Wing friends over homosexual behavior and marriage has the same tint that the anti-abolitionists of th 19th century had, and it is doubtless that had they lived then they would have said that since slavery had existed for thousands of years and was not proscribed in the Bible, thus it too was okay.
and Tico if you are going about busting chops you might instead of illustrating your sexual fascination with another person's avatars instead point out that the poster erroneously cited me for a post actually done by Dys, because that cigar you're avatar is sucking on, well it ain't a cigar in your hands.