15
   

ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

 
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 12:30 pm
No. If Israel showed a reckless disregard for the lives of civilians it would target those civilians and wipe out the whole area from which rockets are being fired. They don't do that. They specifically target the rocket launchers and weapon stockpiles and/or means of importing them. They also express regret for the loss of innocent lives which do happen because the Pals intentionally use civilians as shields hoping for collateral damage among the civilians so they can use that to generate sympathy among the anti-Israeli crowd.

Perhaps you can show where the Palestinians have EVER expressed regret for the loss of innocent lives? We can sure show plenty of instances where the Palestinians have celebrated the death of Israeli children and other innocents.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 12:37 pm
Expressing regret are just words; it doesn't do anything for the innocent dead.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 12:40 pm
That's right, and the Palestinians should be completely ashamed and should be completely condemned for intentionally making sure that children are dead.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 12:46 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
That's right, and the Palestinians should be completely ashamed and should be completely condemned for intentionally making sure that children are dead.



This is true, but it's no excuse for the Jews to be killing innocent Palestinians by multiples. Not all Palestinians are terrorists or suicide bombers; they do not deserve to be killed in greater numbers just because Jews have the means of greater firepower.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:00 pm
The Israelis cannot tolerate a constant barrage of rockets to be fired into Israeli neighborhoods for the express purpose of hitting anybody - kids, grandmas, grandpas, any other innocents - that they can hit. They have to go after the rocket launchers and weapon stockpiles to stop that if they can.

It is NOT the Israelis fault that the Palestinians intentionally put kids, grandmas, grandpas etc. in harms way HOPING that Israeli return fire will hit them. It comes down to whether Israel will tolerate the attempted slaughter of Israeli citizens. Israel does NOT target those kids, etc. Hamas does.

But if the anti-Israel fanatics can't see the difference, I doubt anything I say will change your mind.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:02 pm
Fox, FYI, it's the Jews killing " kids, grandmas, grandpas, any other innocents" in greater numbers. That counts big time in ethics, morality, and even wars.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:09 pm
CI, Revel, et al., wear their anti-Israel blinders, which accounts for their unreasoned and undying support for all things Palestinian. It is pretty fruitless to discuss the situation with them.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:25 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Israel does NOT target those kids, etc. Hamas does.
Thats stupid. Hamas launches rockets into Israel at random and hits a small number of civilians. Israel "targets" the rocket launch sites in the Gaza ghetto and kills hundreds of civilians.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:28 pm
Steve 41oo wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
Israel does NOT target those kids, etc. Hamas does.
Thats stupid. Hamas launches rockets into Israel at random and hits a small number of civilians. Israel "targets" the rocket launch sites in the Gaza ghetto and kills hundreds of civilians.


Sorry but you can't support 'hundreds of civilians being killed.' Nor can you show that Israel was not targeting rocket launchers and or weapons stockpiles when it returned fire.

Some of you people think Hamas gets to kill one and then Israel gets to kill one. If Hamas puts its people in harms way, then Israel must be its people in harms way instead of sending them to bomb shelters. This has to be the most idiotic definition of how war is supposed to be conducted than anything I have EVER seen. And that is even overlooking the obvious anti-semitic attitudes against the Jews that is now creeping into this discussion.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:32 pm
Foxfyre wrote:

Some of you people think Hamas gets to kill one and then Israel gets to kill one. If Hamas puts its people in harms way, then Israel must be its people in harms way instead of sending them to bomb shelters. This has to be the most idiotic definition of how war is supposed to be conducted than anything I have EVER seen. And that is even overlooking the obvious anti-semitic attitudes against the Jews that is now creeping into this discussion.
Well you stated it. I'm not anti Jewish. Are you?
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:35 pm
If we accepted your argument foxfyre; we would have to accept the premise that Hamas intone puts kids and grandmas in harms way. I don't accept that premise so what I said previously still stands. Both kill innocents with reckless disregard; Palestinians just dance in the street about it.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:36 pm
Steve 41oo wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:

Some of you people think Hamas gets to kill one and then Israel gets to kill one. If Hamas puts its people in harms way, then Israel must be its people in harms way instead of sending them to bomb shelters. This has to be the most idiotic definition of how war is supposed to be conducted than anything I have EVER seen. And that is even overlooking the obvious anti-semitic attitudes against the Jews that is now creeping into this discussion.
Well you stated it. I'm not anti Jewish. Are you?


No I didn't start it. And no, I am not anti-Jewish nor am I anti-Arab. CI targeted the "Jews" in his most recent post, however, and that may or may not be instructive in this stupid idea that Israel is the villian when it defends itself against rocket attacks from an enemy intent on killing as many innocent men, women, and children as it can kill.

