15
   

ISRAEL - IRAN - SYRIA - HAMAS - HEZBOLLAH - WWWIII?

 
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 07:53 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
It is a fact that:
(1) That Arabs in Palestine neither ruled nor governed any part of Palestine between the years 1187 and 1949;
(2) In 1947, the British delegated to the UN the solving of their Palestine mandate problem;
(3) The UN resolved that Palestine be divided into an Arab state and a Jew state;
(4) The Jews in Palestine in 1948 declared Israel their own independent state;
(5) There are over a million Arabs living in Israel;
(6) Since the 1967 war Israel has been expanding into the lands it conquered in the 1967 war;
(7) More than once Israel has successfully traded for peace some of the land it conquered in 1967.


I'll agree with all that. In #6 you acknowledge that Israel has been illegally expanding into the occupied territories.

I never said Israel's expansion was illegal. Why do you think it illegal to expand into comquered land?

However Israel has added no new citizens from those seized territories. This is, of course a result of their ethnic cleasnsing of the selected lands - together comprising a large portion of the West Bank. This is regarded as a crime against humanity by the international community and the UN.

By the term "ethnic cleansing of the selected lands" do you mean moving people from the selected lands to other locations? If that's what you mean, then yes that's what Israel has been doing. Specifically, what laws do you think Israel is violating by doing that?

The only land for peace deal I can recall is the one Israel concluded with Egypt. In this Israel returned largely unoccupied lands in the Siani to its rightful owner, in exchange for a peace treaty that both parties have largely observed. The United States is still paying bribes totaling about $10 Billion/year the parties to this treaty as an informal part of the deal.

The only other I know about is their land for peace deal with Jordan

None of this has anything to do with the illegal and unhumane treatment of Palestinians in the occupied territories, who have lived without basic rights under often capricious Israeli military rule for more than forty years now. Israel has made it impossible for a responsible government with meaningful powers to arise in the occupied territories and has cynically used the resulting "failure to acknowledge Israel's right to exist" as the excuse for their systematic and continuing ethnic cleansing of the West Bank and illegal absorbtion of selected territories into Israel. There is no progress towards peace - instead the situation has gotten worse with each succeeding year.

I agree with this excluding your phrase "illegal absorbtion of selected territories into Israel." I might agree with that too if you could show me the specifict law or laws that makes that illegal.

For some time now, George, I have been attempting to figure out why you hold Jews to a higher standard of behavior than you hold the Arabs in Palestine. My first guess which I have since discarded was that you were a shill for the Arabs in Palestine. Then I guessed you were a pacifist. Subsequently, I guessed you judge the Arabs hopelessly uncivilized and that your only hope for solving the Palestinian problem rests with the Jews changing their approach and thereby civilizing the Arab enough. Are any of my guesses even close to correct? Confused
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2007 08:13 pm
ican: By the term "ethnic cleansing of the selected lands" do you mean moving people from the selected lands to other locations? If that's what you mean, then yes that's what Israel has been doing. Specifically, what laws do you think Israel is violating by doing that?


I doubt very much ican will ever see why what the Jews are doing to the Palesstinians by taking their property is illegal and inhumane. I'm sure he'll allow the American Indians to take over his home and property without any fuss.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 07:42 am
There was no ethnic cleansing by Israel. Settlers moved into land that was not occupied. No Pals were forced out of Palestine.

For real ethnic cleansing, consider the effective expulsion of Christian Pals from Palestine, and other Arab countries, by the Islamist thugs. That is real ethnic cleansing.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 07:57 am
Advocate: There was no ethnic cleansing by Israel. Settlers moved into land that was not occupied. No Pals were forced out of Palestine.



I'm afraid Advocate has now gone "over the hill" to never-never land. He will not allow himself to admit he's on the wrong side of this argument.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 08:00 am
THE PALESTINIAN RIGHT OF RETURN
A position statement by Palestine Information Project and Palestine Solidarity Committee/Seattle

In 1947-9 and in 1967, over one million Palestinians were driven out of their homes by force or threat of force.

