15
   

ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

 
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 11:54 am
@Foofie,
Quote:
I said "old-fashioned main stream," not "old fashioned AND main stream." There is no logical "and" in my correct thought. Please do not parse my definition of myself. I am a great believer in the power of sociology. We are, I believe, a product of our socialization. I do not blame people, but the society that socialized them. However, I seem to be blamed for the socialization that nurtured me. That is not erudite from a sociological standpoint, I believe.


"old-fashioned mainstream" had it that Jews were evil, Jews were the killers of Christ and Jews were "name any of the other 1001 inane ideas about Jews". The result of this "old-fashioned mainstream" thought, was that Jews were discriminated against and much worse.

The same for Blacks, Indians, Indians, ... .

Rational, thinking beings do not simply accept "old-fashioned mainstream" thought just because it's old-fashioned. You know that to be true, Foofie, for you would be appalled if Jews, Blacks, Indians or any other group was discriminated against.

Yet you would allow discrimination, you would allow inequality to be put upon Gays. It just doesn't make sense, does it?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 11:59 am
@JTT,
JTT, I'm afraid bigots miss the logic and common sense of "new fashioned" thinkers.

Most cultures have been discriminated against in this country's history, but some people like Foofie are still "old fashion" thinkers who doesn't or can't relate their own experience, because of their ignorance. These people will never learn from history, because they are bound to repeat it.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 02:08 pm
Quote:
A television advert for an Israeli cellphone firm showing soldiers playing soccer over the West Bank barrier has sparked cries of bad taste and prompted Arab lawmakers on Sunday to demand it be taken off air.

[... ... ...]

A Hebrew-language Facebook group called "I too got nauseous watching the new Cellcom ad" had signed up 218 members. They demanded "take this racist commercial off the air immediately."

Israeli blogger Ami Kaufman told Reuters: "We see Israeli soldiers playing with ... the people that they are incarcerating behind the wall. But the most grotesque, most disturbing part of this ad is the fact that the Palestinians basically aren't seen ... They're like monsters or aliens ... This is the alienation that Israeli society feels towards the Palestinian people."

Noam Sheizaf, another Israeli journalist and blogger, said it distorted reality: "In reality, if a Palestinian comes close to the fence to return a football ... he is likely to get shot."

Asked to comment, Cellcom said its "core value is communication between people" regardless of "religion, race or gender." It said the commercial illustrated the possibility for people of diverse opinions to engage in "mutual entertainment."

A spokeswoman said it was a coincidence the ad came out so close to last Thursday's anniversary of the 2004 decision by the World Court that Israel had no right to build hundreds of miles of walls and fences on Palestinian land it took in a 1967 war.

Israel built the barrier with the declared aim of stopping suicide bombers. For Palestinians, it has become one of the most hated symbols of Israeli occupation, a land grab whose course round Jewish settlements would cripple any state they establish.

Israel phone firm's West Bank wall gag fails to amuse



0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 02:21 pm
Walter, it is interesting that you are hyper-critical of everything that Israel does. Perhaps you should contemplate that it was the actions of Germany and the German people that were responsible for the creation of Israel. Germany and its people were bestial in slaughtering six million of their own people, not to mention their slaughter of untold numbers of Russians, Poles, Czechs, French, et al.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 03:00 pm
@Advocate,
Ah, but that lesson has been lost on the Jews as they treat Palestinians with disdain and inhuman treatment.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 03:07 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:

Walter, it is interesting that you are hyper-critical of everything that Israel does. Perhaps you should contemplate that it was the actions of Germany and the German people that were responsible for the creation of Israel.


I know about Theodor Hertzel.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 05:38 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Was he the founder of Zionism?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 05:58 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
That is very cute, Walter. As you know, it was the flood of displaced persons, victims of Germany and its people, who flooded the British Mandate that really gave the impetus for the state of Israel.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 06:21 pm
@Advocate,
But Zionism came into existence before Hitler. Funny twist of history.
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 06:53 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Advocate wrote:
it was the flood of displaced persons, victims of Germany and its people, who flooded the British Mandate that really gave the impetus for the state of Israel.

cicerone imposter" wrote:
But Zionism came into existence before Hitler.

It was in fact true that Zionism came into existence before "the flood of displaced persons, victims of Germany and its people, who flooded the British Mandate. But it is also true that "it was the flood of displaced persons, victims of Germany and its people, who flooded the British Mandate that really gave the impetus for the state of Israel."
0 Replies
 
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 07:19 pm
@JTT,
JTT wrote:

Quote:
I said "old-fashioned main stream," not "old fashioned AND main stream." There is no logical "and" in my correct thought. Please do not parse my definition of myself. I am a great believer in the power of sociology. We are, I believe, a product of our socialization. I do not blame people, but the society that socialized them. However, I seem to be blamed for the socialization that nurtured me. That is not erudite from a sociological standpoint, I believe.


"old-fashioned mainstream" had it that Jews were evil, Jews were the killers of Christ and Jews were "name any of the other 1001 inane ideas about Jews". The result of this "old-fashioned mainstream" thought, was that Jews were discriminated against and much worse.

The same for Blacks, Indians, Indians, ... .

Rational, thinking beings do not simply accept "old-fashioned mainstream" thought just because it's old-fashioned. You know that to be true, Foofie, for you would be appalled if Jews, Blacks, Indians or any other group was discriminated against.