Again, there is NO PROOF, NO SUGGESTION, NO INDICATION that Israel has EVER intentionally targeted innocents nor is there any indication that it does not mitigate such collateral damage as much as is reasonable to prevent. And in the way I look at it, to suggest otherwise is pretty strong evidence of very strong prejudice in this issue.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:41 pm
I goofed on my earlier post (with mispelling and stuff) and didn't post my corrected version and was too late to edit it.

If we accepted your argument foxfyre; we would have to accept the premise that Hamas hides behind grandmothers and kids as human shields and I don't accept that premise so what I said previously still stands. Both Israel and Hamas show a reckless disregard for innocent human life. Can show evidence from sources such as Human Rights Watch and other sources but I know you will not accept it so I won't bother.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:47 pm
Revel, there is NO QUESTION that Hamas intentionally places its rocket launchers and weapon stockpiles among civilians to ensure that there will be collateral damage among those civilians. There are lots of places that Hamas could locate their rocket launchers where that would not be the case. But they never put their rocket launchers in places to minimize danger to the civilians.

You may choose to not believe that. But even the most ardent pro-Palestianian advocates that use even minimal intelligence know that it is true. Hamas puts no value on human life at all. The Israelis do.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:55 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Revel, there is NO QUESTION that Hamas intentionally places its rocket launchers and weapon stockpiles among civilians to ensure that there will be collateral damage among those civilians. There are lots of places that Hamas could locate their rocket launchers where that would not be the case. But they never put their rocket launchers in places to minimize danger to the civilians.

You may choose to not believe that. But even the most ardent pro-Palestianian advocates that use even minimal intelligence know that it is true. Hamas puts no value on human life at all. The Israelis do.


Ok, foxfrye; prove it with acceptable links. (not ones with Jewish sources or biased US Israeli supporters sources)
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 01:58 pm
revel wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
Revel, there is NO QUESTION that Hamas intentionally places its rocket launchers and weapon stockpiles among civilians to ensure that there will be collateral damage among those civilians. There are lots of places that Hamas could locate their rocket launchers where that would not be the case. But they never put their rocket launchers in places to minimize danger to the civilians.

You may choose to not believe that. But even the most ardent pro-Palestianian advocates that use even minimal intelligence know that it is true. Hamas puts no value on human life at all. The Israelis do.


Ok, foxfrye; prove it with acceptable links. (not ones with Jewish sources or biased US Israeli supporters sources)


I and others have posted link after link after link from all sorts of sources showing the truth of what I am saying, Revel, some recently, and don't care to dig all those up again. You either read them or you didn't. Let's see you post a link from anybody that is in any way credible, Palestinian or not, suggesting that it isn't true.

This group is not pro-Palestinian, but they put it out there for anybody to dispute. So far nobody has:
http://www.terrorism-info.org.il/malam_multimedia/English/eng_n/html/human_s_e.htm
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 02:07 pm
Authored by none other than:

Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
at the Israel Intelligence Heritage & Commemoration Center (IICC) March 5, 2008

I guess asking for "credible" sources other than biased ones will never see the light of day.
0 Replies
 
revel
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 02:09 pm
I don't have to prove a negative it is up to you to prove your statements. Indulge me and post a couple of them again.

I am not denying that there are rockets and maybe stockpiles of weapons in civilian areas; what I am denying is that they put them there in the futile hope that Israel won't bomb them because of the civilians in the area. I think they must have been disabused of that notion a long time since.

I will post a link from the Human Rights Watch on the subject. I don't mind posting long articles so I will do so in case you or someone else doesn't want to go the link.


Gaza Strip/Israel: Civilians Bear Brunt of Attacks

Quote:
New York, February 29, 2008) - Indiscriminate rocket attacks by the Palestinian group Hamas against civilian areas in Israel, including one that killed an Israeli man on February 27, are serious violations of international humanitarian law, Human Rights Watch said.

Human Rights Watch also said the high number of Palestinian civilians killed in Israeli attacks in Gaza indicates the need for independent investigations to determine whether Israel has taken all feasible precautions to avoid harming civilians, as required by the laws of war.

Hamas said it fired 55 locally made rockets from Gaza into Israel on Wednesday, February 27, one of which killed Roni Yichia, age 47, near Sapir College on the outskirts of the Israeli border city Sderot. Israeli authorities said that at least 30 rockets had landed in and around Sderot, resulting in shrapnel wounds to several people. One rocket hit a home and another a factory lunchroom. Another rocket reportedly landed near Barzilai Hospital in Ashkelon, a larger city farther from Israel's border with Gaza.

"Attacking civilian areas with indiscriminate weapons violates the core humanitarian principle of civilian immunity," said Joe Stork, director of Human Rights Watch's Middle East and North Africa division. "Hamas leaders have an obligation to stop such indiscriminate attacks immediately."