Currently, over four million Palestinian refugees and their descendants live outside the state of Israel. Of these, 1.2 million are in 59 refugee camps in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, and the Occupied Territories. 620,000 refugees live in the Occupied Territories. Another 250,000 Palestinians are internally displaced inside Israel, living in 100 unrecognized villages with no access to water or electrical services. Of these, only about 14,000 have received any compensation from the Israeli government for property loss.

Although the United Nations addressed their plight from the outset, the problem of the refugees continues to be a sticking point in all serious discussions about a resolution of the Palestine-Israel conflict. Without resolving the problem of the refugees, chances for peace between the two nations are slim indeed. Only a very thoughtful approach to this conflict, taking into account both Palestinian and Israeli needs for homeland, security and independence, will allow progress on the entire host of related problems to take place.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 10:05 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
Advocate: There was no ethnic cleansing by Israel. Settlers moved into land that was not occupied. No Pals were forced out of Palestine.



I'm afraid Advocate has now gone "over the hill" to never-never land. He will not allow himself to admit he's on the wrong side of this argument.

Advocate is correct. You, cice, are incorrect as usual.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 11:08 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
THE PALESTINIAN RIGHT OF RETURN
A position statement by Palestine Information Project and Palestine Solidarity Committee/Seattle

In 1947-9 and in 1967, over one million Palestinians were driven out of their homes by force or threat of force.

Currently, over four million Palestinian refugees and their descendants live outside the state of Israel. Of these, 1.2 million are in 59 refugee camps in Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, and the Occupied Territories. 620,000 refugees live in the Occupied Territories. Another 250,000 Palestinians are internally displaced inside Israel, living in 100 unrecognized villages with no access to water or electrical services. Of these, only about 14,000 have received any compensation from the Israeli government for property loss.
...

In 1947-49 Palestinian Arabs were told by some non-Jews to flee Palestine until Israel was conquered. Some fled, some did not. Israel thus far has not been conquered.

In 1967, Israel launched a preemptive strike on troops massing on its borders to prevent itself from being conquered. Few if any Arabs were driven out of their homes in 1967.

Assuming your numbers are correct, of the 4 million Arabs living outside of Israel:

1.2 million live outside of Palestine and in the occupied territories;

0.62 million live in the occupied territories;

1.2 - 0.62 = 0.58 million live outside of Palestine;

4.0 - 0.58 = 3.62 million live inside Palestine outside of Israel; and,

0.25 million are internally displaced Question living in Israel.

There was no mention of the approximately 1 million more Arabs living in Israel that are not internally displaced Question .

This situation exists because a significant percentage of Palestinian Arabs refuse to grant Israel the right to exist, because some Palestinian Arabs mass murdered Jews in the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2000 - 2007, and because the Jews in Israel fear what these Arabs may do if they are welcomed into Israel without granting Israel the right to exist.

That fear by the Israelis has led them to resume settling in the territories they conquered in 1967.

That fear by the Israelis is rational.

Despite that fear, Israel has successfully traded conquered land for peace, and has unsuccessfully, repeatedly offered to trade more conquered land for peace.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 11:12 am
ican711nm wrote:
This situation exists because a significant percentage of Palestinian Arabs refuse to grant Israel the right to exist, because some Palestinian Arabs mass murdered Jews in the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2000 - 2007, and because the Jews in Israel fear what these Arabs may do if they are welcomed into Israel without granting Israel the right to exist.


ican,

do you have any sources for the "significant percentage of Palestinian Arabs" that doesn't want to grant Israel a right to exist? Any studies, numbers...?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 11:40 am
old europe wrote:
ican711nm wrote:
This situation exists because a significant percentage of Palestinian Arabs refuse to grant Israel the right to exist, because some Palestinian Arabs mass murdered Jews in the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2000 - 2007, and because the Jews in Israel fear what these Arabs may do if they are welcomed into Israel without granting Israel the right to exist.


ican,

do you have any sources for the "significant percentage of Palestinian Arabs" that doesn't want to grant Israel a right to exist? Any studies, numbers...?