Yet you would allow discrimination, you would allow inequality to be put upon Gays. It just doesn't make sense, does it?


For your information, while Jews are not discriminated against in most hotels, etc., as happened in the first half of the 20th century, many decent people do consider Jews (secular) not socially acceptable in all venues. It is just part of the socialization process. Society changes in small increments, over an extended time. Regarding gays, I see no reason to think of gays as deserving of institutions (i.e., marriage) that they had little interest in during previous eras. In fact, as late as the 1960's male homosexuals had little interest in marriage, since many participated in a very promiscuous sex life (read City of Night by John Rechy). Perhaps, AID's made gays rethink their lifestyle? Regardless, comparing Jews to gays is adding apples to oranges. One is an ethnicity (Jews), and the other is a subculture.

By the way, for a private citizen to be homophobic is not a crime. It may limit one's ability to function in a society where one does meet/work with gays, but that would be a personal choice. Just like not wanting to have chit-chat with women, if one is a man. I say this since sexuality is, I believe, only one facet of gayness. There are other components, that if one is aware of, one might just not want to associate with them. Remember, as a private citizen, calling another homophobic is being less than well mannered, in my opinion, since one might just be homophobic based on one's socialization. And, the main point is that one should not act on one's homophobia, or anti-Semitism, or distaste for any number of groups of people. But, as private citizens we have every right to like, or not like, who we want.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 07:31 pm
Foofie wrote:
Quote:
Regarding gays, I see no reason to think of gays as deserving of institutions (i.e., marriage) that they had little interest in during previous eras.


YOu are one ignorant Jew! The reasons that seems as if gays were not interested in marriage is because of people like you; homophobes.

They lived what we euphemistically called "in the closet," because they were denigrated and prosecuted by ignorant folks like you! Marriage for them was unthinkable. Even our government still treats those in the military as if they don't exist; don't ask, don't tell policy is about as ignorant as we can be for a country we claim to be for freedom and equal rights under the law.

You bring shame to the Jews from your utter ignorance of history, humanity and our Constitution.

Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 07:44 pm
@cicerone imposter,
You are angry at the wrong target. I am only one person that is a private citizen. But, you should read City of Night by John Rechy, or Sexual Outlaw by John Rechy to see that back in the 1960's the gay lifestyle was quite different. If AID's is ever prevented with a vaccine, will that lifestyle become acceptable once again? In other words, young heterosexuals might "sow their wild oats"; however, from these books it seems that gay males made sowing their wild oats the ongoing lifestyle. Perhaps, you have never heard of gay baths?

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 08:29 pm
@Foofie,
No, I have heard of gay baths, but I have also heard about the many heterosexual behaviors that are outlandish and of greater varieties that includes children. HIV/AIDS is a virus like any flu, and sex happened to be the culprit of spreading that disease. Swine flu is spread through coughing and contact to any infected areas. Don't blame gay baths for the virus' spread; heterosexuals also engage in unsafe sex which are practiced by almost every culture.

Your ignorance has no limit.
Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 08:42 pm
@cicerone imposter,
It was promiscuity that spread the AID's virus amongst many gay males. Lesbians did not have the same rate of AID's infection, I believe, since they tend not to be promiscuous. If most gay males had been in long term monogamous relationships (since one does not need "marriage" to be in a long term monogamous relationship), when the AID's virus arrived, few gays would have died, compared to the epidemic that evolved in the '80's. We really have nothing to discuss.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jul, 2009 08:55 pm
@Foofie,
Why is it that when gays have sex outside of marriage, you have the gall to call it "promiscuity?" All while denying them the right to marry. What do you call it when heterosexuals have sex outside of marriage - with children, and rape?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jul, 2009 09:00 am
@cicerone imposter,
The two things are not mutually exclusive.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jul, 2009 09:04 am
@cicerone imposter,
Please stop conflating Foofie's views on gays to his being a Jew. There is no relationship (as much as you would want this).
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jul, 2009 10:06 am
@Advocate,
She has made more than several references to Jews as being the smartest and brightest, and how much Jews have contributed to humanity - and how proud she is of being a Jew.

I just challenge her to show others how some Jews think of themselves, and should be ready to be challenged. After all, this discussion is with Foofie on this thread. I know many Jews who do not think like her.

I would also challenge anybody no matter what their cultural background if I do not agree with them. You are also free to challenge me if I make unreasonable, ignorant, statements.

Your problem is you lie about me, and when I ask for evidence, you provide none.

Foofie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jul, 2009 06:20 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

She has made more than several references to Jews as being the smartest and brightest, and how much Jews have contributed to humanity - and how proud she is of being a Jew.

I just challenge her to show others how some Jews think of themselves, and should be ready to be challenged. After all, this discussion is with Foofie on this thread. I know many Jews who do not think like her.

I would also challenge anybody no matter what their cultural background if I do not agree with them. You are also free to challenge me if I make unreasonable, ignorant, statements.

Your problem is you lie about me, and when I ask for evidence, you provide none.




My being Jewish, or "a Jew," has nothing to do with my feelings about the different components of the lgbt community. Pointing out my ethnicity, in context of discussing a subculture is really digressing sociologically, in my opinion.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 01/27/2025 at 01:19:06