Hamas said it fired the rockets in retaliation for an Israeli airstrike earlier in the day that killed five members of Hamas's armed wing riding in a minivan. Other Israeli airstrikes and ground attacks in recent days have killed Palestinian civilians as well as persons whom Israel claims were engaged in armed activity.

Following the Hamas rocket barrage, an Israeli airstrike in northern Gaza on Wednesday evening killed three Palestinian children. Hospital officials told Human Rights Watch the victims were Anas al-Mana'ma (age 10), Muhammad Khalil Hamada (age 12), and Bilal Hijazi (age 10). The Israeli military said the victims were preparing to launch a rocket attack. Palestinian media reported that they were playing near an abandoned portable rocket launcher in the al-Taw'am neighborhood between Beit Lahiya and Gaza City. The attack also wounded 17 persons playing in a sports field nearby, including six children. According to Palestinian media reports, Israeli attacks in Gaza in the 24 hours following Wednesday's rocket barrage into Israel killed at least 23 persons, eight of them children.

On February 23, an Israeli ground-launched shell killed three young Palestinian men near Beit Hanoun in northern Gaza. Eyewitnesses told Human Rights Watch that the men were not armed, and that they had seen no armed activity in the vicinity.

The Israeli man killed yesterday near Sderot was the first person killed by rocket attacks from Gaza since May 2007, and the fourteenth overall since the resumption of Israeli-Palestinian armed clashes in September 2000, according to the Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem. In the same period, B'Tselem reported that 1,259 of the 2,679 Palestinians killed by Israeli security forces in the Gaza Strip were not participating in hostilities when they were killed, and 567 were minors.

The use of rockets that cannot discriminate between civilians and military targets, such as the locally made rockets fired by Hamas, violate the laws of war when fired toward populated areas. "Combatants must take all feasible precautions to avoid harming civilians, regardless of actions taken by the other side," Stork said. "Deliberate or indiscriminate attacks against civilians are always prohibited; who did what first is irrelevant."

As for civilian casualties from Israeli attacks, an investigation is required in many cases to determine whether Israel did everything feasible in its weapons and targeting choices to minimize civilian harm, as required by the laws of war. Recent attacks that killed civilians raise questions about whether Israel is taking all feasible precautions in its targeting decisions. In a report published in July 2007, Human Rights Watch showed that Israel had not monitored civilian casualties in Gaza and had not investigated harm to civilians associated with its attacks in or near civilian-populated areas. Human Rights Watch said that, given the continuing civilian casualties in Gaza, Israel should do more to examine its targeting behavior and to implement measures that better protect civilians.

On February 26, Israel's military advocate general announced that he would not pursue an investigation to determine possible wrongdoing in a November 2006 artillery attack in Gaza that killed 21 Palestinian civilians, saying that the deaths had been the result of a "rare and severe" technical malfunction.

The Israeli military had at first said the November 2006 attack was aimed at a site from where Palestinians had fired rockets, but had accidentally hit civilian homes some 500 meters away. The military later said the decision to shoot was based on reliable intelligence that additional rockets would be fired from the site.

"Israel has an obligation during military operations to minimize civilian deaths, and to conduct impartial investigations into cases that may be the result of wrongdoing or negligence on the part of Israeli forces," Stork said. "The continuing high civilian casualty rates in Gaza suggest that this obligation is not being met."
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 02:17 pm
Israel does minimize civilian deaths as much as possible considering Hamas uses kids and women as human shields.

I did not ask you to 'prove a negative'. I asked you to show anything that disputes Hamas' (or Hezbollah or any other Palestinian terrorist group) practice of using civilian human shields for their gunmen and rocket launchers, weapon stockpiles, etc. Those of us on the pro-Israeli side have produced evidence ad nauseum that the Palestinians place their weapons and weapon stockpiles among civilians and use them from among civilians.

Check this site....especially the links to various sources at the bottom of the article:
http://www.geocities.com/palestiniansarelies/HumanShields.html

Now with all these reports of Palestinians using women and kids as human shields, surely you can find at least one reasonably credible source that disputes this as a normal practice by the Palestinians? Maybe a photo of a Palestinian rocket launcher that isn't in a residential neighborhood?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Mar, 2008 02:31 pm
Fox, Think for a moment if that's at all possible; the PLO/PA uses human sheilds, but those children and adults are not "volunteers." They are forced into those positions.

If you are a youngster, and a gunned masked man tells you to stand in front, what would you do? Follow their order, or ignore them?

You do not understand human nature in any of its forms, but cotinue to be a apologist for the Jewish murders of innoncents. You have no shame.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/05/2025 at 01:36:38