Excellent question!

No, but I'll find a source.

I remember polls of the Palestinian Arabs that showed that more than 10% opposed recognizing Israel's right to exist. I cannot remember the actual percentage. I'll search it again.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 11:53 am
Here's some:
Quote:

http://www.pcpsr.org/survey/polls/2006/p21ejoint.html

(D) Other Conflict Resolution Issues

• 67% Of the Palestinians do not believe Hamas should recognize the state of Israel in order to meet international donor demands. But 63% would support a Palestinian recognition of Israel as a state for the Jewish people after a peace agreement is reached, a Palestinians state is established, and all issues in dispute, including the refugees and Jerusalem, are settled.
• While 57% of the Palestinians support armed attacks against Israeli civilians inside Israel and while 57% believe that armed confrontations have helped Palestinians achieve national rights in ways that negotiations could not, 77% support the call for a ceasefire between Israel and the Palestinians and 22% oppose it.
• 62% Of the Palestinians have not heard of Olmert's realignment plan to evacuate most of the West Bank settlements while realigning into large blocks of settlements along the line of the separation barrier. 70% do not welcome Olmert's plan and only 20% believe it will be implemented. But 75% believe that the evacuation of the settlements in the Gaza Strip was a victory for armed struggle.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 12:40 pm
Why doesn't anyone ask CI for his sources. BTW, how much has been paid by the Pals in compensation for the many Jews killed by them? It is ZERO! When Israel became a state, the Pals murdered every last Jew living in Hebron, and have never paid a penny in compensation.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 01:04 pm
Advocate wrote:
Why doesn't anyone ask CI for his sources.


I don't know. Why don't you ask c.i. for his sources? Or do you ask us to ask c.i. to provide links?



Advocate wrote:
BTW, how much has been paid by the Pals in compensation for the many Jews killed by them? It is ZERO!


Really? Okay.

So how much is Israel paying in compensation per killed Palestinian?
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 01:07 pm
ican711nm wrote:
Here's some:


Thanks for that link!

Had a quick look at it. From what I saw, the poll was taken in the aftermath of Israel's military campaign in Lebanon. The authors of the study seem to say that that has changed some Palestinian as weel as Israeli opinions.

Would be interesting to see some current numbers.... But will take another look at the numbers later!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 01:18 pm
I'll take responsibility for "not" including the source; a bad habit of mine.

However, for those interested in this subject, here's the LINK that explains UN and international laws concerning Israel.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 01:21 pm
Here's the link to the info posted on the previous page: http://www.palestineinformation.org/return.html
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 02:39 pm
The Palestinian data are a joke. No respected commentator gives them any credit.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 02:58 pm
Advocate wrote:
The Palestinian data are a joke. No respected commentator gives them any credit.


Advocate - your response suggests you didn't read the links at all. The first is a summary of various UN resolutions and Israeli-palestinian negotiations done by a U.S. attorney (albeit one obviously sympathetic to the Palestinians) - all focusing on arguments in support of the legality of the claimed Palestinian right of return. The second is merely a essay summary of the palestinian position on the same subject. There is no "data" at all. While you may not agree with the logic and conclusions of the authors, the infoirmation presented is all in the public domain and looks accurate to me.

A closed mind is a formidable thing.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 02:59 pm
Advocate wrote:
The Palestinian data are a joke. No respected commentator gives them any credit.


<smiles>

Do you have a link for that, Advocate?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 03:04 pm
Yea, Advocate, as a matter of fact, I'd like to see "your respected commentator" that challenged what is said in the article. "That" I'd love to see!
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Aug, 2007 05:45 pm
How silly! The fact that something is in the public domain does not add to its credibility.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
THE WAR IN GAZA - Discussion by Advocate
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 01/21/2025 at 10:31:05